Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-09 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 08 September 2013, g sent:
 imagine how big sputnik would have been if the Russians had to use a
 bunch of tubes and batteries :=D 

Apparently a captured Russian aircraft was found to be full of valve
based equipment, to the bewilderment of those who caught it, wondering
if they were really that far behind.  Later they'd find out that it was
deliberate, as that technology was more robust against EMP.

At college, we were told an amusing tale about how the Russians had
worked their way around the embargo of selling certain ICs to them.
Empty pinball machines were found around their embassy, after they
gutted them for the parts.  Leading to a wag in the back of our class
miming how he thought the Russians launched their missiles - pulling
back the spring loaded ball-bearing launcher, and letting go.

-- 


All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point
trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the
public lists.

George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not
a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments.



-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-09 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 04:58:17PM -0500, Javier Perez wrote:
 I know SELinux is not about encryption, it is about limiting access to the
 system AFTER a breach has ocurred. (That is my understanding AFAIK, and
 that is why I think it is a good idea).
 My beef is given the NSA origin of this software, It could very well have a
 backdoor to turn itself off under the appropriate circumstances like an
 NSA-sponsored breach an allow unrestricted access to my system..

Then by turning SELinux off you've spared any such intruder the
necessary step of using that backdoor.

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/
What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?


pgpXH7vwWrbV6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-08 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 07 September 2013, g sent:
 i know that feeling. similarly, i had a skin effect experience when i
 put my hand on a van de graaff generator at the Chicago Museum of
 Science and Industry.

I had my revenge on my unfriendly classmates at school with a Van de
Graaff generator.  ;-)  While they were all daisy-chained to each other,
standing on plastic boxes, with one on the end touching the generator,
as part of a practical demo, I grabbed the water pipe and the person on
the other end.  They all sprang apart in a hurry.

 not so good a feeling was having touched the low voltage rectifier in
 the high voltage section a a tv with palm of my left hand. that went
 straight to the bones in my hand and exited from my foot thru 3 nails
 in heal of my shoe to a floor furnace. i had the burn marks in both
 for well over 40 years.

I hate switchmode power supplies.  Electrically noisy, high voltage,
high current, painful operating frequencies, or DC, live heatsinks...
You have to be damn careful working on them.  I'm not sure which is
worse, them or TV set EHTs.

 it is a shame that most of 'tech heads' of today know very little of
 such, thanks to the needs of the aero space rocket launches.

Yes, if they hadn't needed to cram a computer into a tiny space capsule,
and had the money to fund the research, I don't know how long it would
have been before we got ICs.

-- 
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64

All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point
trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the
public lists.

George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not
a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments.



-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-08 Thread g



On 09/08/2013 06:51 AM, Tim wrote:



I had my revenge on my unfriendly classmates at school with a Van de
Graaff generator.  ;-)  While they were all daisy-chained to each other,
standing on plastic boxes, with one on the end touching the generator,
as part of a practical demo, I grabbed the water pipe and the person on
the other end.  They all sprang apart in a hurry.


and a good thing the current was very low or no one would have let go. :=)

two brothers, bill and clarence, owners of the tv repair service that i learned 
repair, were born and raised in the country.


clarence learned a weird way to turn off tractor when he was finished
plowing and showed me one day with one of the 6 cylinder service vans.

with engine running, he placed his thumbs on engine block, then 1st and
4th fingers of each hand on a spark plug/wire connection.

he shook like a spastic, but engine did die down and quit. weird to
watch, but a good laugh after.


I hate switchmode power supplies.  Electrically noisy, high voltage,
high current, painful operating frequencies, or DC, live heatsinks...
You have to be damn careful working on them.  I'm not sure which is
worse, them or TV set EHTs.


not to mention that they can be a bear to find what is wrong to fix when
they stop working. i believe the only reason they are used in computers
is that with out huge metal transformers, they are inexpensive and no
worry about ac ripple from supplies when dc caps start to go out.



Yes, if they hadn't needed to cram a computer into a tiny space capsule,
and had the money to fund the research, I don't know how long it would
have been before we got ICs.


imagine how big sputnik would have been if the Russians had to use a bunch
of tubes and batteries :=D

--

peace out.

in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

sl6.3 linux

tc.hago.

g
.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-08 Thread Veeti Paananen
On 05/09/13 23:41, Javier Perez wrote:
 After reading this, I am turning off SELINUX
 
 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security
 
 
 Until I hear of  a thorough code review by a non-USA team of this code,
 I do not feel safe using it, privacy wise. 
 
 It's a pity because SELINUX is a good idea.

How do you know that turning it off actually does so? It's still built
into the kernel you're running.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-07 Thread Joe Zeff

On 09/06/2013 10:41 PM, g wrote:

when i descended ladder, staying well clear of antenna wire, i looked down
at water and caught glimpses of some fishes with their bio luminescence.
another great sight.


I remember seeing that when I was in Tonkin Gulf, back in '72.  Never 
saw any St. Elmo's fire, but lots of that bio luminescence.  Once we 
were keeping station around a specific point in a dead calm, with a fog 
bank centered on where we were supposed to be.  Every time we came out 
of the fog, it was time to turn back and take another pass.  In and out 
of that fog for three or four days.  Boring!

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-07 Thread Roger

On 09/07/2013 02:38 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
I tried some of this stuff while in the service and almost got 
busted!  Foil on a 5-ton hut did not work well!


Mike D.


Exactly! Proof that foil trick's been foiled.
Returning to the original discussion about foiling the NSA. If you try 
to foil them they'll try harder. Remember you cannot stop recalcitrant 
gamma particles no matter what! If they put robots on gamma particles 
we're all screwed.

R
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-07 Thread g


hello, Joe. ;=)

On 09/07/2013 02:46 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 09/06/2013 10:41 PM, g wrote:

when i descended ladder, staying well clear of antenna wire, i looked down
at water and caught glimpses of some fishes with their bio luminescence.
another great sight.


I remember seeing that when I was in Tonkin Gulf, back in '72.  Never
saw any St. Elmo's fire, but lots of that bio luminescence.  Once we
were keeping station around a specific point in a dead calm, with a fog
bank centered on where we were supposed to be.  Every time we came out
of the fog, it was time to turn back and take another pass.  In and out
of that fog for three or four days.  Boring!


we never went out during any form of fog. no radar or sonar on the boats.

yes, heavy fog tends to 'short out'/'suppress' St. Elmo's Fire.

Tonkin Gulf sounded familiar, so i ran a search.

you were there around the time of 'delimitation'. had it been 1964. it would
not have been so Boring!.


--

peace out.

in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

sl6.3 linux

tc.hago.

g
.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-07 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 07 September 2013, g sent:
 for some reason or other, i decided to climb up on top of bridge.
 along side of ladder was cable for antenna. while climbing up, i kept
 getting a stinging on my ear, so i swatted at what i thought were
 mosquitos.
 
 after looking around horizon, i looked up into sky to observe the many
 stars. that is when i notice St. Elmo's fire off end of antenna. i
 move over to antenna wire, looked closely and saw a faint but clearly
 visible blue static around wire. 

I can remember the lovely lilac corona you could get when you poked the
end of a screwdriver *near* the tripler in a CRT set.  Tens of thousands
of volts going *almost* through you (more like around the outside of
you, rather than through your innards), but you were the conductor,
though you couldn't really feel a thing.

There'd, also, be a rather ominous screeching noise from the
electronics.

-- 


All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point
trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the
public lists.

George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not
a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments.



-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-07 Thread g



On 09/07/2013 06:39 AM, Tim wrote:



I can remember the lovely lilac corona you could get when you poked the
end of a screwdriver *near* the tripler in a CRT set.  Tens of thousands
of volts going *almost* through you (more like around the outside of
you, rather than through your innards), but you were the conductor,
though you couldn't really feel a thing.

There'd, also, be a rather ominous screeching noise from the
electronics.


i know that feeling. similarly, i had a skin effect experience when i put
my hand on a van de graaff generator at the Chicago Museum of Science and
Industry. [as a side note, i know the man, Steve Worack, Circuitron, Inc.,
who built the model railroad exhibit. a neighbor from when we lived in
North Riverside, IL.]

not so good a feeling was having touched the low voltage rectifier in the
high voltage section a a tv with palm of my left hand. that went straight
to the bones in my hand and exited from my foot thru 3 nails in heal of my
shoe to a floor furnace. i had the burn marks in both for well over 40 years.

if you want to reminisce about tubes;

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_tubes
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_vacuum_tubes

i still have my first and last RCA and GE tube manuals stored in my
historical storage boxes along with my RCA and GE semiconductor manuals.
hell, even a lot of my ic manuals are now outdated. i guess i will have
to do some relabeling of the boxes. :=)

it is a shame that most of 'tech heads' of today know very little of such,
thanks to the needs of the aero space rocket launches.

sure would be nice if fedoraproject would create a 'general' list like
mozilla did. then reminiscing would not be a thread unraveler. ;=)

--

peace out.

in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

sl6.3 linux

tc.hago.

g
.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-07 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:15:32 -0500
g wrote:

 sure would be nice if fedoraproject would create a 'general' list like
 mozilla did. then reminiscing would not be a thread unraveler. ;=)

Well, to get back on topic then, I'll just point out
for the tin foil hat folks that the selinux libraries
are linked into your executables even if you turn selinux
off. Who knows how mad they will get when they find
at runtime that you've turned off selinux? :-).

Obviously your only real hope is to switch to gentoo
linux and fixup all your source build patterns to disable
compiling and of the selinux code.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-07 Thread Joe Zeff

On 09/07/2013 03:31 AM, g wrote:


Tonkin Gulf sounded familiar, so i ran a search.

you were there around the time of 'delimitation'. had it been 1964. it
would
not have been so Boring!.


Steaming in and out of a fog bank was boring.  I suggest that you read 
up on the Easter Offensive, because I was on one of the 38 ships 
supporting the ARVN at that time.  If it weren't for that, I probably 
wouldn't have lost part of my hearing.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-07 Thread Joe Zeff

On 09/07/2013 02:00 PM, g wrote:



On 09/07/2013 03:01 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 09/07/2013 03:31 AM, g wrote:


Tonkin Gulf sounded familiar, so i ran a search.

you were there around the time of 'delimitation'. had it been 1964. it
would
not have been so Boring!.


Steaming in and out of a fog bank was boring.  I suggest that you read
up on the Easter Offensive, because I was on one of the 38 ships
supporting the ARVN at that time.  If it weren't for that, I probably
wouldn't have lost part of my hearing.



is that the 31 January 1968 Tet Offensive?



No.  The Easter Offensive was in '72, when the NVA poured across the 
border with 150,000 men and more armor than the Germans sent to the 
Kursk Salient.  They ended up with a few positions south of the border, 
and got back 50,000 men on foot.  ARVN did almost all of the ground 
work.  We supplied air support and shore bombardment, and took almost no 
casualties.  Look it up in Wikipedia.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-07 Thread g



On 09/07/2013 04:20 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:



No.  The Easter Offensive was in '72, when the NVA poured across the
border with 150,000 men and more armor than the Germans sent to the
Kursk Salient.  They ended up with a few positions south of the border,
and got back 50,000 men on foot.  ARVN did almost all of the ground
work.  We supplied air support and shore bombardment, and took almost no
casualties.  Look it up in Wikipedia.



ok. i looked it up;

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARVN

another fine example of how screwed up things can get with lack of good
communications.

especially in a 'police action' as some mistakenly reported it to be.

--

peace out.

in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

sl6.3 linux

tc.hago.

g
.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-07 Thread Joe Zeff

On 09/07/2013 03:25 PM, g wrote:

ok. i looked it up;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARVN

another fine example of how screwed up things can get with lack of good
communications.


Try looking here instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_Offensive 
because it deals with the offensive in question, rather than being a 
general article on one of the armies involved.  (If you wanted to learn 
about the Korean War, would you consult only an article on the US Army?)

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-07 Thread g



On 09/07/2013 06:01 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 09/07/2013 03:25 PM, g wrote:

ok. i looked it up;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARVN

another fine example of how screwed up things can get with lack of good
communications.


Try looking here instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_Offensive
because it deals with the offensive in question, rather than being a
general article on one of the armies involved.


ok. thanks.


(If you wanted to learn about the Korean War, would you consult only an

 article on the US Army?)

not really. it was what wikipedia found in search. i guess wikipedia does
not know all the general answers. :=)


--

peace out.

in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

sl6.3 linux

tc.hago.

g
.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-07 Thread Joe Zeff

On 09/07/2013 04:30 PM, g wrote:


not really. it was what wikipedia found in search. i guess wikipedia does
not know all the general answers. :=)


Odd.  I put Easter Offensive into the search bar and got exactly what I 
was looking for.  What search term did you use?


BTW, if you want to discuss the offensive, or ask about it, feel free, 
but off-list because I don't want to bore the rest of the list with 
something this far off-topic.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Clive Hills
Ah Ken's ACm lecture on Trusting trust.
yes good reading.


On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Dave Stevens g...@uniserve.com wrote:

 Quoting Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com:

  Hi


 On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Javier Perez   wrote:

  I know SELinux is not about encryption, it is about limiting access to
 the
 system AFTER a breach has ocurred. (That is my understanding AFAIK, and
 that is why I think it is a good idea).
 My beef is given the NSA origin of this software, It could very well have
 a backdoor to turn itself off under the appropriate circumstances like an
 NSA-sponsored breach an allow unrestricted access to my system..


 NSA is a *huge* organization with multiple divisions

 SELinux  can prevent breaches as well as mitigate the extend of any
 breaches depending on the situation but more importantly,  it is fully
 free
 and open source software and part of the upstream Linux kernel which has
 been thoroughly reviewed and powered competing Govt agencies including
 both
 US and Russian defense.

 As a side note, running SELinux doesn't prevent say someone monitoring
 your
 email or chat unless you are encrypting all of that and even then it might
 be just a speed bump for NSA.   If you want to change what they do, engage
 in the right political advocacy groups.

 Rahul


 Not to contradict what Rahul says, which I agree with, you might also want
 to read this:

 http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/**ken/trust.htmlhttp://cm.bell-labs.com/who/ken/trust.html

 Old but still relevant.

 Dave




 --
 Advertising is the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket - George
 Orwell




 --
 users mailing list
 users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/usershttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 Fedora Code of Conduct: 
 http://fedoraproject.org/code-**of-conducthttp://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
 Guidelines: 
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/**Mailing_list_guidelineshttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




-- 
Clive
 -- 077222971491
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Edward Martinez

On 9/5/2013 1:41 PM, Javier Perez wrote:
Until I hear of  a thorough code review by a non-USA team of this 
code, I do not feel safe using it, privacy wise. 


With NSA's Utah Data Center opening this month, I don't think using 
SElinux will seem a problem

 
http://photoblog.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/07/18831205-nsas-massive-new-data-center-in-utah?lite


--

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Andrew Haley
On 09/05/2013 09:41 PM, Javier Perez wrote:
 After reading this, I am turning off SELINUX
 
 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security
 
 
 Until I hear of  a thorough code review by a non-USA team of this code, I
 do not feel safe using it, privacy wise.
 
 It's a pity because SELINUX is a good idea.

That's what they want you to do.

Andrew.


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 06 September 2013, Andrew Haley sent:
 That's what they want you to do.

Haha, best retort yet.

-- 


All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point
trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the
public lists.

George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not
a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments.



-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 17:58:03 +0200
Heinz Diehl h...@fritha.org wrote:
 On 06.09.2013, Javier Perez wrote: 
 
  My beef is given the NSA origin of this software, It could very
  well have a backdoor to turn itself off under the appropriate
  circumstances like an NSA-sponsored breach an allow unrestricted
  access to my system..
 
 Every person contributing to free open source software could do
 that. You're talking about the NSA: they could easily pay
 somebody to do that for them. Everybody with a lot of money could do
 the same. If that's your concern, you can never ever be
 shure, unless you have reviewed all of the sourcecode running on your
 machine by yourself, and recompiled the software using this source
 afterwards.

That's not enough, because the compiler may be rigged to reintroduce
backdoors straight into binaries. You need to check the compiler source
code, and then bootstrap it from a simpler compiler that you have wrote
yourself in machine code (and I mean machine code, not the assembly
language).

However, this also isn't good enough, since the bios, CPU (firmware and
hardware in general) might have an undocumented set of instructions
that can remotely trigger total control over the machine. It's quite
simple, actually --- NSA pays some money to rig Intel, AMD, ARM and PPC
architectures in this way, and they can access anything remotely.

So in order to go around that, you need to build a computer yourself
from scratch, in particular the CPU. After bootstraping Linux on that
hardware (LFS distro comes to mind...), you're safe against the NSA.

As for the tinfoil hat, it needs two layers --- the inside layer needs
to be orientend shiny-side in, which would prevent the NSA from spying
on your brain waves. But the outside layer needs to be oriented
shiny-side out, to prevent the NSA from feeding your brain with
undesired signals. The two layers need to be well insulated against
each other --- it's obvious that a short-circuit between them will
leave you completely vulnerable...

HTH, :-)
Marko

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 06.09.2013, Javier Perez wrote: 

 My beef is given the NSA origin of this software, It could very well have a
 backdoor to turn itself off under the appropriate circumstances like an
 NSA-sponsored breach an allow unrestricted access to my system..

Every person contributing to free open source software could do
that. You're talking about the NSA: they could easily pay
somebody to do that for them. Everybody with a lot of money could do
the same. If that's your concern, you can never ever be
shure, unless you have reviewed all of the sourcecode running on your
machine by yourself, and recompiled the software using this source afterwards.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Reindl Harald


Am 06.09.2013 00:35, schrieb Javier Perez:
  I know it is a long shot and a lot of paranoid-think, after all, if I 
 have to depend on SELinux to defend my
 system
  from external breaches, I am F*ck up already.
 
 says who?
 
 I say so, based on my current knowledge of how to defend your system from 
 external threats

but your knowledge is very little it seems

 If your ONLY defense left is SELinux then one is quite naked to the world  
 with only one 
 last fig leaft to protect you :)

uneducated and wrong guess - SELinux is not your only defense - it is the last 
resort by design

 Althought I think you answered this line too fast, taking that line out of 
 context, given the explanation I gave in
 the next paragraph.

no my daily job is security based on knowledge and not on uneducated guesses

  Attackers should first have to breach the firewall and then obtain some 
 sort of user access
 
 *what* has a firewall to do with a potential buffer overlow in running 
 code
 resulting in execute inujected code on your system - that's what SElinux 
 is about
 
 may i suggest to learn basics about the different layers of a operating 
 system
 before read random completly unrelated articles and speard FUD based on 
 them
 without understan dwhat they are talking about?
 
 
 Again, I think I am not explaining properly my thoughts. In this paragraph I 
 am talking of the total security of
 the system and the different layers an attacker would have to peel before 
 pawining the system, not of SELinux alone. 

again: SElinux is the *last resort*

  then trick the system to scalate it to a root access before SELinux 
 comes into play
 
 may i suggest to learn how SElinux works
 it is supposed to prevent exactly this
 
 
 And that is my point exactly. If as the article has said, NSA is spending 
 millions to compromise security systems,
 how sure are we that there isn't something in the code that allows them to 
 bypass the protection that SELinux
 promises to confer? Before the article, I'd agree with you, FUDmongering. 
 After it, I wonder. 
 BTW, thanks for the correction, I was forgetting once an attacker gets root, 
 you are pawned. I was wondering at the
 wrong level :)

anything not proven by facts is FUD

  But again, It is good to know that all links in the chain to being 
 pawned
  are good and strong before trusting them, and this article certainly 
 throws
  some mud to whatever contribution NSA has made to any security system
 
 without any specified backround it is uneducated FUD
 no tmore and not less
 
 As I said, before the article I would agree with you. But after reading it, I 
 just wonder if there is any Achilles
 heel in the armor 

if you only would understand how stupid your whole argumentation is

* SLinux is opensource
* it is part of the kernel
* it is reviewed by a lot of people outside the USA
* if you do not trust these people you must not trust the rest of the kernel

well, and in this case use Windows or OSX
but wait, both are closed source and US companies
so who do you trust more - USA closed source, ot reviewed
or opensource widely reviewed?

none of them? well than shut down your computer at all



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Reindl Harald


Am 05.09.2013 23:58, schrieb Javier Perez:
 I know SELinux is not about encryption, it is about limiting access to the 
 system AFTER a breach has ocurred. (That
 is my understanding AFAIK, and that is why I think it is a good idea)

well, so *why* do you refer to an article about encryption

 My beef is given the NSA origin of this software, It could very well have a 
 backdoor to turn itself off under the
 appropriate circumstances like an NSA-sponsored breach an allow unrestricted 
 access to my system

could very well is not any qualified statement - it is FUD

 I know it is a long shot and a lot of paranoid-think, after all, if I have to 
 depend on SELinux to defend my system
 from external breaches, I am F*ck up already.

says who?

 Attackers should first have to breach the firewall and then obtain some sort 
 of user access

*what* has a firewall to do with a potential buffer overlow in running code
resulting in execute inujected code on your system - that's what SElinux is 
about

may i suggest to learn basics about the different layers of a operating system
before read random completly unrelated articles and speard FUD based on them
without understan dwhat they are talking about?

 then trick the system to scalate it to a root access before SELinux comes 
 into play

may i suggest to learn how SElinux works
it is supposed to prevent exactly this

 But again, It is good to know that all links in the chain to being pawned 
 are good and strong before trusting them, and this article certainly throws 
 some mud to whatever contribution NSA has made to any security system

without any specified backround it is uneducated FUD
no tmore and not less



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Dave Stevens

Quoting Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com:


On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 17:58:03 +0200
Heinz Diehl h...@fritha.org wrote:

On 06.09.2013, Javier Perez wrote:

 My beef is given the NSA origin of this software, It could very
 well have a backdoor to turn itself off under the appropriate
 circumstances like an NSA-sponsored breach an allow unrestricted
 access to my system..

Every person contributing to free open source software could do
that. You're talking about the NSA: they could easily pay
somebody to do that for them. Everybody with a lot of money could do
the same. If that's your concern, you can never ever be
shure, unless you have reviewed all of the sourcecode running on your
machine by yourself, and recompiled the software using this source
afterwards.


That's not enough, because the compiler may be rigged to reintroduce
backdoors straight into binaries. You need to check the compiler source
code, and then bootstrap it from a simpler compiler that you have wrote
yourself in machine code (and I mean machine code, not the assembly
language).

However, this also isn't good enough, since the bios, CPU (firmware and
hardware in general) might have an undocumented set of instructions
that can remotely trigger total control over the machine. It's quite
simple, actually --- NSA pays some money to rig Intel, AMD, ARM and PPC
architectures in this way, and they can access anything remotely.

So in order to go around that, you need to build a computer yourself
from scratch, in particular the CPU. After bootstraping Linux on that
hardware (LFS distro comes to mind...), you're safe against the NSA.

As for the tinfoil hat, it needs two layers --- the inside layer needs
to be orientend shiny-side in, which would prevent the NSA from spying
on your brain waves. But the outside layer needs to be oriented
shiny-side out, to prevent the NSA from feeding your brain with
undesired signals. The two layers need to be well insulated against
each other --- it's obvious that a short-circuit between them will
leave you completely vulnerable...

HTH, :-)
Marko


I think Rahul nailed it, this is a political problem with no technical  
solution.


Dave




--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org





--
Advertising is the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket - George Orwell



--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Fred Erickson
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:05:12 -0500
Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com wrote:

 On 09/06/2013 11:18 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
  As for the tinfoil hat, it needs two layers --- the inside layer
  needs to be orientend shiny-side in, which would prevent the NSA
  from spying on your brain waves. But the outside layer needs to be
  oriented shiny-side out, to prevent the NSA from feeding your brain
  with undesired signals. The two layers need to be well insulated
  against each other --- it's obvious that a short-circuit between
  them will leave you completely vulnerable...
 
 Wouldn't this allow the hat to function as a capacitor?  What happens
 with it builds up a sufficient charge to pop?  As long as you're at
 it, use lead foil and paper towels soaked with vinegar or lemon
 juice.  That will make it a battery and you can use it to keep your
 cell phone charged, so they satellites can more easily track you. :-)
 

I love it, this thread is starting to contain some useful information. :)
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


RE: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Alan Gagne

As for the tinfoil hat, it needs two layers --- the inside layer needs
to be orientend shiny-side in, which would prevent the NSA from spying
on your brain waves. But the outside layer needs to be oriented
shiny-side out, to prevent the NSA from feeding your brain with
undesired signals. The two layers need to be well insulated against
each other --- it's obvious that a short-circuit between them will
leave you completely vulnerable...


I prefer kevlar in the insulated layer. Also my hat is more of a full 
helmet.

Like to make it slightly more difficult in the event they decide my
process needs to be terminated.

:-)

Alan
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Steven Stern
On 09/06/2013 11:18 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
 As for the tinfoil hat, it needs two layers --- the inside layer needs
 to be orientend shiny-side in, which would prevent the NSA from spying
 on your brain waves. But the outside layer needs to be oriented
 shiny-side out, to prevent the NSA from feeding your brain with
 undesired signals. The two layers need to be well insulated against
 each other --- it's obvious that a short-circuit between them will
 leave you completely vulnerable...

Wouldn't this allow the hat to function as a capacitor?  What happens
with it builds up a sufficient charge to pop?  As long as you're at it,
use lead foil and paper towels soaked with vinegar or lemon juice.  That
will make it a battery and you can use it to keep your cell phone
charged, so they satellites can more easily track you. :-)

-- 
-- Steve
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Roger

On 09/07/2013 03:35 AM, Fred Erickson wrote:

On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:05:12 -0500
Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com wrote:


On 09/06/2013 11:18 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:

As for the tinfoil hat, it needs two layers --- the inside layer
needs to be orientend shiny-side in, which would prevent the NSA
from spying on your brain waves. But the outside layer needs to be
oriented shiny-side out, to prevent the NSA from feeding your brain
with undesired signals. The two layers need to be well insulated
against each other --- it's obvious that a short-circuit between
them will leave you completely vulnerable...

Wouldn't this allow the hat to function as a capacitor?  What happens
with it builds up a sufficient charge to pop?  As long as you're at
it, use lead foil and paper towels soaked with vinegar or lemon
juice.  That will make it a battery and you can use it to keep your
cell phone charged, so they satellites can more easily track you. :-)


I love it, this thread is starting to contain some useful information. :)

Objection on the grounds of misinformation
Quite some time ago I asked for info on how to cut out overhead power 
line static from the bus radio when driving along country roads and got 
pretty much the same foil response. Tried the hat, suddenly saw the 
whole universe to molecular level.
You can no longer fool me! I even wrapped the whole school bus in 2 
layers of insulated foil but it did not work because I could not 
completely ground the inner layer of foil and the earth peg pulled out 
of the ground while driving.

Steer clear of this one!
Roger



--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread g



On 09/06/2013 12:35 PM, Fred Erickson wrote:


I love it, this thread is starting to contain some useful information. :)


yeah. like what is fud. :=D

and that is not a question. i mean their opinion about what is fud. ;=)


--

peace out.

in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

sl6.3 linux

tc.hago.

g
.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread g



On 09/06/2013 06:06 PM, Roger wrote:




You can no longer fool me! I even wrapped the whole school bus in 2
layers of insulated foil but it did not work because I could not
completely ground the inner layer of foil and the earth peg pulled out
of the ground while driving.


you needed to have dragged a heavy chain like gasoline delivery tankers
did years ago.


--

peace out.

in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

sl6.3 linux

tc.hago.

g
.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Roger

On 09/07/2013 01:02 PM, g wrote:



On 09/06/2013 06:06 PM, Roger wrote:




You can no longer fool me! I even wrapped the whole school bus in 2
layers of insulated foil but it did not work because I could not
completely ground the inner layer of foil and the earth peg pulled out
of the ground while driving.


you needed to have dragged a heavy chain like gasoline delivery tankers
did years ago.


Nay! that dug trenches in the dirt roads and reduced mileage to 2km.ltr. 
Side benefit though!. The radio antenna gathered static and charged the 
2 layers like a capacitor...kids never touched the windows again, sat 
like angels, hands on laps, spikey hair did look funny. No grimey kid 
prints on the windows I was the envy of other bus drivers.

Still can't listen to the radio.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Javier Perez
Loved it! :)

As for the tinfoil hat, it needs two layers --- the inside layer needs
 to be orientend shiny-side in, which would prevent the NSA from spying
 on your brain waves. But the outside layer needs to be oriented
 shiny-side out, to prevent the NSA from feeding your brain with
 undesired signals. The two layers need to be well insulated against
 each other --- it's obvious that a short-circuit between them will
 leave you completely vulnerable...

 HTH, :-)
 Marko

 --
 users mailing list
 users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




-- 
--
 /\_/\
 |O O|  pepeb...@gmail.com
  Javier Perez
   While the night runs
   toward the day...
  m m   Pepebuho watches
from his high perch.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread Mike Dwiggins
I tried some of this stuff while in the service and almost got busted!  
Foil on a 5-ton hut did not work well!


Mike D.


On 9/6/2013 9:25 PM, Javier Perez wrote:

Loved it! :)

As for the tinfoil hat, it needs two layers --- the inside layer needs
to be orientend shiny-side in, which would prevent the NSA from spying
on your brain waves. But the outside layer needs to be oriented
shiny-side out, to prevent the NSA from feeding your brain with
undesired signals. The two layers need to be well insulated against
each other --- it's obvious that a short-circuit between them will
leave you completely vulnerable...

HTH, :-)
Marko

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




--
--
 /\_/\
 |O O| pepeb...@gmail.com mailto:pepeb...@gmail.com
  Javier Perez
   While the night runs
   toward the day...
  m m   Pepebuho watches
from his high perch.




-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-06 Thread g



On 09/06/2013 10:56 PM, Roger wrote:



Nay! that dug trenches in the dirt roads and reduced mileage to 2km.ltr.
Side benefit though!. The radio antenna gathered static and charged the
2 layers like a capacitor...kids never touched the windows again, sat
like angels, hands on laps, spikey hair did look funny. No grimey kid
prints on the windows I was the envy of other bus drivers.
Still can't listen to the radio.


i can relate to antenna static and charges.

years back, 1965, i work as a ship's navigator doing off shore shallow
water oil survey in Gulf of Mexico.

late one evening when we were returning to crew quarters boat, for some
reason or other, i decided to climb up on top of bridge. along side of
ladder was cable for antenna. while climbing up, i kept getting a
stinging on my ear, so i swatted at what i thought were mosquitos.

after looking around horizon, i looked up into sky to observe the many
stars. that is when i notice St. Elmo's fire off end of antenna. i move
over to antenna wire, looked closely and saw a faint but clearly visible
blue static around wire.

when i descended ladder, staying well clear of antenna wire, i looked down
at water and caught glimpses of some fishes with their bio luminescence.
another great sight.

truly an experience of 3 of the many wonders of nature.


--

peace out.

in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

sl6.3 linux

tc.hago.

g
.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-05 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:41:06 -0500, Javier Perez wrote:

 After reading this, I am turning off SELINUX
 
 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security
 
 
 Until I hear of  a thorough code review by a non-USA team of this code, I
 do not feel safe using it, privacy wise.
 
 It's a pity because SELINUX is a good idea.

SELinux is not about encryption, though.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-05 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 09/05/2013 04:41 PM, Javier Perez wrote:
 After reading this, I am turning off SELINUX
 
 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security

 
 
 Until I hear of  a thorough code review by a non-USA team of this
 code, I do not feel safe using it, privacy wise.
 
 It's a pity because SELINUX is a good idea.
 


SELinux is a *great* idea. You know what's the best part? It has
nothing at all to do with encryption. This article is completely
irrelevant to the SELinux discussion.

Now, it *could* be relevant to a discussion about openssl, gnutls and
Mozilla NSS, but unless you haven't been paying attention, you'll
notice that all of those projects (and SELinux) have a very heavy
non-US contributor community.

This is pretty much a perfect example of the value of open-source: no
one is going to be able to sneak something into the upstream code.

Please stop spreading FUD and *STOP TURNING OFF SELINUX*.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlIo8YsACgkQeiVVYja6o6NzxgCgnTMTOZc2Mwu77QCThs3fqy2F
C6UAoJlhW6h6yn9H2171fkt5ALQghw+U
=+TaE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-05 Thread Javier Perez
After reading this, I am turning off SELINUX

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security


Until I hear of  a thorough code review by a non-USA team of this code, I
do not feel safe using it, privacy wise.

It's a pity because SELINUX is a good idea.

-- 
--
 /\_/\
 |O O|  pepeb...@gmail.com
  Javier Perez
   While the night runs
   toward the day...
  m m   Pepebuho watches
from his high perch.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-05 Thread Javier Perez
I know SELinux is not about encryption, it is about limiting access to the
system AFTER a breach has ocurred. (That is my understanding AFAIK, and
that is why I think it is a good idea).
My beef is given the NSA origin of this software, It could very well have a
backdoor to turn itself off under the appropriate circumstances like an
NSA-sponsored breach an allow unrestricted access to my system..
I know it is a long shot and a lot of paranoid-think, after all, if I have
to depend on SELinux to defend my system from external breaches, I am F*ck
up already. Attackers should first have to breach the firewall and then
obtain some sort of user access, then trick the system to scalate it to a
root access before SELinux comes into play. But again, It is good to know
that all links in the chain to being pawned are good and strong before
trusting them, and this article certainly throws some mud to whatever
contribution NSA has made to any security system.

My 2 cents.




On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:41:06 -0500, Javier Perez wrote:

  After reading this, I am turning off SELINUX
 
 
 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security
 
 
  Until I hear of  a thorough code review by a non-USA team of this code, I
  do not feel safe using it, privacy wise.
 
  It's a pity because SELINUX is a good idea.

 SELinux is not about encryption, though.
 --
 users mailing list
 users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




-- 
--
 /\_/\
 |O O|  pepeb...@gmail.com
  Javier Perez
   While the night runs
   toward the day...
  m m   Pepebuho watches
from his high perch.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-05 Thread Reindl Harald


Am 05.09.2013 22:41, schrieb Javier Perez:
 After reading this, I am turning off SELINUX
 
 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security
 
 Until I hear of  a thorough code review by a non-USA team of this code, I do 
 not feel safe using it, privacy wise. 
 
 It's a pity because SELINUX is a good idea

and where is the context to SELinux?

* prove things
* if you can't prove them don't spread FUD

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt

and yes i am *clearly* aware of privacy and my job is secuirty
but if i would follow any unqualified FUD i had to search a job outside the IT



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-05 Thread Joe Zeff

On 09/05/2013 01:41 PM, Javier Perez wrote:

After reading this, I am turning off SELINUX

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security



What, if anything, does this have to do with SELinux?  SELinux is all 
about making sure malicious or badly-written code doesn't damage your 
machine and has nothing whatsoever to do with encryption.  Don't throw 
the baby out instead of the bathwater.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-05 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi


On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Javier Perez   wrote:

 I know SELinux is not about encryption, it is about limiting access to the
 system AFTER a breach has ocurred. (That is my understanding AFAIK, and
 that is why I think it is a good idea).
 My beef is given the NSA origin of this software, It could very well have
 a backdoor to turn itself off under the appropriate circumstances like an
 NSA-sponsored breach an allow unrestricted access to my system..


NSA is a *huge* organization with multiple divisions

SELinux  can prevent breaches as well as mitigate the extend of any
breaches depending on the situation but more importantly,  it is fully free
and open source software and part of the upstream Linux kernel which has
been thoroughly reviewed and powered competing Govt agencies including both
US and Russian defense.

As a side note, running SELinux doesn't prevent say someone monitoring your
email or chat unless you are encrypting all of that and even then it might
be just a speed bump for NSA.   If you want to change what they do, engage
in the right political advocacy groups.

Rahul
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Turning off SELINUX

2013-09-05 Thread Dave Stevens

Quoting Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com:


Hi


On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Javier Perez   wrote:


I know SELinux is not about encryption, it is about limiting access to the
system AFTER a breach has ocurred. (That is my understanding AFAIK, and
that is why I think it is a good idea).
My beef is given the NSA origin of this software, It could very well have
a backdoor to turn itself off under the appropriate circumstances like an
NSA-sponsored breach an allow unrestricted access to my system..



NSA is a *huge* organization with multiple divisions

SELinux  can prevent breaches as well as mitigate the extend of any
breaches depending on the situation but more importantly,  it is fully free
and open source software and part of the upstream Linux kernel which has
been thoroughly reviewed and powered competing Govt agencies including both
US and Russian defense.

As a side note, running SELinux doesn't prevent say someone monitoring your
email or chat unless you are encrypting all of that and even then it might
be just a speed bump for NSA.   If you want to change what they do, engage
in the right political advocacy groups.

Rahul



Not to contradict what Rahul says, which I agree with, you might also  
want to read this:


http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/ken/trust.html

Old but still relevant.

Dave




--
Advertising is the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket - George Orwell



--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org