Re: Window focus in F40
On 26.03.24 17:44, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi, I'm running F40 with wayland. Is there any command wich is setting the behaviour the window focus to the mouse pointer automatically when hovvering above a group of windows? Fedora release 40 (Forty) 6.8.1-300.fc40.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- Fedora release 40 (Forty) 6.8.1-300.fc40.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: How do I install the rescue kernel for fc38?
On 29.08.23 13:14, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Fedora 38 My rescue kernel is FC30. How do I install the FC38 rescue kernel? # dnf whatprovides kernel\* | grep -i rescue And my search engine is not helping. Many thanks, -T Have a look at: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/questions-about-rescue-kernel/84561 -- Fedora release 38 (Thirty Eight) 6.4.12-200.fc38.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Help needed: disabling system wide the Caps lock key in GNOME/Xwayland
Hi gys, I'm running F38 with *Gnome/X-Wayland*, and in my environment I do not need (hate it) the *Caps Lock* key.Question: How to realize the disabling system wide, and how to get it working again? Regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 38 (Thirty Eight) 6.4.7-200.fc38.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Security hole in MATE?
Hi Guys, I'm running my F35 desktop with MATE. If I wake up after having suspended the box using some key, no password is requested, whereas the Cinnamon (I used it in F34) desktop requests it. This Missing password request in MATE seems to be a security hole. Your opinion? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 35 (Thirty Five) Kernel-5.15.5-200.fc35.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Modifying DNF's output
On 6/2/21 9:54 AM, Francisco Tissera wrote: Hello everyone, I'd like to thank both Ed and Poc for their input. Ed, adding the -q option makes it... Too quiet, LOL! Poc, what you suggested, is really useful, thanks, since you wrote that any output can be customized to what I like. How ever, I have another question: Is there a way to make that grep permanent? or would I have to type the command including grep every time? Thanks again. Best regards. Francisco. Hi Francsisco, 1. I would defiine an own Shell script piping the dnf output to grep 2. Or define an own alias or a bash function in your ~/.bashrc file or similar which pipes the bash output to grep or simillar, if you are using another shell Regards Joachim Backes On 6/1/21 12:06 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 09:32 -0400, Francisco Tissera wrote: Hello everyone, I am currently using Fedora_linux 34, and I'd like to know, since I have been using this OS for over a month and a half, and I find DNF's output a bit... too much, if I could modify it somehow. I'd like to modify how it outputs the installation of software. For example, when the dnf install package name command is issued, the dependency check was done. Can that line of output be suppressed in any way? If not, that's fine, I'll get used to it, but still, it would be cool if it could. Any help would be apriciated. Anything that writes to standard output (or even standard error) can be filtered on whatever criteria you like, typically using grep, e.g.: $ sudo dnf update|grep -v "Last metadata" Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Fedora release 34 (Thirty Four) Kernel-5.12.8-300.fc34.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: cannot upgrade since this morning
On 3/22/21 1:23 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Joachim Backes writes: Hi guys, trying this morning an udate by "sudo dnf upgrade" within F33, which will be rejected by You've caught a mirror in the middle of mirroring. Trying again might pick a different mirror. Or, wait a little while and try again. Hi Sam, this does not help. I waited and tried again, with the same result. What could be wrong in my system? Kind regards Joachim Backes. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Fedora release 33 (Thirty Three) Kernel-5.11.8-200.fc33.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
cannot upgrade since this morning
4/repodata/df17a50f7caf174a454b885017bf2d9ded97f590795d7ade4d40c25586383e81-updateinfo.xml.xz (IP: 137.44.10.8) - Status code: 404 for https://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/fedora/linux/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/df17a50f7caf174a454b885017bf2d9ded97f590795d7ade4d40c25586383e81-updateinfo.xml.xz (IP: 195.220.108.108) - Status code: 404 for https://mirror.sucs.org/pub/linux/fedora/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/3db1c9fe57d0b2cb34244c70c3d7c7d1d6aa06788e7edfcc29de8b50b43e4526-prestodelta.xml.gz (IP: 137.44.10.8) - Status code: 404 for http://linus.iyte.edu.tr/linux/fedora/linux/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/daf3a1d4941c3e965acb33ca92bc106403af709224bce114bcad9ae16e2cee97-primary.xml.gz (IP: 193.140.248.40) - Status code: 404 for http://linus.iyte.edu.tr/linux/fedora/linux/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/3db1c9fe57d0b2cb34244c70c3d7c7d1d6aa06788e7edfcc29de8b50b43e4526-prestodelta.xml.gz (IP: 193.140.248.40) - Status code: 404 for http://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/os/Linux/distr/fedora/linux/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/3db1c9fe57d0b2cb34244c70c3d7c7d1d6aa06788e7edfcc29de8b50b43e4526-prestodelta.xml.gz (IP: 2001:67c:6ec:221:145:220:21:40) - Status code: 404 for https://mirror.dogado.de/fedora/linux/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/daf3a1d4941c3e965acb33ca92bc106403af709224bce114bcad9ae16e2cee97-primary.xml.gz (IP: 185.3.234.216) - Status code: 404 for https://ftp.lip6.fr/ftp/pub/linux/distributions/fedora/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/3db1c9fe57d0b2cb34244c70c3d7c7d1d6aa06788e7edfcc29de8b50b43e4526-prestodelta.xml.gz (IP: 195.83.118.1) - Status code: 404 for https://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/fedora/linux/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/5b3e2fd9ae9b1e492b941d8504c753d372c3ed751e47be024f654475698de8d8-filelists.xml.gz (IP: 195.220.108.108) - Status code: 404 for http://mirror.sucs.org/pub/linux/fedora/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/df17a50f7caf174a454b885017bf2d9ded97f590795d7ade4d40c25586383e81-updateinfo.xml.xz (IP: 137.44.10.8) - Status code: 404 for http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/3db1c9fe57d0b2cb34244c70c3d7c7d1d6aa06788e7edfcc29de8b50b43e4526-prestodelta.xml.gz (IP: 2001:630:341:12::184) - Status code: 404 for http://ftp.lip6.fr/ftp/pub/linux/distributions/fedora/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/daf3a1d4941c3e965acb33ca92bc106403af709224bce114bcad9ae16e2cee97-primary.xml.gz (IP: 195.83.118.1) - Status code: 404 for https://mirror.dogado.de/fedora/linux/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/5b3e2fd9ae9b1e492b941d8504c753d372c3ed751e47be024f654475698de8d8-filelists.xml.gz (IP: 185.3.234.216) - Status code: 404 for http://mirror.nonstop.co.il/fedora/linux/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/3db1c9fe57d0b2cb34244c70c3d7c7d1d6aa06788e7edfcc29de8b50b43e4526-prestodelta.xml.gz (IP: 62.90.168.59) - Status code: 404 for https://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/5b3e2fd9ae9b1e492b941d8504c753d372c3ed751e47be024f654475698de8d8-filelists.xml.gz (IP: 2001:630:341:12::184) - Status code: 404 for http://mirror.nonstop.co.il/fedora/linux/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/df17a50f7caf174a454b885017bf2d9ded97f590795d7ade4d40c25586383e81-updateinfo.xml.xz (IP: 62.90.168.59) - Status code: 404 for http://mirror.sucs.org/pub/linux/fedora/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/5b3e2fd9ae9b1e492b941d8504c753d372c3ed751e47be024f654475698de8d8-filelists.xml.gz (IP: 137.44.10.8) - Status code: 404 for http://mirror.nonstop.co.il/fedora/linux/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/5b3e2fd9ae9b1e492b941d8504c753d372c3ed751e47be024f654475698de8d8-filelists.xml.gz (IP: 62.90.168.59) - Status code: 404 for https://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/fedora/linux/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/daf3a1d4941c3e965acb33ca92bc106403af709224bce114bcad9ae16e2cee97-primary.xml.gz (IP: 195.220.108.108) - Status code: 404 for https://mirror.dogado.de/fedora/linux/updates/33/Everything/x86_64/repodata/df17a50f7caf174a454b885017bf2d9ded97f590795d7ade4d40c25586383e81-updateinfo.xml.xz (IP: 185.3.234.216) Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates': Yum repo downloading error: Downloading error(s): repodata/daf3a1d4941c3e965acb33ca92bc106403af709224bce114bcad9ae16e2cee97-primary.xml.gz - Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success; repodata/5b3e2fd9ae9b1e492b941d8504c753d372c3ed751e47be024f654475698de8d8-filelists.xml.gz - Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success; repodata/3db1c9fe57d0b2cb34244c70c3d7c7d1d6aa06788e7edfcc29de8b50b43e4526-prestodelta.xml.gz - Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success; repodata/df17a50f7caf174a454b885017bf2d9ded97f590795d7ade4d40c25586383e81-updateinfo.xml.xz - Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success Any reason or workaround for this? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release
Re: Keyboard switches to US keyboard after each reboot
On 11/25/20 9:58 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi, I'm running F33 with Cinnamon/German nodeadkeys keyboard layout. Having the problem that after each reboot the keyboad layout switches to US layout. Workaround (not permanent; valid until next reboot): "loadkeys de" in some console windowd (Ctrl Fx ...) Anybody sees a solution for this problem? Kind regards Seems to be a Cinnamon problem. Does not arise if using a GNOME desktop. Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 33 (Thirty Three) Kernel-5.9.11-200.fc33.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Keyboard switches to US keyboard after each reboot
Hi, I'm running F33 with Cinnamon/German nodeadkeys keyboard layout. Having the problem that after each reboot the keyboad layout switches to US layout. Workaround (not permanent; valid until next reboot): "loadkeys de" in some console windowd (Ctrl Fx ...) Anybody sees a solution for this problem? Kind regards -- Fedora release 33 (Thirty Three) Kernel-5.9.11-200.fc33.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Keyboard problem in F33
Hi guys, I upgraded almost sucessfully to F33. Before this action, my Keyboard was German,no deadkeys option, in all Fedora versions. But now, each time I logout and relogin, my keyboard is reset to an STD US keyboard. I am running as desktop a CINNAMON desktop. How can I get rid from this problem? KInd regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 33 (Thirty Three) Kernel-5.9.1-300.fc33.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Cannot upgrade gnutls with dnf (transaction problems)
On 2020-05-30 10:28, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/30/20 1:03 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: On 2020-05-30 09:45, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-05-30 15:33, Joachim Backes wrote: The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/share/doc/manual/gnutls.html conflicts between attempted installs of gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686 and gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/share/info/gnutls.info-3.gz conflicts between attempted installs of gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686 and gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/share/info/gnutls.info.gz conflicts between attempted installs of gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686 and gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64 Anybody has similar problems? No. But then again I only have the x86_64 versions of those packages installed. Do you really have a need for the i686 versions? No, I have not. But if I try to remove the gnutls*i686 packages, a lot of WINE pkgs will be additionally removed. and this I do not want. Just remove the i686 -devel packages. You shouldn't need those. Thanks, that was it. Upgrading now runs perfectly. Kind regards. Joachim Backes ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 32 (Thirty Two) Kernel-5.6.15-300.fc32.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Cannot upgrade gnutls with dnf (transaction problems)
On 2020-05-30 09:45, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-05-30 15:33, Joachim Backes wrote: The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/share/doc/manual/gnutls.html conflicts between attempted installs of gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686 and gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/share/info/gnutls.info-3.gz conflicts between attempted installs of gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686 and gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/share/info/gnutls.info.gz conflicts between attempted installs of gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686 and gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64 Anybody has similar problems? No. But then again I only have the x86_64 versions of those packages installed. Do you really have a need for the i686 versions? No, I have not. But if I try to remove the gnutls*i686 packages, a lot of WINE pkgs will be additionally removed. and this I do not want. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 32 (Thirty Two) Kernel-5.6.15-300.fc32.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cannot upgrade gnutls with dnf (transaction problems)
Hi, upgrading to the with the most recent f32 updates with dnf fails: sudo dnf upgrade Last metadata expiration check: 0:56:44 ago on Sat May 30 08:16:52 2020. Dependencies resolved. Package Architecture Version Repository Size Upgrading: gnutls i686 3.6.13-4.fc32 updates 995 k gnutls x86_64 3.6.13-4.fc32 updates 981 k gnutls-c++ i686 3.6.13-4.fc32 updates 30 k gnutls-c++ x86_64 3.6.13-4.fc32 updates 29 k gnutls-dane i686 3.6.13-4.fc32 updates 31 k gnutls-dane x86_64 3.6.13-4.fc32 updates 30 k gnutls-devel i686 3.6.13-4.fc32 updates 2.1 M gnutls-devel x86_64 3.6.13-4.fc32 updates 2.1 M gnutls-utils x86_64 3.6.13-4.fc32 updates 348 k Transaction Summary Upgrade 9 Packages Total size: 24 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: [SKIPPED] gnutls-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] gnutls-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] gnutls-c++-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] gnutls-c++-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] gnutls-dane-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] gnutls-dane-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] gnutls-utils-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/share/doc/manual/gnutls.html conflicts between attempted installs of gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686 and gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/share/info/gnutls.info-3.gz conflicts between attempted installs of gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686 and gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/share/info/gnutls.info.gz conflicts between attempted installs of gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686 and gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64 Anybody has similar problems? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 32 (Thirty Two) Kernel-5.6.15-300.fc32.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cinnamon configuring the samsung ml-1660 printer as duplex printer
Hi all, i'm trying to configure my samsung laser printer ml-1660 as an (usb) duplex printer, but tis will not succeed anymore. I'm using the Cinnamon desktop. Neither the Cinnamon system settings menu entry nor the system-config-printer (using obviously the splix pckg) command will achieve this. All system upgrades are installed. Each advice would be welcome. Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 30 (Thirty) Kernel-5.2.14-200.fc30.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Default application for some file typeHi
Hi guys, how to define the default application for opening files with some type in F30, for example the app for opening PDF files (acroread or evince are examples)? My DESKTOP envs are Cinnamon and GNOME. All hints are welcome. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 30 (Thirty) Kernel-5.1.7-300.fc30.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to get rid of the gnome desktop popup menu entry " keep aligned" (some change)
Addendum: I forgot to report that I exchanged nautilus by nemo. Joachim Backes ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/N2MOZJEMWO5PP6XLOR2OR25RNN6EMHPO/
How to get rid of the gnome desktop popup menu entry " keep aligned"
Hi gnome users, it happens very often the I hit the gnome desktop menu entry "keep aligned" (which will align all desktop icons). Any chance to get rid of this feature? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 28 (Twenty Eight) Kernel-4.17.3-200.fc28.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2SNJ4XQDEYTYPQAQACICXIXGIPLWU2KV/
[OT] modula-2 compiler [ISO] for fedora 28
Hi, anybody knows where to get an ISO version of the modula-2 compiler for LINUX, especially FEDORA-28? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 28 (Twenty Eight) Kernel-4.17.2-200.fc28.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KCVH6ZLVXOFI2IQJW5LRK67FIDOUW5XO/
Re: Dependency failed for Suspend
On 04/19/18 20:50, Tim via users wrote: Allegedly, on or about 19 April 2018, Neal Becker sent: Perhaps the messages are not related to the suspend issue. But the symptoms are very strange. The laptop appears to suspend (power light changes from on to flashing), but at a random time later (seconds to minutes later), it wakes itself up again! Only thing I could think of is WOL, but it's not connected to wired enet. Other BIOS wake-up methods? Wake on mouse, perhaps, if a slight bump has made the mouse move. Additionally: some BIOSes wake up on Network events (if the computer is attached to the lan). Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 27 (Twenty Seven) Kernel-4.15.17-300.fc27.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: tail for a list of files
On 03/03/18 17:15, bruce wrote: Hi Bruce, Hey.. Trying to figure out how to do a single line cmd (it should be possible right??) to do a tail -5 for a list of files??? I thought I could combine find with exec/xargs and tail to generate the list of files/tail data.. But couldn't figure out the syntax.. thoughts?? find /foo -name "*dog.dat ... tail -5<< obviously not correct! Indee what would work? If I understood you correctly, then find /foo -name "*dog.dat"|tail -5 should do the job. You forgot the pipe sign :-) Kind regards Joachim Backes thanks.. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 27 (Twenty Seven) Kernel-4.15.7-300.fc27.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
weird effect: gnome-terminal does not open links correctly
Hi all, I'm running f27 under gnome with gnome-terminal as preferred terminal application. Anybody has seen that opening URL's found within the gnome-terminal output is not done correctly (popup menu: Open link ... in gnome-terminal)? Only the issuer's home URL is opened, independent from the URL found in the terminal. Using konsole5 instead of gnome-terminal will solve the problem. Kind regards -- Fedora release 27 (Twenty Seven) Kernel-4.15.3-300.fc27.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
gnome-terminal does not open links correctly
I'm running f27 under gnome. Anybody has seen that opening URL's found in the gnome-terminal output is not done correctly? Only the issuers home URL is opened, independent from the URL found in the terminal. Using konsole5 instead of gnome-terminal solves the problem. -- Fedora release 27 (Twenty Seven) Kernel-4.15.3-300.fc27.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Who has created a directory called "~/updates"
I'm running F27, and found coincidentally a directory called ~/updates containing megs of RPMs in my home directory. Does anybody know wherefrom these entries are coming? Kind regards Joachim Backes Fedora release 27 (Twenty Seven) Kernel-4.14.15-301.fc27.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Libreoffice 100% CPU usage
On 01/12/18 06:37, Alessio Ciregia wrote:
Just now I've spotted that any Libreoffice program is reported by top
command as using 100% of CPU time (and in fact the fans of the laptop
are spinning furiously).
Seeing this too on my desktop PC with libreoffice-5.4.4.2-2.fc27.x86_64
(soffice.bin):
strace -p reports:
...
write(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8) = 8
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=14, events=POLLIN}, {fd=18,
events=POLLIN}], 3, 2460) = 1 ([{fd=9, revents=POLLIN}])
read(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 8
write(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8) = 8
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=14, events=POLLIN}, {fd=18,
events=POLLIN}], 3, 2460) = 1 ([{fd=9, revents=POLLIN}])
read(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 8
write(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8) = 8
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=14, events=POLLIN}, {fd=18,
events=POLLIN}], 3, 2460) = 1 ([{fd=9, revents=POLLIN}])
read(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 8
write(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8) = 8
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=14, events=POLLIN}, {fd=18,
events=POLLIN}], 3, 2459) = 1 ([{fd=9, revents=POLLIN}])
read(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 8
write(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8) = 8
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=14, events=POLLIN}, {fd=18,
events=POLLIN}], 3, 2459) = 1 ([{fd=9, revents=POLLIN}])
read(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 8
write(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8) = 8
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=14, events=POLLIN}, {fd=18,
events=POLLIN}], 3, 2459) = 1 ([{fd=9, revents=POLLIN}])
read(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 8
write(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8) = 8
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=14, events=POLLIN}, {fd=18,
events=POLLIN}], 3, 2459) = 1 ([{fd=9, revents=POLLIN}])
read(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 8
write(9, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8) = 8
...
I'm on F27 x86_64, and this happens even with with libreoffice 5.4.4.2-1
and 5.4.4.2-2 (updates-testing).
Has anyone else noticed this behavior? Where can I look to debug it?
Ciao,
A.
___________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Ciao
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 27 (Twenty Seven)
Kernel-4.14.13-300.fc27.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Getting permanentiy in F27: failed to synchronize cache for repo 'region51-chrome-gnome-shell', disabling.
Each time if I'm running 'dnf upgrade', I see: failed to synchronize cache for repo 'region51-chrome-gnome-shell', disabling. Anybody sees this too? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 27 (Twenty Seven) Kernel-4.13.13-300.fc27.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: broken pipe installing kernel?
On 11/17/17 15:53, Tom Horsley wrote: Just installed f27 workstation and did the first "dnf update" When it is running the script to install the updated kernel, I see this come out on the terminal: cat: broken pipe That does not cause warm fuzzies :-). The new kernel did seem to boot OK and I didn't notice any problems. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Hi Tom, I see this too in F27! Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 27 (Twenty Seven) Kernel-4.13.13-300.fc27.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Very minor but very weird
On 10/13/17 09:03, Mayavimmer wrote: On 12/10/2017 19:56, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: In the command interpreter (shell) the underline character (underline_char) generally but not always echos as a space when actually typed and generally but not always displays as an underline when produced by the system. For example: (1) $ echo underline_char (2) underline_char the underline echos as a space when actually typed on line (1) but then changes to an underline when I hit return and line (2) appears. Line (2) displays properly. System: 4 processor true-intel CPUs Fedora-26 with all upgrades Konsole (KDE) version Version 17.04.1 What's going on? How can it be fixed? I first saw this a couple years ago, in a different distro, and noticed that changing character size (try Ctrl_+ or Ctrl_- in Konsole) made it go away. It's probably a Konsole problem. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Seeing this not in gnome (gnome-terminal), and not on the virtual terminals (ctrl alt F1,...). Perhaps your problem is that your bash prompt is highlighted, so the echoed _ character is almost invisible over the following bash prompt. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 26 (Twenty Six) Kernel-4.13.6-200.fc26.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is it possible to start without nouveau?
On 10/06/17 10:16, Ambrogio wrote: Hi all, as trying to solve my problems with Unusable Fedora 26 I would be know if there is a possibility to start with X without using nouveau. I remember (but maybe I'm wrong) that if there is no nouveau available, X can use the intel card but without feature from NVIDIA GPU. If there is a way, can you explain me how to not compromise my working installation, but how to try starting with new kernels. This can be a good point from which to start throubleshooting problem and try some other fix. Tnx Ambrogio ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org The simplest way to start your Fedora without X can be achieved by booting in runlevel s or runlevel 3 (edit the grub kernel line during boot using the "e" letter). Or edit the correspondent kernel line entry in /boot/grub2/grub.cfg. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 26 (Twenty Six) Kernel-4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: DNF packages?
On 09/21/17 18:59, Terry Polzin wrote: On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com <mailto:hobbes1...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Jeffrey Ross <j...@bubble.org <mailto:j...@bubble.org>> wrote: How can I obtain a list of all packages currently installed on the system? Don't need dnf... $ rpm -qa Which will likely be a lot, you can pipe to less to scroll or dump into a file for grepping or later use: $ rpm -qa | less $ rpm -qa > installed.txt dnf list installed Oops: dnf list installed|wc -l 3991 rpm -qa|wc -l 3840 Why this difference?? Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 26 (Twenty Six) Kernel-4.12.14-300.fc26.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: the fedora csh and goto
On 08/21/17 09:16, Michael Welle wrote: Hallo, JD <jd1...@gmail.com> writes: The manpage for the fedora csh describes the usage of goto, but it does not work. Anyone with insight on this? If you CAN make it work, please provide a skeleton of the script where the label is visible and the goto statement is visible :) what does 'does not work' mean? What have you tried so far? It's straight forward, I think. #!/bin/csh label: printf "foo" sleep 1 goto label Regards hmw ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Runs on my box (x86_64, with tcsh-6.20.00-5.fc26) Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 26 (Twenty Six) Kernel-4.12.8-300.fc26.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Correct: Usage of PageUp/Page Down Key in gnome-terminal
Using mate-terminal instead of gnome-terminal runs as expected with the PageUp/Page Down Key. -- Fedora release 26 (Twenty Six) Kernel-4.12.8-300.fc26.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Usage of PageUp/Page Down Key in gnome-terminal
On 08/19/17 14:32, Marmorstein, Robert wrote: I'm running F26/x86_64 and having the following problem: In earlier Fedora Versions, I could use PageUP or PageDown key to scroll through the gnome-terminal output (or I could use the mouse wheel for doing Does SHIFT-PageUp work? Robert Sadly no. Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 26 (Twenty Six) Kernel-4.12.8-300.fc26.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Correct: Usage of PageUp/Page Down Key in gnome-terminal
On 08/19/17 14:22, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi guys, I'm running F26/x86_64 and having the following problem: In earlier Fedora Versions, I could use PageUP or PageDown key to scroll through the gnome-terminal output (or I could use the mouse wheel for doing the same). But in F26, nothings happens if I use these keys or the mouse wheel! Anybody knows whether this feature has been been abolished in F26? Kind regards Joachim Backes Sorry, I meant the Shift+PageUp or Shift+PageDown key. Joachim Backes Fedora release 26 (Twenty Six) Kernel-4.12.8-300.fc26.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Usage of PageUp/Page Down Key in gnome-terminal
Hi guys, I'm running F26/x86_64 and having the following problem: In earlier Fedora Versions, I could use PageUP or PageDown key to scroll through the gnome-terminal output (or I could use the mouse wheel for doing the same). But in F26, nothings happens if I use these keys or the mouse wheel! Anybody knows whether this feature has been been abolished in F26? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 26 (Twenty Six) Kernel-4.12.8-300.fc26.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Can't downgrade to OpenVPN 2.3 anymore
On 05/26/17 17:04, cen wrote: Hi I need OpenVPN 2.3 because the end router has an outdated OpenVPN version and OpenVPN 2.4 broke compatibility. 2 weeks ago I accidentally updated to 2.4 but I managed to do dnf downgrade. However, after I updated Fedora 25 today I can no longer downgrade, it says it is at lowest version. OpenVPN upgraded even tho I explicitely set exclude=openvpn in /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo What is the correct way to avoid this in the future? How to properly prevent package from updating? Luckily I found 2.3 rpm on rpmfind so the day is saved for now. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Hi Cen, try the page: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2700 I think this will give you the openvpn version you need, even openvpn-2.3.*, for example openvpn-2.3.13-1.fc25. I guess, other pkgs have to be downgraded, but I think this will be reported if needed when downgrading openvpn. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.11.3-200.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Strange thunderbird behaviour on a reaceived email: not all attachments are readable.
On 05/16/17 07:52, Heinz Diehl wrote: On 15.05.2017, Ed Greshko wrote: Well, without seeing the raw message my guessing of the cause has come to an end. Right-click on the mailbox, choose "Properties -> General information> -> Repair folder". Well, I did it several times, but without any positive result. Obviously, the folder is not corrupt :-( Kind regards Joachim Backes ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.10.16-200.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Strange thunderbird behaviour on a reaceived email: not all attachments are readable.
On 05/15/17 11:35, Ed Greshko wrote: On 05/15/17 17:27, Joachim Backes wrote: it doesn't matter: same behaviour is first saving the attachment and then opening it, or to open it directly by thunderbird. I see Was the message signed by any chance? I have had issues, long enough ago that I don't recall the details, when "inline PGP" was used instead of "PGP/MIME". No, simply attached. And the message was not signed (see: after forwarding and/or redirecting, all is OK). Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.10.15-200.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Strange thunderbird behaviour on a reaceived email: not all attachments are readable.
On 05/15/17 11:12, Ed Greshko wrote: On 05/15/17 16:08, Joachim Backes wrote: I'm running F25 with thunderbird-52.1.0-1.fc25.x86_64. some days ago I received an email with 11 pdf's attached. Trying to open some of the pdf's with acroread or evince fails because of a message like: "attached file has been damaged." But if I foward or redirect this message with all attachments, then this forwarded or redirected email is fully readable together with all attachments. Anybody has an explanation for such a behaviour? Have not had any problems with attachments. Granted, the most I've gotten in a single email these days has been 3. When you tried to open them, did you do so directly? Did you also try saving them to disk first and then trying to open them? Hi Ed, it doesn't matter: same behaviour is first saving the attachment and then opening it, or to open it directly by thunderbird. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.10.15-200.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Strange thunderbird behaviour on a reaceived email: not all attachments are readable.
I'm running F25 with thunderbird-52.1.0-1.fc25.x86_64. some days ago I received an email with 11 pdf's attached. Trying to open some of the pdf's with acroread or evince fails because of a message like: "attached file has been damaged." But if I foward or redirect this message with all attachments, then this forwarded or redirected email is fully readable together with all attachments. Anybody has an explanation for such a behaviour? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.10.15-200.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Lightning full part of thunderbird or not?
On 04/28/17 01:17, Jake Shipton wrote: On 27/04/17 06:38, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi all, Alledgely, since TB 38 lightning is full part of thunderbird. For the moment, I'm running TB 52 on F25. Going to the TB addons, seeing that an lightning addon is installed. This a strange policy. Can anybody please explain this circumstances. Kind regards Joachim Backes Hi, Technically lightning is fully integrated, as once the add-on is installed it integrates entirely (as opposed to Sunbird). However, it remains an add-on to keep the ability to be compatible with SeaMonkey[1] because SeaMonkey users use it also. I think that the add-on has it's own team working on it rather than the TB devs, but I'm not sure about that. Hi Jake, thanks for clarification. Kind regards Joachim Backes [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Calendar/Calendar_Versions Kind Regards, Jake Shipton (JakeMS) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.10.13-200.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Lightning full part of thunderbird or not?
Hi all, Alledgely, since TB 38 lightning is full part of thunderbird. For the moment, I'm running TB 52 on F25. Going to the TB addons, seeing that an lightning addon is installed. This a strange policy. Can anybody please explain this circumstances. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.10.12-200.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: i want to install a package from debian to fedora
-1.0-3.fc25.x86_64 1/2 Installing : espeak-ng-1.49.1-2.fc25.x86_64 2/2 Verifying : espeak-ng-1.49.1-2.fc25.x86_64 1/2 Verifying : pcaudiolib-1.0-3.fc25.x86_64 2/2 Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.10.10-200.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: i want to install a package from debian to fedora
On 04/14/17 16:11, Amir-Trend Plus wrote:
Hi,
for the alien thing, i've tried downloading the deb package, convert
using alien but no go. it cannot installed the rpm.
as for the espeak-ng and espeak are same or not, actually in 2006
untul 2014, the synthesizer is called espeak, but for some reason the
person who developed this dont know where he goes, so a new person
take over this project, rename the espeak to espeak-ng while providing
updates and impprovements to it, such as adding more languages to this
speech synthesizer. So, the new driver that i want, in fedora the
package espeak-ng is available, but without the driver to communicate
between speech-dispatcher and the espeak-ng, my screen reader wont
know how to use that espeak-ng. In debian, there ar two, one the
speech-dispatcher-espeak-ng that i gave the url before, and the other
is the library for espeak-ng, libespeak-ng1,
https://packages.debian.org/sid/libespeak-ng1
so, the espeak is the older version of the synthesizer, espeak-ng,
stands for new generation, is newer and has many languages added.
thanks for the help, hope to get this solved! :)
2017-04-14 13:07 GMT+08:00, poma <pomidorabelis...@gmail.com>:
On 14.04.2017 01:06, Amir-Trend Plus wrote:
Hi,
i am a new user here, using fedora 25 with a screen reader. Since i
use the assistive technology, i need to use a package, not one i
think, maybe two, packages from debian. The first one, adds support
for the new voice available on fedora, called, espeak-ng. It needs a
driver to communicate with my speech-dispatcher, an interface that
will provide speech using the synthesizer. Unfortunately, the driver
is not availablne in .rpm, but in debian it is available. Both debian
and rpm are using the 0.86 version of this app, so i think it is not
an issue of version. I tried alien and when installing, it said
conflict with file. I also cannot find the source package for this.
The package i mean is, speech-dispatcher-espeak-ng, available from
this link,
https://packages.debian.org/sid/main/speech-dispatcher-espeak-ng
if anyone can convert it to rpm and i can install it, it will be great!
$ dpkg -I speech-dispatcher-espeak-ng_0.8.6-4_amd64.deb | grep Homepage
-A12
Homepage: http://devel.freebsoft.org/speechd
Description: Speech Dispatcher: Espeak-ng output module
Speech Dispatcher provides a device independent layer for speech
synthesis.
It supports various software and hardware speech synthesizers as
backends and provides a generic layer for synthesizing speech and
playing back PCM data via those different backends to applications.
.
Various high level concepts like enqueueing vs. interrupting speech and
application specific user configurations are implemented in a device
independent way, therefore freeing the application programmer from
having to yet again reinvent the wheel.
.
This package contains the output module for the espeak-ng speech
synthesizer.
$ dpkg -c speech-dispatcher-espeak-ng_0.8.6-4_amd64.deb | awk '{print $6}'
./
./usr/
./usr/lib/
./usr/lib/speech-dispatcher-modules/
./usr/lib/speech-dispatcher-modules/sd_espeak-ng
./usr/share/
./usr/share/doc/
./usr/share/doc/speech-dispatcher-espeak-ng/
./usr/share/doc/speech-dispatcher-espeak-ng/changelog.Debian.gz
./usr/share/doc/speech-dispatcher-espeak-ng/copyright
$ rpm -qilp speech-dispatcher-espeak-0.8.6-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm | grep URL -A
9
URL : http://devel.freebsoft.org/speechd
Summary : Speech Dispatcher espeak module
Description :
This package contains the espeak output module for Speech Dispatcher.
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak.conf
/usr/lib64/speech-dispatcher-modules/sd_espeak
Are these two essentially the same module/driver?
Hi Amri-Trend,
did you have a look at rpmfind.net? Searching for espeak-ng returns the
result page
"https://www.rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=espeak-ng=Search+...==;,
and there you will find some binary rpms and source rpm's too. You can
try to install a binary rpm, or, if no success, you can try to download
the source rpm and recompile it.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five)
Kernel-4.10.10-200.fc25.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
gdm won't start gnome (wayland) session after running once a gnome-classic session
Hi all, normally, I'm using a gnome (wayland) desktop sessions. If I started (only once) the gnome classic session, then logging out and thenre-logging in again with the usage of gnome (wayland), I still get a gnome classic session. Only after restarting my box, I can again run gnome (wayland) sessions. My login manager is gdm. Anybody sees this too? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.10.10-200.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: i want to install a package from debian to fedora
On 04/14/17 01:06, Amir-Trend Plus wrote: Hi, i am a new user here, using fedora 25 with a screen reader. Since i use the assistive technology, i need to use a package, not one i think, maybe two, packages from debian. The first one, adds support for the new voice available on fedora, called, espeak-ng. It needs a driver to communicate with my speech-dispatcher, an interface that will provide speech using the synthesizer. Unfortunately, the driver is not availablne in .rpm, but in debian it is available. Both debian and rpm are using the 0.86 version of this app, so i think it is not an issue of version. I tried alien and when installing, it said conflict with file. I also cannot find the source package for this. The package i mean is, speech-dispatcher-espeak-ng, available from this link, https://packages.debian.org/sid/main/speech-dispatcher-espeak-ng if anyone can convert it to rpm and i can install it, it will be great! Would *alien* be the right software for you: - NAME alien - Convert or install an alien binary package SYNOPSIS alien [--to-deb] [--to-rpm] [--to-tgz] [--to-slp] [options] file [...] DESCRIPTION alien is a program that converts between Red Hat rpm, Debian deb, Stampede slp, Slackware tgz, and Solaris pkg file formats. If you want to use a package from another linux distribution than the one you have installed on your system, you can use alien to convert it to your preferred package format and install it. It also supports LSB packages. -- If yes, then run: sudo dnf install alien. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.10.10-200.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: dnf list --showduplicates shows a lot of double entries
On 03/17/17 12:38, Honza Silhan wrote: # yum-deprecated list --showduplicates -q | wc -l 73450 # dnf list --showduplicates -q | wc -l 76411 vs # yum-deprecated list -q | wc -l 56101 # dnf list -q | wc -l 55966 (counts differs because different metadata) seems like it does something in both DNF and yum. Even after checking the output they look the same. IFAIK it should show all versions of the same package name instead of just highest. I am not sure what are you trying to achieve but I would recommend you to use `dnf repoquery` instead. E.g. for showing duplicates on the system: `dnf repoquery --installed --duplicates` or `dnf check --duplicates`. Honza Hi Honza, I think the problem has been solved: Using "dnf list installed --showduplicates" generated another output without the issues I mentioned. I did not know that the "installed" option was not the default, it seems that "available" was the default, so that output (please try dnf list available --showduplicates). Kind regards Joachim Backes > Hi, On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> wrote: Hi all, dnf list --showduplicates shows a lot of duplicate entries, with origin fedora and commandline, for example of the package yelp: dnf list --showduplicates|grep yelp yelp.x86_64 2:3.22.0-1.fc25 @@commandline yelp-libs.x86_64 2:3.22.0-1.fc25 @@commandline yelp-xsl.noarch 3.20.1-1.fc25 @@commandline yelp.x86_64 2:3.22.0-1.fc25 @@commandline yelp.x86_64 2:3.22.0-1.fc25fedora yelp-devel.i686 2:3.22.0-1.fc25fedora yelp-devel.x86_642:3.22.0-1.fc25fedora yelp-libs.i686 2:3.22.0-1.fc25fedora yelp-libs.x86_64 2:3.22.0-1.fc25 @@commandline yelp-libs.x86_64 2:3.22.0-1.fc25fedora yelp-tools.noarch3.18.0-3.fc25 fedora yelp-xsl.noarch 3.20.1-1.fc25 @@commandline yelp-xsl.noarch 3.20.1-1.fc25 fedora Is this an known dnf issue, or how to get rid of this annoying effect? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Kernel-4.10.3-200.fc25.x86_64 Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.10.3-200.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
dnf list --showduplicates shows a lot of double entries
Hi all, dnf list --showduplicates shows a lot of duplicate entries, with origin fedora and commandline, for example of the package yelp: dnf list --showduplicates|grep yelp yelp.x86_64 2:3.22.0-1.fc25 @@commandline yelp-libs.x86_64 2:3.22.0-1.fc25 @@commandline yelp-xsl.noarch 3.20.1-1.fc25 @@commandline yelp.x86_64 2:3.22.0-1.fc25 @@commandline yelp.x86_64 2:3.22.0-1.fc25fedora yelp-devel.i686 2:3.22.0-1.fc25fedora yelp-devel.x86_642:3.22.0-1.fc25fedora yelp-libs.i686 2:3.22.0-1.fc25fedora yelp-libs.x86_64 2:3.22.0-1.fc25 @@commandline yelp-libs.x86_64 2:3.22.0-1.fc25fedora yelp-tools.noarch3.18.0-3.fc25 fedora yelp-xsl.noarch 3.20.1-1.fc25 @@commandline yelp-xsl.noarch 3.20.1-1.fc25 fedora Is this an known dnf issue, or how to get rid of this annoying effect? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Kernel-4.10.3-200.fc25.x86_64 Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: running some X11-Applications with sudo under GNOME/Wayland fails
On 03/06/17 13:18, Jeroen Mathon wrote: On Monday, March 6, 2017 11:13:59 AM CET Joachim Backes wrote: Hi, seeing coincidentally that some X11 applications with sudo under GNOME/Wayland will fail: - For example: 1. sudo xterm No protocol specified Warning: This program is an suid-root program or is being run by the root user. The full text of the error or warning message cannot be safely formatted in this environment. You may get a more descriptive message by running the program as a non-root user or by removing the suid bit on the executable. xterm: Xt error: Can't open display: %s 2. sudo gnome-terminal No protocol specified Unable to init server: Could not connect: Connection refused Failed to parse arguments: Cannot open display: Running the same under Gnome/Xorg executes properly. Anybody sees this too? Kind regards Joachim Backes Hey Joachim, Could you supply us with some more information, like: - The output of `echo $DISPLAY` Hi Jeron, echo $DISPLAY :0 - Verbose output of you're display manager How to do? - The version of the software you are using(Gnome, xorg and gdm) rpm -qa|egrep -i '(xorg|gdm|^gnome)' xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.99.917-26.20160929.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-geode-2.11.18-2.fc25.i686 gnome-themes-standard-3.22.2-1.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-resutils-7.5-13.fc24.x86_64 gnome-software-3.22.5-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-shell-extension-common-3.22.2-1.fc25.noarch gnome-maps-3.22.2-1.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.19.1-3.fc25.x86_64 gnome-keyring-pam-3.20.0-1.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1.0.13-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-settings-daemon-3.22.1-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-system-monitor-3.22.2-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-desktop3-3.22.2-2.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-fbdev-0.4.3-25.fc25.x86_64 gnome-python2-2.28.1-18.fc25.x86_64 gnome-sudoku-3.22.2-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-shell-extension-alternate-tab-3.22.2-1.fc25.noarch gnome-color-manager-3.22.2-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-clocks-3.22.1-1.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-xkb-utils-7.7-17.fc24.x86_64 gnome-keyring-sharp-1.0.1-0.21.133722svn.fc24.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.5-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-contacts-3.22.1-2.fc25.x86_64 gnome-logs-3.22.1-2.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-xdm-1.1.11-10.fc24.x86_64 xorg-x11-server-Xwayland-1.19.1-3.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-vesa-2.3.2-25.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.9.0-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-shell-extension-apps-menu-3.22.2-1.fc25.noarch gnome-disk-utility-3.22.1-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-desktop-2.32.0-17.fc24.x86_64 gnome-shell-extension-window-list-3.22.2-1.fc25.noarch gnome-keyring-3.20.0-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-themes-2.32.0-14.fc24.noarch gnome-vfs2-2.24.4-20.fc24.x86_64 xorg-x11-server-utils-7.7-20.fc25.x86_64 gnome-bluetooth-3.20.1-1.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-misc-7.5-16.fc24.noarch abrt-addon-xorg-2.9.0-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-classic-session-3.22.2-1.fc25.noarch gnome-user-docs-3.22.0-1.fc25.noarch gnome-initial-setup-3.22.1-1.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-xbitmaps-1.1.1-9.fc24.noarch gnome-icon-theme-3.12.0-4.fc24.noarch gnome-boxes-3.22.4-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-video-effects-0.4.3-1.fc25.noarch xorg-x11-utils-7.5-21.fc24.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.5.0-2.fc25.x86_64 gnome-weather-3.20.2-1.fc25.noarch gnome-screenshot-3.22.0-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-abrt-1.2.5-1.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-server-common-1.19.1-3.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.34.0-4.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-font-utils-7.5-32.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-xauth-1.0.9-5.fc24.x86_64 gnome-user-share-3.18.3-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-terminal-3.22.1-5.fc25.x86_64 gnome-session-wayland-session-3.22.2-3.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-Type1-7.5-16.fc24.noarch gnome-terminal-nautilus-3.22.1-5.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-qxl-0.1.5-2.fc25.x86_64 gnome-backgrounds-3.22.1-1.fc25.noarch gnome-bluetooth-libs-3.20.1-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-python2-canvas-2.28.1-18.fc25.x86_64 gnome-vfs2-common-2.24.4-20.fc24.noarch xorg-x11-apps-7.7-15.fc24.x86_64 gnome-menus-3.13.3-5.fc24.x86_64 gnome-shell-extension-user-theme-3.22.2-1.fc25.noarch gnome-getting-started-docs-3.22.0-1.fc25.noarch gnome-web-photo-0.10.5-9.fc24.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-libinput-0.23.0-2.fc25.x86_64 gnome-session-xsession-3.22.2-3.fc25.x86_64 gnome-autoar-0.2.1-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-online-accounts-3.22.4-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-font-viewer-3.22.0-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-do-0.95.3-3.fc24.x86_64 gnome-shell-extension-launch-new-instance-3.22.2-1.fc25.noarch xorg-x11-xinit-1.3.4-13.fc25.x86_64 gnome-shell-3.22.3-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-characters-3.22.0-1.fc25.x86_64 pulseaudio-gdm-hooks-10.0-2.fc25.x86_64 gnome-desktop-sharp-2.26.0-28.fc24.x86_64 gnome-sharp-2.24.2-12.fc25.x86_64 gnome-tweak-tool-3.22.0-1.fc25.noarch xorg-x11-proto-devel-7.7-20.fc25.noarch gnome-shell-extension-places-menu-3.22.2-1.fc25.noarch gnome-calculator-3.22.3-1.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi-7.5-16.fc24.noarch xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.7.1-1.20160928git3fc839ff.fc25.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-vmware-13.2.1-1.fc25.x86_64 gdm-3.22.2-1.fc25.x86_64 gnome-session-3.22.2-3.fc25.x86_64 Can you
running some X11-Applications with sudo under GNOME/Wayland fails
Hi, seeing coincidentally that some X11 applications with sudo under GNOME/Wayland will fail: - For example: 1. sudo xterm No protocol specified Warning: This program is an suid-root program or is being run by the root user. The full text of the error or warning message cannot be safely formatted in this environment. You may get a more descriptive message by running the program as a non-root user or by removing the suid bit on the executable. xterm: Xt error: Can't open display: %s 2. sudo gnome-terminal No protocol specified Unable to init server: Could not connect: Connection refused Failed to parse arguments: Cannot open display: Running the same under Gnome/Xorg executes properly. Anybody sees this too? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.9.13-200.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: running ssh/remote cmd in the background
On 02/26/17 18:08, bruce wrote: Morn guys... The following works as a test ssh to fire off a remote cmd. However it waits for the cmd to complete befor returning. I'm looking to run th cmd as a background on the local/calling instance. Ultimaely, I'll be testing this from py/php scripts. ssh -t user1@67.205.151.05 'cat /cloud/hash2.dat | wc -l' -would the following work? ssh -t user1@67.205.151.05 'cat /cloud/hash2.dat | wc -l' & It runs the (complete) local ssh cmd (including it's parameters) locally in background. If you want to run the remote cmd in background (cat /cloud/hash2.dat | wc -l) you must add the "&" before the closing "'" and not after. But this means your ssh command likely may exit before the remote cmd finishes. Is this reasonable? Kind regards Joachim Backes Im not sure if the "&" would be applied to the remote or local side for the ssh. And yeah, I know I could run a few tests... but I thought I'd get the opinion of some of you guys as well...!! Thanks ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.9.12-200.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: safety
On 01/18/17 15:51, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, When you log from the graphics interface (gnome) and provide the password, if the system is slow (long response time), then the password can appear in clear !!! Hi Patrick, having the same issue if booting into runlevel 3 and then login: if I'm too fast with entering the password after having entered the username, then the password can be seen until the password prompt appears :-( Kind regards Joachim Backes This my be annoying! === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.9.4-201.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Shell question
On 12/27/2016 11:49 PM, JD wrote: Reading lines from 2 files in such a way that each iteration lets me read the next line from each file so that the items read from each file are in sync as far as line number is concerned. Is this "doable"? For a single file, indexing to next line is automatic, visa vis while read line; do echo $line done < some_file.txt for when more than 1 file is involved, it is not so easy ... JD, If using the bash, you could introduce file descriptors for each file you are reading from ( set the fie descriptor by using the exec command) and then read using the -u option for each file. Kind regards Joachim Backes Hypothetical (of course, non-working example): export index=1 while true do; file_A_line=`read line$index` # Read from file A file_B_line=`read line$index` # read from file B [ x$file_A_line = x -o x$file_B_line = x ] && break index=`expr $index + 1` done So how can the reading from 2 files be accomplished and keep the index to next line in sync? I know it is a no brainer with a C program. Thanx. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.8.15-300.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Advice needed for "opening a bug by usage of of the bugzilla page"
On 12/20/2016 06:39 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 12/20/16 13:22, Joachim Backes wrote: How to write a bug report for bugzilla (installed package not listed as fedora component [This happens if trying to write a BZ for gnome-terminal-nautilus])? If it were me I'd file it under "nautilus-extensions" since the info states... Description : This package provides a Nautilus extension that adds the 'Open in : Terminal' option to the right-click context menu in Nautilus. On my site: rpm -qi nautilus-extensions Name: nautilus-extensions Version : 3.22.2 Release : 1.fc25 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Wed Dec 14 08:42:03 2016 Group : Unspecified Size: 77890 License : LGPLv2+ Signature : RSA/SHA256, Mon Dec 12 14:08:25 2016, Key ID 4089d8f2fdb19c98 Source RPM : nautilus-3.22.2-1.fc25.src.rpm Build Date : Mon Dec 12 13:42:55 2016 Build Host : buildhw-09.phx2.fedoraproject.org Relocations : (not relocatable) Packager: Fedora Project Vendor : Fedora Project URL : https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Nautilus Summary : Nautilus extensions library Description : This package provides the libraries used by nautilus extensions. *** But no <> *** AND rpm -qi gnome-terminal-nautilus Name: gnome-terminal-nautilus Version : 3.22.1 Release : 2.fc25 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Fri Dec 16 18:32:57 2016 Group : Unspecified Size: 76057 License : GPLv3+ and GFDL Signature : RSA/SHA256, Thu Dec 15 16:56:55 2016, Key ID 4089d8f2fdb19c98 Source RPM : gnome-terminal-3.22.1-2.fc25.src.rpm Build Date : Thu Dec 15 16:20:49 2016 Build Host : buildvm-29.phx2.fedoraproject.org Relocations : (not relocatable) Packager: Fedora Project Vendor : Fedora Project URL : http://www.gnome.org/ Summary : GNOME Terminal extension for Nautilus Description : This package provides a Nautilus extension that adds the 'Open in Terminal' option to the right-click context menu in Nautilus. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.8.15-300.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Advice needed for "opening a bug by usage of of the bugzilla page"
Hi all, How to write a bug report for bugzilla (installed package not listed as fedora component [This happens if trying to write a BZ for gnome-terminal-nautilus])? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.8.15-300.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adding own startup applications (located in some private folder) to gnome-tweak-tool
On 12/01/16 16:38, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 12/01/2016 05:01 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: is it possible to add own startup applications located in some private folder to the gnome-tweak-tool submenu "startup applications"? Any advice is welcome. You may place a .desktop file into your ~/.config/autostart/ directory. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Hi Michael, thanks for the hint. I made some .desktop file in ~/.config/autostart by copying and editing another one, but the entry won't appear in gnome-tweak-tool when trying to add this entry. Any important rules for the lines in such a .desktop file? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.8.11-300.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Adding own startup applications (located in some private folder) to gnome-tweak-tool
Hi F25 users, is it possible to add own startup applications located in some private folder to the gnome-tweak-tool submenu "startup applications"? Any advice is welcome. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.8.11-300.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25 nautilus problem: Double clicking on .tgz archives will extract them immediatley into the same directory
On 11/27/16 17:36, Branko Grubic wrote: On Sun, 2016-11-27 at 14:44 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: On 11/27/16 13:28, bitlord wrote: On Sun, 2016-11-27 at 11:57 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: Hy all F25 users, ... "Extract the files on open" Hi bitlord, following exactly your advice did not help: If now Doubleclicking on the .tgz file, nothing happens. The only thing which helps is selecting the archive file with the right mouse key, then select "Open with other application" and activate "archiv manager" as recommended app. I have no idea, for me it does work as expected, did only try with .tar.xz, .tar.gz, .tgz and .zip files, it opens file-roller by default when this feature is disabled. Hi Branko, in the meantime I experimented a little bit with the "properties" window, and now, the double klicking on tgz files works as expected. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.8.10-300.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25 nautilus problem: Double clicking on .tgz archives will extract them immediatley into the same directory
On 11/27/16 13:28, bitlord wrote: On Sun, 2016-11-27 at 11:57 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: Hy all F25 users, I'm running F25 with gnome/X11 desktop environment, and having problems with nautilus: I have some directories where .tgz archives are located. Suddenly, clicking on the .tgz files will no more open them and show their contents, but the .tgz file will be immediately unpacked into the same dir. How to restore the old behaviour which will only open the archive and not unpack it? Any help will be appreciated. Kind regards Joachim Backes Hi Joachim, Go to app menu of nautilus (next to the Activities), open Preferences, select Behavior tab, and there is an option Compressed Files uncheck "Extract the files on open" Hi bitlord, following exactly your advice did not help: If now Doubleclicking on the .tgz file, nothing happens. The only thing which helps is selecting the archive file with the right mouse key, then select "Open with other application" and activate "archiv manager" as recommended app. Kind regards Joachim Backes ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.8.10-300.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
F25 nautilus problem: Double clicking on .tgz archives will extract them immediatley into the same directory
Hy all F25 users, I'm running F25 with gnome/X11 desktop environment, and having problems with nautilus: I have some directories where .tgz archives are located. Suddenly, clicking on the .tgz files will no more open them and show their contents, but the .tgz file will be immediately unpacked into the same dir. How to restore the old behaviour which will only open the archive and not unpack it? Any help will be appreciated. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.8.10-300.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Taking a screenshot in GNOME desktop during a pulldown menu is open. How to?
Hi all, having a problem: I need to take a screenshot on the gnome desktop (no wayland!)with alt+print or shift+print keys, during some pulldown menu of some window is opened, but nothing happens. How can I achive this? The pulldown menu should be included in the screenshot. The screenshot is performed flawlessly if the pulldown menu is closed. It seems that this is a X11 problem. All comments are welcome. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.8.3-300.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: starting remote firefox via SSH
On 10/19/16 12:23, bruce wrote: Hi. This is a "continuation" of the issue of starting firefox for a diff user on a box. If one logs into (SSH) into a remote box, and wants to start firefox on the remote machine, such that all firefox operations occur on the remote machine.. Different sites suggest setting the DISPLAY var, as well as xauth, etc.. none of which seem to work. The local/remote are both centos/fed. The goal: To be able to SSH into a remote box, and run a py script that initiates a py/selenium binding/process to use firefox. -This requires that the remote box be able to start/run firefox for the user that the SSH session was started as/under. The SSH/Firefox issue: -How to SSH into the box, and start firefox? (Already set up the keys, to allow ssh into the box vai ssh 192.168.1.4) Tried: ssh 192.168.1.4 foo@box1# DISPLAY=0: firefox ---ERROR: cannot open display: 0: foo@box1# export DISPLAY=0: foo@box1# firefox ---No protocol specified ---ERROR: cannot open display: 0: This has to be simple! Take "ssh -X" instead of "ssh". Thos will solve your problem! Joachim Backes Any thoughts?? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.8.2-300.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
evince question concerning numerical calculations in PDF forms
Hi all Fedora users, can anybody explain why evince is unable to perform calculations with numerical rows or columns of pdf forms? So I must continue to use acroread or foxit reader for such operations :-( All comments are welcome. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.7.7-200.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Boot normally, but give me a root shell
On 10/08/16 19:02, Greg Woods wrote: On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de <mailto:joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>> wrote: If you add "init=/bin/bash" to the grub line, there is simply a root shell started (with id=0), so no password is required This doesn't change what I said about "vanilla system"; it requires the installed system be explicitly modified. Hi Greg, I'm running a F24 system with the kernel 4.7.7-200.fc24.x86_64 (no vanilla!), and adding "init=/bin/bash" to the grub line really boots into a root shell! Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.7.7-200.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Boot normally, but give me a root shell
On 10/08/16 17:35, Greg Woods wrote: On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Tim <ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au <mailto:ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au>> wrote: The old run level one (whatever they call it, these days), was a basic, isolated from the network, text-only, login. It still is, except that it requires "Give root password" before you can get a shell, at least in a vanilla system. Greg, if you add "init=/bin/bash" to the grub line, there is simply a root shell started (with id=0), so no password is required, but you have root rights. Kind regards Joachim Backes --Greg ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.7.7-200.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Boot normally, but give me a root shell
On 10/07/16 07:03, fedora wrote: Hi Rich what you require comes close to going into (former) runlevel 3: Select your boot instance in grub2, type e (for edit) and add "3" at the end of the line. Then continue booting. I don't believe that this will run: runlevel 3 is still a standard way to login withous graphical environment, and in runlevel 3 a password is required (similar to a graphical environment). But you could try "init=/bin/bash" in the grub boot line. Kind regards Joachim Backes suomi On 10/06/2016 11:55 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Is there a way to get Fedora to boot into a root shell, without requiring a password? NOTE: I'm not interested in "emergency" shells and this is not for recovering a system. I want the (specialized, non-networked) system to boot as normal, all the way to multi-user.target, and then drop me to a root shell. Rich. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.7.6-200.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Thunderbird add-on
On 08/15/16 19:28, jd1008 wrote: in TB (Thunderbird for the un-initiate :) Tools -> Add-Ons no longer provides "install add-on from file. On my box, Thunderbird->Add-ons shows in a tab the addons manager. There you will find a dropdown menu (a window with a gear) where you may install an add-on from a file. I think this is what you are looking for. Kind regards Joachim Backes Could someone show how to install an-add-on from file? Thanx. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.6.6-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: bugzilla always logs out as of late if leaving a BZ session in firefox?
On 08/15/16 10:47, Ntlworld wrote:
Have you disabled cookies?
Getting rid of the problem by deactivating "Use Tracking Protection in
Private Windows" in the firefox "Privacy" section.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
On 15 Aug 2016, at 09:30, Sylvia Sánchez <lailah...@gmail.com
<mailto:lailah...@gmail.com>> wrote:
That's weird... Maybe a setting on your side? I just opened the page
and I'm still logged in despite Firefox was closed since yesterday.
Cheers,
Sylvia
On 15 August 2016 at 09:07, Joachim Backes
<joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de <mailto:joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>>
wrote:
Hi all,
since some weeks I have the following problem with bugzilla page:
each time I open a BZ page, I'm prompted to login in BZ again.
This happens since some weeks. Does BZ logout automatically if
closing the browser (firefox for example)? I never had to re-login
to BZ in earlier times after leaving the browser.
So, any solution for this problem?
All comments are welcome.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four)
Kernel-4.6.6-300.fc24.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
<mailto:joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>>
http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
<http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/>
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
<https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
<http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct>
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines>
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
--
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
--
Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four)
Kernel-4.6.6-300.fc24.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
bugzilla always logs out as of late if leaving a BZ session in firefox?
Hi all, since some weeks I have the following problem with bugzilla page: each time I open a BZ page, I'm prompted to login in BZ again. This happens since some weeks. Does BZ logout automatically if closing the browser (firefox for example)? I never had to re-login to BZ in earlier times after leaving the browser. So, any solution for this problem? All comments are welcome. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.6.6-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
libtroffice-x11
Hi all, can anybody explain the purpose of libreoffice-x11? My libreoffice runs properly without libreoffice-x11. rpm -qi gives no usable information. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.6.6-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [OT] Usage of VirualBox from UnitedRpms for installing VB VM's in F24
On 07/19/16 13:25, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/19/16 14:18, Joachim Backes wrote: Having problems to use a simple CD/DVD drive for the usage in VirtualBox from UnitedRpms: The correspondent storage dialog only accepts iso files for a virtual CD/DVD. Devices as /dev/sr0 are not accepted. No such problems with VB from oracle. Anybody sees this too? I too have no idea what the UnitedRpms are I'd say, it's a (better, more actual) replacement for rpmfusion: https://gitlab.com/groups/FedoraUnited What I do know is that you need the matching Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack for the Guest OS to access some HW features of the Host. The problem: I didn't find any (the VB version from UnitedRpms is VirtualBox-5.0.20-1.fc24.x86_64), and the correspondent extpack version from Oracle is Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-5.0.20-106931.vbox-extpack). But there is no extpack for the UnitedRpms version. If you don't have the in the United RPMs that is probably the issue. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.6.4-301.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [OT] Usage of VirualBox from UnitedRpms for installing VB VM's in F24
On 07/19/16 13:21, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 08:18 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: Having problems to use a simple CD/DVD drive for the usage in VirtualBox from UnitedRpms: The correspondent storage dialog only accepts iso files for a virtual CD/DVD. Devices as /dev/sr0 are not accepted. I'd say, UnitedRpms is a (better, more actual) replacement for rpmfusion. I've no idea what UnitedRpms is, however I know the standard free version of VirtualBox does not redirect USB devices. For that you need the Oracle version. /dev/sr0 is no USB device, but a SATA attached DVD drive. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.6.4-301.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[OT] Usage of VirualBox from UnitedRpms for installing VB VM's in F24
Hi all F24 users, Having problems to use a simple CD/DVD drive for the usage in VirtualBox from UnitedRpms: The correspondent storage dialog only accepts iso files for a virtual CD/DVD. Devices as /dev/sr0 are not accepted. No such problems with VB from oracle. Anybody sees this too? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.6.4-301.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 24: Network inoperable after a manual NetworkManager restart
On 07/07/16 14:51, Rami Rosen wrote: Hi, Joachim, Apologies, I could only answer just now. The problem is, for sure, that restarting the Network Manager did not create the "nameserver 192.168.100.1" entry in /etc/resolv.conf. This is the entry which is solely responsible for DNS name resolving, and its omission deprives you from getting an answer to your ping request you mentioned. I am unsure as to what is the exact reason. I would suggest the following three actions, to further try to understand the issue: Hi Rami, Today morning, I filed a BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353184 The BZ seems now to be under examination. 1) post here the content of /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf see attachment! 2) if this config file has "dns=dnsmasq" entry, try to comment it and restart NetworkManager, then see if /etc/resolv.conf is empty or not. 3) tell us if selinux is enabled on this machine (the output of "getenforce" from the command line) /etc/selinux/config has a line: SELINUX=disabled Kind regards and thanks for your efforts Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.6.3-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ # Configuration file for NetworkManager. # # See "man 5 NetworkManager.conf" for details. # # The directory /usr/lib/NetworkManager/conf.d/ can contain additional configuration # snippets installed by packages. These files are read before NetworkManager.conf # and have thus lowest priority. # The directory /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/ can contain additional configuration # snippets. Those snippets override the settings from this main file. # # The files within one conf.d/ directory are read in asciibetical order. # # If /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/ contains a file with the same name as # /usr/lib/NetworkManager/conf.d/, the latter file is shadowed and thus ignored. # Hence, to disable loading a file from /usr/lib/NetworkManager/conf.d/ you can # put an empty file with the same name. # # If two files define the same key, the one that is read afterwards will overwrite # the previous one. [main] #plugins=ifcfg-rh,ibft [logging] # When debugging NetworkManager, enabling debug logging is of great help. # # Logfiles contain no passwords and little sensitive information. But please # check before posting the file online. You can also personally hand over the # logfile to a NM developer to treat it confidential. Meet us on #nm on freenode. # Please post full logfiles except minimal modifications of private data. # # You can also change the log-level at runtime via # $ nmcli general logging level TRACE domains ALL # However, usually it's cleaner to enable debug logging # in the configuration and restart NetworkManager so that # debug logging is enabled from the start. # # You will find the logfiles in syslog, for example via # $ journalctl -u NetworkManager # #level=TRACE #domains=ALL -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 24: Network inoperable after a manual NetworkManager restart
On 07/06/16 15:54, Rami Rosen wrote: > Hi, Joachim, > > Regarding DNS resolving: the /etc/resolv.conf, which is generated by > Network Manager, as responsible for DNS resolving > Can you please post the output of > cat /etc/reslov.conf > after fresh reboot, before restarting NetworkManager, when > ping succeeds, > and after restargin NetworkManager, when > "ping: fails ? Hi Rami, /etc/resolv.conf before NM restart -- # Generated by NetworkManager nameserver 192.168.100.1 /etc/resolv.conf after NM restart -- # Generated by NetworkManager journalctl -f before and after NM restart: See attached file "journalctl-f" (the dashed line in "journalctl-f" marks the restart) Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.6.3-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- Logs begin at Wed 2016-03-30 14:05:49 CEST. -- Jul 06 16:16:08 eule audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='unit=systemd-hostnamed comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=success' Jul 06 16:16:10 eule chronyd[912]: Selected source 87.106.126.46 Jul 06 16:16:14 eule audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='unit=systemd-localed comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=success' Jul 06 16:16:15 eule realmd[1707]: quitting realmd service after timeout Jul 06 16:16:15 eule realmd[1707]: stopping service Jul 06 16:16:23 eule blueman-mechanism[2564]: Exiting Jul 06 16:16:51 eule dbus-daemon[1809]: Activating via systemd: service name='org.gnome.Terminal' unit='gnome-terminal-server.service' Jul 06 16:16:51 eule systemd[1768]: Starting GNOME Terminal Server... Jul 06 16:16:51 eule dbus-daemon[1809]: Successfully activated service 'org.gnome.Terminal' Jul 06 16:16:51 eule systemd[1768]: Started GNOME Terminal Server. --Jul 06 16:18:07 eule sudo[2721]: backes : TTY=pts/1 ; PWD=/home/backes ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/service NetworkManager restart Jul 06 16:18:07 eule audit[2721]: USER_CMD pid=2721 uid=1000 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='cwd="/home/backes" cmd=73657276696365204E6574776F726B4D616E616765722072657374617274 terminal=pts/1 res=success' Jul 06 16:18:07 eule audit[2721]: CRED_REFR pid=2721 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='op=PAM:setcred grantors=pam_env,pam_fprintd acct="root" exe="/usr/bin/sudo" hostname=? addr=? terminal=/dev/pts/1 res=success' Jul 06 16:18:07 eule sudo[2721]: pam_systemd(sudo:session): Cannot create session: Already occupied by a session Jul 06 16:18:07 eule audit[2721]: USER_START pid=2721 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='op=PAM:session_open grantors=pam_keyinit,pam_limits,pam_keyinit,pam_limits,pam_systemd,pam_unix acct="root" exe="/usr/bin/sudo" hostname=? addr=? terminal=/dev/pts/1 res=success' Jul 06 16:18:07 eule sudo[2721]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0) Jul 06 16:18:07 eule polkitd[937]: Registered Authentication Agent for unix-process:2722:22771 (system bus name :1.75 [/usr/bin/pkttyagent --notify-fd 4 --fallback], object path /org/freedesktop/PolicyKit1/AuthenticationAgent, locale en_US.utf8) Jul 06 16:18:07 eule systemd[1]: Stopping Network Manager... Jul 06 16:18:07 eule NetworkManager[1191]: [1467814687.2564] caught SIGTERM, shutting down normally. Jul 06 16:18:07 eule NetworkManager[1191]: [1467814687.2578] device (virbr0-nic): released from master device virbr0 Jul 06 16:18:07 eule NetworkManager[1191]: [1467814687.2581] exiting (success) Jul 06 16:18:07 eule systemd[1]: Stopped Network Manager. Jul 06 16:18:07 eule audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='unit=NetworkManager comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=success' Jul 06 16:18:07 eule org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1545]: Gjs-Message: JS LOG: Removing a network device that was not added Jul 06 16:18:07 eule audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='unit=NetworkManager comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=success' Jul 06 16:18:07 eule org.gnome.Shell.desktop[2059]: Gjs-Message: JS LOG: Removing a network device that was not added Jul 06 16:18:07 eule org.gnome.Shell.desktop[2059]: Gjs-Message: JS LOG: Removing a network device that was not added Jul 06 16:18:07 eule org.gnome.Shell.desktop[2059]: Gjs-Message: JS LOG: Removing a network device that was not added Jul 06 16:18:07 eule audit[2721]: USER_END pid=2721 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='op=PAM:session_clo
Fedora 24: Network inoperable after a manual NetworkManager restart
Hi F24 users, after a manual restart of NetworkManager (for some reasons) with sudo systemctl restart NetworkManager.service having some problems: 1. The Networkmanager icon disappeared from the dashboard of the GNOME3 desktop 2. DNS is no more operable: trying to access remote hosts by a hostname: "ping " fails with "ping: : Name or service not known" Using the IP address instead of hostname works. Status of NetworkManager: sudo systemctl status NetworkManager.service NetworkManager.service - Network Manager Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Wed 2016-07-06 12:47:52 CEST; 10min ago Main PID: 5905 (NetworkManager) Tasks: 5 (limit: 512) CGroup: /system.slice/NetworkManager.service ├─1375 /sbin/dhclient -d -q -sf /usr/libexec/nm-dhcp-helper -pf /var/run/dhclient-enp4s0.pid -lf /var/lib/NetworkManager/dhclient-7c3e2629-ab57-4b └─5905 /usr/sbin/NetworkManager --no-daemon Jul 06 12:47:52 eule NetworkManager[5905]: [1467802072.8854] device (enp4s0): Activation: successful, device activated. Jul 06 12:47:52 eule NetworkManager[5905]: [1467802072.8862] device (virbr0): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason Jul 06 12:47:52 eule NetworkManager[5905]: [1467802072.9191] device (virbr0): Activation: successful, device activated. Jul 06 12:47:52 eule NetworkManager[5905]: [1467802072.9578] connectivity: check for uri 'http://fedoraproject.org/static/hot Jul 06 12:47:52 eule NetworkManager[5905]: [1467802072.9581] connectivity: check for uri 'http://fedoraproject.org/static/hot Jul 06 12:47:52 eule NetworkManager[5905]: [1467802072.9633] connectivity: check for uri 'http://fedoraproject.org/static/hot Jul 06 12:47:52 eule NetworkManager[5905]: [1467802072.9635] connectivity: check for uri 'http://fedoraproject.org/static/hot Jul 06 12:47:52 eule NetworkManager[5905]: [1467802072.9644] connectivity: check for uri 'http://fedoraproject.org/static/hot Jul 06 12:52:53 eule NetworkManager[5905]: [1467802373.4568] connectivity: check for uri 'http://fedoraproject.org/static/hot Jul 06 12:57:53 eule NetworkManager[5905]: [1467802673.4573] connectivity: check for uri 'http://fedoraproject.org/static/hotlines Anybody sees this too? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.6.3-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is there a way to upgrade a 32bit fedora34 installation to a 64bit Fedora24?
On 06/28/16 14:07, Rex Dieter wrote: Joachim Backes wrote: does anybody know a simple way to upgrade a 32bit fedora24 workstation to a 64bit fedora24 workstation without a complete system reinstall? short answer: no Hi Rex, does your answer "no" mean that *you* don't know a solution, or does "no" mean that my problem can't be solved in a simple manner? I fear you meant the last alternative :-) Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Rex -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.6.3-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is there a way to upgrade a 32bit fedora24 installation to a 64bit Fedora24?
On 06/28/16 12:10, Joachim Backes wrote: Subject modification: Is there a way to upgrade a 32bit fedora24 installation to a 64bit Fedora24? (not Fedora34), sorry for typo. Hi all, does anybody know a simple way to upgrade a 32bit fedora24 workstation to a 64bit fedora24 workstation without a complete system reinstall? All comments are welcome. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.6.3-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Is there a way to upgrade a 32bit fedora34 installation to a 64bit Fedora24?
Hi all, does anybody know a simple way to upgrade a 32bit fedora24 workstation to a 64bit fedora24 workstation without a complete system reinstall? All comments are welcome. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.6.3-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
NetworkManager: openconnect VPN connections won't work in F24
Hi all F24 users, I established a new opneconnect-VPN connection by the GNOME NetworkManager menue, but this connection does not work. I'm endlessly requested for a valid Userid/Password. But if establishing this openconnect VPN connection by the cli /sbin/openconnect, the connection works immediately. Anybody seas this too? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.6.3-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: vpn password will not save in fedora 24
On 06/27/16 12:21, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2016-06-25 at 17:37 -0700, William Biggs wrote: I set up my vpn server in gnome but it will not keep the password . Every time i connect to the vpn it ask my for the password . How can I get it to save it I don't see what Gnome has to do with a VPN server, but at a minimum you might want to say which specific VPN system you're talking about. poc Having a similar problem with my *openconnect* VPN sessions (in a gnome session): the username won't be saved, but the password is saved. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.6.3-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: The burn tool Brasero in F24 needs extremly long time until it is completely started and it's desktop window appers.
On 06/22/16 12:59, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/22/16 18:40, Joachim Backes wrote: Starting brasero in F24 takes about 40 (fourty!!) seconds until it's window appears on the screen. Until this moment, one CPU is completely busy (100%). Starting it a second time, the startup time is shorter and takes only about 1 sec. The ldd command for /usr/bin/brasero lists 128 libs. This happens with brasero-3.12.1-4.fc24.x86_64. Anybody sees this too? Takes about 20 seconds on a very old laptop. Everything is slow to start on this systemso it seems normal to me. I started it from a KDE session on the konsole command line. It started much faster the second time. I guess needed libs were not flushed. Hi Ed, seems to be comparable with my issue. I started brasero not from a KDE session, but inside a gnome3 session. My board has 4 Intel cores, each with 2.5 GHz. Seems not be a memory problem, because gnome-system-monitor did not point out a memory overloeading, only one fully running CPU core. I agree that if started a second time, the libs had not been flushed. That is my impression too. Thanks for your remarks. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.5.7-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
The burn tool Brasero in F24 needs extremly long time until it is completely started and it's desktop window appers.
Starting brasero in F24 takes about 40 (fourty!!) seconds until it's window appears on the screen. Until this moment, one CPU is completely busy (100%). Starting it a second time, the startup time is shorter and takes only about 1 sec. The ldd command for /usr/bin/brasero lists 128 libs. This happens with brasero-3.12.1-4.fc24.x86_64. Anybody sees this too? -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.5.7-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F24-K3b crashes if trying to burn the F24 Workstation image to a DVD
On 06/22/16 09:26, Dev wrote:
It must be problem from missing KDE library.
1.
http://linuxbsdos.com/2015/07/28/solution-for-crashing-kde-applications-on-linux-mint-17-1-cinnamon/
I'm not KDE user, but I suggest you to find thus KDE library inside
fedora repo and install it
I did this already before reporting this issue to the Fedora user list,
but did not help!
JB
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Joachim Backes
<joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de <mailto:joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>>
wrote:
After having installed the F24 Beta x86-64 workstation and running
it since some weeks without problems, I tried to burn the recently
released F24 Workstation image
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24-1.2.iso
to a DVD using k3b. But k3b crashes immediately after selecting the
F24 downloaded image for burning:
-- k3b(2625)/kdeui (kdelibs): Attempt to use QAction "view_projects"
with KXMLGUIFactory!
k3b(2625)/kdeui (kdelibs): Attempt to use QAction "view_dir_tree"
with KXMLGUIFactory!
k3b(2625)/kdeui (kdelibs): Attempt to use QAction "view_contents"
with KXMLGUIFactory!
k3b(2625)/kdeui (kdelibs): Attempt to use QAction "location_bar"
with KXMLGUIFactory!
KCrash: Application 'k3b' crashing...
KCrash: Attempting to start from kdeinit
KCrash: Connect sock_file=/home/backes/.kde/socket-eule/kdeinit4__0
KCrash: Attempting to start directly
KCrash failed to exec(), errno = 2
Using brasero burns the image without flaw.
Burning data files with k3b succeeds too.
Anybody sees this too?
Kind regards
Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four)
Kernel-4.5.7-300.fc24.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
<mailto:joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>>
http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
--
Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four)
Kernel-4.5.7-300.fc24.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
F24-K3b crashes if trying to burn the F24 Workstation image to a DVD
After having installed the F24 Beta x86-64 workstation and running it since some weeks without problems, I tried to burn the recently released F24 Workstation image Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24-1.2.iso to a DVD using k3b. But k3b crashes immediately after selecting the F24 downloaded image for burning: -- k3b(2625)/kdeui (kdelibs): Attempt to use QAction "view_projects" with KXMLGUIFactory! k3b(2625)/kdeui (kdelibs): Attempt to use QAction "view_dir_tree" with KXMLGUIFactory! k3b(2625)/kdeui (kdelibs): Attempt to use QAction "view_contents" with KXMLGUIFactory! k3b(2625)/kdeui (kdelibs): Attempt to use QAction "location_bar" with KXMLGUIFactory! KCrash: Application 'k3b' crashing... KCrash: Attempting to start from kdeinit KCrash: Connect sock_file=/home/backes/.kde/socket-eule/kdeinit4__0 KCrash: Attempting to start directly KCrash failed to exec(), errno = 2 Using brasero burns the image without flaw. Burning data files with k3b succeeds too. Anybody sees this too? Kind regards Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.5.7-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: how to remove bootloader
On 04/12/16 13:25, Amadeus W.M. wrote: I have a pc which initially had a single drive with F23 installed on it, running perfectly. Now I just added a second drive and I installed again F23 on it, with the intent of using the first drive for data only. So now I have two perfectly good F23s installed on separate drives and I can boot either one of them. I want to 1) remove the bootloader from the first disk 2) reformat the system partitions on the first disk 3) keep and expand the data partitions from the first disk I know how to do 2 and 3, but I need to know how to do 1 without losing the partition table. The reason I need to remove the bootloader is that by default, the pc boots from the first drive. I can display the boot order (F12) and select the 2nd drive manually upon boot, and I can also probably change the boot order in the bios, but I recon there must be a software way to remove the bootloader. Does anybody know how to do this? Thanks! This may help: http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-how-to-uninstall-grub/ Pls. see section "Using Linux" Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.5.0-302.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Scrolling through LO documents lets horizontal/verlitacl lines appear/disappear with some ati video cards
Hi F23 users, Having problems with displaying Libreoffice documents using horizontal or vertical lines: If scrolling through such documents, rather often the lines disappear or appear again. Seems a displaying problem (such printed documents show the lines always!). I think id could be a problem with the video card: 1. VGA compatible controller:Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Cedar [Radeon HD 5000/6000/7350/8350 Series] 2. xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.6.1-3.20160215gitd41fccc.fc23.x86_64 I'm not running drivers from rpmfusion. Anybody has similar problems? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.4.3-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ for devel and test: archives not actual
Hi, anybody knows why the mailing list archives for devel and test are not up-to-date? (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel resp. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test). In both archives, the last month entries are november 2015 entries! NB: The users archives are up-to-date! Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.8-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ for devel and test: archives not actual
On 04.01.2016 15:48, Ed Greshko wrote: On 01/04/16 22:27, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi, anybody knows why the mailing list archives for devel and test are not up-to-date? (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel resp. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test). In both archives, the last month entries are november 2015 entries! NB: The users archives are up-to-date! Kind regards Joachim Backes Because those lists have been migrated to an updated mailman. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test%40lists.fedoraproject.org/ is the archives for the test list. Thanks, works for me! JB -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.8-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Immediate re-login after logout in gnome3 sessions fails very often
Hi all, anybody sees this too: running a gnome3 session with gdm as desktop manager. After logging out and trying immediately to relogin (with the correct password), the login is is rejected. But login into a console session works properly. A ps command in this situation always shows a "systemd" and "(sd-pam)" process. Killing these processes manually in the console session lets me relogin immediately. Some months ago I had a similar behaviour: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260487 It seemed to be solved. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.8-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Immediate re-login after logout in gnome3 sessions fails very often
On 01.01.2016 10:17, Joe Zeff wrote: On 01/01/2016 12:01 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: anybody sees this too: running a gnome3 session with gdm as desktop manager. After logging out and trying immediately to relogin (with the correct password), the login is is rejected. No, not personally. However, there's a thread about it (no answers as yet) at ask.fedora: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/80675/fedora-23-dont-allow-me-to-re-login-after-logout/ Thanks, seems to be the same problem. Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.8-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
nxclient (from nomachine) and gnome3
Hi all, I'm running f23 with gnome3 desktop env. Having a weird problem if connecting with nxclient-3.5.0-7 to some remote linux server (for example scientific linux) running nxserver-3.5.0 or freenx-0.7.3-9.4.el6: My problem: if configuring the nxclient when accessing the remote machine (remote: gnome, but not gnome3, and, this is important, full screen), then the upper part of the remote display (menu bar: unusable,...) is not usable (remains insensitive) . It seems the local gnome 3 bar (at the screen's top) inhibits the use of this remote area of the screen). I think it's a gnome3 problem, because if running lxde as local desktop, then the described problem disappears. So my question: anybody has similar problem and has a solution? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.8-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Problem with bash: alias command
Hi all, Running F23, and my shell is /bin/bash. My problem: suppose you define an alias: alias x='echo PAR=$1' Now call the alias by: x 1 Output: PAR= 1 My question: why do I get the blank before the "1"? All comments are welcome. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.8-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Problem with bash: alias command
On 20.12.2015 13:42, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi all, Running F23, and my shell is /bin/bash. My problem: suppose you define an alias: alias x='echo PAR=$1' Now call the alias by: x 1 Output: PAR= 1 My question: why do I get the blank before the "1"? All comments are welcome. Kind regards Joachim Backes Hi all, I could solve the problem by using a bash function instead of the usage of an alias. Remark: Working with aliases seems to be a bit sophisticated :-) Thanks to all for their contributions. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.8-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Xsane problem -
On 24.11.2015 21:41, Bob Goodwin wrote: I just discovered that I can not use my flat bed scanner, xsane protests "no devices available." lsusb shows: Bus 005 Device 007: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110 I believe this has worked since installing F-23 beta originally... The last dnf upgrade was done this morning. I have not seen othertrouble reports here on the list/ Any suggestions appreciated, bob Bob, did you try to access the scanner as root user? In earlier times, I had sometimes similar problems, and accessing the scanner as root user was a workaround. I'm running a fully updated F23 too, and my USB scanner Canon-Lide30 still operates flawlessly: Bus 002 Device 005: ID 04a9:220e Canon, Inc. CanoScan N1240U/LiDE 30 Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.6-301.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: installing grub back to MBR
On 19.11.2015 16:38, Angelo Moreschini wrote: Hj, I arranged differently the position of the HD(s) installed on my computer and then, because this, Fedora didn't start regularly... (at boot I got only the emergency prompt of GRUB). I was able to start Fedora using the "disk GRUB 2 for recovery".. I and after this tried to install grub back to the MBR.. I tried this operation using the command : grub2 install /dev/sdc The command ls -l /dev/sd* give me this output : er@zorro ~]$ ls -l /dev/sd* brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 0 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sda brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 1 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sda1 brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 16 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sdb brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 17 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sdb1 brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 18 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sdb2 brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 32 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sdc brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 33 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sdc1 brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 34 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sdc2 brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 37 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sdc5 I used the command grub2 install /dev/sdc,thinking fedora is installed on /dev/sdc... This is wrong: you must use "grub2_install /dev/sdc" Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.6-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: installing grub back to MBR
On 19.11.2015 17:51, Joachim Backes wrote: On 19.11.2015 16:38, Angelo Moreschini wrote: Hj, I arranged differently the position of the HD(s) installed on my computer and then, because this, Fedora didn't start regularly... (at boot I got only the emergency prompt of GRUB). I was able to start Fedora using the "disk GRUB 2 for recovery".. I and after this tried to install grub back to the MBR.. I tried this operation using the command : grub2 install /dev/sdc The command ls -l /dev/sd* give me this output : er@zorro ~]$ ls -l /dev/sd* brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 0 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sda brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 1 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sda1 brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 16 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sdb brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 17 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sdb1 brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 18 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sdb2 brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 32 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sdc brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 33 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sdc1 brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 34 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sdc2 brw-rw. 1 root disk 8, 37 Nov 19 16:49 /dev/sdc5 I used the command grub2 install /dev/sdc,thinking fedora is installed on /dev/sdc... This is wrong: you must use "grub2_install /dev/sdc" Sorry for typo: Must be: grub2-install /dev/sdc Joachim Backes ´ -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.6-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Gnome/Wayland
Hi all F23 users, seeing some little problem with Gnome/Wayland desktop in F23: After logging in, during the next (few) secconds, the screen fades out and becomes dark. I have to click immediately on the screen, or the screen locks up (within few seconds). Anybody sees this too? -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.6-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome/Wayland
On 12.11.2015 12:46, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote: Me - no. Maybe check your power settings (Dim and blank screen option, etc.) I've no special screen power settings (no dim/blank screen options). Joachim Backes чт, 12 нояб. 2015 г. в 14:02, Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de <mailto:joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>>: Hi all F23 users, seeing some little problem with Gnome/Wayland desktop in F23: After logging in, during the next (few) secconds, the screen fades out and becomes dark. I have to click immediately on the screen, or the screen locks up (within few seconds). Anybody sees this too? -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.6-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de <mailto:joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org> To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.6-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
koji seems to be offline?
Trying to visit some page on koji.fedoraproject.org, but getting no answer. Anybody knows when it will be online again? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.5-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I start GPM?
On 14.10.2015 16:17, Jonathan Allen wrote: Dear List, How can I start 'gpm' on a F22 laptop? I've installed the GPM package, but it doesn't seem to want to start ... Jonathan Did you try: "chkconfig gpm on" and "sudo service gpm start"? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.3-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
