Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
Op Tue, 02 Jan 2024 17:36:51 +0100 schreef Ralf Corsépius : Am 29.12.23 um 15:40 schrieb Chris Adams: Once upon a time, Ralf Corsépius said: IMNSHO, it's time to demand FESCO to take consequences against these persons. On what basis? Respect and reason? The way the guys, who are conducting the rebaser of ffmpeg on Cisco are behaving rude, disrespectful, RHAT-egoistic and non-helpful towards users in many aspects, IMNSHO. Apparently, they not even test their stuff. Ralf -- As I wrote and mailed 29.11.2013 on this subject ( ffmpeg , gstreamer , openh264 , the poor Gisco server etc.) ""The ever continued story of Coronationstreet."" Ger van Dijck. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Gemaakt met Opera's e-mailprogramma: http://www.opera.com/mail/ -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
Am 29.12.23 um 21:54 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 12/29/23 07:02, Jeffrey Walton wrote: It seems like (to me) lack of communication or coordination between Fedora and RPMFusion is one of the root causes of the breaks. I should have checked before making a comment like that. I don't know about the vlc thing, but this change was coordinated. There is just a timing difference between rpmfusion and fedora repos. The vlc thing is much more than a timing issue. Fedora's vlc "new" packaging is widely incompatible to RPMFusion's and breaks existing installations. Ralf -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
Am 29.12.23 um 15:40 schrieb Chris Adams: Once upon a time, Ralf Corsépius said: IMNSHO, it's time to demand FESCO to take consequences against these persons. On what basis? Respect and reason? The way the guys, who are conducting the rebaser of ffmpeg on Cisco are behaving rude, disrespectful, RHAT-egoistic and non-helpful towards users in many aspects, IMNSHO. Apparently, they not even test their stuff. Ralf -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
RPMFusion has now pushed the packages to stable, for example see https://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/39/x86_64/g/ . -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
On 12/29/23 07:02, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 4:02 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: On 12/29/23 00:52, Frank Elsner via users wrote: How can I solve this problem? Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstasf.so from install of gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.22.8-2.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1:1.22.7-1.fc39.x86_64 This is not the only file involved in this gstreamer1 update. It appears that Fedora packagers have made changes to the gstreamer plugin packages without coordinating with rpmfusion. Does Fedora have a requirement and process to provide a "heads up" to other projects, like RPMFusion? For Fedora, I know an updated package will go to testing, and if all is Ok, then to release in about a week. Is there a hook in the flow to inform projects like RPMFusion that a change is taking place, and they should build, test and prepare to release new binaries? And is a week enough time for RPMFusion to trigger a rebuild and detect/fix a problem? I wonder what's going on lately. Earlier it was vlc. It happens with every system-upgrade, too. It is often the graphic drivers that break. At a system upgrade (like F38 -> F39), the mailing lists, message boards and Reddit see a lot of traffic due to breaks. And the fix for users is to wait a week or so until RPMFusion updates things. It seems like (to me) lack of communication or coordination between Fedora and RPMFusion is one of the root causes of the breaks. I should have checked before making a comment like that. I don't know about the vlc thing, but this change was coordinated. There is just a timing difference between rpmfusion and fedora repos. There are builds available, you can probably get them by enabling the testing repo. The NVidia drivers just have a lot of problems in general. akmods help, but kernel changes break them regularly. That's the price you pay for using proprietary drivers. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
On 12/29/23 05:12, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Dec 29, 2023, at 04:16, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Some overzealous RHAT employees are pushing incompatible and apparently insufficently changes into released Fedoras. IMNSHO, it's time to demand FESCO to take consequences against these persons. I have a hard time believing this was done by a Red Hat employee at Red Hat’s behest, since Red Hat is mostly concerned with GNOME and the vlc change was being included in a KDE change. This accusation is being thrown around, as some sort of malicious action. It was, at best, poor communication between Fedora packagers and RPMfusion, and delays in packages being released during a period when many people are spending time with their family and not paying attention to packaging drama. Just to be clear, I didn't attribute any malice to this, merely lack of communication. And actually, I should have checked the rpmfusion koji before commenting on that as well. There are builds done, but not fully pushed, so it's merely a timing issue between the two repos. https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=27500 * Wed Dec 20 2023 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1:1.22.8-1 - Update to 1.22.8 - Drop plugins moved to Fedora -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 4:02 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 12/29/23 00:52, Frank Elsner via users wrote: > > How can I solve this problem? > > > > Error: Transaction test error: > >file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstasf.so from install of > > gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.22.8-2.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from > > package gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1:1.22.7-1.fc39.x86_64 > > > > This is not the only file involved in this gstreamer1 update. > > It appears that Fedora packagers have made changes to the gstreamer > plugin packages without coordinating with rpmfusion. Does Fedora have a requirement and process to provide a "heads up" to other projects, like RPMFusion? For Fedora, I know an updated package will go to testing, and if all is Ok, then to release in about a week. Is there a hook in the flow to inform projects like RPMFusion that a change is taking place, and they should build, test and prepare to release new binaries? And is a week enough time for RPMFusion to trigger a rebuild and detect/fix a problem? > I wonder what's > going on lately. Earlier it was vlc. It happens with every system-upgrade, too. It is often the graphic drivers that break. At a system upgrade (like F38 -> F39), the mailing lists, message boards and Reddit see a lot of traffic due to breaks. And the fix for users is to wait a week or so until RPMFusion updates things. It seems like (to me) lack of communication or coordination between Fedora and RPMFusion is one of the root causes of the breaks. Jeff -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
Once upon a time, Ralf Corsépius said: > IMNSHO, it's time to demand FESCO to take consequences against these > persons. On what basis? Not everybody uses RPMFusion, and there's absolutely nothing in the Fedora guidelines about RPMFusion. Someone opened a BZ that said "hey, looks like these things are now legal, can they be enabled", and after checking what was legal, things were enabled. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236889 -- Chris Adams -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
On Dec 29, 2023, at 04:16, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > Some overzealous RHAT employees are pushing incompatible and apparently > insufficently changes into released Fedoras. > > IMNSHO, it's time to demand FESCO to take consequences against these persons. I have a hard time believing this was done by a Red Hat employee at Red Hat’s behest, since Red Hat is mostly concerned with GNOME and the vlc change was being included in a KDE change. This accusation is being thrown around, as some sort of malicious action. It was, at best, poor communication between Fedora packagers and RPMfusion, and delays in packages being released during a period when many people are spending time with their family and not paying attention to packaging drama. -- Jonathan Billings -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d9bca05694 . The problem is that the gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld and gstreamer1-plugins-ugly from RPMFusion haven't yet been updated to be compatible, though they have been built and signed and are waiting to be pushed stable. If you want you can download the signed packages from https://koji.rpmfusion.org/packages/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld/1.22.8/1.fc39/data/signed/d651ff2e/ and https://koji.rpmfusion.org/packages/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly/1.22.8/1.fc39/data/signed/d651ff2e/ now, or just remove gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld and gstreamer1-plugins-ugly and then wait for RPMFusion to push the stable updates. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
On 12/29/23 01:33, Frank Elsner wrote: On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 01:02:20 -0800 Samuel Sieb wrote: On 12/29/23 00:52, Frank Elsner via users wrote: How can I solve this problem? Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstasf.so from install of gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.22.8-2.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1:1.22.7-1.fc39.x86_64 This is not the only file involved in this gstreamer1 update. It appears that Fedora packagers have made changes to the gstreamer plugin packages without coordinating with rpmfusion. I wonder what's going on lately. Earlier it was vlc. Thanks for the explanation. But what should I do? I just added "-x gstream*" to the dnf command and I'll deal with it later if it doesn't get sorted out in the meantime. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 01:02:20 -0800 Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 12/29/23 00:52, Frank Elsner via users wrote: > > How can I solve this problem? > > > > Error: Transaction test error: > >file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstasf.so from install of > > gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.22.8-2.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from > > package gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1:1.22.7-1.fc39.x86_64 > > > > This is not the only file involved in this gstreamer1 update. > > It appears that Fedora packagers have made changes to the gstreamer > plugin packages without coordinating with rpmfusion. I wonder what's > going on lately. Earlier it was vlc. Thanks for the explanation. But what should I do? --Frank -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
Am 29.12.23 um 10:02 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 12/29/23 00:52, Frank Elsner via users wrote: How can I solve this problem? Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstasf.so from install of gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.22.8-2.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1:1.22.7-1.fc39.x86_64 This is not the only file involved in this gstreamer1 update. It appears that Fedora packagers have made changes to the gstreamer plugin packages without coordinating with rpmfusion. kaffeine also is broken I wonder what's going on lately. Earlier it was vlc. Some overzealous RHAT employees are pushing incompatible and apparently insufficently changes into released Fedoras. IMNSHO, it's time to demand FESCO to take consequences against these persons. Ralf -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
On 12/29/23 00:52, Frank Elsner via users wrote: How can I solve this problem? Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstasf.so from install of gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.22.8-2.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1:1.22.7-1.fc39.x86_64 This is not the only file involved in this gstreamer1 update. It appears that Fedora packagers have made changes to the gstreamer plugin packages without coordinating with rpmfusion. I wonder what's going on lately. Earlier it was vlc. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
Hello, How can I solve this problem? Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstasf.so from install of gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.22.8-2.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1:1.22.7-1.fc39.x86_64 This is not the only file involved in this gstreamer1 update. Greetings, Frank -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
