Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Joe Zeff

On 10/01/2023 05:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:




That would be considered an install, not an upgrade in the usual 
understanding of those concepts.  I had the same question when reading that.


I'm looking at it as an upgrade, because /home will be preserved, but 
YMMV and clearly does in this case.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Joe Zeff

On 10/01/2023 05:30 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:




I don't know why it's not working for you, unless there's something 
funny with your BIOS.  Have you tried both UEFI and legacy modes?
I created a boot drive using dd with the Workstation image and it worked 
fine on everything I've tried, including an old mac mini which is now 
running Fedora.


As I posted earlier, I tried it on both my laptop and my desktop and got 
the same results.  It's hard to get into the laptop's BIOS if the 
drive's inserted, and if it isn't, any attempt to leave just opens it up 
again.  I've sent a request to the OEM for email help on getting past 
this, but I don't expect a response until tomorrow at least.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Joe Zeff

On 10/01/2023 05:30 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:




Which iso image is this?  Since you've renamed it, there's no indication 
of what it is.


I didn't rename it, that's the generic name used in the example I was 
given.  The .iso I'm using is Fedora-Xfce-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 10/1/23 16:04, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 10/01/2023 04:52 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:


I'm not sure I understand: You don't try an install with the LiveUSB
but instead try to upgrade from F25 to F38 ... ?


My laptop's hard drive died, and I need to install Fedora on it.  Then, 
I'll use the flash drive to install F38 on my desktop, upgrading it all 
the way in one step.  What's hard to understand?


That would be considered an install, not an upgrade in the usual 
understanding of those concepts.  I had the same question when reading that.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 10/1/23 15:46, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 10/01/2023 04:38 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't know what the context is here, but are you sure you're booting 
from the USB?  If there's grub installed on the internal hard drive, 
but missing partitions or something, then you'll get that.




The laptop has a new drive, unformatted and I'm trying to get Fedora 
installed on it.  My desktop has a working system on it, but if I try to 
boot from the flashdrive, it fails in the same way that it does on my 
laptop.



dd if=f38.iso of=/dev/sdX bs=1M


Which iso image is this?  Since you've renamed it, there's no indication 
of what it is.


That's good.  You can mount the USB drive to verify that the files are 
there.


I did and it does.


I don't know why it's not working for you, unless there's something 
funny with your BIOS.  Have you tried both UEFI and legacy modes?
I created a boot drive using dd with the Workstation image and it worked 
fine on everything I've tried, including an old mac mini which is now 
running Fedora.



And the correction was using M instead of m.


Shouldn't matter either way, other than probably being more efficient 
with M.


If so, why did dd fail until I used M instead of m?


Sorry, I forgot the result of the earlier thread.  "m" is invalid.  The 
two options are "M" and "MB".

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Joe Zeff

On 10/01/2023 04:52 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:


I'm not sure I understand: You don't try an install with the LiveUSB
but instead try to upgrade from F25 to F38 ... ?


My laptop's hard drive died, and I need to install Fedora on it.  Then, 
I'll use the flash drive to install F38 on my desktop, upgrading it all 
the way in one step.  What's hard to understand?

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer

On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 04:32:03PM -0600, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 10/01/2023 04:21 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:

8M should be fine, according to
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/creating-and-using-a-live-installation-image/index.html#_using_a_direct_write_method


I'm using F25, and hope to use the drive to upgrade my desktop after
I've gotten the laptop working, and that page calls for packages that
don't exist for my box.


I'm not sure I understand: You don't try an install with the LiveUSB
but instead try to upgrade from F25 to F38 ... ?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Joe Zeff

On 10/01/2023 04:38 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't know what the context is here, but are you sure you're booting 
from the USB?  If there's grub installed on the internal hard drive, but 
missing partitions or something, then you'll get that.




The laptop has a new drive, unformatted and I'm trying to get Fedora 
installed on it.  My desktop has a working system on it, but if I try to 
boot from the flashdrive, it fails in the same way that it does on my 
laptop.



dd if=f38.iso of=/dev/sdX bs=1M


That's good.  You can mount the USB drive to verify that the files are 
there.




I did and it does.


And the correction was using M instead of m.


Shouldn't matter either way, other than probably being more efficient 
with M.


If so, why did dd fail until I used M instead of m?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer

On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 04:23:54PM -0600, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 10/01/2023 04:21 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:


8M should be fine, according to
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/creating-and-using-a-live-installation-image/index.html#_using_a_direct_write_method


Is there any reason to think that using 1M caused the issue I'm
seeing? [ .. ]


No, I don't think so. But 8M probably finishes the dd faster than 1M.
Convenience - nothing more .. :)

Again: I'd use UEFI to boot the thumb, and try another one if it fails
...
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 10/1/23 12:39, Joe Zeff wrote:
Recently, I had trouble creating a LiveUSB and asked for help here.  I 
was given instructions on how to create it using dd, and followed them 
after correcting a slight error in the instructions.  Now, I've finally 
got my laptop back, and tried to use the flash drive.  All that happens 
is a grub> prompt.  I don't know what went wrong, or how to correct it. 
This is the command that I used:


I don't know what the context is here, but are you sure you're booting 
from the USB?  If there's grub installed on the internal hard drive, but 
missing partitions or something, then you'll get that.



dd if=f38.iso of=/dev/sdX bs=1M


That's good.  You can mount the USB drive to verify that the files are 
there.



And the correction was using M instead of m.


Shouldn't matter either way, other than probably being more efficient 
with M.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Joe Zeff

On 10/01/2023 04:21 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:

8M should be fine, according to
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/creating-and-using-a-live-installation-image/index.html#_using_a_direct_write_method


I'm using F25, and hope to use the drive to upgrade my desktop after 
I've gotten the laptop working, and that page calls for packages that 
don't exist for my box.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Couple of Thunderbird pains

2023-10-01 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 10/1/23 10:43, Lester Petrie wrote:


On 10/1/2023 5:51 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Sat, 2023-09-30 at 14:43 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:

On 9/30/23 14:40, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 09/30/2023 03:18 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:

As far as I know, there aren't any options for local storage.

I mean there are no options for what type of storage Thunderbird uses

for local storage.  It only has the format Mozilla has always used,
which I think is something like mbox with an index.


mbox is the default, but you can select Maildir when you create the 
account, at least when you are using imap.


I've never seen any options like that and still don't when I tried it again.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Joe Zeff

On 10/01/2023 04:21 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:


8M should be fine, according to
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/creating-and-using-a-live-installation-image/index.html#_using_a_direct_write_method


Is there any reason to think that using 1M caused the issue I'm seeing? 
If not, why does it matter?

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer

Did you enter the BIOS/UEFI boot menu and start the LiveUSB from there?

On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 01:39:47PM -0600, Joe Zeff wrote:

Recently, I had trouble creating a LiveUSB and asked for help here.  I
was given instructions on how to create it using dd, and followed them
after correcting a slight error in the instructions.  Now, I've
finally got my laptop back, and tried to use the flash drive.  All
that happens is a grub> prompt.  I don't know what went wrong, or how
to correct it. This is the command that I used:

dd if=f38.iso of=/dev/sdX bs=1M


8M should be fine, according to
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/creating-and-using-a-live-installation-image/index.html#_using_a_direct_write_method
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


NVME messages in journal since last kernel upgrade

2023-10-01 Thread t_pol
Hi all.

after last kernel upgrade to 6.5.5-100 I have a lot of message in the
journal generated by "nvme" (never seen before).

Is there someone with the same problem?

Thanks in advance for any answer.

Ciao,
Angelo

--
Host:   HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cs0xxx
OS: Fedora Linux 37 (Xfce) x86_64
Kernel: 6.5.5-100.fc37.x86_64
DE: Xfce 4.16 
CPU:Intel i7-8550U (4) @ 4.000GHz

/dev/nvme0n1 vendor: Western Digital model: PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006
--

Here a few messages
==
...
Oct 01 21:13:48 kernel: nvme nvme0: I/O 6 QID 0 timeout, completion polled
Oct 01 21:17:17 kernel: nvme nvme0: I/O 23 QID 0 timeout, completion polled 
Oct 01 21:47:48 kernel: nvme nvme0: I/O 6 QID 0 timeout, completion polled
...
==
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Joe Zeff

On 10/01/2023 04:03 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:

To use dd, you have to unmount the drive, did you do that?

We need more information on the laptop to help.


I'm almost certain that I unmounted the drive.  I think I remember 
having it fail if the drive were mounted.  And, before I posted on the 
list, I rebooted my desktop (blowing away 42 days of uptime) and tried 
to boot from the drive and got exactly the same result, so it's not my 
laptop, it's either the flashdrive or the .iso.  BTW, Gparted reports it 
as being bootable if that matters.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Sun Oct01'23 01:39:47PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> From: Joe Zeff 
> Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 13:39:47 -0600
> To: Fedora 
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users 
> Subject: LiveUSB doesn't boot
>
> Recently, I had trouble creating a LiveUSB and asked for help here.  I was
> given instructions on how to create it using dd, and followed them after
> correcting a slight error in the instructions.  Now, I've finally got my
> laptop back, and tried to use the flash drive.  All that happens is a grub>
> prompt.  I don't know what went wrong, or how to correct it. This is the
> command that I used:
>
> dd if=f38.iso of=/dev/sdX bs=1M
>
> And the correction was using M instead of m.

It is not clear to me if things work.

To use dd, you have to unmount the drive, did you do that?

We need more information on the laptop to help.

Ranjan

> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: sendmail

2023-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer

On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 11:22:47PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:

Hello,

It seems that 09/09, the sendmail was working fine, but not on 09/16.


What was happenning in between these dates: software updates, your
changes?



Now I get

systemctl start sendmail.service
[ ... ]



Sep 30 23:08:29 Sappho sendmail[88774]: My unqualified host name (Sappho) 
unknown; sleeping for retry
Sep 30 23:09:15 Sappho systemd[1]: sendmail.service: start operation timed out. 
Terminating.
[ ... ]



I have in
/etc/hostname
Sappho

in /etc/host.conf
multi on

in /etc/hosts
# Loopback entries; do not change.
# For historical reasons, localhost precedes localhost.localdomain:
127.0.0.1   localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 localhost4.localdomain4
::1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost6 localhost6.localdomain6



I also run sendmail. The only config differences between your 3
files above and mine (apart from comments, and my hostname) is
in the first line of /etc/hosts:

yours:
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 localhost4.localdomain4

mine:
127.0.0.1   localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 
localhost4.localdomain4

What does typing 'hostname -f' give on your computer? If it results in
an error, I'd try adding 'Sappho', which seems to be your hostname,
after '127.0.0.1' in the line above, and leave the rest unchanged. Then
again: 'hostname -f' - if that still gives errors, I'd either restart
sendmail, or whatever. Even better: I'd reboot ...

Good luck!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


LiveUSB doesn't boot

2023-10-01 Thread Joe Zeff
Recently, I had trouble creating a LiveUSB and asked for help here.  I 
was given instructions on how to create it using dd, and followed them 
after correcting a slight error in the instructions.  Now, I've finally 
got my laptop back, and tried to use the flash drive.  All that happens 
is a grub> prompt.  I don't know what went wrong, or how to correct it. 
This is the command that I used:


dd if=f38.iso of=/dev/sdX bs=1M

And the correction was using M instead of m.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Couple of Thunderbird pains

2023-10-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2023-10-01 at 13:43 -0400, Lester Petrie wrote:
> 
> On 10/1/2023 5:51 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2023-09-30 at 14:43 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > On 9/30/23 14:40, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > > > On 09/30/2023 03:18 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > > > As far as I know, there aren't any options for local storage.
> > > > I mean there are no options for what type of storage
> > > > Thunderbird uses
> > > for local storage.  It only has the format Mozilla has always
> > > used,
> > > which I think is something like mbox with an index.
> 
> mbox is the default, but you can select Maildir when you create the 
> account, at least when you are using imap.

Good to know. I would have been surprised if TB didn't support it,
though there's no reason it should be restricted to IMAP.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Couple of Thunderbird pains

2023-10-01 Thread Lester Petrie


On 10/1/2023 5:51 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Sat, 2023-09-30 at 14:43 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:

On 9/30/23 14:40, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 09/30/2023 03:18 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:

As far as I know, there aren't any options for local storage.

I mean there are no options for what type of storage Thunderbird uses

for local storage.  It only has the format Mozilla has always used,
which I think is something like mbox with an index.


mbox is the default, but you can select Maildir when you create the 
account, at least when you are using imap.




That explains the "compacting". Mbox has one file per mail folder, and
leaves holes when mails are deleted, so the mbox file doesn't actually
shrink until it's copied and renamed, i.e. "compacted". This can cause
issues with locking, especially if the mbox is on a remote mount.
Maildir is a better solution which has no locking issues and doesn't
require compacting.

I'm sure you know all this, but others may not.

poc

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-01 Thread stan via users
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 09:18:59 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry  wrote:

> On Wed, 27 Sep 2023, stan via users wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:06:46 -0500 (CDT)
> > I think it is done by running javascript through your version of
> > firefox.  Do you have noscript add-on installed?  That will block
> > any  
> 
> Noscript was already installed nand active.
> It did not complain.
> 
> > javascript from a site, and you will have to turn on the urls that
> > you want to be able to run javascript.  I'm not sure how effective
> > that would be in this case, since cloudfront.net is often needed
> > because many sites use it as their host.  But, I expect that the
> > problem url would show up differently in noscript, and you would be
> > able to leave it disabled.  Usually, cloudfront.net is disabled
> > automatically for other urls.  I'm not willing to test that
> > expectation, for obvious reasons. :-)  
> 
> I'm not clear on what this means.
> The url window showed .cloudfront.net .
> 
> > You could test whether this is the solution by installing noscript,
> > shutting down and restarting firefox to clear the cache of allowed
> > sites (that is a setting in the privacy tab), and then visiting the
> > site again. The site should be blocked, and you can click on the  
> 
> I already had noscript installed and it did not complain.
> 
> > noscript icon to see the list of urls that have been blocked from
> > running javascript.  If you want to experience the thrill again, you
> > can allow javascript from the above problem address for
> > confirmation. Then, turn it off, and the recovery is what you have
> > already discovered.  
> 
> Once the site was active,
> all I could click on was an always-on application that was already
> running. The site seemed to have made firefox
> fullscreen and turned off all its buttons.
> 
> Javascript is client-side, correct?
> The problem went away after disabling networking.
> 
> Is there a way to tell firefox never to let a website take it
> fullscreen? Failing that, is there a way to tell firefox to never go
> fullscreen at all?
> 
> 
An alternative that you could use when visiting dodgy sites is to use
firefox profiles.  It is as if you are running as a different user when
you use one.
/usr/bin/firefox --new-instance --ProfileManager
will allow you to select, create, and delete profiles.  You could
create one called darkweb, that has everything locked down, and use it
only for visiting dodgy sites.  And even then, you could also use a
container tab within it, so it is very restricted in its actions and
access. Because these profiles are separate instances of firefox, you
have to install all the add-ons and customizations for each one.
Otherwise, you just get a default firefox instance.

I also use them in the opposite way, when I know a website is
legitimate, I reduce the security for that site in that profile.  On
sites like youtube, this helps restrict tracking (a little) when going
into the belly of the beast (Google).
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-01 Thread stan via users
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 09:18:59 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry  wrote:
> Noscript was already installed nand active.
> It did not complain.
> 
> I'm not clear on what this means.
> The url window showed .cloudfront.net .
> 
> I already had noscript installed and it did not complain.
> 

Then you have cloudfront.net whitelisted in noscript.  The only way to
block javascript is by having it turned off for a site when you first
visit it.  If you have it whitelisted, the javascript runs before you
have a chance to intercept.

I do not have any of the cloud servers whitelisted.  When a site comes
up, if it isn't a site I've visited before, I check the list of third
party sites that are blocked.  If there is a cloud server site there, I
usually click to temporarily allow it, if the site seems legitimate.  Is
this disruptive to smooth web browsing, does it take work / effort?
Yes. But that is the nature of security.  If you don't want to do this,
then you need to install something like ublock-origin, that you can
tune to specific websites. It also blocks javascript, but requires more
effort because it is more fine grained (to specific site and even
subdomains).  So, more work up front, but then should do the right
thing from then on.  I don't visit so many unknown sites that I bother
doing this.

> Once the site was active,

The javascript has already run in order for the site to be active.

> all I could click on was an always-on application that was already
> running. The site seemed to have made firefox
> fullscreen and turned off all its buttons.
> 
> Javascript is client-side, correct?

It is fetched from the web site and run client side if it has
permission.

> The problem went away after disabling networking.

I wonder if it was downloading the content of your computer that
firefox had access to, maybe your history or your bookmarks, etc.
Or maybe, it had set up the javascript to run continuously, downloading
in a loop from its website.  Any application monitoring the web
connection could show this if it was allowed to run.

> Is there a way to tell firefox never to let a website take it
> fullscreen? Failing that, is there a way to tell firefox to never go
> fullscreen at all?

I'm not aware of a way, but if you ask on the mozilla forums, there
are some really knowledgeable people there who might know a way.
There are a *lot* of settings in about:config, and without application
knowledge it is really hard to tell what they actually do.  As George
said, this is not solving the problem though.  The javascript might
just ignore, or issue a warning, if it can't specify fullscreen.

I can't remember, were you able to bring up a console
(Ctrl-Alt-[F2-F6])?  If you could get to a console, you could use ps
or top to see what is running and top or kill to kill applications
(like firefox), iotop to see what web traffic is doing.  Look in the
journal, etc.  My understanding is that javascript designed for guis
can't run there, so you would not be blocked from any access.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: fedora 38: grainy printing with hp lj pro mfp m130fw

2023-10-01 Thread Doug Herr
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023, at 2:08 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> Thanks for your replies.
> My model is this one:
> https://support.hp.com/us-en/product/details/hp-laserjet-pro-mfp-m130-series/model/9365374
> In support and drivers it makes me go here at the end:
> https://developers.hp.com/hp-linux-imaging-and-printing/supported_devices/index
> where for my printer I find:
>
> Model namemin hplip version  chrome os 
> support 
> HP LaserJet Pro MFP m130fw3.16.11 Yes  

Doing a general google search with that model plus "linux" I ended up with the 
suggestion to download and install the version of hplip found at:

https://developers.hp.com/hp-linux-imaging-and-printing

That page says: "The current version of the HPLIP solution is version 3.23.8"

So I checked what F38 is offering:

Installing:
 hplip  x86_64   3.23.5-8.fc38   updates   20 M

So we are close, but not at the bleeding edge here. Maybe it would worth the 
hassle of trying a manual install of it. If you do just make sure to watch 
where everything goes so that you can clean it back up if it does not help.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: fedora 38: grainy printing with hp lj pro mfp m130fw

2023-10-01 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
It seems that configuring it via cups and using the driverless option of
discovered network printers gives the best results in printing quality.
Connected to the cupsd through https://localhost:631 in a browser:
Administration
authentication with root
Add printer
In "discovered network printers" section I get these 3 options:

HP LaserJet MFP M130fw (3330D5) (HP LaserJet MFP M129-M134)
HP LaserJet MFP M130fw (HP LaserJet MFP M129-M134)
HP LaserJet MFP M129-M134 (driverless) (HP LaserJet MFP M129-M134)

I chose the "(driverless)" one.
>From what I understand the .ppd file should be created on the fly with
cupsd communicating with the printer itself about its capabilities.
In /etc/cups/printers.conf I get at the end:

configuration made by hplip and using ppd described in the beginning of the
thread:


PrinterId 6
UUID urn:uuid:54d8b569-230d-3b4b-6257-e384254c5030
Info
Location
MakeModel HP LaserJet MFP m129-m134, hpcups 3.23.5
DeviceURI hp:/net/HP_LaserJet_MFP_M129-M134?ip=192.168.1.223
State Idle
StateTime 1695995051
ConfigTime 1695022167
Type 36868
Accepting Yes
Shared Yes
JobSheets none none
QuotaPeriod 0
PageLimit 0
KLimit 0
OpPolicy default
ErrorPolicy stop-printer



PrinterId 8
UUID urn:uuid:5cb90984-e18c-32b4-4ca2-50fac32da52a
AuthInfoRequired none
Info HP LaserJet MFP M129-M134 driverless
Location unitedStates
MakeModel LaserJet MFP M129-M134 - IPP Everywhere
DeviceURI ipps://NPI3330D5.local:631/ipp/print
State Idle
StateTime 1696161542
ConfigTime 1696161247
Type 36868
Accepting Yes
Shared No
JobSheets none none
QuotaPeriod 0
PageLimit 0
KLimit 0
OpPolicy default
ErrorPolicy stop-printer
Attribute marker-colors \#00,none
Attribute marker-levels 97,79
Attribute marker-low-levels 3,1
Attribute marker-high-levels 100,100
Attribute marker-names Black Cartridge HP CF217A,Imaging Drum HP CF219A
Attribute marker-types toner,opc
Attribute marker-change-time 1696161525


corresponding files under /etc/cups/ppd are quite different:

diff HP_LaserJet_MFP_M129-M134_driverless.ppd HP_LaserJet_MFP_M129-M134.ppd
1a2,4
> * PPD file for HP LaserJet MFP m129-m134 with CUPS.
> * Created by the CUPS PPD Compiler CUPS v2.4.6.
> *% (c) 2008 Copyright HP Development Company, LP
3c6
< *FileVersion: "2.4"
---
> *FileVersion: "3.23.5"
5a9,25
> *PCFileName: "hp-laserjet_mfp_m129-m134.ppd"
> *Product: "(HP LaserJet Pro MFP m132a)"
> *Product: "(HP LaserJet Pro MFP m132nw)"
> *Product: "(HP LaserJet Pro MFP m132snw)"
> *Product: "(HP LaserJet Pro MFP m134a)"
> *Product: "(HP LaserJet Pro MFP m132fw)"
> *Product: "(HP LaserJet Pro MFP m132fn)"
> *Product: "(HP LaserJet Pro MFP m132fp)"
> *Product: "(HP LaserJet Pro MFP m134fn)"
> *Product: "(HP LaserJet Pro MFP m130a)"
> *Product: "(HP LaserJet Pro MFP m130nw)"
> *Product: "(HP LaserJet Pro MFP m130fn)"
> *Product: "(HP LaserJet Pro MFP m130fw)"
> *Manufacturer: "HP"
> *ModelName: "HP LaserJet MFP m129-m134"
> *ShortNickName: "HP LaserJet MFP m129-m134 hpijs"
> *NickName: "HP LaserJet MFP m129-m134, hpcups 3.23.5"
8,14d27
< *FileSystem: False
< *PCFileName: "ippeve.ppd"
< *Manufacturer: "HP"
< *ModelName: "LaserJet MFP M129-M134"
< *Product: "(LaserJet MFP M129-M134)"
< *NickName: "LaserJet MFP M129-M134 - IPP Everywhere"
< *ShortNickName: "LaserJet MFP M129-M134 - IPP Everywhere"


with hplip configured one being hp-laserjet_mfp_m129-m134.ppd and the new
and better one being ippeve.ppd (I presume created on the fly while
configuring)

Gianluca
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: fedora 38: grainy printing with hp lj pro mfp m130fw

2023-10-01 Thread George N. White III
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 6:09 AM Gianluca Cecchi 
wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 9:01 PM George N. White III 
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 12:33 PM Patrick O'Callaghan <
>> pocallag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> [snip]
>
>>
>>> I've had good results just by uninstalling the manufacturer's driver
>>> (Brother in my case) and configuring the printer/scanner to use IPP.
>>>
>>
>> <
>> https://support.hp.com/us-en/product/product-specs/hp-laserjet-ultra-mfp-m134-printer-series/9365381
>> >
>> says this model is USB only, so does not have native support for IPP.
>>
>>>
>>> I recently saw a news item saying (IIRC) that MS intend to remove
>>> proprietary drivers from future Windows versions and "encouraging"
>>> manufacturers to use standard protocols, so at some future time expect
>>> them to stop supporting specific drivers for Linux.
>>>
>>
>> Vendors aren't maintaining their legacy drivers so they often break
>> when used with newer kernels.  That leaves users relying on community
>> supported PPD's.  It may be possible support IPP using older drivers
>> in a VM..
>>
>> --
>> George N. White III
>>
>>
>>
> Thanks for your replies.
> My model is this one:
>
> https://support.hp.com/us-en/product/details/hp-laserjet-pro-mfp-m130-series/model/9365374
> In support and drivers it makes me go here at the end:
>
> https://developers.hp.com/hp-linux-imaging-and-printing/supported_devices/index
> where for my printer I find:
>
> Model namemin hplip version  chrome os
> support
> HP LaserJet Pro MFP m130fw3.16.11 Yes
>
> driver plug-in   Support level   print mode   scan to pc  pc send fax
>  connectivity
> NoFull  Mono   Yes
> Yes   USB,Network
>
> I'm trying to see then what the hoto here suggests
>

If your model supports network access, check for Apple AirPrint.
Currently, Airprint is
essentially the same as IPP  (Apple could change IPP support anytime, but
if you have
IPP working on non-Apple devices.you may not be affected until you install
some HP
update to your printer to support the new AirPrint).

With IPP you should install legacy CUPS PPD's as IPP provides the
information that
used to come in PPD's directly from the printer.

-- 
George N. White III
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Couple of Thunderbird pains

2023-10-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2023-09-30 at 14:43 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 9/30/23 14:40, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 09/30/2023 03:18 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > As far as I know, there aren't any options for local storage.
> > 
> > If you use POP3 as I do, all mail is stored in local storage.  You
> > can 
> > have it left on the server so that you can download it onto another
> > box, 
> > but you don't have to.
> 
> I mean there are no options for what type of storage Thunderbird uses
> for local storage.  It only has the format Mozilla has always used, 
> which I think is something like mbox with an index.

That explains the "compacting". Mbox has one file per mail folder, and
leaves holes when mails are deleted, so the mbox file doesn't actually
shrink until it's copied and renamed, i.e. "compacted". This can cause
issues with locking, especially if the mbox is on a remote mount.
Maildir is a better solution which has no locking issues and doesn't
require compacting.

I'm sure you know all this, but others may not.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: monitoring of fed/web severs

2023-10-01 Thread bruce
Hi Peter..

Was your email directed to me specifically regarding my
needs/questions? Or to the list in general?

Thanks

-bruce

On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 3:59 AM Peter Boy  wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > Am 01.10.2023 um 01:08 schrieb bruce :
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > To all you sys admin -- real or just good!
> >
> > I'm doing some thought/research prep to figure out what's required to
> > monitor remote (cloud) web servers, and the services running on the
> > instance.
> >
> > Ie, what apps/services should be used
> > -3rd party apps running/pointed to the box
> > -what  should be tracked/monitored?
> > -are there "recipes" to use to be used as a starting point?
> > -things "not" to do  -- things "to" do..
> >
> > Good/Better/Best practices...
> > Server security processes
> > User attacking the server
> > Traffic attacking the web Server process..
> >
> > Whatever the list has to offer, I'd be interested in seeing/hearing.
> >
> > thanks much
> >
> > ps. The use case is a couple of test servers, running different
> > webSites, with different mysql db. The apps will be php/javascript for
> > the most part.
> >
> > thanks!!
> > ___
>
>
> As Fedora Server WG we are starting to  pursue a project to use an ARM SBC 
> (very low power consumption) to create a dedicated 24/7 monitor appliance. 
> Currently, I'm leaning towards OpenNMS (https://www.opennms.com/horizon/) as 
> the monitor software of choice. Icinga might be an alternative. Maybe we can 
> cooperate on this.
>
>
> Best
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Boy
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
> p...@fedoraproject.org
>
> Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)
>
> Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
> Fedora Docs team contributor and board member
> Java developer and enthusiast
>
>
>
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: fedora 38: grainy printing with hp lj pro mfp m130fw

2023-10-01 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 9:01 PM George N. White III 
wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 12:33 PM Patrick O'Callaghan <
> pocallag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> [snip]

>
>> I've had good results just by uninstalling the manufacturer's driver
>> (Brother in my case) and configuring the printer/scanner to use IPP.
>>
>
> <
> https://support.hp.com/us-en/product/product-specs/hp-laserjet-ultra-mfp-m134-printer-series/9365381
> >
> says this model is USB only, so does not have native support for IPP.
>
>>
>> I recently saw a news item saying (IIRC) that MS intend to remove
>> proprietary drivers from future Windows versions and "encouraging"
>> manufacturers to use standard protocols, so at some future time expect
>> them to stop supporting specific drivers for Linux.
>>
>
> Vendors aren't maintaining their legacy drivers so they often break
> when used with newer kernels.  That leaves users relying on community
> supported PPD's.  It may be possible support IPP using older drivers
> in a VM..
>
> --
> George N. White III
>
>
>
Thanks for your replies.
My model is this one:
https://support.hp.com/us-en/product/details/hp-laserjet-pro-mfp-m130-series/model/9365374
In support and drivers it makes me go here at the end:
https://developers.hp.com/hp-linux-imaging-and-printing/supported_devices/index
where for my printer I find:

Model namemin hplip version  chrome os
support
HP LaserJet Pro MFP m130fw3.16.11 Yes

driver plug-in   Support level   print mode   scan to pc  pc send fax
 connectivity
NoFull  Mono   Yes
Yes   USB,Network

I'm trying to see then what the hoto here suggests

Gianluca
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: monitoring of fed/web severs

2023-10-01 Thread Peter Boy



> Am 01.10.2023 um 01:08 schrieb bruce :
> 
> Hi.
> 
> To all you sys admin -- real or just good!
> 
> I'm doing some thought/research prep to figure out what's required to
> monitor remote (cloud) web servers, and the services running on the
> instance.
> 
> Ie, what apps/services should be used
> -3rd party apps running/pointed to the box
> -what  should be tracked/monitored?
> -are there "recipes" to use to be used as a starting point?
> -things "not" to do  -- things "to" do..
> 
> Good/Better/Best practices...
> Server security processes
> User attacking the server
> Traffic attacking the web Server process..
> 
> Whatever the list has to offer, I'd be interested in seeing/hearing.
> 
> thanks much
> 
> ps. The use case is a couple of test servers, running different
> webSites, with different mysql db. The apps will be php/javascript for
> the most part.
> 
> thanks!!
> ___


As Fedora Server WG we are starting to  pursue a project to use an ARM SBC 
(very low power consumption) to create a dedicated 24/7 monitor appliance. 
Currently, I'm leaning towards OpenNMS (https://www.opennms.com/horizon/) as 
the monitor software of choice. Icinga might be an alternative. Maybe we can 
cooperate on this. 


Best
Peter

--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org

Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)

Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora Docs team contributor and board member
Java developer and enthusiast



___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue