Re: F32 bind9 split dns debug

[Tim via users]

On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 13:38 -0800, Jack Craig wrote:
> current named.conf
> 
> options
> {
> // Put files that named is allowed to write in the data/ directory:
> directory   "/var/named";   // "Working" directory
> dump-file   "data/cache_dump.db";
> statistics-file "data/named_stats.txt";
> memstatistics-file  "data/named_mem_stats.txt";
> secroots-file   "data/named.secroots";
> recursing-file  "data/named.recursing";
> 
> listen-on port 53   { any; };
> listen-on-v6 port 53{ any; };
> 
> allow-transfer{ 108.220.213.120/29; };  
> 
> forwarders {
> 8.8.8.8;
> 8.8.4.4;
> };

I found when I tried using forwarders, that all queries went to them,
not just the ones that the server couldn't answer for itself.



> controls {
> 
>   inet 127.0.0.1 allow { localhost; } keys { "rndc-key"; };
> };
> 
> view "internal-lan-view"
> {
> match-clients   { internals; };
> 
> allow-recursion { internals; };
> allow-recursion-on { internals; };
> 
> zone "linuxlighthouse.com" { 
>type master;
>file "/var/named/internal.db";
>allow-query{ internals; };
> };
> };

Above, you've used "match-clients," but haven't defined what
"internals" means (and I can't see "internals" listed as a predefined
term in the BIND docs).

e.g. acl "internals" { localhost; 192.168/16; 10.0/16; };

NB:  "acl" needs to be defined outside of the views clause.

I believe "localhost" and/or "localnets" are predefined terms that
could be useful to you.

see:  https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9_16_6/reference.html

4.2.2. acl Statement Definition and Usage

The acl statement assigns a symbolic name to an address match list.
It gets its name from a primary use of address match lists: Access
Control Lists (ACLs).

The following ACLs are built-in:

"any" Matches all hosts.

"none" Matches no hosts.

"localhost" Matches the IPv4 and IPv6 addresses of all network
interfaces on the system. When addresses are added or removed, the
localhost ACL element is updated to reflect the changes.

"localnets" Matches any host on an IPv4 or IPv6 network for which the
system has an interface. When addresses are added or removed, the
localnets  ACL element is updated to reflect the changes. Some systems
do not provide a way to determine the prefix lengths of local
IPv6 addresses; in such a case, localnets only matches the local IPv6
addresses, just like localhost.

(Their definition of localhost goes beyond the "localhost simply means
127.0.0.1" that we're used to with hostnames.)

> view "external-wan-view"
> {
> match-clients   { any; };
> recursion no;
> 
> allow-query { any; };
> allow-transfer  { 108.220.213.120/29; };
> 
> zone "linuxlighthouse.com" { 
> type master;
> file "/var/named/linuxlighthouse.com.db";
> };
> 
> zone "213.220.108.in-addr.arpa" { 
> type master;
> file "/var/named/213.220.108.in-addr.arpa";
> };
> };
> 

Since you've used "any" as a match, here, something else has to match
it before this clause, else this clause will always match it.

i.e. Your internal rules have to be first.
 
-- 
 
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.2.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Oct 20 16:53:08 UTC 2020 x86_64
 
Boilerplate:  All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Not enough swap space for hibernation

[Samuel Sieb]

On 11/13/20 9:39 PM, Tim via users wrote:

On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 21:24 +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:

I have no idea why this is happening when I have 8GB of free swap space :

$  free -h
   totalusedfree  shared  buff/cache   available
Mem:  7.7Gi   1.6Gi   4.1Gi   269Mi   2.0Gi   5.6Gi
Swap: 8.0Gi  0B   8.0Gi

My RAM is also 8GB.


The old recommendation always was to have *MORE* swap space than RAM.


That's a good point.  The memory usage is quite low at that point, but 
if he ever ended up using swap space, there could easily not be enough 
to hibernate.  However, it should work in this current case.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Swap still not activated on later kernels

[Samuel Sieb]

On 11/13/20 9:35 PM, Tim via users wrote:

On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 13:16 -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote:

 In principle the location of a swap file’s header may be
 determined with the help of appropriate filesystem
 driver. Unfortunately, however, it requires the filesystem holding
 the swap file to be mounted, and if this filesystem is journaled,
 it cannot be mounted during resume from disk. For this reason to
 identify a swap file swsusp uses the name of the partition that
 holds the file and the offset from the beginning of the partition
 at which the swap file’s header is located. For convenience, this
 offset is expressed in  units.


Surely the absolute position of any file in a file system couldn't be
relied upon to always be the same?


Of course it can.  How is it going to move around?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Not enough swap space for hibernation

[Tim via users]

On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 21:24 +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> I have no idea why this is happening when I have 8GB of free swap space :
> 
> $  free -h
>   totalusedfree  shared  buff/cache   
> available
> Mem:  7.7Gi   1.6Gi   4.1Gi   269Mi   2.0Gi   
> 5.6Gi
> Swap: 8.0Gi  0B   8.0Gi
> 
> My RAM is also 8GB.

The old recommendation always was to have *MORE* swap space than RAM.
 
-- 
 
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.2.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Oct 20 16:53:08 UTC 2020 x86_64
 
Boilerplate:  All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Swap still not activated on later kernels

[Tim via users]

On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 13:16 -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> In principle the location of a swap file’s header may be
> determined with the help of appropriate filesystem
> driver. Unfortunately, however, it requires the filesystem holding
> the swap file to be mounted, and if this filesystem is journaled,
> it cannot be mounted during resume from disk. For this reason to
> identify a swap file swsusp uses the name of the partition that
> holds the file and the offset from the beginning of the partition
> at which the swap file’s header is located. For convenience, this
> offset is expressed in  units.

Surely the absolute position of any file in a file system couldn't be
relied upon to always be the same?

-- 
 
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.2.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Oct 20 16:53:08 UTC 2020 x86_64
 
Boilerplate:  All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Grub2 Boot Menu Hidden in Fedora 33

[Stephen Morris]

In Fedora 32 issuing the command sudo grub2-editenv - unset 
auto_hide_menu would enable the display of the grub boot menu.


This does not work in Fedora 33. I did find some details on the net on 
how to get the menu to display on the next boot, but that was not a 
permanent solution.


In Fedora 33 is the only way to get the menu to permanently display to 
edit /etc/grub.d/12_menu_auto_hide and change the timeout_style and 
timeout settings within the else condition for the fastboot check? I 
currently have the menu permanently displayed as a result of making this 
modification.


regards,

Steve


___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: unable to access localhost

[Geoffrey Leach]

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:56:53 -0800
Samuel Sieb  wrote:

> On 11/13/20 2:51 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:21:21 -0800
> > Samuel Sieb  wrote:  
> >> Do you have a smtp server running?
> >> What does "lsof -i tcp:25" show?  
> > 
> > root@webster[7]->lsof -i tcp:25
> > root@webster[8]->
> > 
> > Source of the problem? A service needs restarting? Which service?  
> 
> That depends on what mail server you have installed.  e.g. sendmail
> or postfix.  But you will also need to configure it.
> 
>  From your original email, are you sure you want to be sending it 
> through localhost?  Don't you have a mail server already that you
> could send through?  What does your email client use?

Hmmm  two systems. Both use claws-mail. I used mailx as a simple (I
thought) way of describing the problem. So let's scratch my
"simplification" and restate the problem.

I have two systems, both with up-to-date Fedora 32, both running
claws-mail. Both access the smtp server on hughes.net using port 465.
The 'working' systems logs in and transmits the emailwithout any
problem. The non-working system hangs on the connection until it times
out.

Update: Turns out that the SSL certificate was missing. Why, I have no
idea. My guess it that hughes (email provider) started requiring it
without telling anybody. Sigh!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Gedit and no geometry?

[ToddAndMargo via users]

On 2020-11-13 16:25, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

On 2020-11-13 16:00, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

On 2020-11-13 15:04, Samuel Sieb wrote:

On 11/13/20 2:48 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

Looking at uboboo's man page for gedit, it
has a --geometry command line switch;

http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/en/man1/gedit.1.html

But our's does not.

Are we way out of date?


No, that page is.  You were looking at the page from 16.04.  Look at 
the top bar.  If you click on the most recent one, that option is gone.


Rats



I am thinking of messing with leafpad's rc

     ./.config/leafpad/leafpadrc
     $ cat leafpadrc
     0.8.18.1
     699    <-- X (Horizontal width)
     237    <-- Y (Vertical height)
     Monospace 12
     1
     1
     0

I wonder what the 0.8.18.1 is all about.



I read leafpadrc into a variable
copy it to a new variable
modify the X, Y, and font size
write the new one back out
fire off leafpad
write the old rc back out

Problem solved and it was a fun write.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Swap still not activated on later kernels

[Chris Murphy]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 5:41 AM Sreyan Chakravarty  wrote:

> 1) Why doesn't fallocate work anymore ?

Fallocate is the preferred way to do this, e.g.

fallocate -l 8G swapfile

> 2) I trieddd if=/dev/zero of=/fedora.swap bs=1 count=0 seek=8G
>
> This did not work. swapon complained about files being full of holes.

That's because that command creates a sparse file, which has holes in
it. Same as using 'truncate'.

> What is so special about bs=1M ?

I think it's count=0 and seek= that causes it to become sparse. I
don't think the bs size is relevant.

> /fedora.swap none swap sw 0 0

I have no idea what 'sw' is in the fstab file is for; I don't see it
in either man fstab or man swapon. I'd just make this line:

/fedora.swap none defaults



>
>
> I now have a new problem.
>
> SELinux is preventing systemd-logind to read the swap file.
>
> Here is the message:
>
> SELinux is preventing systemd-logind from read access on the file 
> /fedora.swap.

mkswap sets the label. So this is a secondary effect of what Sam Sieb
already discovered from the lack of a blkid swap signature. You forgot
to use mkswap on the file.




-- 
Chris Murphy
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Gedit and no geometry?

[ToddAndMargo via users]

On 2020-11-13 16:00, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

On 2020-11-13 15:04, Samuel Sieb wrote:

On 11/13/20 2:48 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

Looking at uboboo's man page for gedit, it
has a --geometry command line switch;

http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/en/man1/gedit.1.html

But our's does not.

Are we way out of date?


No, that page is.  You were looking at the page from 16.04.  Look at 
the top bar.  If you click on the most recent one, that option is gone.


Rats



I am thinking of messing with leafpad's rc

./.config/leafpad/leafpadrc
$ cat leafpadrc
0.8.18.1
699<-- X (Horizontal width)
237<-- Y (Vertical height)
Monospace 12
1
1
0

I wonder what the 0.8.18.1 is all about.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Gedit and no geometry?

[ToddAndMargo via users]

On 2020-11-13 15:04, Samuel Sieb wrote:

On 11/13/20 2:48 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

Looking at uboboo's man page for gedit, it
has a --geometry command line switch;

http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/en/man1/gedit.1.html

But our's does not.

Are we way out of date?


No, that page is.  You were looking at the page from 16.04.  Look at the 
top bar.  If you click on the most recent one, that option is gone.


Rats
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: systemd-resolved breakage

[Sam Varshavchik]

Petr Menšík writes:


Am I missing something?


Yes, system is being shoved down your gullet, whether you like it or not.


would NetworkManager.conf:
dns=default

Write resolv.conf again? Can I make it rewrite after disabling
systemd-resolved? Why doesn't it restore /etc/resolv.conf on
systemd-resolved shutdown?


Yes, /etc/resolv.conf is a symlink. Apparently NetworkManager has been  
changed to write /run/NetworkManager/resolv.conf instead, so you can set  
/etc/resolv.conf symlink to point to it.


This whole house of cards is an epic fail. There is already a perfectly  
usable architecture in place to handle this: alternatives. Both  
NetworkManager and systemd should use alternatives to claim dibs on  
/etc/resolv.conf, and alternatives will manage the symlink itself.


This is just plain dumb. /etc/resolv.conf should be an alternatives-managed  
link. If it were, you'd immediately know how to obtain the list of all the  
alternative configurations, and have a simple mechanism for selecting how  
you want DNS to be configured, and complete freedom to use or not use  
systemd-resolved. I refuse to believe that this obvious solution never  
occured to anyone, instead it was decided to intentionally cram systemd- 
resolved down everyone's throat and make people jump through hoops to get  
rid of it.




pgpw9NpDaag_y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Gedit and no geometry?

[Andy Paterson via users]

I recall —geometry is handled by an X-windows library function & is common to 
most X based apps
So when this (or any other app) used Xlib there are various command line 
arguments (argv[]) that are handled by the X regardless of the app
> On 13 Nov 2020, at 22:49, ToddAndMargo via users 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Looking at uboboo's man page for gedit, it
> has a --geometry command line switch;
> 
> http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/en/man1/gedit.1.html
> 
> But our's does not.
> 
> Are we way out of date?
> 
> Do we have test editor with a geometry switch?
> 
> -T
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Gedit and no geometry?

[Samuel Sieb]

On 11/13/20 2:48 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

Looking at uboboo's man page for gedit, it
has a --geometry command line switch;

http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/en/man1/gedit.1.html

But our's does not.

Are we way out of date?


No, that page is.  You were looking at the page from 16.04.  Look at the 
top bar.  If you click on the most recent one, that option is gone.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: unable to access localhost

[Samuel Sieb]

On 11/13/20 2:51 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:21:21 -0800
Samuel Sieb  wrote:

Do you have a smtp server running?
What does "lsof -i tcp:25" show?


root@webster[7]->lsof -i tcp:25
root@webster[8]->

Source of the problem? A service needs restarting? Which service?


That depends on what mail server you have installed.  e.g. sendmail or 
postfix.  But you will also need to configure it.


From your original email, are you sure you want to be sending it 
through localhost?  Don't you have a mail server already that you could 
send through?  What does your email client use?

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: unable to access localhost

[Geoffrey Leach]

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:21:21 -0800
Samuel Sieb  wrote:

> On 11/13/20 1:57 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 16:13:35 -0500
> > Jonathan Billings  wrote:
> >   
> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 01:05:46PM -0800, Geoffrey Leach wrote:  
> >>>
> >>> System is running up-to-date Fedora 32.
> >>>
> >>> root@webster[3]->mailx  -v -v -s test ge...@hughes.net  >>> Null message body; hope that's ok
> >>> ge...@hughes.net... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay...
> >>> ge...@hughes.net... Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]
> >>>
> >>> Suggestions for cause/diagnosis would be appreciated.  
> >>
> >> I don't believe Fedora installs and configure an MTA listening on
> >> port 25 by default, so mailx deliver mail via the 'sendmail'
> >> executable. 
> > 
> > I should have mentioned that access to localhost works correctly on
> > a similarly-configured system.  
> 
> Do you have a smtp server running?
> What does "lsof -i tcp:25" show?

root@webster[7]->lsof -i tcp:25
root@webster[8]->

Source of the problem? A service needs restarting? Which service?

Thanks.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Gedit and no geometry?

[ToddAndMargo via users]

Hi All,

Looking at uboboo's man page for gedit, it
has a --geometry command line switch;

http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/en/man1/gedit.1.html

But our's does not.

Are we way out of date?

Do we have test editor with a geometry switch?

-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: unable to access localhost

[Samuel Sieb]

On 11/13/20 1:57 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 16:13:35 -0500
Jonathan Billings  wrote:


On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 01:05:46PM -0800, Geoffrey Leach wrote:


System is running up-to-date Fedora 32.

root@webster[3]->mailx  -v -v -s test ge...@hughes.net 

I don't believe Fedora installs and configure an MTA listening on port
25 by default, so mailx deliver mail via the 'sendmail' executable.



I should have mentioned that access to localhost works correctly on a
similarly-configured system.


Do you have a smtp server running?
What does "lsof -i tcp:25" show?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How can I use GNOME even after I uninstalled it ?

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 22:32 +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> How would I download all the KDE packages and set it up ? Would it
> happen
> automatically ?

sudo dnf group install KDE

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: unable to access localhost

[Geoffrey Leach]

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 16:13:35 -0500
Jonathan Billings  wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 01:05:46PM -0800, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> >
> > System is running up-to-date Fedora 32. 
> > 
> > root@webster[3]->mailx  -v -v -s test ge...@hughes.net  > Null message body; hope that's ok
> > ge...@hughes.net... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay...
> > ge...@hughes.net... Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]
> > 
> > root@webster[6]->ping 127.0.0.1
> > PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.080 ms
> > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.086 ms
> > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.091 ms
> > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.103 ms
> > ^C
> > --- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
> > 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3096ms
> > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.080/0.090/0.103/0.008 ms
> > 
> > Suggestions for cause/diagnosis would be appreciated.  
> 
> I don't believe Fedora installs and configure an MTA listening on port
> 25 by default, so mailx deliver mail via the 'sendmail' executable. 
> 

I should have mentioned that access to localhost works correctly on a
similarly-configured system.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: ps2eps

[None via users]

Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland.

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, November 13, 2020 11:13 AM, Patrick Dupre  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Has the package ps2eps been removed from the distribution?
> What is the alternative?
>
> Thanks
>
> 
>
> Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
> Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
> 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE
> Tel: +33 (0)380395988
>
> ===
>
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

[olivares@localhost ~]$ dnf whatprovides ps2eps
Fedora 33 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_643.4 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:00
Fedora Modular 33 - x86_64  3.2 MB/s | 3.3 MB 00:01
Fedora Modular 33 - x86_64 - Updates789 kB/s | 1.0 MB 00:01
Fedora 33 - x86_64 - Updates 11 MB/s |  12 MB 00:01
Fedora 33 - x86_64   30 MB/s |  72 MB 00:02
RPM Fusion for Fedora 33 - Free - Updates   243 kB/s | 257 kB 00:01
RPM Fusion for Fedora 33 - Free 997 kB/s | 897 kB 00:00
texlive-ps2eps-7:20200327-16.fc33.x86_64 : Produce Encapsulated PostScript from
 : PostScript
Repo: fedora
Matched from:
Filename: /usr/bin/ps2eps

[olivares@localhost ~]$

Regards,



Antonio
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F32 bind9 split dns debug

[Jack Craig]

first, a hearty Thanks for your responses to date.

I have tried to apply the suggested changes, but it's not changed the
initial behaviour.
so i am still missing something...

additional suggestions. i am going to look at host, who,w hois, nslookup
for more info, thx, jackc...


*default.log:13-Nov-2020 13:30:43.484 query-errors: info: client
@0x7f98541abfc0 40.69.104.72#54502 (linuxlighthouse.com
): view external-wan-view: query failed
(REFUSED) for linuxlighthouse.com/IN/A  at
../../../bin/named/query.c:7270default.log:13-Nov-2020 13:30:49.778
query-errors: info: client @0x7f98541abfc0 40.69.104.77#49493
(linuxlighthouse.com ): view external-wan-view:
query failed (REFUSED) for linuxlighthouse.com/IN/A
 at ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270*


*queries.log:13-Nov-2020 13:30:43.484 queries: info: client @0x7f98541abfc0
40.69.104.72#54502 (linuxlighthouse.com ): view
external-wan-view: query: linuxlighthouse.com 
IN A -E(0)D (10.0.0.101)queries.log:13-Nov-2020 13:30:49.778 queries: info:
client @0x7f98541abfc0 40.69.104.77#49493 (linuxlighthouse.com
): view external-wan-view: query:
linuxlighthouse.com  IN A -E(0)D (10.0.0.101)*

*security.log:13-Nov-2020 13:30:43.484 client @0x7f98541abfc0
40.69.104.72#54502 (linuxlighthouse.com ): view
external-wan-view: query 'linuxlighthouse.com/A/IN
' denied*

*security.log:13-Nov-2020 13:30:49.778 client @0x7f98541abfc0
40.69.104.77#49493 (linuxlighthouse.com ): view
external-wan-view: query 'linuxlighthouse.com/A/IN
' denied*

current named.conf

options
{
// Put files that named is allowed to write in the data/ directory:
directory   "/var/named";   // "Working"
directory
dump-file   "data/cache_dump.db";
statistics-file "data/named_stats.txt";
memstatistics-file  "data/named_mem_stats.txt";
secroots-file   "data/named.secroots";
recursing-file  "data/named.recursing";

listen-on port 53   { any; };
listen-on-v6 port 53{ any; };

allow-transfer{ 108.220.213.120/29; };

forwarders {
8.8.8.8;
8.8.4.4;
};

/* DNSSEC related options. See information about keys ("Trusted
keys", bellow) */
/* Enable serving of DNSSEC related data - enable on both
authoritative
   and recursive servers DNSSEC aware servers */
dnssec-enable yes;

/* Enable DNSSEC validation on recursive servers */
dnssec-validation yes;

/* In Fedora we use /run/named instead of default /var/run/named
   so we have to configure paths properly. */
pid-file "/run/named/named.pid";
session-keyfile "/run/named/session.key";
managed-keys-directory "/var/named/dynamic";

/* In Fedora we use system-wide Crypto Policy */
/* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CryptoPolicy */
include "/etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/bind.config";

/* use querylog all the time rndc */
querylog yes;
};


controls {
  inet 127.0.0.1 allow { localhost; } keys { "rndc-key"; };
};

view "internal-lan-view"
{
match-clients   { internals; };

allow-recursion { internals; };
allow-recursion-on { internals; };

zone "linuxlighthouse.com" {
   type master;
   file "/var/named/internal.db";
   allow-query{ internals; };
};
};

view "external-wan-view"
{
match-clients   { any; };
recursion no;

allow-query { any; };
allow-transfer  { 108.220.213.120/29; };

zone "linuxlighthouse.com" {
type master;
file "/var/named/linuxlighthouse.com.db";
};

zone "213.220.108.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "/var/named/213.220.108.in-addr.arpa";
};
};







On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 6:10 AM Petr Menšík  wrote:

> Hi Jack,
>
> On 11/13/20 8:02 AM, Jack Craig wrote:
> > hi all,
> > any dns pros in the house??
> >
> > i am trying to debug a split view dns.
> > i am using F32 & bind9 where i have internal & external views.
> >
> > internal network 10.0.0.0/24, external 108.220.213.120/29
> >
> > what i think i am seeing is a refusal of query, but Why??
> >
> > where can i find a query_log print-severity definition?
> >
> > dig shows, ...
> >
> > dig ws.linuxlighthouse.com ns
> >
> > ; <<>> DiG 9.11.23-RedHat-9.11.23-1.fc32 <<>> ws.linuxlighthouse.com ns
> > ;; global options: +cmd
> > ;; Got answer:
> > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 45484
> > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, 

Re: unable to access localhost

[Jonathan Billings]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 01:05:46PM -0800, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
>
> System is running up-to-date Fedora 32. 
> 
> root@webster[3]->mailx  -v -v -s test ge...@hughes.net  Null message body; hope that's ok
> ge...@hughes.net... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay...
> ge...@hughes.net... Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]
> 
> root@webster[6]->ping 127.0.0.1
> PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.080 ms
> 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.086 ms
> 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.091 ms
> 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.103 ms
> ^C
> --- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
> 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3096ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.080/0.090/0.103/0.008 ms
> 
> Suggestions for cause/diagnosis would be appreciated.

I don't believe Fedora installs and configure an MTA listening on port
25 by default, so mailx deliver mail via the 'sendmail' executable. 

-- 
Jonathan Billings 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

unable to access localhost

[Geoffrey Leach]

System is running up-to-date Fedora 32. 

root@webster[3]->mailx  -v -v -s test ge...@hughes.net ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.080 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.086 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.091 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.103 ms
^C
--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3096ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.080/0.090/0.103/0.008 ms

Suggestions for cause/diagnosis would be appreciated.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bugzilla.gnome.org is closing

[ToddAndMargo via users]

On 2020-11-13 12:41, Jonathan Billings wrote:

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 01:17:23PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:


On 11/13/20 12:32 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:


I just got a notification that bugzilla.gnome.org
is being replaced by gitlab.gnome.org and that
they are starting over.


Well, that's one way of getting rid of all the bugs they don't want to work
on.


They said that they're migrating the bugs into gitlab issues.

https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2018-May/msg00026.html


Interesting double speak on their part.  This is what
they said in my notification:

  If you still use gparted and if you still see
  this bug / want this feature in a recent and
  currently supported version, then please feel
  free to report it at
 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gparted/-/issues/

That means they are starting over.  Lets hope they
are migrating!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bugzilla.gnome.org is closing

[Jonathan Billings]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 01:17:23PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
> On 11/13/20 12:32 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> > 
> > I just got a notification that bugzilla.gnome.org
> > is being replaced by gitlab.gnome.org and that
> > they are starting over.
> 
> Well, that's one way of getting rid of all the bugs they don't want to work
> on.

They said that they're migrating the bugs into gitlab issues.

https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2018-May/msg00026.html



-- 
Jonathan Billings 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bugzilla.gnome.org is closing

[ToddAndMargo via users]

On 2020-11-13 12:17, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 11/13/20 12:32 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:


I just got a notification that bugzilla.gnome.org
is being replaced by gitlab.gnome.org and that
they are starting over.


Well, that's one way of getting rid of all the bugs they don't want to 
work on.


They could always just ignore them as does Libre Office

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bugzilla.gnome.org is closing

[Joe Zeff]

On 11/13/20 12:32 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:


I just got a notification that bugzilla.gnome.org
is being replaced by gitlab.gnome.org and that
they are starting over.


Well, that's one way of getting rid of all the bugs they don't want to 
work on.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Swap still not activated on later kernels

[Samuel Sieb]

On 11/13/20 2:18 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:

$ blkid /fedora.swap
(No Output)


This means that you didn't use "mkswap" to format the file as swap.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

bugzilla.gnome.org is closing

[ToddAndMargo via users]

Hi All,

I just got a notification that bugzilla.gnome.org
is being replaced by gitlab.gnome.org and that
they are starting over.

-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Need help with rsync

[ToddAndMargo via users]

On 2020-11-13 00:37, Cameron Simpson wrote:

On 12Nov2020 20:38, ToddAndMargo  wrote:

But the question still arises, why did the command stop
pruning after it found the bad link?  It still updated.


Rsync does that. I think it's just caution. The delete phase is sort of
separate (runs last by default, but that is tunable). I think it thinks
the update failed in some way, so stop now.

Cheers,
Cameron Simpson 



Hi Cameron,

   Makes sense.  Thank you for the confirmation!

-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Swap still not activated on later kernels

[Bob Marcan]

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:16:05 -0500
Jonathan Billings  wrote:


> 
> 2) Use an application that will bmap the swap file with the help
> of the FIBMAP ioctl and determine the location of the file’s swap
> header, as the offset, in  units, from the beginning of
> the partition which holds the swap file. 
> 
> 3) Add the following parameters to the kernel command line:
> 

Use an application that will bmap the swap file with the help

Does this application already exists or we need to write one? ;-)
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Swap still not activated on later kernels

[Jonathan Billings]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 05:44:57PM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> 
> It's been years since I did this so things may have changed (I don't
> use hibernation as it doesn't work with GPU passthrough for VMs), but
> in my notes it says to add the UUID of the swap device to the command
> line in /etc/sysconfig/grub:
> 
> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="... resume=UUID= ..."
>  
> and then run 'grub2-mkconfig' to do its magic. I'm not sure if this can
> be adapted to using a swapfile, but something tells me it can't. It has
> to be a device or partition unless things have changed. I'm sure more
> experienced hands will correct this if I'm wrong.

There are extra steps if you use a swap file, instead of a swap
partition.

According to the kernel documentation:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/power/swsusp-and-swap-files.html

The Linux kernel handles swap files almost in the same way as it
handles swap partitions and there are only two differences between
these two types of swap areas: (1) swap files need not be
contiguous, (2) the header of a swap file is not in the first
block of the partition that holds it. From the swsusp’s point of
view (1) is not a problem, because it is already taken care of by
the swap-handling code, but (2) has to be taken into
consideration.

In principle the location of a swap file’s header may be
determined with the help of appropriate filesystem
driver. Unfortunately, however, it requires the filesystem holding
the swap file to be mounted, and if this filesystem is journaled,
it cannot be mounted during resume from disk. For this reason to
identify a swap file swsusp uses the name of the partition that
holds the file and the offset from the beginning of the partition
at which the swap file’s header is located. For convenience, this
offset is expressed in  units.

In order to use a swap file with swsusp, you need to:

1) Create the swap file and make it active, eg.:

# dd if=/dev/zero of= bs=1024 count=
# mkswap 
# swapon 


2) Use an application that will bmap the swap file with the help
of the FIBMAP ioctl and determine the location of the file’s swap
header, as the offset, in  units, from the beginning of
the partition which holds the swap file. 

3) Add the following parameters to the kernel command line:

resume= resume_offset=

where  is the partition on which the swap
file is located and  is the offset of the swap
header determined by the application in 2) (of course, this step
may be carried out automatically by the same application that
determines the swap file’s header offset using the FIBMAP ioctl)

-- 
Jonathan Billings 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How can I use GNOME even after I uninstalled it ?

[Jonathan Billings]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:32:16PM +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:17 PM Jonathan Billings 
> wrote:
> 
> > If you have Fedora Workstation installed, you have the
> > 'fedora-release-workstation' package installed, which has
> > 'fedora-release-identity-workstation' as a requirement.  You'd need to
> > swap it out for fedora-release-kde, which you could do with this:
> >
> > sudo dnf swap fedora-release-workstation fedora-release-kde
> >
> 
> Ok, I get what protected packages are now, but I am confused as to what  '
> fedora-release-workstation ' represents.
> 
> Is it a software component ? Like if I want ssh I would do something like :
> 
> dnf install ssh
> 
> This would install the SSH package on my system.
> 
> But what does " fedora-release-workstation " represent ? Is a software
> component or is it a group of components ? If it is a group why not just
> make it a dnf group ?

The 'fedora-release-*' packages are the base packges for different
default configurations, like Workstation, Server, XFCE, MATEcompiz,
etc.  They provide no files, just bring in dependencies.  In a way,
they're like dnf groups, but they use the RPM database for managing
the group of packages, not DNF repository group metadata.  You can
only have one 'release' installed at a time since they conflict with
each other.

You'd have to ask the Fedora core maintainers as to why there are
so many different ways to maintain groups of packages.  dnf modularity
is another one, to further muddy the water.

> >
> > I'm not sure if Fedora has documented changing from one kind of fedora
> > to another.
> >
> > So just for the sake of argument you are saying that if I wanted to use
> the KDE version of Fedora I can swap  "fedora-release-workstation" for "
> fedora-release-kde ".
> 
> How would I download all the KDE packages and set it up ? Would it happen
> automatically ?

I don't know, I have never used KDE.


-- 
Jonathan Billings 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Swap still not activated on later kernels

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 20:22 +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> $  systemctl hibernate
> Failed to hibernate system via logind: Not enough swap space for
> hibernation
> 
> I don't understand why after having 8GB of free swap space, I am
> still
> unable to hibernate ?
> 
> Is this an SELinux issue ?
> 
> What is the problem here ?

It's been years since I did this so things may have changed (I don't
use hibernation as it doesn't work with GPU passthrough for VMs), but
in my notes it says to add the UUID of the swap device to the command
line in /etc/sysconfig/grub:

GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="... resume=UUID= ..."
 
and then run 'grub2-mkconfig' to do its magic. I'm not sure if this can
be adapted to using a swapfile, but something tells me it can't. It has
to be a device or partition unless things have changed. I'm sure more
experienced hands will correct this if I'm wrong.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: systemd-resolved breakage

[Tom H]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 3:17 PM Petr Menšík 
wrote:
>
> Sad thing is, I want Network Manager to write my resolv.conf as it
> did before. I just want systemd-resolved disabled and keep simple
> text file in /etc/resolv.conf.
>
> I haven't found automatic way to recover my system, after I do:
> systemctl disable --now systemd-resolved
>
> It keep broken /etc/resolv.conf, which I have to fix manually.
>
> systemctl restart NetworkManager does not help.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> would NetworkManager.conf:
> dns=default
>
> Write resolv.conf again? Can I make it rewrite after disabling
> systemd-resolved? Why doesn't it restore /etc/resolv.conf on
> systemd-resolved shutdown?

It should work if you replace "rc-manager=symlink" in the settings of
my previous email with "rc-manager=file" and set "/etc/resolv.conf" as
a file.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: ps2eps

[Jerry James]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:14 AM Patrick Dupre  wrote:
> Has the package ps2eps been removed from the distribution?

On a Fedora 33 machine:

$ dnf repoquery -f /usr/bin/ps2eps
texlive-ps2eps-7:20200327-16.fc33.x86_64

-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

ps2eps

[Patrick Dupre]

Hello,

Has the package ps2eps been removed from the distribution?
What is the alternative?

Thanks

===
 Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE
 Tel: +33 (0)380395988
===
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How can I use GNOME even after I uninstalled it ?

[Sreyan Chakravarty]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:17 PM Jonathan Billings 
wrote:

> If you have Fedora Workstation installed, you have the
> 'fedora-release-workstation' package installed, which has
> 'fedora-release-identity-workstation' as a requirement.  You'd need to
> swap it out for fedora-release-kde, which you could do with this:
>
> sudo dnf swap fedora-release-workstation fedora-release-kde
>

Ok, I get what protected packages are now, but I am confused as to what  '
fedora-release-workstation ' represents.

Is it a software component ? Like if I want ssh I would do something like :

dnf install ssh

This would install the SSH package on my system.

But what does " fedora-release-workstation " represent ? Is a software
component or is it a group of components ? If it is a group why not just
make it a dnf group ?

>
> I'm not sure if Fedora has documented changing from one kind of fedora
> to another.
>
> So just for the sake of argument you are saying that if I wanted to use
the KDE version of Fedora I can swap  "fedora-release-workstation" for "
fedora-release-kde ".

How would I download all the KDE packages and set it up ? Would it happen
automatically ?

Interesting stuff.

-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How can I use GNOME even after I uninstalled it ?

[Jonathan Billings]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:05:44PM +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:02 PM Jonathan Billings 
> wrote:
> 
> > If you are using Fedora Workstation, you can't.  gnome-shell is a
> > protected package, and the definition of that is defined by the
> > fedora-release-identity-workstation package.
> >
> >
> Sorry for my ignorance but what are protected packages ?

https://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/conf_ref.html

protected_packages

List of packages that DNF should never completely remove. They are
protected via Obsoletes as well as user/plugin removals. 

The default is: dnf, glob:/etc/yum/protected.d/*.conf and
glob:/etc/dnf/protected.d/*.conf. So any packages which should be
protected can do so by including a file in /etc/dnf/protected.d
with their package name in it. 

DNF will protect also the package corresponding to the running
version of the kernel. See also protect_running_kernel option. 

The fedora-release-package-identity-workstation package has:

/etc/dnf/protected.d/gnome-shell.conf

... which has 'gnome-shell' in it.

> > If you replace that with fedora-release-identity-kde, you'd probably
> > have better luck.
> >
> 
> And could you elaborate on what you meant by this ?

If you have Fedora Workstation installed, you have the
'fedora-release-workstation' package installed, which has
'fedora-release-identity-workstation' as a requirement.  You'd need to
swap it out for fedora-release-kde, which you could do with this:

sudo dnf swap fedora-release-workstation fedora-release-kde

I'm not sure if Fedora has documented changing from one kind of fedora
to another. 

-- 
Jonathan Billings 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: systemd-resolved breakage

[Tom H]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 2:22 PM Tom Horsley  wrote:


> systemctl stop systemd-resolvd
> systemctl disable systemd-resolvd

resolved


> Edit /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf And in the [main]
> section stick this:
>
> [main]
> dns=none

Since "/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf" is
"%config(noreplace)", it'd be better to create
"/etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/dns.conf" with the above.

Or you can leverage NM:

- set "dns=default" and "rc-manager=symlink" in "[main]" in
"/etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/dns.conf"

- set "dns=127.0.0.1" in
"/etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/.nmconnection"

- set "/etc/resolv.conf" as a symlink to "../run/NetworkManager/resolv.conf"
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How can I use GNOME even after I uninstalled it ?

[Sreyan Chakravarty]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:02 PM Jonathan Billings 
wrote:

> If you are using Fedora Workstation, you can't.  gnome-shell is a
> protected package, and the definition of that is defined by the
> fedora-release-identity-workstation package.
>
>
Sorry for my ignorance but what are protected packages ?

If you replace that with fedora-release-identity-kde, you'd probably
> have better luck.
>

And could you elaborate on what you meant by this ?

-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How can I use GNOME even after I uninstalled it ?

[Jonathan Billings]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:52:47PM +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 9:47 PM Jonathan Billings 
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > You are seeing gnome-shell launched as part of the gnome-session
> > package, which are probably both installed.
> >
> > 'dnf remove @gnome-desktop' doesn't remove gnome-session or
> > gnome-shell packages.  Group remove only removes packages that don't
> > already belong to another dnf group or weren't installed explicitly by
> > the user (the latter of which is probably happened in anaconda).
> >
> >
> So if I wanted to remove GNOME for good, how would I do that ?

If you are using Fedora Workstation, you can't.  gnome-shell is a
protected package, and the definition of that is defined by the
fedora-release-identity-workstation package.

If you replace that with fedora-release-identity-kde, you'd probably
have better luck.

-- 
Jonathan Billings 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How can I use GNOME even after I uninstalled it ?

[Sreyan Chakravarty]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 9:47 PM Jonathan Billings 
wrote:

>
> You are seeing gnome-shell launched as part of the gnome-session
> package, which are probably both installed.
>
> 'dnf remove @gnome-desktop' doesn't remove gnome-session or
> gnome-shell packages.  Group remove only removes packages that don't
> already belong to another dnf group or weren't installed explicitly by
> the user (the latter of which is probably happened in anaconda).
>
>
So if I wanted to remove GNOME for good, how would I do that ?
-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How can I use GNOME even after I uninstalled it ?

[Jonathan Billings]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:35:38PM +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
>
> Hi,
> 
> I have shifted to KDE from GNOME in Fedora using :
> 
> dnf install @kde-desktop
> 
> and uninstalled GNOME using:
> 
> dnf remove @gnome-desktop
> 
> Now common sense says that I should not be able to use GNOME any more.
> 
> *But,*
> 
> 
> *I can seemingly log into GNOME from SDDM. *
> 
> The option still works, how ??
> 
> How is this possible?
> 
> *Does SDDM emulate GNOME ? Or did I not remove it from my system ?*
> 
> Can someone shed some light on this weirdness ?

You are seeing gnome-shell launched as part of the gnome-session
package, which are probably both installed.

'dnf remove @gnome-desktop' doesn't remove gnome-session or
gnome-shell packages.  Group remove only removes packages that don't
already belong to another dnf group or weren't installed explicitly by
the user (the latter of which is probably happened in anaconda).

-- 
Jonathan Billings 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

How can I use GNOME even after I uninstalled it ?

[Sreyan Chakravarty]

Hi,

I have shifted to KDE from GNOME in Fedora using :

dnf install @kde-desktop

and uninstalled GNOME using:

dnf remove @gnome-desktop

Now common sense says that I should not be able to use GNOME any more.

*But,*


*I can seemingly log into GNOME from SDDM. *

The option still works, how ??

How is this possible?

*Does SDDM emulate GNOME ? Or did I not remove it from my system ?*

Can someone shed some light on this weirdness ?
-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Not enough swap space for hibernation

[Sreyan Chakravarty]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 9:29 PM Jonathan Billings 
wrote:

> I believe that using a swap *file* for hibernation requires special
> steps, as described here:
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/power/swsusp-and-swap-files.html
>
> I believe you need to add the kernel parameters to make it work, or
> you have to switch to the userland suspend interface.
>

I already have the required kernel parameters set.

-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Not enough swap space for hibernation

[Jonathan Billings]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:24:52PM +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
>
> Hi,
> 
> I have just upgraded to the new 5.8 kernel on Fedora 32.
> 
> I have also configured my swap as a swap file of 8GB.
> 
> But when I try to hibernate using the following command:
> 
> $ systemctl hibernate
> Failed to hibernate system via logind: Not enough swap space for hibernation
> 
> I have no idea why this is happening when I have 8GB of free swap space :
> 
> $  free -h
>   totalusedfree  shared  buff/cache
> available
> Mem:  7.7Gi   1.6Gi   4.1Gi   269Mi   2.0Gi
> 5.6Gi
> Swap: 8.0Gi  0B   8.0Gi
> 
> My RAM is also 8GB.
> 
> Any ideas ?

I believe that using a swap *file* for hibernation requires special
steps, as described here:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/power/swsusp-and-swap-files.html

I believe you need to add the kernel parameters to make it work, or
you have to switch to the userland suspend interface.


-- 
Jonathan Billings 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Not enough swap space for hibernation

[Sreyan Chakravarty]

Hi,

I have just upgraded to the new 5.8 kernel on Fedora 32.

I have also configured my swap as a swap file of 8GB.

But when I try to hibernate using the following command:

$ systemctl hibernate
Failed to hibernate system via logind: Not enough swap space for hibernation

I have no idea why this is happening when I have 8GB of free swap space :

$  free -h
  totalusedfree  shared  buff/cache
available
Mem:  7.7Gi   1.6Gi   4.1Gi   269Mi   2.0Gi
5.6Gi
Swap: 8.0Gi  0B   8.0Gi

My RAM is also 8GB.

Any ideas ?
-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Swap still not activated on later kernels

[Sreyan Chakravarty]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 6:28 PM Sreyan Chakravarty 
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 3:58 PM Ed Greshko  wrote:
>
>> Looking at https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=256614 and the
>> URL's contained within
>> it seems doing a
>>
>> dd if=/dev/zero of=/fedora.swap bs=1M count=2048 status=progress
>>
>> may cure the w(hole) issue.  :-)
>>
>>
> Also weirdly my 8GB swap file is being interpreted as only 8MB.
>
> $  swapon -s
> FilenameTypeSizeUsed
>  Priority
> /fedora.swapfile8388604 0   -2
>
> $   ls -sh /fedora.swap
> 8.1G /fedora.swap
>
> What on earth is happening?
>

Ok my mistake.

I seem to have 8 GB of swap space. I can confirm by the free command.

$ free -h
  totalusedfree  shared  buff/cache
available
Mem:  7.7Gi   1.7Gi   4.4Gi   337Mi   1.6Gi
5.4Gi
Swap: 8.0Gi  0B   8.0Gi


BUT

I am still unable to hibernate:

$  systemctl hibernate
Failed to hibernate system via logind: Not enough swap space for hibernation

I don't understand why after having 8GB of free swap space, I am still
unable to hibernate ?

Is this an SELinux issue ?

What is the problem here ?
-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: systemd-resolved breakage

[Petr Menšík]

Sad thing is, I want Network Manager to write my resolv.conf as it did
before. I just want systemd-resolved disabled and keep simple text file
in /etc/resolv.conf.

I haven't found automatic way to recover my system, after I do:
systemctl disable --now systemd-resolved

It keep broken /etc/resolv.conf, which I have to fix manually.

systemctl restart NetworkManager does not help.

Am I missing something?

would NetworkManager.conf:
dns=default

Write resolv.conf again? Can I make it rewrite after disabling
systemd-resolved? Why doesn't it restore /etc/resolv.conf on
systemd-resolved shutdown?

On 11/13/20 2:22 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> (Relatively) simple fix:
> 
> systemctl stop systemd-resolvd
> systemctl disable systemd-resolvd
> 
> Edit /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf And in the [main]
> section stick this:
> 
> [main]
> dns=none
> 
> Now rm -f /etc/resolv.conf
> 
> Now create your own /etc/resolv.conf file from scratch with
> the nameserver and search directives you actually want.
> 
> Systemd won't stick its nose in, NetworkManager won't clobber
> your resolve.conf file, your network will actually function :-).
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 

-- 
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
email: pemen...@redhat.com
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB


OpenPGP_0x4931CA5B6C9FC5CB_and_old_rev.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F32 bind9 split dns debug

[Petr Menšík]

Hi Jack,

On 11/13/20 8:02 AM, Jack Craig wrote:
> hi all,
> any dns pros in the house??
> 
> i am trying to debug a split view dns.
> i am using F32 & bind9 where i have internal & external views.
> 
> internal network 10.0.0.0/24, external 108.220.213.120/29
> 
> what i think i am seeing is a refusal of query, but Why??
> 
> where can i find a query_log print-severity definition?
> 
> dig shows, ...
> 
> dig ws.linuxlighthouse.com ns
> 
> ; <<>> DiG 9.11.23-RedHat-9.11.23-1.fc32 <<>> ws.linuxlighthouse.com ns
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 45484
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
> 
> ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;ws.linuxlighthouse.com. IN NS
> 
> ;; Query time: 355 msec
> ;; SERVER: 10.0.0.1#53(10.0.0.1)
> ;; WHEN: Thu Nov 12 22:53:45 PST 2020
> ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 51
> 
> dig 108.220.213.121
> 
> ; <<>> DiG 9.11.23-RedHat-9.11.23-1.fc32 <<>> 108.220.213.121
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 46338
> ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
> 
> ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;108.220.213.121. IN A
> 
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> 108.220.213.121. 0 IN A 108.220.213.121
> 
> ;; Query time: 1 msec
> ;; SERVER: 10.0.0.1#53(10.0.0.1)
> ;; WHEN: Thu Nov 12 22:54:52 PST 2020
> ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 60
> 
> suggestions?
> 
> tia, jackc...
> 
> 
> my named.conf
> 
> /* top of file */
> 
> acl slaves {
> 108.220.213.122;
> };
> 
> acl internals {
> 10.0.0.0/24;
> 127.0.0.0/8;
> };
> 
> /*
> 108.220.213.120/29;
> */
> 
> options
> {
> // Put files that named is allowed to write in the data/ directory:
> directory "/var/named"; // "Working" directory
> dump-file "data/cache_dump.db";
> statistics-file "data/named_stats.txt";
> memstatistics-file "data/named_mem_stats.txt";
> secroots-file "data/named.secroots";
> recursing-file "data/named.recursing";
> 
> listen-on port 53 { localhost; };
Localhost usually has only 127.0.0.0/8 and ::1 addresses. Without both
internal address and external or any; Outside IPv4 packet would never
reach bind.
> listen-on-v6 port 53 { any; };
> 
> allow-query  { internals;  };
Move this to views. allow-query includes recursive and non-recursive
queries. Kind of firewall equivalent. Just let it inside or not.
> allow-query-cache { any; };
Unless you override this in view, this would make your (internal) cache
open to outside world. It it would act authoritative for outside and
recursive for inside clients, I would recommend removing these two and
using just allow-recursion { internals; };
allow-recursion-on { internals };

in specific view.
> allow-transfer{ 108.220.213.120/29; };
It is better to use keys to authenticate. Check tsig-keygen(8) manual page.
> 
> recursion yes;
Remove this one ^^. Instead, configure it only per view
> 
> forwarders {
> 8.8.8.8;
> 8.8.4.4;
> };
> 
> /* DNSSEC related options. See information about keys ("Trusted keys",
> bellow) */
> 
> /* Enable serving of DNSSEC related data - enable on both authoritative
> and recursive servers DNSSEC aware servers */
> dnssec-enable yes;
> 
> /* Enable DNSSEC validation on recursive servers */
> dnssec-validation yes;
> 
> /* In Fedora we use /run/named instead of default /var/run/named
>   so we have to configure paths properly. */
> pid-file "/run/named/named.pid";
> session-keyfile "/run/named/session.key";
> 
> managed-keys-directory "/var/named/dynamic";
> 
> /* In Fedora we use system-wide Crypto Policy */
> /* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CryptoPolicy */
> include "/etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/bind.config";
> 
> /* use querylog all the time rndc */
> querylog yes;
> };
> 
> logging {
> channel default_file {
> file "/var/log/named/default.log" versions 3 size 5m;
> severity dynamic;
> print-time yes;
> print-category yes;
> print-severity yes;
> };
> default.log:12-Nov-2020 22:16:58.021 query-errors: info: client
> @0x7f99e01bab90 60.215.138.163#62853 (ws.linuxlighthouse.com): view
> external-wan-view: query failed (REFUSED) for ws.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/
> at ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270
> default.log:12-Nov-2020 22:16:58.503 query-errors: info: client
> @0x7f99e01bab90 60.215.138.163#48181 (ws.linuxlighthouse.com): view
> external-wan-view: query failed (REFUSED) for ws.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/A
> at ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270
> default.log:12-Nov-2020 22:16:59.036 query-errors: info: client
> @0x7f99e01bab90 60.215.138.163#52399 (ws.linuxlighthouse.com): view
> external-wan-view: query failed (REFUSED) for ws.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/A
> at ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270

Client 60.215.138.163 does not 

Re: F32 bind9 split dns debug

[Tim via users]

Jack Craig:
>>> listen-on port 53 { localhost; };
>>> listen-on-v6 port 53  { any; };

Tim:
>> Unless I missed something, elsewhere, your IPv4 connections can only
>> come from localhost.

Jack Craig:
> i am sure i am the one missing something. you are suggesting  listen
> on external ip?
>  
> listen-on port 53   { localhost; 108.220.213.121; };

If you want to allow a query from outside, you have to allow a
connection to listen to the outside world.  You can specify networks,
or even a specific to listen on.  That's the IP it will listen on, not
some IP out on the world for it to listen to.

You've set your named to listen to *any* IPv6 interface.  You can do
the same with IPv4.

That's *IF* you want connections from outside through to your server. 
And, your firewall has to let them through, too.

> also, do you know where to look up the below query log entry for this
> failing request.
> 
> 13-Nov-2020 02:18:51.600 queries: info: client @0x7fa3f41c9760
> 172.253.1.1#54405 (linuxlighthouse.com): view external-wan-view:
> query: linuxlighthouse.com IN A -E(0)DC (10.0.0.101)

Elsewhere in your config, you had this parameter:

  file "/var/log/named/default.log"

That's the file to look through.

Confusingly, you seem to have log entries pasted in the middle of your
configuration file.

That log line suggests on that date and time a query from the 172... IP
address was answered using the data for the external-wan-view of the
DNS record.

You can find out more data about that IP using "dig -x 172.253.1.1" and
"whois 172.253.1.1" commands.

-- 
 
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1127.19.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 25 17:23:54 UTC 2020 x86_64
 
Boilerplate:  All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: systemd-resolved breakage

[Tom Horsley]

(Relatively) simple fix:

systemctl stop systemd-resolvd
systemctl disable systemd-resolvd

Edit /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf And in the [main]
section stick this:

[main]
dns=none

Now rm -f /etc/resolv.conf

Now create your own /etc/resolv.conf file from scratch with
the nameserver and search directives you actually want.

Systemd won't stick its nose in, NetworkManager won't clobber
your resolve.conf file, your network will actually function :-).
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Swap still not activated on later kernels

[Sreyan Chakravarty]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 3:58 PM Ed Greshko  wrote:

> Looking at https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=256614 and the
> URL's contained within
> it seems doing a
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/fedora.swap bs=1M count=2048 status=progress
>
> may cure the w(hole) issue.  :-)
>
>
Also weirdly my 8GB swap file is being interpreted as only 8MB.

$  swapon -s
FilenameTypeSizeUsed
 Priority
/fedora.swapfile8388604 0   -2

$   ls -sh /fedora.swap
8.1G /fedora.swap

What on earth is happening?

-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Swap still not activated on later kernels

[Sreyan Chakravarty]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:00 PM Ed Greshko  wrote:

> > Looking at https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=256614 and the
> URL's contained within
> > it seems doing a
> >
> > dd if=/dev/zero of=/fedora.swap bs=1M count=2048 status=progress
> >
> > may cure the w(hole) issue.  :-)
> >
>
> Sorry, the count above was for a 2GB swap file.  Increase it to cover your
> 8GB file.
>
>
dd if=/dev/zero of=/fedora.swap bs=1M count=8192 status=progress

This command has partially solved my problem

But I have a couple of questions,

1) Why doesn't fallocate work anymore ?
2) I trieddd if=/dev/zero of=/fedora.swap bs=1 count=0 seek=8G

This did not work. swapon complained about files being full of holes.
What is so special about bs=1M ?


I now have a new problem.

SELinux is preventing systemd-logind to read the swap file.

Here is the message:

SELinux is preventing systemd-logind from read access on the file
/fedora.swap.

*  Plugin restorecon (99.5 confidence) suggests


If you want to fix the label.
/fedora.swap default label should be etc_runtime_t.
Then you can run restorecon. The access attempt may have been stopped due
to insufficient permissions to access a parent directory in which case try
to change the following command accordingly.
Do
# /sbin/restorecon -v /fedora.swap

*  Plugin catchall (1.49 confidence) suggests
**

If you believe that systemd-logind should be allowed read access on the
fedora.swap file by default.
Then you should report this as a bug.
You can generate a local policy module to allow this access.
Do
allow this access for now by executing:
# ausearch -c 'systemd-logind' --raw | audit2allow -M my-systemdlogind
# semodule -X 300 -i my-systemdlogind.pp

Additional Information:
Source Contextsystem_u:system_r:systemd_logind_t:s0
Target Contextunconfined_u:object_r:swapfile_t:s0
Target Objects/fedora.swap [ file ]
Sourcesystemd-logind
Source Path   systemd-logind
Port  
Host  localhost.HPNotebook
Source RPM Packages
Target RPM Packages
SELinux Policy RPMselinux-policy-targeted-3.14.5-44.fc32.noarch
Local Policy RPM  selinux-policy-targeted-3.14.5-44.fc32.noarch
Selinux Enabled   True
Policy Type   targeted
Enforcing ModeEnforcing
Host Name localhost.HPNotebook
Platform  Linux localhost.HPNotebook
5.8.18-200.fc32.x86_64
  #1 SMP Mon Nov 2 19:49:11 UTC 2020 x86_64
x86_64
Alert Count   3
First Seen2020-11-13 17:59:22 IST
Last Seen 2020-11-13 17:59:22 IST
Local ID  375aec7e-f77d-47ab-865a-f83a47c12423

Raw Audit Messages
type=AVC msg=audit(1605270562.371:320): avc:  denied  { read } for
 pid=1256 comm="systemd-logind" name="fedora.swap" dev="dm-2" ino=13
scontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_logind_t:s0
tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:swapfile_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0


Hash: systemd-logind,systemd_logind_t,swapfile_t,file,read


I don't know much about SELinux, can you help me fix the label ?

How can I fix the label as described here?

If you want to fix the label.
/fedora.swap default label should be etc_runtime_t.


-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

systemd-resolved breakage

[Sam Varshavchik]

I was surprised that a

dig www.unicode.org a

was coming back with a SERVFAIL. I have bind running on the same server, so  
I thought it just had a hiccup. Just to be sure I haven't fat-fingered  
anything and accidentally set dns lookups to go to another dns server on the  
network, I did an explicit "dig @127.0.0.1", and that worked. Must be it,  
right? I looked at /etc/resolv.conf and found out that the default server is  
127.0.0.53, and then remembered in F33 it was decided to have systemd stick  
its nose into another place it didn't belong in the first place.


So, systemd's resolver was broken, for some reason, with no indication why  
or how. Nothing was logged anywhere, as I far as I could see. Typical. As I  
was researching for the proper way to get rid of yet another pile of systemd  
junk, I got to the point of finding out about "resolvectl dns" which proudly  
reported the server's IP address as the only DNS server it knows about, then  
resolution via 127.0.0.53 started working again. And again, without any  
explanation.


Reading the amusing list of buzzwords in "man resolvectl", like "server  
feature probing logic" it is unclear why any of that crap is needed. If the  
whole purpose of this whole house of cards is to have a proxy that silently  
redirect DNS lookups to whatever DNS server is configured via the currently  
active connection, I can see the value in that but I do not see what's to be  
gained by a fragile "server feature probing logic" that, apparently,  
sometimes decides that the DNS server on the same host doesn't really exist,  
and decides to reject all requests, on its own initiative, with SERVFAILs.  
And provide no useful logging, whatsoever. 'journalctl -u systemd-resolved'  
has no explanation, of any kind, whatsoever.


DNS resolution is a critical function. systemd-resolved failed it,  
miserably. And without having even the courage to provide any kind of a  
useful logging that can be used to file a bug report.




pgpwCu9K32Hxr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Recommendations for video-conferencing setup

[George N. White III]

On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 23:55, Tim via users 
wrote:

> On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 13:42 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > There's an Android app call Droidcam (non-free) which has a Linux
> > download. Might be worth checking out.
>
> I never got anywhere trying that out.  Dunno if it simply doesn't work,
> or secure boot made it impossible to load the module.
>

I was able to use droidcam with a MOK (machine-owner key).   See:
https://www.rodsbooks.com/efi-bootloaders/secureboot.html#initial_shim

-- 
George N. White III
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Swap still not activated on later kernels

[Ed Greshko]

On 13/11/2020 18:27, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 13/11/2020 18:18, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:



On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:31 PM Samuel Sieb mailto:sam...@sieb.net>> wrote:

    What do "ls -lh /fedora.swap", "du -h /fedora.swap", and "blkid
    /fedora.swap" show?


This is the requested data:

$ ls -lh /fedora.swap
-rw---. 1 root root 8.0G Nov 13 15:36 /fedora.swap

$ du -h /fedora.swap
8.1G    /fedora.swap

$ blkid /fedora.swap
(No Output)

    Didn't you have a similar problem a while ago or was that someone else?


I had the same problem with the 5.7 kernel, and my solution was to use the 5.6 
kernel.

    There was some kernel change that might require you to recreate the swap
    file.


 I have created the swap but they still get the same error.

    Nov 13 15:39:33 localhost.HPNotebook kernel: swapon: swapfile has 
holes

Anything else I can do ?


Looking at https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=256614 and the URL's 
contained within
it seems doing a

dd if=/dev/zero of=/fedora.swap bs=1M count=2048 status=progress

may cure the w(hole) issue.  :-)



Sorry, the count above was for a 2GB swap file.  Increase it to cover your 8GB 
file.

---
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F32 bind9 split dns debug

[Jack Craig]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 1:55 AM Tim via users 
wrote:

> On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 23:02 -0800, Jack Craig wrote:
> > listen-on port 53 { localhost; };
> > listen-on-v6 port 53  { any; };
>
> Unless I missed something, elsewhere, your IPv4 connections can only
> come from localhost.
>

i am sure i am the one missing something. you are suggesting  listen on
external ip?


> * listen-on port 53   { localhost; 108.220.213.121; };*
>

also, do you know where to look up the below query log entry for this
failing request.

13-Nov-2020 02:18:51.600 queries: info: client @0x7fa3f41c9760
172.253.1.1#54405 (linuxlighthouse.com):* view external-wan-view: query:
linuxlighthouse.com  IN A -E(0)DC (10.0.0.101)*

thanks to both replies, jackc...

> --
>
> uname -rsvp
> Linux 3.10.0-1127.19.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 25 17:23:54 UTC 2020
> x86_64
>
> Boilerplate:  All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
> I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
>
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Swap still not activated on later kernels

[Ed Greshko]

On 13/11/2020 18:18, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:



On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:31 PM Samuel Sieb mailto:sam...@sieb.net>> wrote:

What do "ls -lh /fedora.swap", "du -h /fedora.swap", and "blkid
/fedora.swap" show?


This is the requested data:

$ ls -lh /fedora.swap
-rw---. 1 root root 8.0G Nov 13 15:36 /fedora.swap

$ du -h /fedora.swap
8.1G    /fedora.swap

$ blkid /fedora.swap
(No Output)

Didn't you have a similar problem a while ago or was that someone else?


I had the same problem with the 5.7 kernel, and my solution was to use the 5.6 
kernel.

There was some kernel change that might require you to recreate the swap
file.


 I have created the swap but they still get the same error.

    Nov 13 15:39:33 localhost.HPNotebook kernel: swapon: swapfile has 
holes

Anything else I can do ?


Looking at https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=256614 and the URL's 
contained within
it seems doing a

dd if=/dev/zero of=/fedora.swap bs=1M count=2048 status=progress

may cure the w(hole) issue.  :-)

---
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Swap still not activated on later kernels

[Sreyan Chakravarty]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:31 PM Samuel Sieb  wrote:

> What do "ls -lh /fedora.swap", "du -h /fedora.swap", and "blkid
> /fedora.swap" show?
>

This is the requested data:

$ ls -lh /fedora.swap
-rw---. 1 root root 8.0G Nov 13 15:36 /fedora.swap

$ du -h /fedora.swap
8.1G/fedora.swap

$ blkid /fedora.swap
(No Output)

Didn't you have a similar problem a while ago or was that someone else?
>

I had the same problem with the 5.7 kernel, and my solution was to use the
5.6 kernel.

There was some kernel change that might require you to recreate the swap
> file.


 I have created the swap but they still get the same error.

Nov 13 15:39:33 localhost.HPNotebook kernel: swapon: swapfile
has holes

Anything else I can do ?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F32 bind9 split dns debug

[Tim via users]

On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 23:02 -0800, Jack Craig wrote:
> listen-on port 53 { localhost; };
> listen-on-v6 port 53  { any; };

Unless I missed something, elsewhere, your IPv4 connections can only
come from localhost.

-- 
 
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1127.19.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 25 17:23:54 UTC 2020 x86_64
 
Boilerplate:  All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Recommendations for video-conferencing setup

[Tim via users]

Tim (re droidcam):
>> I never got anywhere trying that out.  Dunno if it simply doesn't
>> work, or secure boot made it impossible to load the module.

Samuel Sieb:
> You would either have to disable secure boot

I tried that.

> or add the signing key to the system store.

I couldn't figure out how to do that.

In the end, I gave up.  And can't think of a reason to try again.

-- 
 
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1127.19.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 25 17:23:54 UTC 2020 x86_64
 
Boilerplate:  All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org