Re: OT: ink jet printers

2021-07-06 Thread Erik P. Olsen
On 2021-07-06 at 17:36:13 Tom Horsley wrote:

> On Tue, 06 Jul 2021 17:18:19 -0400
> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> 
> > This shows very, very scant HP support. Who should I believe?  
> 
> I've pretty much given up on linux and scanning. My current all-in-one
> Epson Artisan 725 claimed to have a linux driver, but it never
> worked. I do all my scanning on a windows (the Epson is a network
> device) virtual machine, and save the scanned images to a samba
> share hosted on the fedora system where I actually want the scans.

Have you tried VueScan? https://www.hamrick.com/


-- 
Erik P. Olsen - Copenhagen, Denmark
Fedora 34/64 bit xfce Claws-Mail POP3 Gramps 5.1.3 Bacula 11.0.5
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: OT: ink jet printers

2021-07-06 Thread Peter Boy


> Am 07.07.2021 um 00:33 schrieb James Szinger :
> 
> On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 09:57:47 -0600
> Greg Woods  wrote:
> 
>> Question #2 is, are any of the all-in-one laser printers any good and
>> work (all functions) with Fedora Linux?
> 
> I currently have an HP Color LaserJet MFP M477fdw.  It prints great
> from Fedora, CentOS, Mac OS, iOS, MS Windows, and Android.  I usually
> scan to e-mail or USB disk.  I can also scan over the network from
> Fedora 34 with xsane and airscan.

From my experience of about 30 years the HP software support or multifunction 
laser printers is really superb and works smoothly. There is no difference to 
inkjet devices. For that reason I avoid any of the cheaper laser printer 
alternatives. It’s not worth the headache and the time to spend resolving 
issues. For heavy load and quality requirements Lexmark is an alternative.

A problem is when you want to print borderless, often required for graphic 
printing or photos. This does not work technically. You have to take oversized 
paper and crop it afterwards. Desirable precision can be a challenge.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: downloading a complete web page without using a browser...

2021-07-06 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
D writes:

 > env shows :0.0. I have tried several variations:
 > export DISPLAY=:0
 > export DISPLAY=:0.0
 > export DISPLAY=:0.1

The first two should work, not sure about the second.  I would check
the following:

1.  Is there actually a firefox executable where the script expects
it?  (Note that depending on how you run the script, it may not
actually search PATH for firefox.)  If you're sure Firefox is
starting, then this doesn't apply.
2.  If you're running over ssh, you may have a different DISPLAY
(typically 10.0) or no DISPLAY set at all.  This is very unlikely,
I suppose you're running the script the same way you ran env.  Oh,
make sure you're running env on the host where the script is!
3.  Nowadays most X servers require authentication from clients,
usually a simple MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE by default.  This requires
credentials be stashed somewhere, typically $HOME/.Xauthority on
the host where the client is started.

All of this seems kinda unlikely, but it's what I can come up with
offhand.  There is a kind of X server that you may be able to install
(Xnull or Xtest or something like that), that doesn't actually do
anything except speak the X protocol back to the client.  I don't know
whether that would help, but it could avoid a flash of a window (and
perhaps save a few milliseconds in execution).

Steve
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: GRUB_DEFAULT entry

2021-07-06 Thread Robert McBroom via users

On 7/6/21 11:32 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:

On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 10:11:01AM -0400, Robert McBroom via users wrote:

grub seems to now ignore the settings in /etc/default/grub. What is needed
to restore the function of setting a specific boot option?

I've noticed that GRUB2 on Fedora uses BootLoaderSpec (see this page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BootLoaderSpecByDefault ),
however, if you (or an RPM scriptlet) uses the 'grubby' command to
change the kernel parameters, in the individual /boot/loader/entries/
files, the 'options $kernelopts' line is replaced with the full kernel
options, and they're never updated again even if you change the
/etc/default/grub settings.  FWIW, the nvidia packages use grubby in
an RPM post script, so people who use those often run into this.

It looks like this has been reported:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651686

I'm not sure if Fedora needs to do a better job documenting this
behavior, or if it should just be fixed so people aren't confused by
this. Maybe something like "These settings only affect when the system
is loaded and changing them won't affect a running system's grub" in
the /etc/default/grub file?

I typically have several different OS in stanzas in 
/etc/grub.d/06_custom. They don't go through


/boot/loader/entries/

GRUB_DEFAULT

in /etc/default/grub would select the system I wanted to use for a session from 
the menuentry until edited.
typically these were CENTOS systems that had the legacy support the codes I use 
needed.
That functionality appears to have been lost.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: F33 Xorg XFCE4 ALSA => F34 Wayland Gnome PipeWire - Issue #1

2021-07-06 Thread Bob Marcan
On Wed, 07 Jul 2021 07:11:23 +1000
Philip Rhoades via users  wrote:

> Doug,
> 
> 
> On 2021-07-07 04:31, Doug H. wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 2021, at 10:30 AM, Philip Rhoades via users wrote:  
> >> People,  
> >> >> There doesn't seem to be a dedicated Fedora Gnome list so I am posting  
> >> here - I have looked around a lot for info before posting.  
> >> >> In my traditional XFCE4 environment, on the top task bar I have had  
> >> direct access to everything I need to get to:  
> > 
> > Why don't you continue with Xfce4 in F34?  
> 
> 
> Mostly because I have been wanting to use Wayland for a long time but it is 
> not supported by XFCE4 yet . . I will probably look at going back to XFCE4 
> when Wayland is supported . .
> 
> P.

Did you consider the opposite?
I'm using fvwm and i'm waiting when Wayland will support emulating X11. ;-)

BR, Bob
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 2021-07-06 2:42 a.m., Stephen Morris wrote:
 From the screenshot in the attachment I assume it is telling me that 
under Windows 10 it is finding a tpm, is that correct?


That is correct.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Unable to start GeoClue client

2021-07-06 Thread ToddAndMargo via users

On 7/6/21 3:08 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 07/07/2021 03:30, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

Anyone know how to fix this?  The FAQ was zero help.

-T

$ redshift

Trying location provider `geoclue2'...
Using provider `geoclue2'.
Using method `randr'.
Waiting for initial location to become available...
Unable to start GeoClue client: 
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: 'redshift' 
disallowed, no agent for UID 500.

Access to the current location was denied by GeoClue!
Make sure that location services are enabled and that Redshift is 
permitted
to use location services. See https://github.com/jonls/redshift#faq 
for more

information.
Unable to get location from provider.


What do you mean the FAQ was zero help?

[egreshko@f34k2 ~]$ rpm -qa | grep ^reds
redshift-1.12-11.fc34.x86_64
redshift-gtk-1.12-11.fc34.x86_64
[egreshko@f34k2 ~]$ rpm -qa | grep geoclu
geoclue2-2.5.7-2.fc34.x86_64
geoclue2-libs-2.5.7-2.fc34.x86_64

[egreshko@f34k2 ~]$ redshift
Trying location provider `geoclue2'...
Using provider `geoclue2'.
Using method `randr'.
Waiting for initial location to become available...
Unable to start GeoClue client: 
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: 'redshift' 
disallowed, no agent for UID 1026.

Access to the current location was denied by GeoClue!
Make sure that location services are enabled and that Redshift is permitted
to use location services. See https://github.com/jonls/redshift#faq for 
more

information.
Unable to get location from provider

[egreshko@f34k2 ~]$ cp /usr/share/doc/redshift/redshift.conf.sample 
.config/redshift.conf

[egreshko@f34k2 ~]$ redshift
Waiting for initial location to become available...
Location: 48.10 N, 11.60 E



Hi Ed,

Oh crap.  I missed that part.  It is working now.

Thank you!

-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: OT: ink jet printers

2021-07-06 Thread James Szinger
On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 09:57:47 -0600
Greg Woods  wrote:

> Well, not completely OT because I do need one that will work on
> Fedora.
> 
> I have found a number of ink jet all-in-ones that work well on
> Fedora, from Epson, HP, and Brother. The problem is that I don't use
> the printer all that much, and every single one of them eventually
> (after I've had it for a few months) develops a head clog that is so
> bad that not even the printer's cleaning cycle can fix it. I have
> tried some of the cleaning kits with not much success (I'm a lousy
> handyman), and even if I could get the cleaning kits to work, I'd
> rather find a printer where I can avoid this headache.

I gave up on ink jet printers because of this.

> So, is there any such thing as an all-in-one ink jet printer that
> does not suffer from this problem if it is not used regularly?
> Question #2 is, are any of the all-in-one laser printers any good and
> work (all functions) with Fedora Linux?

I currently have an HP Color LaserJet MFP M477fdw.  It prints great
from Fedora, CentOS, Mac OS, iOS, MS Windows, and Android.  I usually
scan to e-mail or USB disk.  I can also scan over the network from
Fedora 34 with xsane and airscan.

Jim
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread Ed Greshko

On 07/07/2021 05:27, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 22:19 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 06/07/2021 20:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 20:22 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 06/07/2021 20:08, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

It's annoying when banks decide to "improve" security by
requiring
their customers to use a specific platform rather than a
general
standard. All banks here use smartcards but the personal
terminal
is
just an offline card reader with a display.

It is only the Post Office Bank here that requires the Smart Card
Reader.  The Post Office
also sells the a reader to make things "easier".  I suspect they
take
a piece of the action.
:-) :-)

And require a Windows machine to use it? Personally. I'd look for a
different bank. Here the bank just gives you the card reader when
you
open an account.

We have accounts at other banks.  But the P O account is tied into
paying house taxes,
electric bill, gas bill and others.  Too much of a pain to change.

Getting way off-topic here, but in the UK you can switch bank accounts
for all such payments (direct debits) in a single operation. The two
banks coordinate the handover between themselves. Takes a few days but
is no more complicated than changing your phone service provider. I did
it a couple of years ago and as I recall didn´t need to contact any of
the payees myself.



You are 100% right about being OT.  And I violate my own rules again.

I'll just leave you with "Don't Get Me Started on Banks in Taiwan"!!!  And 
especially
"Don't get me stated on Banks in Taiwan and their treatment of non-citizens".

--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Unable to start GeoClue client

2021-07-06 Thread Ed Greshko

On 07/07/2021 03:30, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

Anyone know how to fix this?  The FAQ was zero help.

-T

$ redshift

Trying location provider `geoclue2'...
Using provider `geoclue2'.
Using method `randr'.
Waiting for initial location to become available...
Unable to start GeoClue client: 
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: 'redshift' disallowed, no 
agent for UID 500.
Access to the current location was denied by GeoClue!
Make sure that location services are enabled and that Redshift is permitted
to use location services. See https://github.com/jonls/redshift#faq for more
information.
Unable to get location from provider.


What do you mean the FAQ was zero help?

[egreshko@f34k2 ~]$ rpm -qa | grep ^reds
redshift-1.12-11.fc34.x86_64
redshift-gtk-1.12-11.fc34.x86_64
[egreshko@f34k2 ~]$ rpm -qa | grep geoclu
geoclue2-2.5.7-2.fc34.x86_64
geoclue2-libs-2.5.7-2.fc34.x86_64

[egreshko@f34k2 ~]$ redshift
Trying location provider `geoclue2'...
Using provider `geoclue2'.
Using method `randr'.
Waiting for initial location to become available...
Unable to start GeoClue client: 
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: 'redshift' disallowed, no 
agent for UID 1026.
Access to the current location was denied by GeoClue!
Make sure that location services are enabled and that Redshift is permitted
to use location services. See https://github.com/jonls/redshift#faq for more
information.
Unable to get location from provider

[egreshko@f34k2 ~]$ cp /usr/share/doc/redshift/redshift.conf.sample 
.config/redshift.conf
[egreshko@f34k2 ~]$ redshift
Waiting for initial location to become available...
Location: 48.10 N, 11.60 E

--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: GRUB_DEFAULT entry

2021-07-06 Thread Chris Murphy
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 8:11 AM Robert McBroom via users
 wrote:
>
> grub seems to now ignore the settings in /etc/default/grub. What is
> needed to restore the function of setting a specific boot option?

Whatever is in /etc/default/grub will be set in each BLS snippet if
you run grub2-mkconfig -o /etc/grub2.cfg

New kernels will get whatever is currently in /proc/cmdline.

If you use grubby with --update-kernel=ALL then all possibilities are
modified regardless of Fedora release version (grubenv or BLS snippets
or grub.cfg as the case may be).

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2?rd=Grub2#Changing_kernel_command-line_parameters_with_grubby


--
Chris Murphy
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: OT: ink jet printers

2021-07-06 Thread Tom Horsley
On Tue, 06 Jul 2021 22:31:35 +0100
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

> I have a wireless Brother laser all-in-one that I use on a daily basis
> and has been working since 2014 on Fedora. You just download a tarfile
> from their support page and run it to set the thing up. Both scanner
> and printer work.

I just looked on the brother web site earlier today and all their
all-in-one laser systems are listed as "out of stock" :-).
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 22:19 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/07/2021 20:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 20:22 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > On 06/07/2021 20:08, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > It's annoying when banks decide to "improve" security by
> > > > requiring
> > > > their customers to use a specific platform rather than a
> > > > general
> > > > standard. All banks here use smartcards but the personal
> > > > terminal
> > > > is
> > > > just an offline card reader with a display.
> > > It is only the Post Office Bank here that requires the Smart Card
> > > Reader.  The Post Office
> > > also sells the a reader to make things "easier".  I suspect they
> > > take
> > > a piece of the action.
> > > :-) :-)
> > And require a Windows machine to use it? Personally. I'd look for a
> > different bank. Here the bank just gives you the card reader when
> > you
> > open an account.
> 
> We have accounts at other banks.  But the P O account is tied into
> paying house taxes,
> electric bill, gas bill and others.  Too much of a pain to change.

Getting way off-topic here, but in the UK you can switch bank accounts
for all such payments (direct debits) in a single operation. The two
banks coordinate the handover between themselves. Takes a few days but
is no more complicated than changing your phone service provider. I did
it a couple of years ago and as I recall didn´t need to contact any of
the payees myself.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 15:01 -0400, mcgarrett wrote:
> From the mail, it appears that a software TPM should solve the
> problem on older computers,
> but it occurs to me that you might not be permitted to install the
> software unless
> a TPM is found. So, for those who have already tried version 11, has
> any one of you
> tried installing on an older laptop, and then adding a software TPM,
> or is this impossible?  --doug

As stated earlier, my system doesn´t have a hardware TPM, but adding a
software TPM in virt-manager was enough.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: OT: ink jet printers

2021-07-06 Thread Tom Horsley
On Tue, 06 Jul 2021 17:18:19 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:

> This shows very, very scant HP support. Who should I believe?

I've pretty much given up on linux and scanning. My current all-in-one
Epson Artisan 725 claimed to have a linux driver, but it never
worked. I do all my scanning on a windows (the Epson is a network
device) virtual machine, and save the scanned images to a samba
share hosted on the fedora system where I actually want the scans.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: OT: ink jet printers

2021-07-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 09:57 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> Well, not completely OT because I do need one that will work on
> Fedora.
> 
> I have found a number of ink jet all-in-ones that work well on
> Fedora, from
> Epson, HP, and Brother. The problem is that I don't use the printer
> all
> that much, and every single one of them eventually (after I've had it
> for a
> few months) develops a head clog that is so bad that not even the
> printer's
> cleaning cycle can fix it. I have tried some of the cleaning kits
> with not
> much success (I'm a lousy handyman), and even if I could get the
> cleaning
> kits to work, I'd rather find a printer where I can avoid this
> headache.
> 
> So, is there any such thing as an all-in-one ink jet printer that
> does not
> suffer from this problem if it is not used regularly? Question #2 is,
> are
> any of the all-in-one laser printers any good and work (all
> functions) with
> Fedora Linux?

I have a wireless Brother laser all-in-one that I use on a daily basis
and has been working since 2014 on Fedora. You just download a tarfile
from their support page and run it to set the thing up. Both scanner
and printer work.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: OT: ink jet printers

2021-07-06 Thread Sam Varshavchik

Greg Woods writes:

So, is there any such thing as an all-in-one ink jet printer that does not  
suffer from this problem if it is not used regularly? Question #2 is, are any  
of the all-in-one laser printers any good and work (all functions) with  
Fedora Linux?


I think that a laser printer is going to be the best bet here, and I'm  
wondering the same thing, actually. I'd settle down for only a scanner,  
since my laserjet m118dw worked out of the box, after pointing hplip in its  
direction. But an all-in-one would work too.


I did some searching over the weekend, and there's some conflicting  
information on HP's multifunction devices. HP's site:


https://developers.hp.com/hp-linux-imaging-and-printing/supported_devices/index

This seems to suggest that hplip can configure most of their MFP with sane.
However, over at sane:

http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html#Z-HEWLETT-PACKARD

This shows very, very scant HP support. Who should I believe?

I've been unable to find anything else on the intertubes that talks about  
the trials and tribulation of such an endeavor. And I do not see Fedora's  
hplip package install anything that might suggest a sane driver. Maybe when  
it sees a supported scanner or MFP it dumps something, somewhere, where sane  
sees it.


Maybe HP's stuff works so well, that there's no reason for anyone to say  
much about it, it just works.


Another data point that raises a shadow of suspicion on the quality of  
hplip's documentation: according to HP's web site my M118dw is a color laser  
printer. That's news to me, and to the best of my abilities I've yet to  
locate any color cartridges inside the chassis.




pgpST34zQPvJ9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: F33 Xorg XFCE4 ALSA => F34 Wayland Gnome PipeWire - Issue #1

2021-07-06 Thread Philip Rhoades via users

Doug,


On 2021-07-07 04:31, Doug H. wrote:

On Tue, Jul 6, 2021, at 10:30 AM, Philip Rhoades via users wrote:

People,

There doesn't seem to be a dedicated Fedora Gnome list so I am posting
here - I have looked around a lot for info before posting.

In my traditional XFCE4 environment, on the top task bar I have had
direct access to everything I need to get to:


Why don't you continue with Xfce4 in F34?



Mostly because I have been wanting to use Wayland for a long time but it 
is not supported by XFCE4 yet . . I will probably look at going back to 
XFCE4 when Wayland is supported . .


P.
--
Philip Rhoades

PO Box 896
Cowra  NSW  2794
Australia
E-mail:  p...@pricom.com.au
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: OT: ink jet printers

2021-07-06 Thread ToddAndMargo via users

On 7/6/21 10:19 AM, Jon LaBadie wrote:

On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 09:57:47AM -0600, Greg Woods wrote:

Well, not completely OT because I do need one that will work on Fedora.

I have found a number of ink jet all-in-ones that work well on Fedora, 
from

Epson, HP, and Brother. The problem is that I don't use the printer all
that much, and every single one of them eventually (after I've had it 
for a
few months) develops a head clog that is so bad that not even the 
printer's
cleaning cycle can fix it. I have tried some of the cleaning kits with 
not

much success (I'm a lousy handyman), and even if I could get the cleaning
kits to work, I'd rather find a printer where I can avoid this headache.

So, is there any such thing as an all-in-one ink jet printer that does 
not

suffer from this problem if it is not used regularly? Question #2 is, are
any of the all-in-one laser printers any good and work (all functions) 
with

Fedora Linux?

Thanks,
--Greg


If replacing your current unit, I suggest exploring color laser 
technology instead of ink jet.  May not be that much more expensive

and the printer can sit at idle power with no problems.

I'd recommend one that has network connectivity and does PostScript
(or manufacturer's emulation, like Brother's BR-3).



If you go with a color laser, be aware that the toner
cartridges they send (starter toner) is only 10%
filled and you will run out very quickly.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Unable to start GeoClue client

2021-07-06 Thread ToddAndMargo via users

Anyone know how to fix this?  The FAQ was zero help.

-T

$ redshift

Trying location provider `geoclue2'...
Using provider `geoclue2'.
Using method `randr'.
Waiting for initial location to become available...
Unable to start GeoClue client: 
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: 'redshift' 
disallowed, no agent for UID 500.

Access to the current location was denied by GeoClue!
Make sure that location services are enabled and that Redshift is permitted
to use location services. See https://github.com/jonls/redshift#faq for more
information.
Unable to get location from provider.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread mcgarrett

> On July 6, 2021 at 1:34 AM "Stephen J. Turnbull"  wrote:
> 
> 
> Tim writes:
> 
>  > I reckon the default thought of most people who're suddenly faced with
>  > a computer failing a security test is not going to be that something
>  > has changed on them without authority, but that something has gone
>  > wrong.  They're going to try and reset something, rather than work out
>  > if they've been compromised.
> 
> Indeed.  Pragmatically speaking, I don't think they're wrong, do you?
> 
> Patrick writes:
> 
>  > I think much depends on what the TPM is used for. Certainly if the
>  > user takes care not to subvert the intention, it can reasonably be
>  > used to ensure that only trusted software is run.
> 
> "Pragmatically speaking ..." ;-)  Seriously, I think TPM mostly makes
> sense with VMs.  People who write programs are generally going to be
> very unhappy with the amount of kissing up to the TPM they have to do.
> Like, on Mac every time LLVM releases a new version of the debugger I
> have to go through the self-signing dance.  So far I have been
> satisfied with the results every time (there really are new features
> or performance improvements), but it's infrequent enough that I have
> no memory of the procedure, let alone muscle memory.
> 
>  > OTOH, I think one application of TPM (at least when originally
>  > proposed) was to prevent the user from bypassing DRM, in which case
>  > the trust goes in the other direction and the situation is
>  > different.
> 
> Yeah, there was a *lot* of angst about potential DRM applications at
> the time.  I'm willing to bet it's possible to distinguish a hardware
> TPM from a software TPM for that application, though.  I didn't look
> hard enough to see if the Xen folk had proposed a protocol to get a
> token from the hardware TPM to vouch for a VM in that case.
> 
> Steve
From the mail, it appears that a software TPM should solve the problem on older 
computers,
but it occurs to me that you might not be permitted to install the software 
unless
a TPM is found. So, for those who have already tried version 11, has any one of 
you
tried installing on an older laptop, and then adding a software TPM, or is this 
impossible?  --doug
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: F33 Xorg XFCE4 ALSA => F34 Wayland Gnome PipeWire - Issue #1

2021-07-06 Thread Doug H.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021, at 10:30 AM, Philip Rhoades via users wrote:
> People,
> 
> There doesn't seem to be a dedicated Fedora Gnome list so I am posting 
> here - I have looked around a lot for info before posting.
> 
> In my traditional XFCE4 environment, on the top task bar I have had 
> direct access to everything I need to get to:

Why don't you continue with Xfce4 in F34?


-- 
Doug Herr
fedoraproject@wombatz.com
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: OT: ink jet printers

2021-07-06 Thread Bob Marcan
On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 09:57:47 -0600
Greg Woods  wrote:

> Well, not completely OT because I do need one that will work on Fedora.
> 
> I have found a number of ink jet all-in-ones that work well on Fedora, from
> Epson, HP, and Brother. The problem is that I don't use the printer all
> that much, and every single one of them eventually (after I've had it for a
> few months) develops a head clog that is so bad that not even the printer's
> cleaning cycle can fix it. I have tried some of the cleaning kits with not
> much success (I'm a lousy handyman), and even if I could get the cleaning
> kits to work, I'd rather find a printer where I can avoid this headache.
> 
> So, is there any such thing as an all-in-one ink jet printer that does not
> suffer from this problem if it is not used regularly? Question #2 is, are
> any of the all-in-one laser printers any good and work (all functions) with
> Fedora Linux?
> 
> Thanks,
> --Greg

In one of my previous jobs, we are using a cron entry, to print a test page 
once a day. 

BR, Bob
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Python libraries problem with F34

2021-07-06 Thread Todd Zullinger
Barry wrote:
>> On 6 Jul 2021, at 03:38, Frederic Muller 
>> wrote:
>>> On 7/6/21 3:34 AM, Barry wrote:
[...]
>>> It’s fine to install packages with pip install —user.
>>> Use of venv is very useful, but not mandatory.
>>> 
>> Actually it's not. That's what I do all the time. Rather
>> than copying the explanation, I'll point whoever is
>> interested into the explanations and the resolution *it
>> seems to be a very common problem users are facing
>> apparently*:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JNBGOXQ73P6VSOWYHGRT7T2IMMJ7RPSD/
> 
> I read all of the thread, i am on the dev list.
> 
> It told you to never install into the fedora system python
> directories, which it appears you did.
> It did not tell you that installing the user dirs will
> break fedora.

Doing so can still interact badly with the system python
modules.

While it's better to limit that to just one user rather than
the whole system, it doesn't really help when the user who's
got an odd python problem is your own. :)

I think it's entirely reasonable advice to generally
recommend using venv if you're using pip.  Personally, I'd
package anything I needed before I'd ever use pip install.

Can you get away with not doing so in every case?  Sure.
But you have to know what those cases are.  So it's not good
general advice to suggest you shouldn't bother with using
venv, IMO.

-- 
Todd


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


F33 Xorg XFCE4 ALSA => F34 Wayland Gnome PipeWire - Issue #1

2021-07-06 Thread Philip Rhoades via users

People,

There doesn't seem to be a dedicated Fedora Gnome list so I am posting 
here - I have looked around a lot for info before posting.


In my traditional XFCE4 environment, on the top task bar I have had 
direct access to everything I need to get to: workspaces and stacked 
programs of each app eg:  Chrome, FF, Brave, X-Terminals, Kitty 
Terminals etc.  Now in Gnome, not only do I not have direct access to 
the workspace I want (I usually have four - each used for different 
work), but the task bar is only showing ONE stacked app instead of ALL 
the apps in the current workspace - how do I customise this task bar to 
look like my usual work environment?  I want to persist with this 
environment but so far the update / changeover has resulted in a severe 
downgrade in my productivity . .


Thanks,

Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades

PO Box 896
Cowra  NSW  2794
Australia
E-mail:  p...@pricom.com.au
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: OT: ink jet printers

2021-07-06 Thread Jon LaBadie

On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 09:57:47AM -0600, Greg Woods wrote:

Well, not completely OT because I do need one that will work on Fedora.

I have found a number of ink jet all-in-ones that work well on Fedora, from
Epson, HP, and Brother. The problem is that I don't use the printer all
that much, and every single one of them eventually (after I've had it for a
few months) develops a head clog that is so bad that not even the printer's
cleaning cycle can fix it. I have tried some of the cleaning kits with not
much success (I'm a lousy handyman), and even if I could get the cleaning
kits to work, I'd rather find a printer where I can avoid this headache.

So, is there any such thing as an all-in-one ink jet printer that does not
suffer from this problem if it is not used regularly? Question #2 is, are
any of the all-in-one laser printers any good and work (all functions) with
Fedora Linux?

Thanks,
--Greg


If replacing your current unit, I suggest exploring color laser 
technology instead of ink jet.  May not be that much more expensive

and the printer can sit at idle power with no problems.

I'd recommend one that has network connectivity and does PostScript
(or manufacturer's emulation, like Brother's BR-3).

--
Jon H. LaBadie  jo...@jgcomp.com
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Python libraries problem with F34

2021-07-06 Thread Barry


> On 6 Jul 2021, at 03:38, Frederic Muller  wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 7/6/21 3:34 AM, Barry wrote:
>>> Hi and thank you!
>>> 
>>> Actually Felix from the devel list 'smelled' the issue right away: I 
>>> install libraries through pip without a virtual environment. I should 
>>> either used rpm packages or create venv and use pip for that environment.
>> It’s fine to install packages with pip install —user. Use of venv is very 
>> useful, but not mandatory.
>> 
>> Barry
> Actually it's not. That's what I do all the time. Rather than copying the 
> explanation, I'll point whoever is interested into the explanations and the 
> resolution *it seems to be a very common problem users are facing apparently*:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JNBGOXQ73P6VSOWYHGRT7T2IMMJ7RPSD/

I read all of the thread, i am on the dev list.

It told you to never install into the fedora system python directories, which 
it appears you did.
It did not tell you that installing the user dirs will break fedora.

Barry

> 
> Thank you all for the help.
> 
> Fred
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: OT: ink jet printers

2021-07-06 Thread Tom Horsley
On Wed, 07 Jul 2021 02:05:25 +0930
Tim via users wrote:

> I believe some people have good luck with the Brother brand, too.

My ancient Brother is going strong, and even prints nice and
crisp again since I recently replaced both of the "consumable"
cartridges. But it is just a printer, not an all-in-one.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: OT: ink jet printers

2021-07-06 Thread Tim via users
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 09:57 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> I have found a number of ink jet all-in-ones that work well on
> Fedora, from Epson, HP, and Brother. The problem is that I don't use
> the printer all that much, and every single one of them eventually
> (after I've had it for a few months) develops a head clog that is so
> bad that not even the printer's cleaning cycle can fix it.

That's a general problem with the inkjet technology.  That, and wasting
lots of ink in their cleaning cycle before they'll print.  I've got an
all-in-one that insists on wasting several minutes cleaning the heads
even if I just want to use the scanner by itself.

I've not heard of any that don't behave like that (clogging and ink
wasting), and was advised to just print something once a week or so,
whether you needed to, or not. Print a small shopping list, bank
statement, something like that.

For printing I use an old HP LaserJet.  HP has been one of the better
manufacturers for producing hardware that worked on Linux.  Any that
have built in networking and support postscript is a promising sign of
being usable (e.g. search for those models first, then see if you can
find Linux info).

I believe some people have good luck with the Brother brand, too.

Now that Macs use CUPs for printing, it should be easier to find a
printer that works with Linux.

-- 
 
uname -rsvp
Linux 5.11.21-100.fc32.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri May 14 18:03:50 UTC 2021 x86_64
 
Boilerplate:  All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


OT: ink jet printers

2021-07-06 Thread Greg Woods
Well, not completely OT because I do need one that will work on Fedora.

I have found a number of ink jet all-in-ones that work well on Fedora, from
Epson, HP, and Brother. The problem is that I don't use the printer all
that much, and every single one of them eventually (after I've had it for a
few months) develops a head clog that is so bad that not even the printer's
cleaning cycle can fix it. I have tried some of the cleaning kits with not
much success (I'm a lousy handyman), and even if I could get the cleaning
kits to work, I'd rather find a printer where I can avoid this headache.

So, is there any such thing as an all-in-one ink jet printer that does not
suffer from this problem if it is not used regularly? Question #2 is, are
any of the all-in-one laser printers any good and work (all functions) with
Fedora Linux?

Thanks,
--Greg
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: GRUB_DEFAULT entry

2021-07-06 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 10:11:01AM -0400, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
> grub seems to now ignore the settings in /etc/default/grub. What is needed
> to restore the function of setting a specific boot option?

I've noticed that GRUB2 on Fedora uses BootLoaderSpec (see this page: 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BootLoaderSpecByDefault ),
however, if you (or an RPM scriptlet) uses the 'grubby' command to
change the kernel parameters, in the individual /boot/loader/entries/
files, the 'options $kernelopts' line is replaced with the full kernel
options, and they're never updated again even if you change the
/etc/default/grub settings.  FWIW, the nvidia packages use grubby in
an RPM post script, so people who use those often run into this.

It looks like this has been reported:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651686

I'm not sure if Fedora needs to do a better job documenting this
behavior, or if it should just be fixed so people aren't confused by
this. Maybe something like "These settings only affect when the system
is loaded and changing them won't affect a running system's grub" in
the /etc/default/grub file?

-- 
Jonathan Billings 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: downloading a complete web page without using a browser...

2021-07-06 Thread D
On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 14:31:29 +0900
step...@xemacs.org wrote:

> Samuel Sieb writes:
>  > On 2021-07-03 8:02 p.m., dwoody5...@gmail.com wrote:
>  > > the url I am trying to download does not have an extension ie. no
>  > > '.htm' such as:
>  > > https://my.acbl.org/club-results/details/338288
> 
> The extension doesn't matter to any of the utilities mentioned as far
> as I know.  I'm pretty sure they get the MIME type from the HTTP
> Content-Type header.
> 
>  > > wget does not download the correct web page.
>  > 
>  > I tried it and it worked, sort of.  The problem is that you want to 
>  > download everything to view it offline, but the site my.acbl.org has a 
>  > robots.txt that says "no robots allowed".  So wget respects that and 
>  > will not download any required files from that site other than the 
>  > initial page.  curl probably has the same issue.
> 
> 1.  The page does not have content represented in HTML AFAICT: it's a
> blob which is parsed and formatted by a battery of (java)scripts,
> some of which are resources on the Internet, and some are inline.
> In other words, the HTML in that file is used as a container format
> to transport the scripts to the browser.
> Neither wget nor curl support Javascript at all as far as I know.
> 
> 2.  96% of the page is in two blobs; AFAICT there were no IMG or other
> elements that specify requirements by URL.  If so, that would
> explain why only the top page was downloaded.
> 
> 3.  curl does not document how it handles robots.txt.  Since as far as
> I can tell curl has no recursive or get-requirements option, it
> probably doesn't handle it at all.
> wget documents that wget -r (recursive downloads) respects
> robots.txt.  It does not document that wget -p (get page
> requisites, too) respects robots.txt, but a quick test suggests
> that it does.  I think this is a bug: any interactive program that
> supports non-text media will download required resources with the
> access to the HTML file.  (If someone agrees and wants to do
> something about it, this is a wget bug, not a Fedora bug.)
> 
> I don't have an alternative fetch tool to suggest, unfortunately.  I
> think that you need to use a graphical browser somehow, or write a
> script in your favorite P-language.
> 
> Steve

Thanks for the info.

I have been using a script called save-page-as.sh that runs firefox. I have
changed the save-page-as in firefox to use the 'Web Page, complete' The
savd-page-as.sh script sends a ctls-s to firefox and saves the page. It works
perfectly when run from the command line. I have tried to use the
save-page-as.sh script by sending an email to my computer. It does not run
firefox for some reason. In searching it says that firefox can be run from a
cron script by exporting DISPLAY. Running from a cron script, I would
think, is similar to running a script from an email (using procmailrc) no luck
, however.

env shows :0.0. I have tried several variations:
export DISPLAY=:0
export DISPLAY=:0.0
export DISPLAY=:0.1

with no luck.

Perhaps there is another setting that need to be included as well.

Any thoughts?

David

> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List
> Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List
> Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread Tim via users
Tim, with mangled quoting by crapmail programs, come on you've had
decades to get this shit right:

>  > I reckon the default thought of most people who're suddenly faced
> with
>  > a computer failing a security test is not going to be that
> something
>  > has changed on them without authority, but that something has gone
>  > wrong.  They're going to try and reset something, rather than work
> out
>  > if they've been compromised.

Stephen J. Turnbull
> Indeed.  Pragmatically speaking, I don't think they're wrong, do you?


Quite probably it *is* a fault, nine times out of ten (which makes you
ignore the time it's really a problem).

With badly engineered hardware, software, and stupidly worded error
messages, the blame is really not on the user.

-- 
 
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.31.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 10 13:32:12 UTC 2021 x86_64
 
Boilerplate:  All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread Ed Greshko

On 06/07/2021 20:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 20:22 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 06/07/2021 20:08, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

It's annoying when banks decide to "improve" security by requiring
their customers to use a specific platform rather than a general
standard. All banks here use smartcards but the personal terminal
is
just an offline card reader with a display.

It is only the Post Office Bank here that requires the Smart Card
Reader.  The Post Office
also sells the a reader to make things "easier".  I suspect they take
a piece of the action.
:-) :-)

And require a Windows machine to use it? Personally. I'd look for a
different bank. Here the bank just gives you the card reader when you
open an account.


We have accounts at other banks.  But the P O account is tied into paying house 
taxes,
electric bill, gas bill and others.  Too much of a pain to change.

--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


GRUB_DEFAULT entry

2021-07-06 Thread Robert McBroom via users
grub seems to now ignore the settings in /etc/default/grub. What is 
needed to restore the function of setting a specific boot option?

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 20:22 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/07/2021 20:08, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > It's annoying when banks decide to "improve" security by requiring
> > their customers to use a specific platform rather than a general
> > standard. All banks here use smartcards but the personal terminal
> > is
> > just an offline card reader with a display.
> 
> It is only the Post Office Bank here that requires the Smart Card
> Reader.  The Post Office
> also sells the a reader to make things "easier".  I suspect they take
> a piece of the action.
> :-) :-)

And require a Windows machine to use it? Personally. I'd look for a
different bank. Here the bank just gives you the card reader when you
open an account.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread Ed Greshko

On 06/07/2021 20:08, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

It's annoying when banks decide to "improve" security by requiring
their customers to use a specific platform rather than a general
standard. All banks here use smartcards but the personal terminal is
just an offline card reader with a display.


It is only the Post Office Bank here that requires the Smart Card Reader.  The 
Post Office
also sells the a reader to make things "easier".  I suspect they take a piece 
of the action.
:-) :-)

--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 19:21 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/07/2021 18:56, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 14:34 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > > Patrick writes:
> > > 
> > >   > I think much depends on what the TPM is used for. Certainly
> > > if the
> > >   > user takes care not to subvert the intention, it can
> > > reasonably be
> > >   > used to ensure that only trusted software is run.
> > > 
> > > "Pragmatically speaking ..." ;-)  Seriously, I think TPM mostly
> > > makes
> > > sense with VMs.  People who write programs are generally going to
> > > be
> > > very unhappy with the amount of kissing up to the TPM they have
> > > to
> > > do.
> > > Like, on Mac every time LLVM releases a new version of the
> > > debugger I
> > > have to go through the self-signing dance.  So far I have been
> > > satisfied with the results every time (there really are new
> > > features
> > > or performance improvements), but it's infrequent enough that I
> > > have
> > > no memory of the procedure, let alone muscle memory.
> > Indeed. I have no particular interest in TPM as such. My original
> > question was aimed at anticipating possible issues with VMs and
> > Windows
> > 11 if I ever get round to installing it, but that seems to be
> > resolved.
> > 
> 
> Yes, I installed Windows 11 in a VM just fine with an emulated TPM. I
> don't actually use
> Windows all that much.  But, for what I use it Windows 11 does seem
> to do it better.
> I only use it mainly for the WebATM of the Taiwan Post Office Bank.
> In Windows 10 I had to get the
> sequence just right for plugging in the USB smart card reader and
> inserting my bank
> card.
> 
> Still sucks that the Post Office doesn't support Linux.  :-(

It's annoying when banks decide to "improve" security by requiring
their customers to use a specific platform rather than a general
standard. All banks here use smartcards but the personal terminal is
just an offline card reader with a display.

oic 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread Ed Greshko

On 06/07/2021 18:56, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 14:34 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

Patrick writes:

  > I think much depends on what the TPM is used for. Certainly if the
  > user takes care not to subvert the intention, it can reasonably be
  > used to ensure that only trusted software is run.

"Pragmatically speaking ..." ;-)  Seriously, I think TPM mostly makes
sense with VMs.  People who write programs are generally going to be
very unhappy with the amount of kissing up to the TPM they have to
do.
Like, on Mac every time LLVM releases a new version of the debugger I
have to go through the self-signing dance.  So far I have been
satisfied with the results every time (there really are new features
or performance improvements), but it's infrequent enough that I have
no memory of the procedure, let alone muscle memory.

Indeed. I have no particular interest in TPM as such. My original
question was aimed at anticipating possible issues with VMs and Windows
11 if I ever get round to installing it, but that seems to be resolved.



Yes, I installed Windows 11 in a VM just fine with an emulated TPM. I don't 
actually use
Windows all that much.  But, for what I use it Windows 11 does seem to do it 
better.
I only use it mainly for the WebATM of the Taiwan Post Office Bank. In Windows 
10 I had to get the
sequence just right for plugging in the USB smart card reader and inserting my 
bank
card.

Still sucks that the Post Office doesn't support Linux.  :-(

--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 14:34 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Patrick writes:
> 
>  > I think much depends on what the TPM is used for. Certainly if the
>  > user takes care not to subvert the intention, it can reasonably be
>  > used to ensure that only trusted software is run.
> 
> "Pragmatically speaking ..." ;-)  Seriously, I think TPM mostly makes
> sense with VMs.  People who write programs are generally going to be
> very unhappy with the amount of kissing up to the TPM they have to
> do.
> Like, on Mac every time LLVM releases a new version of the debugger I
> have to go through the self-signing dance.  So far I have been
> satisfied with the results every time (there really are new features
> or performance improvements), but it's infrequent enough that I have
> no memory of the procedure, let alone muscle memory.

Indeed. I have no particular interest in TPM as such. My original
question was aimed at anticipating possible issues with VMs and Windows
11 if I ever get round to installing it, but that seems to be resolved.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread Stephen Morris

On 6/7/21 20:33, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 19:42 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:

Is this directly on the hardware or in a VM? If the former, it
would
appear to be a bug. If the latter, presumably the VM is emulating
the
TPM.

Windows is Windows 10 and it is native, I boot the machine into
Windows
10. Fedora is running inside a Vmware Player Vm hosted on the Windows
10
machine the screenshot is from.

That would indicate that the hardware does have TPM but that the VM
isn't detecting it, possibly because it hasn't been configured in
VMware. In my case the host is Linux and the guest is Windows. The host
doesn't have hardware TPM but the guest (using QEMU/KVM) is emulating
it.

I don't know what the screenshot shows. I don't see anything related to
TPM.
Sorry, I thought the "TPM Manufacturer Section" of the TPM output was 
indicating there was a TPM when it indicated the version.

Maybe I don't actually have the hardware.

regards,
Steve



poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: DNF not Installing all Updates?

2021-07-06 Thread Stephen Morris

On 5/7/21 21:51, Stephen Morris wrote:

On 1/7/21 19:55, Stephen Morris wrote:

On 29/6/21 07:37, old sixpack13 wrote:

On 28/6/21 10:18, Ed Greshko wrote:
I usually ignore the "nothing to do"
situation as well and just issue
the command again the next time I'm ready to put on updates again. 
It is
a bit disconcerting though when Discover reports there being, in my 
case
638MB of Fedora System Updates as opposed to application updates, 
right

from the first boot of F34 after a fresh install, and that calculation
of how many updates are available never changes irrespective of how 
many
updates are applied by dnf and how often. I've had F34 installed in 
the

vm for probably around 6 months, and Discover has never stopped
reporting 638MB of System Updates until I actually put them on.

regards,
Steve

what happens when you do in an terminal:
sudo flatpak update
and afterwards in your "software center" (discovery ?)
a refresh/new search for updates

???

I've seen similar about "~600 MB platform update" which stuck 
somehow on F34/F33 (?)

the above fixed it
I ran sudo flatpak update in the terminal and opened discover after 
the update finished and Discover said it had 129 updates to be applied.
I check dnf and it said it had 124 package updates and 4 installs, 
which I applied. After rebooting Discover still said it had 34 
updates to put on, which are below.


Sorry, it looks like I forgot to add the screenshot, I'll try it again 
the next time I'm doing an update.
I ran a sudo flatpak update again and ran Discover and it said there 
were 38 updates, and sudo dnf upgrade said there were 38 updates. When I 
put on all the updates with dnf and rebooted the vm, Discover said 
everything was up-to-date. I guess I'll just have to keep an eye on it 
and see what happens.


regards,
Steve



regards,
Steve




regards,
Steve

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 19:42 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
> > Is this directly on the hardware or in a VM? If the former, it
> > would
> > appear to be a bug. If the latter, presumably the VM is emulating
> > the
> > TPM.
> Windows is Windows 10 and it is native, I boot the machine into
> Windows
> 10. Fedora is running inside a Vmware Player Vm hosted on the Windows
> 10 
> machine the screenshot is from.

That would indicate that the hardware does have TPM but that the VM
isn't detecting it, possibly because it hasn't been configured in
VMware. In my case the host is Linux and the guest is Windows. The host
doesn't have hardware TPM but the guest (using QEMU/KVM) is emulating
it.

I don't know what the screenshot shows. I don't see anything related to
TPM.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Python libraries problem with F34

2021-07-06 Thread George N. White III
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 at 23:37, Frederic Muller  wrote:

> On 7/6/21 3:34 AM, Barry wrote:
>
> Hi and thank you!
>
> Actually Felix from the devel list 'smelled' the issue right away: I install 
> libraries through pip without a virtual environment. I should either used rpm 
> packages or create venv and use pip for that environment.
>
> It’s fine to install packages with pip install —user. Use of venv is very 
> useful, but not mandatory.
>
> Barry
>
> Actually it's not. That's what I do all the time. Rather than copying the
> explanation, I'll point whoever is interested into the explanations and the
> resolution *it seems to be a very common problem users are facing
> apparently*:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JNBGOXQ73P6VSOWYHGRT7T2IMMJ7RPSD/
>
> Thank you all for the help.
>

Thanks for the followup.   I use a NASA command-line batch processing
package
that just came out with a new version.   They replaced most of the shell
scripts with
python, which has been generating problem reports, many related to
"requests",
so it is indeed a very common problem.

Too many linux users are doing "sudo pip install ...".   I'm beginning to
think  Google
should downgrade search hits that contain "sudo" and also add a
"potentially unsafe"
warning to such links.

-- 
George N. White III
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Windows 11 VMs

2021-07-06 Thread Stephen Morris

On 6/7/21 00:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 21:42 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:

On 4/7/21 07:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 22:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

Just have to add the tpm device to your vm using virsh.

I'll have to give that a try.  My Win10 VM doesn't have that
device.



Oh, I'd never noticed.  It is in virt-manager "add hardware"
section.

You're right. Even better.

Just tried it using the default settings and it worked. After
booting
Windows 10, type 'tpm' into a Windows Shell (admin) instance and it
confirms the module exists.

Interesting, the windows command you have listed indicates that I
have
an AMD V2.0 tpm, which I assume is in the ryzen cpu, but Fedora via
journalctl | grep -i tpm tells me a tpm doesn't exist.

Is this directly on the hardware or in a VM? If the former, it would
appear to be a bug. If the latter, presumably the VM is emulating the
TPM.
Windows is Windows 10 and it is native, I boot the machine into Windows 
10. Fedora is running inside a Vmware Player Vm hosted on the Windows 10 
machine the screenshot is from.
From the screenshot in the attachment I assume it is telling me that 
under Windows 10 it is finding a tpm, is that correct?


regards,
Steve



poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: downloading a complete web page without using a browser...

2021-07-06 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 2021-07-05 10:30 p.m., Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:

On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 12:26 PM Samuel Sieb  wrote:


On 2021-07-03 8:02 p.m., dwoody5...@gmail.com wrote:

the url I am trying to download does not have an extension ie. no '.htm' such
as:
https://my.acbl.org/club-results/details/338288

wget does not download the correct web page.


I tried it and it worked, sort of.  The problem is that you want to
download everything to view it offline, but the site my.acbl.org has a
robots.txt that says "no robots allowed".  So wget respects that and
will not download any required files from that site other than the
initial page.  curl probably has the same issue.
___


for wget
https://gist.github.com/u0d7i/87aa962311f2a7c739aa


Ok, that solves it.  I was able to download everything and opening the 
resulting file in Firefox didn't have any network access.  I was able to 
see the entire page and even interact with it somewhat.

wget -e robots=off -EHkp https://my.acbl.org/club-results/details/338288
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure