Re: F34 kernel-devel drpm checksum mismatch
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 11:26 +, John Pilkington wrote: > For several recent kernel updates, dnf has complained about this but > has updated as normal. I've just noticed that the package name > looks strange, too. Should it get a BZ? .drpm files are delta RPMs. Small differences between one version of a RPM and another can be sent as delta RPMs instead of downloading and installing the newest full RPM. It's a toss-up whether you're better doing this, and the computer grinding its gears to deal with it, or just downloading full RPMs and directly installing them (I've seen the latter being quicker on high speed broadband, and the first quicker on slow dial-up internet). If there's been more than one RPM created between the version you'd already installed and the update you're about to, the delta RPM may not be useable. > /var/cache/dnf/updates-1eb77e9f45b4391a/packages/kernel-devel-5.15.4- > 101.fc34_5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.drpm: > md5 mismatch of result > Some packages were not downloaded. Retrying. > kernel-devel-5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.rpm > 5.3 MB/s | 15 MB 00:02 Though that error message warning strikes me more as a package doesn't match its checksum, indication corruption (during creation, download, saving, or hacking). -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.45.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 13 17:20:51 UTC 2021 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 kernel-devel drpm checksum mismatch
On 11/30/21 11:35, John Pilkington wrote: On 30/11/2021 19:23, Samuel Sieb wrote: The mismatch can be caused by one of the files getting changed on the system. Then the delta won't apply correctly and the result won't match what is expected. Yes, I realised after sending that a 'diff' has two sources. I had thought it worth reporting as something persistent. I don't know of any reason for a 'change on the system'. You could try running "rpm -qV kernel-devel" and see if it flags any modified files. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 kernel-devel drpm checksum mismatch
On 30/11/2021 19:23, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/30/21 03:26, John Pilkington wrote: For several recent kernel updates, dnf has complained about this but has updated as normal. I've just noticed that the package name looks strange, too. Should it get a BZ? /var/cache/dnf/updates-1eb77e9f45b4391a/packages/kernel-devel-5.15.4-101.fc34_5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.drpm: md5 mismatch of result What do you think is strange about the package name? It's a deltarpm file, so it shows the versions that are involved. kernel-devel-5.15.4-101.fc34_5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.drpm The package name is "kernel-devel" and this is the delta between versions "5.15.4-101.fc34" and "5.15.5-100.fc34". The mismatch can be caused by one of the files getting changed on the system. Then the delta won't apply correctly and the result won't match what is expected. Yes, I realised after sending that a 'diff' has two sources. I had thought it worth reporting as something persistent. I don't know of any reason for a 'change on the system'. Thanks. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 kernel-devel drpm checksum mismatch
On 11/30/21 03:26, John Pilkington wrote: For several recent kernel updates, dnf has complained about this but has updated as normal. I've just noticed that the package name looks strange, too. Should it get a BZ? /var/cache/dnf/updates-1eb77e9f45b4391a/packages/kernel-devel-5.15.4-101.fc34_5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.drpm: md5 mismatch of result What do you think is strange about the package name? It's a deltarpm file, so it shows the versions that are involved. kernel-devel-5.15.4-101.fc34_5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.drpm The package name is "kernel-devel" and this is the delta between versions "5.15.4-101.fc34" and "5.15.5-100.fc34". The mismatch can be caused by one of the files getting changed on the system. Then the delta won't apply correctly and the result won't match what is expected. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 kernel-devel drpm checksum mismatch
On 30.11.21 12:26, John Pilkington wrote: For several recent kernel updates, dnf has complained about this but has updated as normal. I've just noticed that the package name looks strange, too. Should it get a BZ? FWIW, I think this is needed by the rpmfusion nVidia packages. :-) /var/cache/dnf/updates-1eb77e9f45b4391a/packages/kernel-devel-5.15.4-101.fc34_5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.drpm: md5 mismatch of result Some packages were not downloaded. Retrying. kernel-devel-5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.rpm 5.3 MB/s | 15 MB 00:02 This means that the delta rpm is broken for some reason. This happens from time to time. So your system is loading the full rpm package in the line below. So, there is nothing wrong with your system. Best regards Ulf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
F34 kernel-devel drpm checksum mismatch
For several recent kernel updates, dnf has complained about this but has
updated as normal. I've just noticed that the package name looks
strange, too. Should it get a BZ?
FWIW, I think this is needed by the rpmfusion nVidia packages. :-)
Thanks,
John P
{{{
Downloading Packages:
(1/6): kernel-5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.rpm
92 kB/s | 14 kB 00:00
(2/6): kernel-devel-5.15.4-101.fc34_5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.drpm
3.1 MB/s | 3.0 MB 00:00
(3/6): kernel-modules-extra-5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.rpm
3.4 MB/s | 2.0 MB 00:00
(4/6): exfatprogs-1.1.3-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm
684 kB/s | 62 kB 00:00
(5/6): kernel-modules-5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.rpm
3.6 MB/s | 32 MB 00:09
(6/6): kernel-core-5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.rpm
2.4 MB/s | 35 MB 00:14
/var/cache/dnf/updates-1eb77e9f45b4391a/packages/kernel-devel-5.15.4-101.fc34_5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.drpm:
md5 mismatch of result
Some packages were not downloaded. Retrying.
kernel-devel-5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.rpm
5.3 MB/s | 15 MB 00:02
}}}
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
