Re: Is this true ?
DJ Delorie wrote: >> Wasn't the original quote "With great power there must also come >> great responsibility" ? José Matos: > Yes, and it first appeared in the comics before the movies. :-) It's a wee bit older than that... "Voltaire, the French author first coined the phrase “with great power comes great responsibility” only to have it (the phrase) memorialized and thrust into American folklore through Uncle Ben’s cautionary warning to a young Peter Parker, a/k/a Spider-Man." https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2023/03/06/with-great-power-comes-great-responsibility/ -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.108.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jan 25 16:17:31 UTC 2024 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: finding missing font file (eurm10.map)
On Thu Feb08'24 09:47:29PM, Jerry James wrote: > From: Jerry James > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:43 PM Ranjan Maitra via users > wrote: > > Thanks, this did not do anything different. Are you sure that this font is > > in this package? > > $ rpm -ql texlive-amsfonts > ... > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/afm/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.afm > ... > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.tfm > ... > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.pfb > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.pfm > ... > > Maybe the "at 600" part is significant? We have reached the limits of > my knowledge, I'm afraid. Hopefully somebody else will know what is > going on. Yes, I hope so too. Thank you again! Best wishes, Ranjan -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: finding missing font file (eurm10.map)
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:43 PM Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > Thanks, this did not do anything different. Are you sure that this font is in > this package? $ rpm -ql texlive-amsfonts ... /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/afm/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.afm ... /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.tfm ... /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.pfb /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.pfm ... Maybe the "at 600" part is significant? We have reached the limits of my knowledge, I'm afraid. Hopefully somebody else will know what is going on. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: finding missing font file (eurm10.map)
On Thu Feb08'24 05:56:26PM, Jerry James wrote: > From: Jerry James > Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 17:56:26 -0700 > To: Community support for Fedora users > CC: Ranjan Maitra > Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users > Subject: Re: finding missing font file (eurm10.map) > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 5:10 PM Ranjan Maitra via users > wrote: > > Thanks, yes, I do have it installed! > > > > $ sudo dnf install texlive-amsfonts > > Last metadata expiration check: 1:15:21 ago on Thu 08 Feb 2024 04:52:50 PM > > CST. > > Package texlive-amsfonts-11:svn61937-69.fc39.noarch is already installed. > > Dependencies resolved. > > Nothing to do. > > Complete! > > In that case I suggest reinstalling it so that the texlive triggers fire > again. Thanks, this did not do anything different. Are you sure that this font is in this package? Thanks again for your help! Best wishes, Ranjan -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: finding missing font file (eurm10.map)
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 5:10 PM Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > Thanks, yes, I do have it installed! > > $ sudo dnf install texlive-amsfonts > Last metadata expiration check: 1:15:21 ago on Thu 08 Feb 2024 04:52:50 PM > CST. > Package texlive-amsfonts-11:svn61937-69.fc39.noarch is already installed. > Dependencies resolved. > Nothing to do. > Complete! In that case I suggest reinstalling it so that the texlive triggers fire again. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: kernels > 6.5.12-300.fc39.x86_64 do not boot
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 1:56 PM olivares33561 via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Dear Fellow Fedora users, > > I have installed and tried to boot the 6.6.X kernels in fedora and now the > latest one 6.7.3 one and > have not seen a successful boot of such a kernel. I have had to delete > the kernels every time I try them. > Have you tried watching the boot messages (either press or edit the command line in the GRUB2 menu by pressing "e" and removing the "rhgb quiet")? I assume you can boot an older kernel. You may get some error messages for failed boots using journalctl. > > $ sudo dnf remove kernel-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > Dependencies resolved. > > > Package ArchVersion Repository > Size > > > Removing: > kernel-core x86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @updates > 66 M > Removing dependent packages: > kernelx86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @updates > 0 > kernel-modulesx86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @updates > 57 M > kernel-modules-core x86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @updates > 32 M > kernel-modules-extra x86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @updates > 2.4 M > > Transaction Summary > > > Remove 5 Packages > > Freed space: 157 M > Is this ok [y/N]: y > Running transaction check > Transaction check succeeded. > Running transaction test > Transaction test succeeded. > Running transaction > Preparing: > 1/1 > Erasing : kernel-modules-extra-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 1/5 > Running scriptlet: kernel-modules-extra-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 1/5 > Erasing : kernel-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 2/5 > Running scriptlet: kernel-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 2/5 > Erasing : kernel-modules-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 3/5 > Running scriptlet: kernel-modules-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 3/5 > Erasing : kernel-modules-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 4/5 > Running scriptlet: kernel-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 5/5 > Erasing : kernel-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 5/5 > Running scriptlet: kernel-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 5/5 > Verifying: kernel-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 1/5 > Verifying: kernel-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 2/5 > Verifying: kernel-modules-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 3/5 > Verifying: kernel-modules-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 4/5 > Verifying: kernel-modules-extra-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > 5/5 > > Removed: > kernel-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > > kernel-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > > kernel-modules-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > > kernel-modules-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > > kernel-modules-extra-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 > > > Complete! > olivares@fedora:~/Downloads/kerTeX/Documents/Documents/mptmp$ sudo lspci > 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 4c53 (rev 01) > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation RocketLake-S GT1 [UHD > Graphics 730] (rev 04) > 00:04.0 Signal processing controller: Intel Corporation Device 4c03 (rev > 01) > 00:08.0 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Device 4c11 (rev 01) > 00:12.0 Signal processing controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH > Thermal Controller > 00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake USB 3.1 xHCI Host > Controller > 00:14.2 RAM memory: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH Shared SRAM > 00:14.3 Network controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH CNVi WiFi > 00:15.0 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH Serial IO > I2C Controller #0 > 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake HECI > Controller > 00:17.0 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake SATA AHCI Controller > 00:1b.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCI Express Root Port #21 > (rev f0) > 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 06bc (rev f0) > 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation H470 Chipset LPC/eSPI Controller > 00:1f.3 Audio device: Intel Corporation Device f1c8 > 00:1f.4 SMBus: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH SMBus Controller > 00:1f.5 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH SPI > Controller > 02:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: KIOXIA Corporation NVMe SSD > Controller BG4 (DRAM-less) > 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device 2600 > (rev 21) > olivares@fedora:~/Downloads/kerTeX/Documents/Documents/mptmp$ sudo lsusb > Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub > Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c534 Logitech, Inc. Unifying Receiver > Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:0129 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. RTS5129 Card > Reader Controller > Bus 001 Device 004: ID 8087:0026 Intel Corp. AX201 Bluetooth > Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub >
Re: finding missing font file (eurm10.map)
On Thu Feb08'24 04:52:13PM, Jerry James wrote: > From: Jerry James > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 4:48 PM Ranjan Maitra via users > wrote: > > On a fully updated F39 system, I get the following font error when I run > > LaTeX: > > > > kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode / --bdpi 600 --mag 1+0/600 --dpi 600 > > eurm10 > > mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for eurm10. > > mktexpk: perhaps eurm10 is missing from the map file. > > kpathsea: Appending font creation commands to missfont.log. > > (see the transcript file for additional information) > > !pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file eurm10): Font eurm10 at 600 not found > > > > I looked around and came across a post from 2020 on Arch forums that says > > that I potentially need texlive-most, however this is not available on F39. > > > > How do I get around the above error? > > On my system, that font file is in the texlive-amsfonts package. Do > you have that installed already? Thanks, yes, I do have it installed! $ sudo dnf install texlive-amsfonts Last metadata expiration check: 1:15:21 ago on Thu 08 Feb 2024 04:52:50 PM CST. Package texlive-amsfonts-11:svn61937-69.fc39.noarch is already installed. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! Best wishes, Ranjan -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: finding missing font file (eurm10.map)
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 4:48 PM Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > On a fully updated F39 system, I get the following font error when I run > LaTeX: > > kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode / --bdpi 600 --mag 1+0/600 --dpi 600 > eurm10 > mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for eurm10. > mktexpk: perhaps eurm10 is missing from the map file. > kpathsea: Appending font creation commands to missfont.log. > (see the transcript file for additional information) > !pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file eurm10): Font eurm10 at 600 not found > > I looked around and came across a post from 2020 on Arch forums that says > that I potentially need texlive-most, however this is not available on F39. > > How do I get around the above error? On my system, that font file is in the texlive-amsfonts package. Do you have that installed already? -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
finding missing font file (eurm10.map)
Hi, On a fully updated F39 system, I get the following font error when I run LaTeX: kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode / --bdpi 600 --mag 1+0/600 --dpi 600 eurm10 mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for eurm10. mktexpk: perhaps eurm10 is missing from the map file. kpathsea: Appending font creation commands to missfont.log. (see the transcript file for additional information) !pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file eurm10): Font eurm10 at 600 not found I looked around and came across a post from 2020 on Arch forums that says that I potentially need texlive-most, however this is not available on F39. How do I get around the above error? Many thanks for your suggestions, and my very best wishes, Ranjan -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Is this true ?
On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 13:39 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > Wasn't the original quote "With great power there must also come > great responsibility" ? Yes, and it first appeared in the comics before the movies. :-) -- José Abílio -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Strange keyboard shortcut on cinnamon
On 2/8/24 08:59, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote: On 2/7/24 00:55, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2/6/24 05:40, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote: I'm under cinnamon. For some time now, the keyboard shortcut Ctrl+Alt+T randomly delivers a Konsole or a gneome-terminal, which I find very annoying. I tried to disable the shortcut and re-enable it, to disable all extensions, etc, nothing changes really. My gsetting do not mention konsole at all. The ones that seem relevant look reasonable to me, so I'm a bit lost... org.cinnamon.desktop.default-applications.terminal exec 'gnome-terminal' org.cinnamon.desktop.default-applications.terminal exec-arg '--' org.cinnamon.desktop.keybindings.media-keys terminal ['t'] I don't know why you would get a Konsole, but those settings look like you would get a gnome-terminal using that key combination. That is also my expectation and the behaviour I want But, I'm still getting Konsole quite often instead Your original question was very unclear. So the real problem is that sometimes you get konsole instead and you don't want that. I wonder if konsole has also somehow registered for that shortcut. Check its settings or maybe just see if you can uninstall it. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: kernels > 6.5.12-300.fc39.x86_64 do not boot
olivares33561 composed on 2024-02-08 17:56 +): > I have installed and tried to boot the 6.6.X kernels in fedora and now the > latest one 6.7.3 one and > have not seen a successful boot of such a kernel. I have had to delete the > kernels every time I try them. ... > $ sudo lspci > 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 4c53 (rev 01) > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation RocketLake-S GT1 [UHD > Graphics 730] (rev 04) > 00:04.0 Signal processing controller: Intel Corporation Device 4c03 (rev 01) > 00:08.0 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Device 4c11 (rev 01) > 00:12.0 Signal processing controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH > Thermal Controller > 00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake USB 3.1 xHCI Host > Controller > 00:14.2 RAM memory: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH Shared SRAM > 00:14.3 Network controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH CNVi WiFi > 00:15.0 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH Serial IO I2C > Controller #0 > 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake HECI Controller > 00:17.0 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake SATA AHCI Controller > 00:1b.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCI Express Root Port #21 > (rev f0) > 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 06bc (rev f0) > 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation H470 Chipset LPC/eSPI Controller > 00:1f.3 Audio device: Intel Corporation Device f1c8 > 00:1f.4 SMBus: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH SMBus Controller > 00:1f.5 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH SPI Controller > 02:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: KIOXIA Corporation NVMe SSD > Controller BG4 (DRAM-less) > 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device 2600 (rev > 21) > olivares@fedora:~/Downloads/kerTeX/Documents/Documents/mptmp$ sudo lsusb > Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub > Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c534 Logitech, Inc. Unifying Receiver > Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:0129 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. RTS5129 Card > Reader Controller > Bus 001 Device 004: ID 8087:0026 Intel Corp. AX201 Bluetooth > Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub ... > When booting the kernels I tried to see where they were stopping, the boot > showed loading the usb mouse/keyboard combination, but showed disabled. I > tried booting with regular usb mouse and keyboard and the same thing happens, > the kernel does not boot. Secure boot is on. Do not know what to do to get > the newer kernels to boot. I dont create a bugzilla because I no longer use > the email that was associated with bugzilla. The newer kernels do work on > raspberry pi though, so it may be related to the hardware? with secure boot > and signed kernels, I cannot seem to find what is going on. > Is there a BIOS setting I can try? RAID ON/RAID OFF, running on nvme0 > internel disk. Was running on a solid state disk(SSD) before. I have same GPU as you, maybe same CPU, running F39 on NVME, though not with secure boot. I have no such trouble as yet with any kernel since 6.5: # inxi -C --vs --zl --hostname inxi 3.3.33-00 (2024-02-06) CPU: Info: 6-core model: 11th Gen Intel Core i5-11400 bits: 64 type: MT MCP cache: L2: 3 MiB Speed (MHz): avg: 809 min/max: 800/4400 cores: 1: 800 2: 800 3: 800 4: 800 5: 800 6: 800 7: 800 8: 800 9: 800 10: 800 11: 910 12: 801 # inxi -GSaz System: Kernel: 6.6.13-200.fc39.x86_64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 2.40-13.fc39 clocksource: tsc avail: hpet,acpi_pm parameters: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz root=LABEL=tm8p15f39 noresume audit=0 ipv6.disable=1 net.ifnames=0 consoleblank=0 preempt=full mitigations=off Desktop: TDE (Trinity) v: R14.1.1 tk: Qt v: 3.5.0 wm: Twin v: 3.0 with: kicker vt: 7 dm: 1: TDM 2: XDM Distro: Fedora Linux 39 (Thirty Nine) Graphics: Device-1: Intel RocketLake-S GT1 [UHD Graphics 730] vendor: ASUSTeK driver: i915 v: kernel arch: Gen-12.1 process: Intel 10nm built: 2020-21 ports: active: DP-1,HDMI-A-1,HDMI-A-2 empty: HDMI-A-3 bus-ID: 00:02.0 chip-ID: 8086:4c8b class-ID: 0300 Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 1.20.14 compositor: Twin v: 3.0 driver: X: loaded: modesetting dri: iris gpu: i915 display-ID: :0 screens: 1 Screen-1: 0 s-res: 3600x2640 s-dpi: 120 s-size: 762x558mm (30.00x21.97") s-diag: 944mm (37.18") Monitor-1: DP-1 pos: primary,bottom-l model: Acer K272HUL serial: built: 2018 res: 2560x1440 hz: 60 dpi: 109 gamma: 1.2 size: 598x336mm (23.54x13.23") diag: 686mm (27") ratio: 16:9 modes: max: 2560x1440 min: 720x400 Monitor-2: HDMI-A-1 mapped: HDMI-1 pos: top-left model: NEC EA243WM serial: built: 2011 res: 1920x1200 hz: 60 dpi: 94 gamma: 1.2 size: 519x324mm (20.43x12.76") diag: 612mm (24.1") ratio: 16:10 modes: max: 1920x1200 min: 640x480 Monitor-3: HDMI-A-2 mapped: HDMI-2 pos: top-right model: Dell P2213 serial: built: 2012 res: 1680x1050 hz: 60
Re: Is this true ?
Lee Thomas Stephen writes: > With Great Power comes great responsibility (Spiderman movie) Wasn't the original quote "With great power there must also come great responsibility" ? The shorter version implies the responsibility is part of the power, but the longer version creates an onus to provide the responsibility yourself. > I wonder whether the current generation of Redhatters knows the power > that they wield. Yes, which is why we believe in free software and open source. We want others to have that power for themselves, too. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
kernels > 6.5.12-300.fc39.x86_64 do not boot
Dear Fellow Fedora users, I have installed and tried to boot the 6.6.X kernels in fedora and now the latest one 6.7.3 one and have not seen a successful boot of such a kernel. I have had to delete the kernels every time I try them. $ sudo dnf remove kernel-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 Dependencies resolved. Package ArchVersion Repository Size Removing: kernel-core x86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @updates 66 M Removing dependent packages: kernelx86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @updates0 kernel-modulesx86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @updates 57 M kernel-modules-core x86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @updates 32 M kernel-modules-extra x86_64 6.7.3-200.fc39 @updates 2.4 M Transaction Summary Remove 5 Packages Freed space: 157 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded. Running transaction Preparing:1/1 Erasing : kernel-modules-extra-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 1/5 Running scriptlet: kernel-modules-extra-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 1/5 Erasing : kernel-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 2/5 Running scriptlet: kernel-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 2/5 Erasing : kernel-modules-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 3/5 Running scriptlet: kernel-modules-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 3/5 Erasing : kernel-modules-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 4/5 Running scriptlet: kernel-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 5/5 Erasing : kernel-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 5/5 Running scriptlet: kernel-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 5/5 Verifying: kernel-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 1/5 Verifying: kernel-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 2/5 Verifying: kernel-modules-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 3/5 Verifying: kernel-modules-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 4/5 Verifying: kernel-modules-extra-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 5/5 Removed: kernel-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 kernel-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 kernel-modules-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 kernel-modules-core-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 kernel-modules-extra-6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 Complete! olivares@fedora:~/Downloads/kerTeX/Documents/Documents/mptmp$ sudo lspci 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 4c53 (rev 01) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation RocketLake-S GT1 [UHD Graphics 730] (rev 04) 00:04.0 Signal processing controller: Intel Corporation Device 4c03 (rev 01) 00:08.0 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Device 4c11 (rev 01) 00:12.0 Signal processing controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH Thermal Controller 00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake USB 3.1 xHCI Host Controller 00:14.2 RAM memory: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH Shared SRAM 00:14.3 Network controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH CNVi WiFi 00:15.0 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH Serial IO I2C Controller #0 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake HECI Controller 00:17.0 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake SATA AHCI Controller 00:1b.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCI Express Root Port #21 (rev f0) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 06bc (rev f0) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation H470 Chipset LPC/eSPI Controller 00:1f.3 Audio device: Intel Corporation Device f1c8 00:1f.4 SMBus: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH SMBus Controller 00:1f.5 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH SPI Controller 02:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: KIOXIA Corporation NVMe SSD Controller BG4 (DRAM-less) 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device 2600 (rev 21) olivares@fedora:~/Downloads/kerTeX/Documents/Documents/mptmp$ sudo lsusb Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c534 Logitech, Inc. Unifying Receiver Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:0129 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. RTS5129 Card Reader Controller Bus 001 Device 004: ID 8087:0026 Intel Corp. AX201 Bluetooth Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
Re: Strange keyboard shortcut on cinnamon
On 2/7/24 00:55, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2/6/24 05:40, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote: I'm under cinnamon. For some time now, the keyboard shortcut Ctrl+Alt+T randomly delivers a Konsole or a gneome-terminal, which I find very annoying. I tried to disable the shortcut and re-enable it, to disable all extensions, etc, nothing changes really. My gsetting do not mention konsole at all. The ones that seem relevant look reasonable to me, so I'm a bit lost... org.cinnamon.desktop.default-applications.terminal exec 'gnome-terminal' org.cinnamon.desktop.default-applications.terminal exec-arg '--' org.cinnamon.desktop.keybindings.media-keys terminal ['t'] I don't know why you would get a Konsole, but those settings look like you would get a gnome-terminal using that key combination. That is also my expectation and the behaviour I want But, I'm still getting Konsole quite often instead Theo. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Virtualbox vs VMware for Fedora?
If you're still not interested in the QEMU/Libvirt route, this news may interest you, might lead to better compatibility. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39300317 On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:03 PM Sbob wrote: > > All; > > > I am running Fedora39, I have run VMware workstation for years, and I > have on and off had issues since VMware does not officially support > Fedora, normally I run a patch after each kernel update and it mostly > just works. > > I am also running the osx unlocker so I can run mac VM's > > > I recently tried virtualbox on a spare laptop, havent looked at > virtualbox in years, and I was impressed, a few questions for the community: > >- can I run the osx unlocker with virtualbox? > > >- does virtualbox have the same issues where it needs a patch after > each kernel and sometimes > just breaks with a new kernel , even with the patch? > -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: scrapy on F39
> On 8 Feb 2024, at 12:38, George N. White III wrote: > > For scrapy there is the added complication of the recent CVE for twisted: do > we get > patches for older versions of twisted or does scrapy have to be changed to > use the > current version? I don’t think twisted back ports fixes. But it should not be hard, usually, to upgrade to latest twisted. May well just work. Barry -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: scrapy on F39
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:48 AM Frederic Muller wrote:
> On 07/02/2024 22:09, George N. White III wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 2:11 AM Frederic Muller wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Installed scrapy and just trying to start the tutorial gives me that:
>>
>> scrapy startproject tutorial
>
> [...]
>
>> /home/fred/.local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/parsel/csstranslator.py",
>>
> line 8, in
>> from cssselect.parser import Element, FunctionalPseudoElement,
>> PseudoElement
>> ImportError: cannot import name 'PseudoElement' from 'cssselect.parser'
>> (/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/cssselect/parser.py)
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>
>
>
>> Any idea why it's not working?
>>
>
> Looks like
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77476433/importerror-cannot-import-name-pseudoelement-from-cssselect-parser
> Fedora 39 has: python-cssselect-1.1.0-6 Have a look at the
> https://github.com/scrapy/scrapy/issues
>
> You should give enough details so others can reproduce the issue: how did
> you install scrapy, which version of Fedora, scrapy, and python-cssselect
> do you have?
>
> There are problems with the Fedora package:
>
> Available Packages
> Name : python3-scrapy
> Version : 2.10.1
> Release : 1.fc39
> Architecture : noarch
> Size : 659 k
> Source : python-scrapy-2.10.1-1.fc39.src.rpm
> Repository : fedora
> Summary : A high-level Python Screen Scraping framework
> URL : https://scrapy.org
> License : BSD
> Description : Scrapy is a fast high-level screen scraping and web crawling
> : framework, used to crawl websites and extract structured
> data
> : from their pages. It can be used for a wide range of
> purposes,
> : from data mining to monitoring and automated testing.
>
> Here, on Fedora 39:
>
> % doas dnf install python3-scrapy
> doas (gnw3@imacf39) password:
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:29 ago on Wed Feb 7 10:39:54 2024.
> Error:
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides (python3.12dist(twisted) < 23.8~~ with
> python3.12dist(twisted) >= 18.9) needed by
> python3-scrapy-2.10.1-1.fc39.noarch from fedora
> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
>
> twisted has https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-46137 so
>
> Many large Python systems have not been ported to python-3.12. I've had
> success using
> fedora's python-3.11 in a conda environment. Anaconda python is also a
> way to run stuff that
> still needs python 3.10 or 3.11.
>
> So yes... just tried something totally different (opening an IFC file with
> FreeCAD) and the importer stops saying:
>
> " File "/app/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ifcopenshell/__init__.py", line
> 62, in raise ImportError("IfcOpenShell not built for '%s'" %
> python_distribution) : IfcOpenShell not built for
> 'linux/64bit/python3.11' "
>
You don't mention how you installed python-3.11 and FreeCAD. Anaconda
provides many python packages that are built in a
way that is compatible with their python binaries. Conda manages
dependencies. Fedora has /usr/bin/python3.11
from python3.11-3.11.7-2.fc39.x86_64.
Back to scrapy I am using F39 updated to the latest everything, I installed
> using the given instructions on their website which is pip install scrapy
> scrapy is version 2.11.0 cssselect is version 1.1.
>
So should I file a bug somewhere or patiently wait (it's been like for over
> a month at least)?
>
Python 3.12 requires major changes to some packages, and many developers
aren't paid for
their contributions, so as long as people are able to continue using
affected packages with
Python 3.10 or 3.11 there is no urgency to make things work with Python
3.12.
For scrapy there is the added complication of the recent CVE for twisted:
do we get
patches for older versions of twisted or does scrapy have to be changed to
use the
current version?
I think the scrapy github Issues already has similar reports. You may
want to add
your configuration to the existing issue. Post on mail lists rarely get
into search
results, so github Issues are more likely to help others who have a
problem..
--
George N. White III
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
