Re: LUKS on shutdown.

2021-12-07 Thread murph nj
When I try to umount them: /home and /other show as not mounted.  / on the
other hand, says busy.

There are 4 entries in crypttab, the two listed by name above, presumably
/, and I don't know what the other is.  It is only listed by uuid, not
sure how to correlate it to a mounted drive.

When I got the output of /proc/mounts, lots of logical entries, and "/"
Appeared to be the only real partition mounted.  (proc, sysfs, none, and
many more were there)

On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 11:33 PM Gordon Messmer 
wrote:

> On 12/4/21 19:15, murph nj wrote:
> >
> >
> > Got another opportunity, redirected lsof /home and lsof /other to
> > files, and there was no output.
>
>
> Interesting... Is there an error if you try to unmount those yourself?
>
>
> > I did get output from systemctl-list-jobs (edited lightly)
> >
> > JOB  UNIT  TYPE  STATE
> > 6039 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2dshome.service  stop  running
> > 6068 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2de8.service stop  running
> > 6055 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2dsother.service  stop  running
> > 6047 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2d23.service stop  running
>
>
> Home and other make sense given your earlier comment, but what are the
> other two?  Do the number of entries in /etc/crypttab match the number
> of LUKS partitions?  (What's in /proc/mounts during the failed shutdown?)



When I try to umount them: /home and /other show as not mounted.  / on the
other hand, says busy.

There are 4 entries in crypttab, the two listed by name above, presumably
/, and I don't know what the other is.  It is only listed by uuid, not
sure how to correlate it to a mounted drive.

When I got the output of /proc/mounts, (from the console when it
was failing to shut down) lots of logical entries, and "/"  Appeared to be
the only real partition mounted.  (proc, sysfs, none, and many more were
there)
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: LUKS on shutdown.

2021-12-05 Thread murph nj
On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 11:33 PM Gordon Messmer 
wrote:

> On 12/4/21 19:15, murph nj wrote:
> >
> >
> > Got another opportunity, redirected lsof /home and lsof /other to
> > files, and there was no output.
>
>
> Interesting... Is there an error if you try to unmount those yourself?
>
>
Remember, all of the output (and the command line I'm typing on) is
immediately erased by the cylon eye, so I'll try (next time it does it) and
try to redirect stdout, and stderr to a file, typing blind.


>
> > I did get output from systemctl-list-jobs (edited lightly)
> >
> > JOB  UNIT  TYPE  STATE
> > 6039 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2dshome.service  stop  running
> > 6068 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2de8.service stop  running
> > 6055 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2dsother.service  stop  running
> > 6047 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2d23.service stop  running
>
>
> Home and other make sense given your earlier comment, but what are the
> other two?  Do the number of entries in /etc/crypttab match the number
> of LUKS partitions?  (What's in /proc/mounts during the failed shutdown?)
>
>
I think they do line up, I'll do my best to confirm, and get the
information from /proc/mounts.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: LUKS on shutdown.

2021-12-04 Thread Gordon Messmer

On 12/4/21 19:15, murph nj wrote:



Got another opportunity, redirected lsof /home and lsof /other to 
files, and there was no output.



Interesting... Is there an error if you try to unmount those yourself?



I did get output from systemctl-list-jobs (edited lightly)

JOB  UNIT                                  TYPE  STATE
6039 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2dshome.service          stop  running
6068 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2de8.service stop  running
6055 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2dsother.service          stop  running
6047 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2d23.service stop  running



Home and other make sense given your earlier comment, but what are the 
other two?  Do the number of entries in /etc/crypttab match the number 
of LUKS partitions?  (What's in /proc/mounts during the failed shutdown?)

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: LUKS on shutdown.

2021-12-04 Thread murph nj
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 2:06 PM Gordon Messmer 
wrote:

> On 12/1/21 18:03, murph nj wrote:
> >
> > lsof showed nothing that I could see.
>
>
> Nothing, or nothing interesting?  I'd expect you to at least see the CWD
> of the debug shell.
>
>
Got another opportunity, redirected lsof /home and lsof /other to files,
and there was no output.


>
> > The stop job rotates between four mounted volumes, and the
> > lvm2-monitor.service.
>
>
> In the past, I've seen lvm2-monitor behave badly in reaction to logical
> volumes (block devices) used for VMs that used LVM internally.  Do you
> have any logical volumes that aren't used for those four mounted volumes?
>
>
No LVM, as mentioned earlier


>
> > systemctl status doesn't seem to display much, but the stop job (and
> > cylon eye) keep overwriting everything, making it really hard to see
> > the output.
>
>
> Several suggestions: Chris suggested that you check "systemctl
> list-jobs".  The contents of /proc/mounts might be interesting. I'd run
> "lsof /path" where path is the longest mount point path of the volumes
> still listed in /proc/mounts.
>

I did get output from systemctl-list-jobs (edited lightly)

JOB  UNIT
 TYPE  STATE
5788 poweroff.target
  start waiting
6039 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2dshome.service  stop
 running
5790 shutdown.target
start waiting
6031 final.target
 start waiting
6068 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2de8.service stop
 running
6055 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2dsother.service  stop
 running
6013 lvm2-monitor.service
stop  running
6047 systemd-cryptsetup@luks\x2d23.service stop
 running
6032 umount.target
 start waiting
5789 systemd-poweroff.service
start waiting

10 jobs listed.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: LUKS on shutdown.

2021-12-02 Thread murph nj
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 2:06 PM Gordon Messmer 
wrote:

> On 12/1/21 18:03, murph nj wrote:
> >
> > lsof showed nothing that I could see.
>
>
> Nothing, or nothing interesting?  I'd expect you to at least see the CWD
> of the debug shell.
>
>
The error messages were continuously overwriting everything in the shell.
If it was a single line, I may not have been able to read it.

>
> > The stop job rotates between four mounted volumes, and the
> > lvm2-monitor.service.
>
>
> In the past, I've seen lvm2-monitor behave badly in reaction to logical
> volumes (block devices) used for VMs that used LVM internally.  Do you
> have any logical volumes that aren't used for those four mounted volumes?
>
>
No LVM on this system.  (I don't recall why, I'm not averse to LVM, but
this one doesn't have it.)


>
> > systemctl status doesn't seem to display much, but the stop job (and
> > cylon eye) keep overwriting everything, making it really hard to see
> > the output.
>
>
> Several suggestions: Chris suggested that you check "systemctl
> list-jobs".  The contents of /proc/mounts might be interesting. I'd run
> "lsof /path" where path is the longest mount point path of the volumes
> still listed in /proc/mounts.
>
>

I'll give it a shot next time it hangs up on shutdown.  Any ideas on how to
make the error messages abate (in the debug shell) so that I can read these
things more easily?

Thanks,
  --murph
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: LUKS on shutdown.

2021-12-02 Thread Gordon Messmer

On 12/1/21 18:03, murph nj wrote:


lsof showed nothing that I could see.



Nothing, or nothing interesting?  I'd expect you to at least see the CWD 
of the debug shell.



The stop job rotates between four mounted volumes, and the 
lvm2-monitor.service.



In the past, I've seen lvm2-monitor behave badly in reaction to logical 
volumes (block devices) used for VMs that used LVM internally.  Do you 
have any logical volumes that aren't used for those four mounted volumes?



systemctl status doesn't seem to display much, but the stop job (and 
cylon eye) keep overwriting everything, making it really hard to see 
the output.



Several suggestions: Chris suggested that you check "systemctl 
list-jobs".  The contents of /proc/mounts might be interesting. I'd run 
"lsof /path" where path is the longest mount point path of the volumes 
still listed in /proc/mounts.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: LUKS on shutdown.

2021-12-02 Thread stan via users
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 21:03:16 -0500
murph nj  wrote:

> So, as far as dragging people through debugging seems somewhat futile
> to me, unless collectively you think that it is worthwhile to pursue
> this. I'm game if this can help the Fedora community, but the system
> is working, I can back up, and do a fresh install after a long time
> of good service after so many upgrades.  (I've done all of them, and
> even switched to the beta track when it got close a few times)
> 
> 
> Any thoughts?

I have no thoughts on investigating or solving your problem, but I think
your logic about doing a new install of the latest version to finesse
the problem is valid. Everyone who has expertise in working on this will
have long ago moved on to the the latest versions of both the OS and
the packages. They have no way of investigating your problem directly.
And, additionally, all the little intermittent tweaks tend to get lost
to memory in the noise of constant change, so their advice if you
choose to continue investigating will reflect that.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: LUKS on shutdown.

2021-12-01 Thread murph nj
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 8:35 PM Chris Murphy 
wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 4:13 PM Gordon Messmer 
> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/30/21 12:41, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > Seems likely to me some service is not quitting properly, preventing /
> > > from being unmounted
> >
> >
> > If that were the case, there might be information about an exit failure
> > in the log.  On the next boot, "journalctl -b -1" might have useful info.
> >
> > I also wonder if enabling sysrq and using sysrq+'t' would help determine
> > which process is stuck:
>
> It might but it's also really verbose, so for starters "systemctl
> list-jobs" is the path of least resistance I suspect. Report suggests
> the systemd cylon eye, which suggests a job is running and not exiting
> as you say, so list the jobs and then do a systemctl status on each
> one of them to find out what they are up to.
>
>



> Well, I finally enabled the shell, and it (as it is intermittent) hung up
on shutdown.

lsof showed nothing that I could see.

The stop job rotates between four mounted volumes, and the
lvm2-monitor.service.
(The lvm2.monitor finally stopped, the volumes have not)

systemctl status doesn't seem to display much, but the stop job (and cylon
eye) keep overwriting everything, making it really hard to see the output.

Perhaps let me let everyone off the hook though.  I was thinking about it,
and started digging into the logs.  This system has been upgraded up from
at least Fedora 30, my dnf logs start in 2019-06.  (It may even predate
that, not sure)

So, as far as dragging people through debugging seems somewhat futile to
me, unless collectively you think that it is worthwhile to pursue this.
I'm game if this can help the Fedora community, but the system is working,
I can back up, and do a fresh install after a long time of good service
after so many upgrades.  (I've done all of them, and even switched to the
beta track when it got close a few times)


Any thoughts?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: LUKS on shutdown.

2021-09-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 4:13 PM Gordon Messmer  wrote:
>
> On 9/30/21 12:41, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Seems likely to me some service is not quitting properly, preventing /
> > from being unmounted
>
>
> If that were the case, there might be information about an exit failure
> in the log.  On the next boot, "journalctl -b -1" might have useful info.
>
> I also wonder if enabling sysrq and using sysrq+'t' would help determine
> which process is stuck:

It might but it's also really verbose, so for starters "systemctl
list-jobs" is the path of least resistance I suspect. Report suggests
the systemd cylon eye, which suggests a job is running and not exiting
as you say, so list the jobs and then do a systemctl status on each
one of them to find out what they are up to.




-- 
Chris Murphy
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: LUKS on shutdown.

2021-09-30 Thread Gordon Messmer

On 9/30/21 12:41, Chris Murphy wrote:

Seems likely to me some service is not quitting properly, preventing /
from being unmounted



If that were the case, there might be information about an exit failure 
in the log.  On the next boot, "journalctl -b -1" might have useful info.


I also wonder if enabling sysrq and using sysrq+'t' would help determine 
which process is stuck:


https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/sysrq.html

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: LUKS on shutdown.

2021-09-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 2:18 PM murph nj  wrote:
>
> I'm having an issue shutting down.  Fedora 34, just updated to 35, same 
> problem.  (It was around in 33 as well, I've been putting up with it.)  I 
> know that there is another list for beta versions, but this issue was there 
> in the current version as well.
>
> Somewhere around 1 out of every 10 shutdowns,  the system goes down to
> "[ OK ] Reached target System Shutdown", but then,
> "[ *** ] a stop job is running for Cryptography setup for luks- LUKS volumes>"
>
> It typically goes for about 1/2 hour if I don't get fed up, and hold the 
> power button down.
>
> I just saw after that 1/2 hour:
> [Time] Timed out starting System Reboot
> Forcibly Rebooting: job timed out.
> audit: type=1334.
>
> I still had to power it off.  On reboot, it seems OK.
>
>
> I haven't found anything interesting in /var/log/messages regarding it.
>
> Any suggestions to further troubleshooting?

Seems likely to me some service is not quitting properly, preventing /
from being unmounted, which prevents cryptsetup from closing the
dm-crypt device. And as tedious as it is, the trick is to find out
what that service is. You might also get a clue by comparing the
shutdown sequences between successful and unsuccessful variants. The
successful log will list all kinds of services being quit, whereas the
unsuccessful one will be missing two or more services. Maybe from that
you can infer what the problem is.

Another idea:  boot using systemd.log_level=debug to get more
information in the journal (a *lot* more information). And also
consider adding systemd.debug-shell=1 as well, but note that this is a
security risk because it will persistently put a root level shell on
tty9, which is what you'll switch to with control-alt-F9 when you get
the shutdown hang. And then do:

systemctl list-jobs
df
lsof 



-- 
Chris Murphy
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: LUKS on shutdown.

2021-09-30 Thread stan via users
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 14:17:01 -0400
murph nj  wrote:

> I'm having an issue shutting down.

[snip]

> I haven't found anything interesting in /var/log/messages regarding
> it.
> 
> Any suggestions to further troubleshooting?

I think this is an artifact of the shutdown process.  It is supposition
on my part, but I think it is just like the startup process, so that
things are shutdown asynchronously.  Thus from time to time, a
dependency is not met because something is too slow or too fast, and it
leads to a race condition, and the outcome you are seeing.  I also
occasionally see the same thing (in rawhide, future F36), but for a
different process. I think the last one I saw was for something called
'User Manager'.  You might also check the journal with 
journalctl -r
and page down to the last shutdown.  It is possible systemd placed a
message there preferentially.  Is there any kind of message about
waiting for something? Other than that, it would require digging into
the scheduling of systemd during shutdown, looking at dependencies for
the process you are waiting on, and tweaking timings through trial and
error to see which removes it.  Infeasible, I think.  If systemd had a
synchronous (sequential) startup and shutdown, these could be
deterministically tuned out, but it would probably be much slower on
both sides.

You could open a bugzilla just in case someone knowledgeable
immediately recognizes the problem and fixes it.  Or, the next time
they are tweaking that area, they might remember it and have a look for
anything obvious.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: LUKS on shutdown.

2021-09-29 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 9/29/21 14:17, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Somehow you sent this as a reply to another thread that most people will 
probably ignore.  I suggest sending it again as not a reply.


And immediately after sending that I saw that there were more emails in 
my inbox and you had already done that.  Sorry!

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: LUKS on shutdown.

2021-09-29 Thread Samuel Sieb
Somehow you sent this as a reply to another thread that most people will 
probably ignore.  I suggest sending it again as not a reply.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


LUKS on shutdown.

2021-09-29 Thread murph nj
I'm having an issue shutting down.  Fedora 34, just updated to 35, same
problem.  (It was around in 33 as well, I've been putting up with it.)  I
know that there is another list for beta versions, but this issue was there
in the current version as well.

Somewhere around 1 out of every 10 shutdowns,  the system goes down to
"[ OK ] Reached target System Shutdown", but then,
"[ *** ] a stop job is running for Cryptography setup for luks-"

It typically goes for about 1/2 hour if I don't get fed up, and hold the
power button down.

I just saw after that 1/2 hour:
[Time] Timed out starting System Reboot
Forcibly Rebooting: job timed out.
audit: type=1334.

I still had to power it off.  On reboot, it seems OK.


I haven't found anything interesting in /var/log/messages regarding it.

Any suggestions to further troubleshooting?

Thanks,
  --murph
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


LUKS on shutdown.

2021-09-29 Thread murph nj
I'm having an issue shutting down.  Fedora 34, just updated to 35, same
problem.  (It was around in 33 as well, I've been putting up with it.)

Somewhere around 1 out of 10 shutdowns,  the system goes down to "[ OK ]
Reached target System Shutdown", but then,
[ *** ] a stop job is running for Cryptography setup for luks-

It typically goes for about 1/2 hour if I don't get fed up, and hold the
power button down.

I just saw after that 1/2 hour:
[Time] Timed out starting System Reboot
Forcibly Rebooting: job timed out.
audit: type=1334.

I still had to power it off.  On reboot, it seems OK.


I haven't found anything interesting in /var/log/messages regarding it.

Any suggestions to further troubleshooting?

Thanks,
  --murph
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure