Re: Fedora 31: Chromium does not support h264 even after installing a lot of different packages
> On Sat, 30 Nov 2019 07:49:05 - > Farhad Mohammadi Majd via users > >. You will have to follow the > directions on the page you pointed to. To follow those instructions > you will have to install the chrome browser, and then copy the > libraries over, and uninstall chrome if you don't want it installed. It seems it does not work: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/installing-widevine-for-chromium/2263 > This resulted in the downgrade of chromimum to chromium-77.0.3865. Nobody don't want an old and unsecure version of chromium only to can play normal MP4 videos. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 31: Chromium does not support h264 even after installing a lot of different packages
Hello. Fedora 31 (AMD64) and Chromium 78, I have installed following packages on the system, but still MP4-H264 is not supported by Chromium: VLC + MPV + GNOME-MPV (celluloid) and their dependencies. gstreamer1-plugin-openh264, gstreamer1-libav, gstreamer1-plugins-ugly I have seen < https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/installing-chromium-or-google-chrome-browsers/ > but widevine plugin is not easy accessibale, I just want a routine MP4 playback. * chromium-libs-media-freeworld * is one version behind latest version (77) and requies downgrading to Chromium 77! while 78 is latest version. There was no clear and straightforward instruction on the web. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 26 & 27 are unable to boot with normal graphic mode on this PC with AMD/ATI RS740 [Radeon 2100] GPU
> So, I think there is an error in the startup of the gnome desktop you are
> using.
Yes, I did run `journalctl -r' and there was many errors related to
"gnome-shell" also in the graphical environment I did run gnome-abrt ("Problem
reporting" applicatin) and there was the same crash report, so I did report it.
> Can you try another desktop?
Yes after exprience of LightDM I myself had the idea to install a light-weight
desktop to see what will happens, my choice is XFCE, I did install it and it
runs without any problem! :)
> I think there is also a way to tell Gnome to run X instead of wayland from
> the desktop manager. Have you tried that?
Yes, I did try all of them before. "... none of the available sessions can't
start ..."
Well, thank you for answer to this thread, I hope this problem be solved for
next release.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 26 & 27 are unable to boot with normal graphic mode on this PC with AMD/ATI RS740 [Radeon 2100] GPU
> Could you try doing a dnf distro-sync as root from runlevel 3, just > to be sure no cruft was left around from the upgrade to F27. Yes I could, but there was 900-1000 MB data for full upgrade! I did remove some packages which I don't use them like "libreoffice**", "qt**", 'cheese', gnome-boxes, totem, rhythmbox and even firefox, this reduced size of upgrade to 500-600 MB, but because there is no guaranty after download all of them my problem be solved, I didn't upgrade. Instead of upgrade, I did install LightDM, then stop-disable gdm.service and enable lightdm.service, then I did boot Fedora without "nomodeset" kernel parameter and the result was LightDM ran on the highest resolution supported by the monitor, 1920x1080, but like the past, none of the available sessions can't start, I did reboot again without "nomodeset" and log-in as normal user in one TTY then `startx' the below log is for this: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/HlME-Kh45WrnP8tkA02fdw > Could you show the kernel settings line? you can see them in log files in the line begins with "Kernel command line" " ro nomodeset rhgb quiet LANG=en_US.UTF-8" > What is the resolution on the virtual console when you boot into runlevel 3? the highest resolution supported by the monitor, 1920x1080 > If you type the command journalctl -b and look through the output, do > you see any error when the kernel tries to load the radeon module? yes, there was some lines in the red color when I boot Fedora with "nomodeset" but there was no red colored lines when boot without 'nomodeset' and even run the command `startx' as root: <> [drm:radeon_init [radeon]] *ERROR* No UMS support in radeon module! . . [drm] VGACON disable radeon kernel modesetting. [drm:radeon_init [radeon]] *ERROR* No UMS support in radeon module! > What does the negotiation look like for video? what should I do? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 26 & 27 are unable to boot with normal graphic mode on this PC with AMD/ATI RS740 [Radeon 2100] GPU
> Could you try doing a dnf distro-sync as root from runlevel 3, just > to be sure no cruft was left around from the upgrade to F27. Yes I could, but there was 900-1000 MB data for full upgrade! I did remove some packages which I don't use them like "libreoffice**", "qt**", 'cheese', gnome-boxes, totem, rhythmbox and even firefox, this reduced size of upgrade to 500-600 MB, but because there is no guaranty after download all of them my problem be solved, I didn't upgrade. Instead of upgrade, I did install LightDM, then stop-disable gdm.service and enable lightdm.service, then I did boot Fedora without "nomodeset" kernel parameter and the result was LightDM ran on the highest resolution supported by the monitor, 1920x1080, but like the past, none of the available sessions can't start, I did reboot again without "nomodeset" and log-in as normal user in one TTY then `startx' the below log is for this: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/HlME-Kh45WrnP8tkA02fdw > Could you show the kernel settings line? you can see them in log files in the line begins with "Kernel command line" " ro nomodeset rhgb quiet LANG=en_US.UTF-8" > What is the resolution on the virtual console when you boot into > runlevel 3? the highest resolution supported by the monitor, 1920x1080 > If you type the command journalctl -b and look through the output, do > you see any error when the kernel tries to load the radeon module? yes, there was some lines in the red color when I boot Fedora with "nomodeset" but there was no red colored lines when boot without 'nomodeset' and even run the command `startx' as root: <> [drm:radeon_init [radeon]] *ERROR* No UMS support in radeon module! . . [drm] VGACON disable radeon kernel modesetting. [drm:radeon_init [radeon]] *ERROR* No UMS support in radeon module! > What does the negotiation look like for video? what should I do? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The Fedora Wiki page, "Mailing list guidelines" needs to update!
The page "Mailing list guidelines" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines is not updated nearly 2 years, I saw few errors within it but I have not an account to fix them: * please mention "https://paste.fedoraproject.org; specially in the sections "No attachments" and "Keep it Short", and *please change that website (paste.fedora...) title for better SEO* * all the links in the section "No HTML Mail, Please" are DEAD!! they must replaced with archived links from http://web.archive.org or another links THANKS ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 26 & 27 are unable to boot with normal graphic mode on this PC with AMD/ATI RS740 [Radeon 2100] GPU
> Is there no video? Is the video at the wrong resolution? Does X (or > wayland) fail to start? I have video output, but when `nomodeset' parameter is used, xorg and wayland use VESA resolutions, there is no full and complete resolutions and also hardware acceleration, this is the problem. Both xorg and Wayland sessions can be run via GDM, there is no problem in here. > wayland might not support older hardware. Wayland works very well on this PC. > What does lsmod show for the module the kernel is using? https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/h7C~gfz~QdvZ~nueqbbXBQ > What shows in /var/log/Xorg.0.log? https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/MIiOaUrOOjtDGWSZ-Xo5XQ > Can you successfully boot into multiuser (runlevel 3)? Yes, I did add "3" to the end of the line that begins with "linux" and removed "nomodeset" parameter to boot as normal, see the line "Kernel command line" > If you can, what happens if you then run the command startx? log-in as normal user and then: $ startx https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/wcFQGkSgwoltO1umSrycIw log-out, then log-in as root in another tty: # startx https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/0bd1QIqIvmGmHlSXS5UQuQ THANKS ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 26 & 27 are unable to boot with normal graphic mode on this PC with AMD/ATI RS740 [Radeon 2100] GPU
Hello, I have an old PC from 2008 which has integrated graphics processors (IGP), I did install Fedora 26 few months ago and it had mentioned problem, I used "nomodeset" kernel parameter for boot during installation and local boot, but I didn't report the problem. Today I did install Fedora 27 (Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-27-1.6) and same problem was exist, fortunately Fedora 27 is smarter and it added "nomodeset" kernel parameter to the GRUB configuration file for local boot, so there is no need to enter it manually to GRUB. $ lspci | grep VGA 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] RS740 [Radeon 2100] Please guide me step-by-step to solve this problem, thank you. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Why size of Firefox package is double in Fedora and CentOS?
On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 00:06 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 08/29/2017 11:59 PM, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote: > > Hello, in openSUSE, Debian and ubuntu, Firefox package has the size > > between 42-46MB, while in Fedora it is 89MB ! why? even official > > Mozilla builds of Firefox for Linux is 44-46MB. > > I suspect it is because all the langpacks are bundled in it. That is right, I changed desktop language on GNOME and after restarting the session, Firefox had the selected language. . ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Why size of Firefox package is double in Fedora and CentOS?
Hello, in openSUSE, Debian and ubuntu, Firefox package has the size between 42-46MB, while in Fedora it is 89MB ! why? even official Mozilla builds of Firefox for Linux is 44-46MB. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please make DeltaRPM for all minor and revision versions of a Firefox release
Hello, size of Firefox package in Fedora/CentOS is double (89M) compared with another Linux distros, this is very huge, currently DeltaRPM for Firefox is available only from last update to current update! this means if the user don't/can't update the Firefox for only one time, he needs to download huge data, this costs bandwidth and traffic use for both the client and the repository provider this is an acute problem, because Firefox rapid release which Fedora only offers it, has very fast updates. I beg you provide DeltaRPM for all minor and revision versions of Firefox within one release, or provide Firefox ESR instead, I have currently Firefox 54.0-2 and there is a available update for 54.0.1-1, and if I want to keep the Firefox up-to-date I must download a very huge package (89M) just for a minor update! this is a disastrous situation!! I really can't continue to use Fedora if this problem don't solved. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
