[389-users] Re: 389 1.3 vs 1.4, CentOS 7
389ds 1.3 is not a product so there is no EOL date, but the 1.3.x branches become less active over time, and eventually with zero activity, more like an archive. The Red Hat Directory Server 10 / RHDS-10 product based on 389ds 1.3.x has been EOL on RHEL-7, and the current active version is RHDS-11 on RHEL-8, based on 389ds 1.4.x M. On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 7:50 AM Morgan Jones wrote: > Thanks Thierry. Does 389 1.3 have an end of life date? > > We are a large school district and aren’t yet running Redhat 8 and may not > for a bit—another team makes that call. > > -morgan > > > > On Nov 10, 2021, at 4:45 AM, Thierry Bordaz wrote: > > > > Hi Morgan, > > > > 389 1.3 and 1.4 are both advisable in production. You may hit some > dependencies difficulties building 1.4 on centos7, as 1.3 was released on > centos7 and 1.4 on centos8. > > > > I would suggest that you upgrade to centos8 as 1.4 contains more > features and improvements but if you target centos7 then 1.3 is the version > to go. > > > > my 2cts > > > > regards > > thierry > > > > On 11/10/21 4:18 AM, Morgan Jones wrote: > >> Hello! > >> > >> Is it advisable to run 389 1.3 in production? > >> > >> If not is there a suggested way to install 1.4 in CentOS 7? On first > blush to install 389 from source it’s looking like I’m going to need to > install libicu from source, the version that ships is an older version: > >> > >>> checking for ICU... no > >>> configure: error: Package requirements (icu-i18n >= 60.2) were not met: > >>> > >>> Requested 'icu-i18n >= 60.2' but version of icu-i18n is 50.2 > >> > >> thank you, > >> > >> -morgan > >> ___ > >> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > >> List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > > > ___ > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
OT: Cannot cut/past from Fedore 35 host to VMware Fedora guest
Hi all; I know this is off topic. I have installed Fedore 35 on a Levovo P73, it's running great! I installed VMware Workstation Pro 16, and it worked with no adjustments, but I cannot copy / paste between the Fedora 35 host and a Fedora 35 guest Thanks in advance for any suggestions ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Action required: Account system IRC pointer reset
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 08:40:32AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 5:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > Greetings everyone. > > > > As you know, we migrated a while back from freenode.net to libera.chat for > > our IRC networks, > > and we also migrated to a new account system. After these moves, we would > > like to clear any > > IRC information that could be no longer correct and allow users to update > > their accounts > > with the correct information. > > > > The old Fedora account system had a ‘irc nick’ field. The new Fedora > > account system has > > a ‘Chat nicknames’ section. In that section you can put IRC nick(s) or > > Matrix Ids. > > If you do not qualify them, they are assumed to be for the libera.chat > > (IRC) and fedora.im (matrix) networks. > > > > Groups in both the old and new account system have a details section often > > containing links to mailing list and irc channel. > > > > On 2021-11-10 we are going to remove from the account system all users > > ‘Chat nicknames’ values > > and adjust all groups irc channel links from freenode.net to libera.chat. > > Users are encouraged > > to login after this time and enter their current and correct Chat nicknames. > > > > Will an additional announcement be going out once this change has been > applied, so we know when to update our nicks? Yes. This change is applied. Please update at your leasure. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Possible to uninstall wayland on Fedora 34? google is failing me....
Thank you to everyone who provided advice and/or suggestions! ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Possible to uninstall wayland on Fedora 34? google is failing me....
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 10:59 AM Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 08:31:13AM -0500, Go Canes wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:56 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > >Yes, I discovered this. I tried a dnf remove on each of the > >individual *wayland* packages that were installed, and all of them > >want to more-or-less take the entire system with them. > > Does that mean you don't have possibly all necessary *xorg* packages > installed to enable KDE to run without the *wayland* ones? I was probably too imprecise. "dnf remove '*wayland*" wants to remove several packages that at a glance I think shouldn't be removed. Several xorg packages, python3 stuff, plasma stuff, emacs, etc. All told 855 packages occupying 3G of space, which is why I haven't listed them here ;-). It is possible that I could "rpm -e - nodeps *wayland*" to get rid of them, and maybe still have a usable system. But I think for now I will stay with Ed Greshko's suggestion and only remove plasma-workspace-wayland - it will prevent my non-technical clients from accidentally choosing wayland. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Apache umask
For some time I've been trying to get apache to enable group write when creating a directory. I've tried every method I found by searching the internet: 1) Add umask.conf to /etc/systemd/system/httpd.service.d containing: [Service] UMask=002 This did make is so that files created by apache had group write permissions, but not directories. 2) echo "umask 002" >> /etc/sysconfig/httpd Nothing works that I have tried. Directories written by apache always have drwdr-sdr-x permissions. What am I missing? Emmett ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Possible to uninstall wayland on Fedora 34? google is failing me....
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 08:31:13AM -0500, Go Canes wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:56 AM Ed Greshko wrote:
The "problem" is that dependencies will, if you use the conventional dnf
commands, will take the
plasma X11 stuff with it.
Yes, I discovered this. I tried a dnf remove on each of the
individual *wayland* packages that were installed, and all of them
want to more-or-less take the entire system with them.
Does that mean you don't have possibly all necessary *xorg* packages
installed to enable KDE to run without the *wayland* ones?
If in doubt:
You wrote you have KDE Plasma installed. So you probably have
installed the "KDE Plasma Workspaces (kde-desktop-environment)" group
("dnf group list kde-desktop-environment"). Right?
If you want to check the dependencies for this group:
dnf group info -v kde-desktop-environment
The result of the last line should yield a "mandatory group" for
"base-x". And with base-x should come a whole bunch of xorg packages.
("dnf group info -v base-x")
Here the result of the last command shows the ones missing in a
different colour.
Wolfgang
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[389-users] Re: 389 1.3 vs 1.4, CentOS 7
Thanks Thierry. Does 389 1.3 have an end of life date? We are a large school district and aren’t yet running Redhat 8 and may not for a bit—another team makes that call. -morgan > On Nov 10, 2021, at 4:45 AM, Thierry Bordaz wrote: > > Hi Morgan, > > 389 1.3 and 1.4 are both advisable in production. You may hit some > dependencies difficulties building 1.4 on centos7, as 1.3 was released on > centos7 and 1.4 on centos8. > > I would suggest that you upgrade to centos8 as 1.4 contains more features and > improvements but if you target centos7 then 1.3 is the version to go. > > my 2cts > > regards > thierry > > On 11/10/21 4:18 AM, Morgan Jones wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Is it advisable to run 389 1.3 in production? >> >> If not is there a suggested way to install 1.4 in CentOS 7? On first blush >> to install 389 from source it’s looking like I’m going to need to install >> libicu from source, the version that ships is an older version: >> >>> checking for ICU... no >>> configure: error: Package requirements (icu-i18n >= 60.2) were not met: >>> >>> Requested 'icu-i18n >= 60.2' but version of icu-i18n is 50.2 >> >> thank you, >> >> -morgan >> ___ >> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Does the program llvm break all the hardware or only some of it ?
Cher Stan, J'ai une panne matériel sur le nouveau matériel, Ce week-end je teste au moyen d'un bipper si je le retrouve ou fais chaque test manuellement, Merci d'avance de comprendre que ça va durer plus longtemps que prévu le retour du système, Je garde ce fil de discussion dans mon dossier important et reviendra quand il y aura du nouveau, Bonne semaine, Cordialement. Dorian Rosse. From: stan via users Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 9:03:13 PM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: stan Subject: Re: Does the program llvm break all the hardware or only some of it ? On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 11:26:48 + Dorian ROSSE wrote: > Does my system was broken because i have removed the program zoo ? Non! Courez uname -r et cat /etc/fedora-release et envoyez le result ici, s'il vous plaît. Merçi. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Action required: Account system IRC pointer reset
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 5:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings everyone. > > As you know, we migrated a while back from freenode.net to libera.chat for > our IRC networks, > and we also migrated to a new account system. After these moves, we would > like to clear any > IRC information that could be no longer correct and allow users to update > their accounts > with the correct information. > > The old Fedora account system had a ‘irc nick’ field. The new Fedora account > system has > a ‘Chat nicknames’ section. In that section you can put IRC nick(s) or Matrix > Ids. > If you do not qualify them, they are assumed to be for the libera.chat (IRC) > and fedora.im (matrix) networks. > > Groups in both the old and new account system have a details section often > containing links to mailing list and irc channel. > > On 2021-11-10 we are going to remove from the account system all users ‘Chat > nicknames’ values > and adjust all groups irc channel links from freenode.net to libera.chat. > Users are encouraged > to login after this time and enter their current and correct Chat nicknames. > Will an additional announcement be going out once this change has been applied, so we know when to update our nicks? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: last BT update buggy with my Logitech MX Master 3
On 10/11/2021 19:38, Frederic Muller wrote: BT packages just got updated and everything seems to be back to normal. Thank you! Yeah Looking at the changelog for bluez. * Sun Nov 07 2021 Adam Williamson - 5.62-2 - Revert an upstream change to fix problems with Logitech MX mice (#2019970 -- On Facebook it is called Vaguebooking. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: last BT update buggy with my Logitech MX Master 3
On 11/10/21 16:36, Ed Greshko wrote: On 09/11/2021 17:14, Frederic Muller wrote: On 11/5/21 06:38, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/11/2021 19:13, Frederic Muller wrote: I lost my dog yesterday so.. not going to venture into anything in the upcoming few days. I am actually using F34 and not 35 as stated previously. I'll probably do a fresh install of F35 and see how it goes. Sorry for your loss. I know the feeling with having lost kitty members of the family. Thank you. When you update to F35 let us know if things improve. Same is happening with F35 unfortunately. What kernel are you running? Your issues may be related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019788 BT packages just got updated and everything seems to be back to normal. Thank you! Fred ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: nothing provides libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) needed by viber-16.1.0.37-2.x86_64
On 11/10/21 05:35, Samuel Sieb wrote: They really need to update their software. You can get the last build of the compat openssl package from F33 at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1574056 or you could try the appimage from their site. That might work. That did work indeed. Thank you. I'll still try to contact them but it seems they don't really wish their customers to get in touch much. Thank you. Fred ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: nothing provides libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) needed by viber-16.1.0.37-2.x86_64
On 11/9/21 22:25, stan via users wrote: On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 3:40 AM Frederic Muller wrote: Hi! Viber desktop user here and it seems I can't install the latest version as I'm getting this message: nothing provides libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) needed by viber-16.1.0.37-2.x86_64 Any workaround? Don't know if this will work. Older crypto policies have been turned off in the latest fedora versions. Try the command, update-crypto-policies --set LEGACY to see if viber will then work. If it will, then you will have to run with the deprecated crypto policies, or ask viber to update their package to use stronger encryption. You can use update-crypto-policies --set DEFAULT to get the stronger encryption again. Thank you. I'll try to see how to contact them. Definitely will wait to use it. Fred ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[389-users] Re: 389 1.3 vs 1.4, CentOS 7
Hi Morgan, 389 1.3 and 1.4 are both advisable in production. You may hit some dependencies difficulties building 1.4 on centos7, as 1.3 was released on centos7 and 1.4 on centos8. I would suggest that you upgrade to centos8 as 1.4 contains more features and improvements but if you target centos7 then 1.3 is the version to go. my 2cts regards thierry On 11/10/21 4:18 AM, Morgan Jones wrote: Hello! Is it advisable to run 389 1.3 in production? If not is there a suggested way to install 1.4 in CentOS 7? On first blush to install 389 from source it’s looking like I’m going to need to install libicu from source, the version that ships is an older version: checking for ICU... no configure: error: Package requirements (icu-i18n >= 60.2) were not met: Requested 'icu-i18n >= 60.2' but version of icu-i18n is 50.2 thank you, -morgan ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: last BT update buggy with my Logitech MX Master 3
On 09/11/2021 17:14, Frederic Muller wrote: On 11/5/21 06:38, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/11/2021 19:13, Frederic Muller wrote: I lost my dog yesterday so.. not going to venture into anything in the upcoming few days. I am actually using F34 and not 35 as stated previously. I'll probably do a fresh install of F35 and see how it goes. Sorry for your loss. I know the feeling with having lost kitty members of the family. Thank you. When you update to F35 let us know if things improve. Same is happening with F35 unfortunately. What kernel are you running? Your issues may be related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019788 -- On Facebook it is called Vaguebooking. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
