Re: New HPLIP release 3.20.6 doesn't require plugin for printers whose needed plugin in the past

2020-06-17 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
On 6/17/20 11:03 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>
> Zdenek have kind of question: why there are so many patches in the
> hplip package?
> Is it any problem with accepting Fedora patches by source tree maintainer?
Yes, it is - HP upstream is unresponsive in most bugfix cases.
> Is there any git or other VCS repo with source tree? (I don't see it
> on launchpad)

Unfortunately, there isn't. HP's vision of open source is releasing
source tarball, not sharing any github/CVS repo for hplip.

My predecessors - twaugh and jpopelka - started a github repo for hplip
to track at least changes between releases, and I keep it up to date -
https://github.com/zdohnal/hplip .

There were considerations whether to fork the project, merge the patches
and have it like that, but it would cut us off from new drivers, which
come from HP, because they have access to HW.

>
> kloczek
> -- 
> Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

-- 
Zdenek Dohnal
Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: New HPLIP release 3.20.6 doesn't require plugin for printers whose needed plugin in the past

2020-06-17 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
Hi Tomasz,

thank you for testing!

Unfortunately, IMO hpcups still loads the plugin... I checked the code
and hpcups doesn't look into models.dat - it loads the plugin either
way, entry in models.dat seems to be checked only during print queue
installation :( .

I have the same experience with scanning on my HP laserjet m1536... it
actually just loads older plugin anyway...

So it wouldn't work on machines were no previous plugin installed.

I'll revert the upstream change and report it.

On 6/16/20 5:11 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 03:21:35PM +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> There isn't a sucg list, but basically you can check git log at
>> https://github.com/zdohnal/hplip .
>   Thanks,
>
> So I have HP M1132 MFT 2 and it basically works wi 3.20.6 and WITHOUT
>   plugin. yay!!
>
> It's not troublefree, yet:
>   1) after installing 3.20.6, priting did not work
>   cze 16 15:28:27 mother.pipebreaker.pl hpcups[1425079]: common/utils.c 
> 177: validate_plugin_version() Plugin version[3.20.5] mismatch with HPLIP 
> version[3.20.6]
>   cze 16 15:28:27 mother.pipebreaker.pl hpcups[1425079]: common/utils.c 
> 210: Plugin version is not matching
>
>   2) I've removed hplip.state file, this caused another error:
> cze 16 15:44:55 mother.pipebreaker.pl hpcups[1430487]: common/utils.c 116: 
> unable to open /var/lib/hp/hplip.state: No such file or directory
> cze 16 15:44:55 mother.pipebreaker.pl hpcups[1430487]: common/utils.c 166: 
> validate_plugin_version() Failed to get Plugin version from 
> [/var/lib/hp/hplip.state]
> cze 16 15:44:55 mother.pipebreaker.pl hpcups[1430487]: common/utils.c 210: 
> Plugin version is not matching
>
>   3) finally, I've edited /var/lib/hp/hplip.state changing version, now it 
> contains:
> --
> [plugin]
> installed = 0
> eula = 1
> version = 3.20.6
> --
>
>   And printing works. What's interesting, the value of installed= seem
> irrelevant.
>
>  (above is on Fedora 31)
>
-- 
Zdenek Dohnal
Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: New HPLIP release 3.20.6 doesn't require plugin for printers whose needed plugin in the past

2020-06-16 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
And please don't try to reinstall plugin. It seems they haven't built a
new one yet or they aren't planning to.

See http://www.openprinting.org/download/printdriver/auxfiles/HP/plugins/

On 6/16/20 3:01 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm HPLIP maintainer in Fedora and I would like to ask *the users
> which have HP printers which needed their HP plugin to test the
> scratch build* of new hplip.
>
> HPLIP released a new version 3.20.6, where most models, which
> previously required HP plugin, were set to do not require plugin anymore.
>
> Although requirement of HP plugin was questionable with some printer
> models, other models may really needed it and they will not work
> without it.
>
> Please try the following scratch builds:
>
> Rawhide:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45790790
>
> F32:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45790902
>
> F31:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45790908
>
> And if the update breaks printing or scanning for you, please let the
> upstream know here:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip
>
>
> Thank you in advance for helping with testing!
>
>
> Zdenek
>
> -- 
> Zdenek Dohnal
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

-- 
Zdenek Dohnal
Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: New HPLIP release 3.20.6 doesn't require plugin for printers whose needed plugin in the past

2020-06-16 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
There isn't a sucg list, but basically you can check git log at
https://github.com/zdohnal/hplip .

On 6/16/20 3:14 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 03:01:22PM +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm HPLIP maintainer in Fedora and I would like to ask *the users which
>> have HP printers which needed their HP plugin to test the scratch build*
>> of new hplip.
>>
>> HPLIP released a new version 3.20.6, where most models, which previously
>> required HP plugin, were set to do not require plugin anymore.
>   Is there a list of printers not requiring plugin anymore?
>   Downloading this plugin was the most cumbersome.  In line with
> Murphys's laws, I was noticing hplip was upgraded, and thus requiring
> re-downloading plugin, when I had to print/scan something urgently.
>
>
-- 
Zdenek Dohnal
Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


New HPLIP release 3.20.6 doesn't require plugin for printers whose needed plugin in the past

2020-06-16 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
Hi all,

I'm HPLIP maintainer in Fedora and I would like to ask *the users which
have HP printers which needed their HP plugin to test the scratch build*
of new hplip.

HPLIP released a new version 3.20.6, where most models, which previously
required HP plugin, were set to do not require plugin anymore.

Although requirement of HP plugin was questionable with some printer
models, other models may really needed it and they will not work without it.

Please try the following scratch builds:

Rawhide:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45790790

F32:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45790902

F31:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45790908

And if the update breaks printing or scanning for you, please let the
upstream know here:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip


Thank you in advance for helping with testing!


Zdenek

-- 
Zdenek Dohnal
Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Can't start hp-toolbox (hplip) with or without GUI

2019-06-30 Thread Jon Ingason
Den 2019-06-30 kl. 23:51, skrev Robert Moskowitz:
> Have you installed hplip-gui?

Yes. Here is what I have installed:

$ rpm -qa |grep ^hplip
hplip-libs-3.18.12-9.fc29.x86_64
hplip-common-3.18.12-9.fc29.x86_64
hplip-gui-3.18.12-9.fc29.x86_64
hplip-3.18.12-9.fc29.x86_64

> 
> On 6/30/19 5:13 PM, Jon Ingason wrote:
>> When I try to start hp-toolbox I get following error:
>>
>> error: Unable to load DBus libraries. Please check your installation and
>> try again.
>> error: Please upgrade your python installation to the latest available
>> version.
>>
>> I am using Fedora 29 Linux lea 5.1.11-200.fc29.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 17
>> 19:30:44 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux and hplip-3.18.12-9.fc29
>>
>> What is the problem?
> 
> 


-- 
Regards

Jon Ingason
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Can't start hp-toolbox (hplip) with or without GUI

2019-06-30 Thread Robert Moskowitz

Have you installed hplip-gui?

On 6/30/19 5:13 PM, Jon Ingason wrote:

When I try to start hp-toolbox I get following error:

error: Unable to load DBus libraries. Please check your installation and
try again.
error: Please upgrade your python installation to the latest available
version.

I am using Fedora 29 Linux lea 5.1.11-200.fc29.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 17
19:30:44 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux and hplip-3.18.12-9.fc29

What is the problem?

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Can't start hp-toolbox (hplip) with or without GUI

2019-06-30 Thread Jon Ingason
When I try to start hp-toolbox I get following error:

error: Unable to load DBus libraries. Please check your installation and
try again.
error: Please upgrade your python installation to the latest available
version.

I am using Fedora 29 Linux lea 5.1.11-200.fc29.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 17
19:30:44 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux and hplip-3.18.12-9.fc29

What is the problem?
-- 
Regards

Jon Ingason
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Hplip.

2019-06-28 Thread Tim Evans

On 6/28/19 12:09 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:



On 6/28/19 11:52 AM, Tim Evans wrote:

On 6/28/19 11:24 AM, Ger van Dijck wrote:


Hi all ,


It seems the whole world has problems with this piece of beautiful 
software .


Hp-setup functionates fine : After the setup run HP-check and be sure 
that the scanner is detected .


All I have ever gotten from hp-setup is:

$ hp-setup

HP Linux Imaging and Printing System (ver. 3.18.12)
Printer/Fax Setup Utility ver. 9.0

Copyright (c) 2001-15 HP Development Company, LP
This software comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
This is free software, and you are welcome to distribute it
under certain conditions. See COPYING file for more details.

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/bin/hp-setup", line 313, in 
    ui = import_module(ui_package + ".setupdialog")
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.7/importlib/__init__.py", line 127, in 
import_module

    return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
  File "", line 1006, in _gcd_import
  File "", line 983, in _find_and_load
  File "", line 953, in 
_find_and_load_unlocked
  File "", line 219, in 
_call_with_frames_removed

  File "", line 1006, in _gcd_import
  File "", line 983, in _find_and_load
  File "", line 965, in 
_find_and_load_unlocked

ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ui5'
$




Did you install hplip-gui?


Oh, a dependency that isn't installed with the rest of the package? OK, 
thanks.  Done. Works now.



--
Tim Evans   |5 Chestnut Court
443-394-3864|Owings Mills, MD 21117
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Hplip.

2019-06-28 Thread Robert Moskowitz



On 6/28/19 11:52 AM, Tim Evans wrote:

On 6/28/19 11:24 AM, Ger van Dijck wrote:


Hi all ,


It seems the whole world has problems with this piece of beautiful 
software .


Hp-setup functionates fine : After the setup run HP-check and be sure 
that the scanner is detected .


All I have ever gotten from hp-setup is:

$ hp-setup

HP Linux Imaging and Printing System (ver. 3.18.12)
Printer/Fax Setup Utility ver. 9.0

Copyright (c) 2001-15 HP Development Company, LP
This software comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
This is free software, and you are welcome to distribute it
under certain conditions. See COPYING file for more details.

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/bin/hp-setup", line 313, in 
    ui = import_module(ui_package + ".setupdialog")
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.7/importlib/__init__.py", line 127, in 
import_module

    return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
  File "", line 1006, in _gcd_import
  File "", line 983, in _find_and_load
  File "", line 953, in 
_find_and_load_unlocked
  File "", line 219, in 
_call_with_frames_removed

  File "", line 1006, in _gcd_import
  File "", line 983, in _find_and_load
  File "", line 965, in 
_find_and_load_unlocked

ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ui5'
$




Did you install hplip-gui?

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Hplip.

2019-06-28 Thread Tim Evans

On 6/28/19 11:24 AM, Ger van Dijck wrote:


Hi all ,


It seems the whole world has problems with this piece of beautiful 
software .


Hp-setup functionates fine : After the setup run HP-check and be sure 
that the scanner is detected .


All I have ever gotten from hp-setup is:

$ hp-setup

HP Linux Imaging and Printing System (ver. 3.18.12)
Printer/Fax Setup Utility ver. 9.0

Copyright (c) 2001-15 HP Development Company, LP
This software comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
This is free software, and you are welcome to distribute it
under certain conditions. See COPYING file for more details.

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/bin/hp-setup", line 313, in 
ui = import_module(ui_package + ".setupdialog")
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.7/importlib/__init__.py", line 127, in 
import_module

return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
  File "", line 1006, in _gcd_import
  File "", line 983, in _find_and_load
  File "", line 953, in 
_find_and_load_unlocked
  File "", line 219, in 
_call_with_frames_removed

  File "", line 1006, in _gcd_import
  File "", line 983, in _find_and_load
  File "", line 965, in 
_find_and_load_unlocked

ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ui5'
$


--
Tim Evans   |5 Chestnut Court
443-394-3864|Owings Mills, MD 21117
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Hplip.

2019-06-28 Thread Ger van Dijck


Hi all ,


It seems the whole world has problems with this piece of beautiful  
software .


Hp-setup functionates fine : After the setup run HP-check and be sure that  
the scanner is detected .


When upgrading I never had any problems ; When I had to do a new install  
very often the scanfunction did not functionate anymore . Just return to  
the former HPlibrairies .





Regards ,



Ger van Dijck .
--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F28 - dnf proble with hplip

2018-12-25 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 2:53 PM Robert Moskowitz 
wrote:

> Been a bit over a week since my last update.  Tried to do one a couple
> minutes ago and got:
>

I had a similar problem on my wife's computer with CUPS. It wouldn't even
update with --best --allowerasing.

I ended up doing a "rpm -e --nodeps ..." on all the cups packages until the
conflict cleared. The strange part was "dnf install cups" wouldn't work. No
output after loading the metadata.

"dnf list" would show the cups package as available but it was colored
slightly blue. I still don't know what that means but it refused to install
it. I finally resorted to pulling the package directly from koji.

Thanks,
Richard
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F28 - dnf proble with hplip

2018-12-25 Thread Robert Moskowitz



On 12/24/18 4:49 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 12/25/18 4:52 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:

Been a bit over a week since my last update.  Tried to do one a couple minutes 
ago and got:



  Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
hplip-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
  Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package
hplip-libs-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
  Problem 3: cannot install the best update candidate for package
libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by
libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
  Problem 4: package hplip-gui-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64 requires 
libsane-hpaio(x86-64) =
3.18.6-11.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed
   - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-gui-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by
libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
  Problem 5: package hplip-libs-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64 requires 
hplip-common(x86-64) =
3.18.6-10.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed
   - cannot install both hplip-common-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64 and
hplip-common-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - problem with installed package hplip-libs-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-common-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64

Is this recent or an 'old problem' that I missed?

Not going to do an update with a new kernel, requiring a reboot when there is a 
new
hplip in the works.


This was noted last week.  Seems as if the needed package hasn't been pushed 
from testing
to stable.  Blame the time of year?

dnf --best --allowerasing --enablerepo=updates-testing update hplip



It was net-snmp-libs that is hung up still in testing...

thanks
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F28 - dnf proble with hplip

2018-12-24 Thread Ed Greshko
On 12/25/18 4:52 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Been a bit over a week since my last update.  Tried to do one a couple 
> minutes ago and got:
>
>
>
>  Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
> hplip-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
> hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
>  Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package
> hplip-libs-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
> hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
>  Problem 3: cannot install the best update candidate for package
> libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by
> libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
>  Problem 4: package hplip-gui-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64 requires 
> libsane-hpaio(x86-64) =
> 3.18.6-11.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> hplip-gui-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by
> libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
>  Problem 5: package hplip-libs-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64 requires 
> hplip-common(x86-64) =
> 3.18.6-10.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - cannot install both hplip-common-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64 and
> hplip-common-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
>   - problem with installed package hplip-libs-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> hplip-common-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
> hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
>
> Is this recent or an 'old problem' that I missed?
>
> Not going to do an update with a new kernel, requiring a reboot when there is 
> a new
> hplip in the works.
>

This was noted last week.  Seems as if the needed package hasn't been pushed 
from testing
to stable.  Blame the time of year?

dnf --best --allowerasing --enablerepo=updates-testing update hplip

-- 
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default 
color scheme
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


F28 - dnf proble with hplip

2018-12-24 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Been a bit over a week since my last update.  Tried to do one a couple 
minutes ago and got:




 Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
  - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
 Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
  - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
 Problem 3: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
  - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
 Problem 4: package hplip-gui-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64 requires 
libsane-hpaio(x86-64) = 3.18.6-11.fc28, but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-gui-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
  - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
 Problem 5: package hplip-libs-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64 requires 
hplip-common(x86-64) = 3.18.6-10.fc28, but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - cannot install both hplip-common-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64 and 
hplip-common-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64

  - problem with installed package hplip-libs-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-common-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
  - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64


Is this recent or an 'old problem' that I missed?

Not going to do an update with a new kernel, requiring a reboot when 
there is a new hplip in the works.


thanks
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: hplip

2018-12-18 Thread Ed Greshko
On 12/18/18 4:24 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello
>
> Thank,
> However:
>
> dnf --enablerepo updates-testing update hplip
> Fedora 28 - x86_64 - Test Updates   400 kB/s | 9.5 MB 00:24   
>  
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:10 ago on Tue 18 Dec 2018 09:21:31 AM 
> CET.
> Dependencies resolved.
>
>  Problem: problem with installed package corosync-2.4.4-1.fc28.x86_64
>   - package corosync-2.4.4-1.fc28.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.30()(64bit), 
> but none of the providers can be installed
>   - cannot install both net-snmp-libs-1:5.8-3.fc28.x86_64 and 
> net-snmp-libs-1:5.7.3-38.fc28.x86_64
>   - cannot install both net-snmp-libs-1:5.7.3-38.fc28.x86_64 and 
> net-snmp-libs-1:5.8-3.fc28.x86_64
>   - cannot install both net-snmp-libs-1:5.7.3-36.fc28.x86_64 and 
> net-snmp-libs-1:5.8-3.fc28.x86_64
>   - package hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit), 
> but none of the providers can be installed
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> hplip-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
> 
>  PackageArchVersion  Repository
> Size
> 
> Skipping packages with conflicts:
> (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):
>  net-snmp-libs  x86_64  1:5.7.3-36.fc28  fedora   801 
> k
>  net-snmp-libs  x86_64  1:5.8-3.fc28 updates-testing  820 
> k
> Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
>  hplip  x86_64  3.18.6-11.fc28   updates   16 
> M
>
> Transaction Summary
> 
> Skip  3 Packages
>
> Nothing to do.
> Complete!
>

Notice the line above

(add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):

just follow the suggestion.




-- 
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default 
color scheme
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: hplip

2018-12-18 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello

Thank,
However:

dnf --enablerepo updates-testing update hplip
Fedora 28 - x86_64 - Test Updates   400 kB/s | 9.5 MB 00:24
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:10 ago on Tue 18 Dec 2018 09:21:31 AM CET.
Dependencies resolved.

 Problem: problem with installed package corosync-2.4.4-1.fc28.x86_64
  - package corosync-2.4.4-1.fc28.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.30()(64bit), 
but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both net-snmp-libs-1:5.8-3.fc28.x86_64 and 
net-snmp-libs-1:5.7.3-38.fc28.x86_64
  - cannot install both net-snmp-libs-1:5.7.3-38.fc28.x86_64 and 
net-snmp-libs-1:5.8-3.fc28.x86_64
  - cannot install both net-snmp-libs-1:5.7.3-36.fc28.x86_64 and 
net-snmp-libs-1:5.8-3.fc28.x86_64
  - package hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit), but 
none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64

 PackageArchVersion  RepositorySize

Skipping packages with conflicts:
(add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):
 net-snmp-libs  x86_64  1:5.7.3-36.fc28  fedora   801 k
 net-snmp-libs  x86_64  1:5.8-3.fc28 updates-testing  820 k
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
 hplip  x86_64  3.18.6-11.fc28   updates   16 M

Transaction Summary

Skip  3 Packages

Nothing to do.
Complete!


===
 Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
===


> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 at 1:16 AM
> From: "Ed Greshko" 
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: hplip
>
> On 12/18/18 5:41 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Here are some errors that I got:
> >
> > dnf update
> > Last metadata expiration check: 1:43:32 ago on Mon 17 Dec 2018 08:55:07 PM 
> > CET.
> > Dependencies resolved.
> >
> >  Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> > hplip-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
> >   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
> > hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
> >  Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> > hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
> >   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
> > hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
> >  Problem 3: problem with installed package hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
> 
> This kind of issue arrives in the list several times
> 
> Fixed by either
> 
> 1.  Waiting until the fixes get pushed to stable.
> 
> 2.  Running "dnf --enablerepo updates-testing update offending-package.
> 
> [root@f28k-b1 ~]# dnf --enablerepo updates-testing update hplip
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:11 ago on Tue 18 Dec 2018 08:11:56 AM 
> CST.
> Dependencies resolved.
> ===
>  Package Arch Version  Repository 
> Size
> ===
> Upgrading:
>  hplip   x86_64   3.18.6-11.fc28   updates    
> 16 M
>  hplip-common    x86_64   3.18.6-11.fc28   updates   
> 110 k
>  hplip-gui   x86_64   3.18.6-11.fc28   updates   
> 1.3 M
>  hplip-libs  x86_64   3.18.6-11.fc28   updates   
> 204 k
>  libsane-hpaio   x86_64   3.18.6-11.fc28   updates   
> 127 k
>  net-snmp-libs   x86_64   1:5.8-3.fc28 updates-testing   
> 820 k
> 
> Transaction Summary
> ===
> Upgrade  6 Packages
> 
> Total download size: 18 M
> Is this ok [y/N]:
> 
> Works like a charm!!
> 
> -- 
> Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the 
> default color scheme
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_lis

Re: hplip

2018-12-17 Thread Ed Greshko
On 12/18/18 5:41 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Here are some errors that I got:
>
> dnf update
> Last metadata expiration check: 1:43:32 ago on Mon 17 Dec 2018 08:55:07 PM 
> CET.
> Dependencies resolved.
>
>  Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> hplip-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
> hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
>  Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
> hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
>  Problem 3: problem with installed package hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64

This kind of issue arrives in the list several times

Fixed by either

1.  Waiting until the fixes get pushed to stable.

2.  Running "dnf --enablerepo updates-testing update offending-package.

[root@f28k-b1 ~]# dnf --enablerepo updates-testing update hplip
Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:11 ago on Tue 18 Dec 2018 08:11:56 AM CST.
Dependencies resolved.
===
 Package Arch Version  Repository 
Size
=======
Upgrading:
 hplip   x86_64   3.18.6-11.fc28   updates    
16 M
 hplip-common    x86_64   3.18.6-11.fc28   updates   
110 k
 hplip-gui   x86_64   3.18.6-11.fc28   updates   
1.3 M
 hplip-libs  x86_64   3.18.6-11.fc28   updates   
204 k
 libsane-hpaio   x86_64   3.18.6-11.fc28   updates   
127 k
 net-snmp-libs   x86_64   1:5.8-3.fc28 updates-testing   
820 k

Transaction Summary
===
Upgrade  6 Packages

Total download size: 18 M
Is this ok [y/N]:

Works like a charm!!

-- 
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default 
color scheme
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


hplip

2018-12-17 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello,

Here are some errors that I got:

dnf update
Last metadata expiration check: 1:43:32 ago on Mon 17 Dec 2018 08:55:07 PM CET.
Dependencies resolved.

 Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
  - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
 Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
  - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
 Problem 3: problem with installed package hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
  - package hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64 requires hplip-common(x86-64) = 
3.18.3-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both hplip-common-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64 and 
hplip-common-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
  - cannot install both hplip-common-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64 and 
hplip-common-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-common-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
  - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64

 Package Arch  Version Repository  Size

Skipping packages with conflicts:
(add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):
 hplip-commonx86_643.18.6-11.fc28  updates110 k
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
 hplip   x86_643.18.6-11.fc28  updates 16 M
 hplip-libs  x86_643.18.6-11.fc28  updates204 k

Transaction Summary

Skip  3 Packages

Nothing to do.
Complete!


and
 dnf update --best --allowerasing
Last metadata expiration check: 1:43:40 ago on Mon 17 Dec 2018 08:55:07 PM CET.
Error: 
 Problem 1: problem with installed package hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
  - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
 Problem 2: problem with installed package hplip-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
  - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64


===
 Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
===
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: hplip update problem (missing net-snmp-5.8 update?)

2018-12-16 Thread Todd Zullinger
Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> I note that a recent update ends with:
> 
>  Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> hplip-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
> hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
>  Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
> hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
>  Problem 3: problem with installed package hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
>   - package hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64 requires hplip-common(x86-64) = 
> 3.18.3-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - cannot install both hplip-common-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64 and 
> hplip-common-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
>   - cannot install both hplip-common-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64 and 
> hplip-common-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> hplip-common-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
> hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
> 
> My understanding is that the source of this problem is this:
> 
> Looking at the packages list I see that the recent update did
>   Fedora Update Notification FEDORA-2018-e7d66d4d3f 2018-12-16 
> 02:24:11.770826
>   Built with new net-snmp
> but the new net-snmp package was provided only to fc29 two weeks ago.
>   Fedora Update Notification FEDORA-2018-042156f164 2018-12-02 
> 08:24:31.362863
>   Update to net-snmp-5.8.

There is a net-smtp update in updates-testing¹, but it's not
going to get pushed to stable until the various broken
dependencies it caues are resolved.  It seems that pushing
hplip to stable was a bit premature.

You may be able to update hplip by enabling the
updates-testing repo to allow it to pull in the net-smtp
update (though you might run into different broken deps if
you have other packages which have yet to be rebuilt against
the new net-smtp).

¹ https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b60fdc1998

-- 
Todd
~~
Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind.
-- Mark Harrold



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


hplip update problem (missing net-snmp-5.8 update?)

2018-12-16 Thread Eyal Lebedinsky

I note that a recent update ends with:

 Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
  - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
 Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
  - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
 Problem 3: problem with installed package hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
  - package hplip-libs-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64 requires hplip-common(x86-64) = 
3.18.3-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both hplip-common-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64 and 
hplip-common-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
  - cannot install both hplip-common-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64 and 
hplip-common-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hplip-common-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
  - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by 
hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64

My understanding is that the source of this problem is this:

Looking at the packages list I see that the recent update did
Fedora Update Notification FEDORA-2018-e7d66d4d3f 2018-12-16 
02:24:11.770826
Built with new net-snmp
but the new net-snmp package was provided only to fc29 two weeks ago.
Fedora Update Notification FEDORA-2018-042156f164 2018-12-02 
08:24:31.362863
Update to net-snmp-5.8.

--
Eyal at Home (fed...@eyal.emu.id.au)
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: ?? on HPLIP drivers

2013-09-10 Thread Ed Greshko
On 09/11/13 04:21, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 09/10/2013 01:13 PM, Jim issued this missive:
>> Fedora 18
>>
>> I understand that if you install the hplip drivers and your printer is
>> supported, that when you plug in your usb cable into computer to printer
>> that it Automatically will be recognised and setup up on computer,, Is
>> that a correct assumption ??
>
> More or less. I've had no problems with it so far. You might have to
> scan for the printer in your printer admin application (Print Settings,
> whatever) and add a queue for it, but that's all. It'll probably have
> a URI like "hp:/usb/model-of-printer". I have:
>
> hp:/usb/Deskjet_D2400_series?serial=TH745341JM04Y7
>

Also, a few models will require you run hp-plugin to install a proprietary 
plugin.


-- 
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


?? on HPLIP drivers

2013-09-10 Thread Jim

Fedora 18

I understand that if you install the hplip drivers and your printer is 
supported, that when you plug in your usb cable into computer to printer 
that it Automatically will be recognised and setup up on computer,, Is 
that a correct assumption ??

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: ?? on HPLIP drivers

2013-09-10 Thread Rick Stevens

On 09/10/2013 01:13 PM, Jim issued this missive:

Fedora 18

I understand that if you install the hplip drivers and your printer is
supported, that when you plug in your usb cable into computer to printer
that it Automatically will be recognised and setup up on computer,, Is
that a correct assumption ??


More or less. I've had no problems with it so far. You might have to
scan for the printer in your printer admin application (Print Settings,
whatever) and add a queue for it, but that's all. It'll probably have
a URI like "hp:/usb/model-of-printer". I have:

hp:/usb/Deskjet_D2400_series?serial=TH745341JM04Y7
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
- IGNORE that man behind the keyboard!   -
-- The Wizard of OS  -
--
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


[SOLVED] Re: hp k80xi hplip fedora 17

2012-08-21 Thread Nate Pearlstein
On 08/17/2012 04:28 PM, Nate Pearlstein wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 03:53 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On 08/17/2012 12:45 PM, Nate Pearlstein wrote:
>>> Anyone have this combination working?
>>>
>>> Fedora complains that it cannot communicate with the device.
>>> My user is part of the sys and lp group, selinux is in permissive mode.
>>
>>
>> Even in permissive mode, SELinux would complain if needed and you don't
>> mention any alerts.  That's one blind ally you can write off.  Second,
>> do you have the hplip (?) packages installed?  I ask because not
>> everybody knows they're needed, and if nothing else, we can eliminate
>> another possibility.
> 
> Yes, they were installed.  Then I tried un-installing them and dl'ing
> and building, installing, them from hplipopensource.com and those didn't
> work either, so I re-installed them from the repo.
> 
> 

Need to rebuild using --enable-libusb_build

https://answers.launchpad.net/hplip/+question/206329



-- 
Nate Pearlstein - npe...@sgi.com - Product Support Engineer
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: hp k80xi hplip fedora 17

2012-08-17 Thread Nate Pearlstein
On 08/17/2012 03:53 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 12:45 PM, Nate Pearlstein wrote:
>> Anyone have this combination working?
>>
>> Fedora complains that it cannot communicate with the device.
>> My user is part of the sys and lp group, selinux is in permissive mode.
> 
> 
> Even in permissive mode, SELinux would complain if needed and you don't
> mention any alerts.  That's one blind ally you can write off.  Second,
> do you have the hplip (?) packages installed?  I ask because not
> everybody knows they're needed, and if nothing else, we can eliminate
> another possibility.

Yes, they were installed.  Then I tried un-installing them and dl'ing
and building, installing, them from hplipopensource.com and those didn't
work either, so I re-installed them from the repo.


-- 
Nate Pearlstein - npe...@sgi.com - Product Support Engineer
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: hp k80xi hplip fedora 17

2012-08-17 Thread Joe Zeff

On 08/17/2012 12:45 PM, Nate Pearlstein wrote:

Anyone have this combination working?

Fedora complains that it cannot communicate with the device.
My user is part of the sys and lp group, selinux is in permissive mode.



Even in permissive mode, SELinux would complain if needed and you don't 
mention any alerts.  That's one blind ally you can write off.  Second, 
do you have the hplip (?) packages installed?  I ask because not 
everybody knows they're needed, and if nothing else, we can eliminate 
another possibility.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


hp k80xi hplip fedora 17

2012-08-17 Thread Nate Pearlstein
Anyone have this combination working?

Fedora complains that it cannot communicate with the device.
My user is part of the sys and lp group, selinux is in permissive mode.

If I manually enter the ub bus and id in hp-setup it can see enough to
create the queues but still says it can't communicate with the printer.

The printer works fine with opensuse 12.1.  Yes I know I can ask for
help at hplipopensource.com.  I tried the fedora 17 packages and
building from hplipopensource.com, same rev 3.12.6.

I tried with usblp blacklisted, not the default, and the default, using
usblp.


-- 
Nate Pearlstein - npe...@sgi.com - Product Support Engineer
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: hplip: Bug #738089 has followed me to Fedora 16 (Workaround)

2011-11-10 Thread Steven P. Ulrick
On 11/09/2011 10:58 AM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> This bug which I reported when I was running Fedora 14 has followed me
> to Fedora 16:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738089
>
> I would appreciate it if anyone who has this issue with their HP printer
> would please add their comments to the above referenced bug.
>
> I have not been able to find a build of hplip for Fedora 16 that I can
> downgrade to as a workaround.

That last comment was a bit premature.  Downgrading to the following
build of hplip results in the top margin printing correctly again:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=252270

Of course this is just a workaround as opposed to a complete fix, but at 
least I can now use my HP LaserJet P2055dn printer on Fedora 16.

Steven P. Ulrick
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


hplip: Bug #738089 has followed me to Fedora 16

2011-11-09 Thread Steven P. Ulrick
Hello Everyone,
This bug which I reported when I was running Fedora 14 has followed me 
to Fedora 16:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738089

I would appreciate it if anyone who has this issue with their HP printer 
would please add their comments to the above referenced bug.

I have not been able to find a build of hplip for Fedora 16 that I can 
downgrade to as a workaround.

Steven P. Ulrick
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: problem with fc 13 and hplip

2010-11-02 Thread Barry
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:30 +, "Tim Waugh"  wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 14:25 -0400, Barry wrote:
> > Yes, the Laserjet, and I've always used the postscript drivers, several
> > machines, different platforms. But I just tried the PCL3 driver and it
> > too is weird. I printed a test page with it that came out with all the
> > graphics. I was able to print one web page, but not another -- however,
> > this time I got an error that said it was an empty file. 
> 
> What device URI are you using on the guest?  It's something like
> socket://{IP-addr-of-printer}:9000/ I expect..?  i.e. can we verify that
> it really is talking directly to the printer, and not to e.g. the host's
> queue.

The device uri is file:///dev/null

I'm sure I didn't write that it, but am just using it as a discovered
printer. The printer is attached to another machine. The print dialogue
window from Firefox shows the correct host for the printer. When I tried
attaching the printer to the machine hosting the vm, it showed up under
that machine's name.

> 
> Try eliminating HPLIP from the equation altogether to see if the problem
> still happens: use another driver entirely (e.g. gutenprint, or a driver
> listed under manufacturer 'Generic') and make sure you are not using the
> 'hp' backend.

But Chrome can print. So can other programs. Makes me wonder if it's not
FF specific.   

I have another vm with the RH 6 beta on it. Later, I'll set up printing
on that and try that.   

> 
> Tim.
> */
> 

Barry 
> -- 


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and
  love email again

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: problem with fc 13 and hplip

2010-11-02 Thread Tim Waugh
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 14:25 -0400, Barry wrote:
> Yes, the Laserjet, and I've always used the postscript drivers, several
> machines, different platforms. But I just tried the PCL3 driver and it
> too is weird. I printed a test page with it that came out with all the
> graphics. I was able to print one web page, but not another -- however,
> this time I got an error that said it was an empty file. 

What device URI are you using on the guest?  It's something like
socket://{IP-addr-of-printer}:9000/ I expect..?  i.e. can we verify that
it really is talking directly to the printer, and not to e.g. the host's
queue.

Try eliminating HPLIP from the equation altogether to see if the problem
still happens: use another driver entirely (e.g. gutenprint, or a driver
listed under manufacturer 'Generic') and make sure you are not using the
'hp' backend.

Tim.
*/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: problem with fc 13 and hplip

2010-11-01 Thread Barry
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:01 -0600, "Manuel Escudero" 
wrote:
> 2010/11/1 Richard Shaw 
> 
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Barry  wrote:
> > > I can print very simple files -- so I can send the file to the print
> > > server, but I fail to print most web pages in irefox. I've tried
> > > printing to a ps file, but end up with a blank page as soon as the page
> > > becomes a little  complex.
> >
> > If you have problems when you print to PS files then it is highly
> > unlikely your problem is with hplip, or at least not the only problem.
> > Try reinstalling CUPS and ghostscript.
> >
> > Richard
> > --
> > users mailing list
> > users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >
> 
> Really wierd... I'm getting lost here, let me see if I understand:
> 
> You say you can print anything from the host machine but You can't
> print a webpage from Firefox?
> 
> Have you tried with other Browsers?
> 
> if the problem remains by example with Google Chrome you may have some
> luck using a "Printing Extension" for Firefox or Chrome... just search
> for
> "Print"
> in their respective extensions galleries, By the way, there's a
> bookmarklet
> that may
> help, give it a shot:
> 
> NAME: Print What You like
> 
> URL:
> javascript:(function(){if(window['ppw']&&ppw['bookmarklet']){ppw.bookmarklet.toggle();}else{window._pwyl_home='
> http://www.printwhatyoulike.com/';window._pwyl_pro_id=null;window._pwyl_bmkl=document.createElement('script');window._pwyl_bmkl.setAttribute('type
> ','text/javascript');window._pwyl_bmkl.setAttribute('src',window._pwyl_home+'static/compressed/pwyl_bookmarklet_10.js');window._pwyl_bmkl.setAttribute('pwyl','true');document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(window._pwyl_bmkl);}})();
> 
> If none of these experiments work, Try in another Distro if you can, by
> example Mandriva,
> wich detects plugged hardware within the "Mandriva Control Center"
> and can install and configure printer & scanner with one click.
> 
> Again, good luck!
> 
> -- 
> <-Manuel Escudero->
> Linux User #509052
> @GWave: jmlev...@googlewave.com
> @Blogger: http://www.blogxenode.tk/ (Xenode Systems Blog)
> PGP/GnuPG: DAE3 82E9 D68E 7AE4 ED31  1F8F 4AF4 D00C 50E7 ABC6
> 

I tried installed Opera a while ago, but the program seg-faulted during
startup. But for some reason I forgot about Chrome. And I *can* print
from it. I tried the Print-PDF extension to Firefox and got nothing.
Firefox saves web pages just fine. And other programs seem to be able to
print files just fine, so I would think cups and ghostscript are ok.
It's a newly created guest. 

 




-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: problem with fc 13 and hplip

2010-11-01 Thread Manuel Escudero
2010/11/1 Richard Shaw 

> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Barry  wrote:
> > I can print very simple files -- so I can send the file to the print
> > server, but I fail to print most web pages in irefox. I've tried
> > printing to a ps file, but end up with a blank page as soon as the page
> > becomes a little  complex.
>
> If you have problems when you print to PS files then it is highly
> unlikely your problem is with hplip, or at least not the only problem.
> Try reinstalling CUPS and ghostscript.
>
> Richard
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>

Really wierd... I'm getting lost here, let me see if I understand:

You say you can print anything from the host machine but You can't
print a webpage from Firefox?

Have you tried with other Browsers?

if the problem remains by example with Google Chrome you may have some
luck using a "Printing Extension" for Firefox or Chrome... just search for
"Print"
in their respective extensions galleries, By the way, there's a bookmarklet
that may
help, give it a shot:

NAME: Print What You like

URL: 
javascript:(function(){if(window['ppw']&&ppw['bookmarklet']){ppw.bookmarklet.toggle();}else{window._pwyl_home='
http://www.printwhatyoulike.com/';window._pwyl_pro_id=null;window._pwyl_bmkl=document.createElement('script');window._pwyl_bmkl.setAttribute('type
','text/javascript');window._pwyl_bmkl.setAttribute('src',window._pwyl_home+'static/compressed/pwyl_bookmarklet_10.js');window._pwyl_bmkl.setAttribute('pwyl','true');document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(window._pwyl_bmkl);}})();

If none of these experiments work, Try in another Distro if you can, by
example Mandriva,
wich detects plugged hardware within the "Mandriva Control Center"
and can install and configure printer & scanner with one click.

Again, good luck!

-- 
<-Manuel Escudero->
Linux User #509052
@GWave: jmlev...@googlewave.com
@Blogger: http://www.blogxenode.tk/ (Xenode Systems Blog)
PGP/GnuPG: DAE3 82E9 D68E 7AE4 ED31  1F8F 4AF4 D00C 50E7 ABC6
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: problem with fc 13 and hplip

2010-11-01 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Barry  wrote:
> I can print very simple files -- so I can send the file to the print
> server, but I fail to print most web pages in irefox. I've tried
> printing to a ps file, but end up with a blank page as soon as the page
> becomes a little  complex.

If you have problems when you print to PS files then it is highly
unlikely your problem is with hplip, or at least not the only problem.
Try reinstalling CUPS and ghostscript.

Richard
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: problem with fc 13 and hplip

2010-11-01 Thread Barry
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:25 -0400, "Barry"  wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:34 +, "Tim Waugh"  wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 10:44 -0400, Barry wrote:
> > > I followed Manuel's suggestion, uninstalled the HPLIP that I had, and
> > > reinstalled the hplip rpms. And I end up in the same situation. I can
> > > print very simple files, local text files, pdfs and a simple web page on
> > > the host machine. I cannot print a web page of any complexity from
> > > Firefox. I plugged the printer into the host machine, installed the
> > > printer, and it prints fine from the host. I was able to install the
> > > printer on the guest, and print a test page, but cannot print from
> > > Firefox. Otherwise networking is fine on the guest.
> > 
> > Is it an HP LaserJet 3050?  Is that a PostScript-capable printer?
> > 
> > HPLIP provides two drivers for that model: a PostScript driver and a
> > PCL3 driver.  The gutenprint-cups package also provides another
> > (raster-based) driver.
> > 
> > Have you tried those other drivers?
> > 
> > There's some information on the wiki about debugging printing problems
> > that might be useful otherwise:
> >   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Printing/Debugging
> > 
> > Tim.
> >
> 
> Yes, the Laserjet, and I've always used the postscript drivers, several
> machines, different platforms. But I just tried the PCL3 driver and it
> too is weird. I printed a test page with it that came out with all the

I means *without* all the graphics.

> graphics. I was able to print one web page, but not another -- however,
> this time I got an error that said it was an empty file. 
> 
> Barry
> 
> -- 

Barry

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: problem with fc 13 and hplip

2010-11-01 Thread Barry
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:34 +, "Tim Waugh"  wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 10:44 -0400, Barry wrote:
> > I followed Manuel's suggestion, uninstalled the HPLIP that I had, and
> > reinstalled the hplip rpms. And I end up in the same situation. I can
> > print very simple files, local text files, pdfs and a simple web page on
> > the host machine. I cannot print a web page of any complexity from
> > Firefox. I plugged the printer into the host machine, installed the
> > printer, and it prints fine from the host. I was able to install the
> > printer on the guest, and print a test page, but cannot print from
> > Firefox. Otherwise networking is fine on the guest.
> 
> Is it an HP LaserJet 3050?  Is that a PostScript-capable printer?
> 
> HPLIP provides two drivers for that model: a PostScript driver and a
> PCL3 driver.  The gutenprint-cups package also provides another
> (raster-based) driver.
> 
> Have you tried those other drivers?
> 
> There's some information on the wiki about debugging printing problems
> that might be useful otherwise:
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Printing/Debugging
> 
> Tim.
>

Yes, the Laserjet, and I've always used the postscript drivers, several
machines, different platforms. But I just tried the PCL3 driver and it
too is weird. I printed a test page with it that came out with all the
graphics. I was able to print one web page, but not another -- however,
this time I got an error that said it was an empty file. 

Barry

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: problem with fc 13 and hplip

2010-11-01 Thread Tim Waugh
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 10:44 -0400, Barry wrote:
> I followed Manuel's suggestion, uninstalled the HPLIP that I had, and
> reinstalled the hplip rpms. And I end up in the same situation. I can
> print very simple files, local text files, pdfs and a simple web page on
> the host machine. I cannot print a web page of any complexity from
> Firefox. I plugged the printer into the host machine, installed the
> printer, and it prints fine from the host. I was able to install the
> printer on the guest, and print a test page, but cannot print from
> Firefox. Otherwise networking is fine on the guest.

Is it an HP LaserJet 3050?  Is that a PostScript-capable printer?

HPLIP provides two drivers for that model: a PostScript driver and a
PCL3 driver.  The gutenprint-cups package also provides another
(raster-based) driver.

Have you tried those other drivers?

There's some information on the wiki about debugging printing problems
that might be useful otherwise:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Printing/Debugging

Tim.
*/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: problem with fc 13 and hplip

2010-11-01 Thread Barry
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:02 +, "Tim Waugh"  wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 23:34 -0400, Barry wrote:
> > I set up FC 13 as a guest on a KVM host, and I installed the latest
> > HPLIP from the sourceforge site. (The fedora rpm hadn't worked at all.)
> 
> OK, that needs some more explanation. :-)
> 
> What's wrong with the Fedora RPM?
> 
> Tim.
> */
> 
> -- 

I followed Manuel's suggestion, uninstalled the HPLIP that I had, and
reinstalled the hplip rpms. And I end up in the same situation. I can
print very simple files, local text files, pdfs and a simple web page on
the host machine. I cannot print a web page of any complexity from
Firefox. I plugged the printer into the host machine, installed the
printer, and it prints fine from the host. I was able to install the
printer on the guest, and print a test page, but cannot print from
Firefox. Otherwise networking is fine on the guest.

Tim, I might have misspoke when I maligned the rpms. My bad. When I
first set up this system, I installed the Fedora rpms and when I tried
to print a web page, I got nothing from the printer, and nothing when I
printed to a file (well, a little of either the ps or pdf headers but no
content). I don't remember exactly, but I probably didn't experiment
much but tried the HP version of the driver. 
 
When I installed the HPLIP from HP, I ended up in exactly the same
situation. Nothing when trying to print a typical web page from Firefox,
although oddly I could print a very simple web file served up by the
host machine -- I haven't found a file from over the web that will
print. Maybe it's a Firefox issue.

When I try to print, I get a message saying the file was successfully
sent to server. On the server there appears to be nothing pending. 




-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users:
  http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: problem with fc 13 and hplip

2010-11-01 Thread Tim Waugh
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 23:34 -0400, Barry wrote:
> I set up FC 13 as a guest on a KVM host, and I installed the latest
> HPLIP from the sourceforge site. (The fedora rpm hadn't worked at all.)

OK, that needs some more explanation. :-)

What's wrong with the Fedora RPM?

Tim.
*/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: problem with fc 13 and hplip

2010-10-31 Thread Manuel Escudero
2010/10/31 Barry 

> I set up FC 13 as a guest on a KVM host, and I installed the latest
> HPLIP from the sourceforge site. (The fedora rpm hadn't worked at all.)
> I'm trying to print to an HP3050 attached to another box on my LAN, but
> it seems to be  driver problem with FC 13.
>
> I can print very simple files -- so I can send the file to the print
> server, but I fail to print most web pages in irefox. I've tried
> printing to a ps file, but end up with a blank page as soon as the page
> becomes a little  complex.
>
> I installed HPLIP 3.10.9 on the guest; the host is running CentOS 5.5,
> with HPLIP 3.10.6, and I can printly correctly to the same printer. The
> guest is running a 32-bit system, but the host is 64. I'll try dropping
> back to 3.10.6 if no one has a cleaner solution.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>


Uninstall whatever you've installed and then Try with:

yum -y install hplip hplip-common

as Root. after that, reboot your system for "better vibe"

and plug your printer to the PC. Try to print something (Be sure the printer
is functional)

If you still getting errors, Try printing a PDF and tell me the result

Good Luck!

-- 
<-Manuel Escudero->
Linux User #509052
@GWave: jmlev...@googlewave.com
@Blogger: http://www.blogxenode.tk/ (Xenode Systems Blog)
PGP/GnuPG: DAE3 82E9 D68E 7AE4 ED31  1F8F 4AF4 D00C 50E7 ABC6
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


problem with fc 13 and hplip

2010-10-31 Thread Barry
I set up FC 13 as a guest on a KVM host, and I installed the latest
HPLIP from the sourceforge site. (The fedora rpm hadn't worked at all.)
I'm trying to print to an HP3050 attached to another box on my LAN, but
it seems to be  driver problem with FC 13.

I can print very simple files -- so I can send the file to the print
server, but I fail to print most web pages in irefox. I've tried
printing to a ps file, but end up with a blank page as soon as the page
becomes a little  complex.

I installed HPLIP 3.10.9 on the guest; the host is running CentOS 5.5,
with HPLIP 3.10.6, and I can printly correctly to the same printer. The
guest is running a 32-bit system, but the host is 64. I'll try dropping
back to 3.10.6 if no one has a cleaner solution.

Thanks.

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: foomatic/hplip vs hpcups drivers

2010-09-29 Thread Tim Waugh
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 21:38 -0700, JD wrote:
> Just wanted to know if the foomatic hplip drivers
> and the hpcups drivers are mutually exclusive?

No, they can both be installed at once, and both be used at once (by
different queues).

> This sourceforge project provides the shell script
> that builds and installs the binaries. User does
> not get to play with configure.

Don't use that then. ;-)

Fedora already ships an HPLIP package, and Fedora 13 can automatically
download and install it for you when you plug in your printer.

Tim.
*/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


foomatic/hplip vs hpcups drivers

2010-09-28 Thread JD
  Just wanted to know if the foomatic hplip drivers
and the hpcups drivers are mutually exclusive?

Reason I ask is that the foomatic hplip project
configured itself (when I installed it) so that
none of the hplip drivers got installed, but
the hpcups drivers did.

This sourceforge project provides the shell script
that builds and installs the binaries. User does
not get to play with configure.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Possible cups/hplip bug?

2010-04-20 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Mikkel  wrote:
> I can tell you this much - it is a glables problem, and not a cups
> problem. If you try printing to the CD with gedit, selecting the CD
> as your media, it will work without complaining. For some reason
> glabels is ignoring the page size, I think.

Hmm... I did try printing to DVD from gedit and it did work without
complaint, but the cups page_log still was the same as the others:

---
HP-Photosmart-C5580-DVD 141 richard [20/Apr/2010:22:13:13 -0500] 1
1DEBUG2: - localhost Unsaved Document 1 na_letter_8.5x11in -
---

I tried searching through the bugs on both bugzilla.redhat.com and the
glabels sourceforge tracker but didn't find anything particularly
helpful.
I also played around with glabels trying some more combinations of
size and x/y offsets but it seems even if I make the "page" size
bigger it still clips at least one of the edges.

Richard
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Possible cups/hplip bug?

2010-04-20 Thread Mikkel
On 04/19/2010 08:44 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Hopefully someone can tell me definitively if this is a bug or not.
> 
> I've been having a lot of trouble getting my CD/DVD printing to work
> properly in F12 after having it work perfectly in F11 on my HP
> Photosmart C5580. I've re-tweaked the glabels template and can get it
> pretty close but no matter what I do the printer always complains that
> there is a media mismatch which I can choose to ignore and have it
> print anyway.
> 
> I have three printer queues setup, one for regular printing, one for
> CD/DVD printing, and one for photo printing. I have verified that the
> settings for both tray and media type are properly selected in the
> cups web interface in case there was a problem with
> system-config-printing, which there does not appear to be. However,
> when I look at my page log I see the following:
> 
<---[ SNIP ]>
> 
> 
> It appears that no matter which queue I use, it uses 8.5x11 regardless
> of my print settings. As you can see from the log I also tried
> printing a photo with the same problem (and same complaint from the
> printer about media size).
> 
> Anyone have and ideas?
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard

I can tell you this much - it is a glables problem, and not a cups
problem. If you try printing to the CD with gedit, selecting the CD
as your media, it will work without complaining. For some reason
glabels is ignoring the page size, I think.

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Possible cups/hplip bug?

2010-04-19 Thread Richard Shaw
Hopefully someone can tell me definitively if this is a bug or not.

I've been having a lot of trouble getting my CD/DVD printing to work
properly in F12 after having it work perfectly in F11 on my HP
Photosmart C5580. I've re-tweaked the glabels template and can get it
pretty close but no matter what I do the printer always complains that
there is a media mismatch which I can choose to ignore and have it
print anyway.

I have three printer queues setup, one for regular printing, one for
CD/DVD printing, and one for photo printing. I have verified that the
settings for both tray and media type are properly selected in the
cups web interface in case there was a problem with
system-config-printing, which there does not appear to be. However,
when I look at my page log I see the following:


HP-Photosmart-C5580-DVD 124 richard [18/Apr/2010:17:47:27 -0500] 1
1INFO: - localhost glabels job #2 na_letter_8.5x11in -
HP-Photosmart-C5580-DVD 125 richard [18/Apr/2010:17:50:44 -0500] 1
1DEBUG2: - localhost glabels job #3 na_letter_8.5x11in -
HP-Photosmart-C5580-DVD 126 richard [18/Apr/2010:17:52:26 -0500] 1
1DEBUG2: - localhost glabels job #1 na_letter_8.5x11in -
HP-Photosmart-C5580-DVD 127 richard [18/Apr/2010:17:54:59 -0500] 1
1STATE: - localhost glabels job #1 na_letter_8.5x11in -
HP-Photosmart-C5580-DVD 128 richard [18/Apr/2010:17:56:00 -0500] 1
1DEBUG2: - localhost glabels job #1 na_letter_8.5x11in -
HP-Photosmart-C5580 129 richard [18/Apr/2010:18:07:31 -0500] 1
1DEBUG2: - localhost glabels job #1 - -
HP-Photosmart-C5580-DVD 130 richard [18/Apr/2010:18:07:58 -0500] 1
1STATE: - localhost glabels job #2 na_letter_8.5x11in -
HP-Photosmart-C5580 131 richard [18/Apr/2010:18:09:40 -0500] 1
1DEBUG2: - localhost glabels job #1 - -
HP-Photosmart-C5580 132 richard [18/Apr/2010:18:10:51 -0500] 1 1STATE:
- localhost glabels job #1 - -
HP-Photosmart-C5580-DVD 133 richard [18/Apr/2010:18:20:54 -0500] 1
1DEBUG2: - localhost glabels job #1 na_letter_8.5x11in -
HP-Photosmart-C5580-DVD 134 richard [18/Apr/2010:18:41:20 -0500] 1
1DEBUG2: - localhost glabels job #1 na_letter_8.5x11in -
HP-Photosmart-C5580-DVD 135 richard [18/Apr/2010:18:47:06 -0500] 1
1STATE: - localhost glabels job #1 na_letter_8.5x11in -
HP-Photosmart-C5580-DVD 136 richard [18/Apr/2010:18:53:37 -0500] 1
1DEBUG2: - localhost glabels job #1 na_letter_8.5x11in -
HP-Photosmart-C5580-DVD 137 richard [18/Apr/2010:18:57:09 -0500] 1
1DEBUG2: - localhost glabels job #1 na_letter_8.5x11in -
HP-Photosmart-C5580-DVD 138 richard [19/Apr/2010:20:38:00 -0500] 1
1DEBUG2: - localhost glabels job #1 na_letter_8.5x11in -
HP-Photosmart-C5580-DVD 139 richard [19/Apr/2010:20:39:50 -0500] 1
1DEBUG2: - localhost glabels job #1 na_letter_8.5x11in -
HP-Photosmart-C5580-Photo 140 richard [19/Apr/2010:20:41:54 -0500] 1
1STATE: - localhost (stdin) na_letter_8.5x11in -
---

It appears that no matter which queue I use, it uses 8.5x11 regardless
of my print settings. As you can see from the log I also tried
printing a photo with the same problem (and same complaint from the
printer about media size).

Anyone have and ideas?

Thanks,
Richard
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines