Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/18/2015 08:13 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote: On 09/17/2015 06:27 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/17/2015 06:21 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: Second, I wouldn't even attempt an update to F22 from here. I would upgrade to F21 first with the local repo disabled. Going the route of first installing f21 and then f22 is way too long (i.e. time consuming, during which the computer is not being used for more important things. But it is also the only one officially supported. You might be able to do a yum upgrade directly to Fedora 22 since no critical components have changed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_20_-.3E_Fedora_21 PS. What does $ rpm -q fedora-release say? $ rpm -q fedora-release fedora-release-20-4.noarch -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/17/2015 06:27 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/17/2015 06:21 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: Second, I wouldn't even attempt an update to F22 from here. I would upgrade to F21 first with the local repo disabled. Going the route of first installing f21 and then f22 is way too long (i.e. time consuming, during which the computer is not being used for more important things. But it is also the only one officially supported. You might be able to do a yum upgrade directly to Fedora 22 since no critical components have changed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_20_-.3E_Fedora_21 PS. What does $ rpm -q fedora-release say? -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/16/2015 11:40 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: yum repolist $ yum repolist Loaded plugins: aliases, auto-update-debuginfo, changelog, fastestmirror, filter-data, fs-snapshot, keys, langpacks, list-data, : local, merge-conf, post-transaction-actions, priorities, protectbase, refresh-packagekit, refresh-updatesd, : remove-with-leaves, rpm-warm-cache, show-leaves, tmprepo, tsflags, upgrade-helper, verify, versionlock _local | 2.9 kB 00:00:00 fedora/20/x86_64/metalink | 3.5 kB 00:00:00 fedora-debuginfo/20/x86_64/metalink | 2.4 kB 00:00:00 fedora-debuginfo | 3.1 kB 00:00:00 fedora-source/20/x86_64/metalink | 2.8 kB 00:00:00 fedora-source | 3.0 kB 00:00:00 google-earth | 951 B 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-debuginfo | 2.7 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-source | 2.7 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-updates | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 skype | 1.2 kB 00:00:00 updates/20/x86_64/metalink | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 updates-debuginfo/20/x86_64/metalink | 2.3 kB 00:00:00 updates-debuginfo | 3.0 kB 00:00:00 updates-source/20/x86_64/metalink | 2.6 kB 00:00:00 updates-source | 3.7 kB 00:00:00 (1/4): updates-debuginfo/20/x86_64/primary_db | 859 kB 00:00:01 (2/4): fedora-debuginfo/20/x86_64/primary_db | 1.9 MB 00:00:02 (3/4): updates-source/20/x86_64/primary_db | 1.8 MB 00:00:02 (4/4): fedora-source/20/x86_64/primary_db | 4.7 MB 00:00:02 (1/4): rpmfusion-free-debuginfo/20/x86_64/primary_db | 49 kB 00:00:01 (2/4): rpmfusion-free-source/20/x86_64/primary_db | 87 kB 00:00:01 (3/4): updates-source/20/x86_64/updateinfo | 2.0 MB 00:00:01 (4/4): updates-source/20/x86_64/pkgtags | 1.6 MB 00:00:00 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * fedora: dl.fedoraproject.org * fedora-debuginfo: dl.fedoraproject.org * fedora-source: dl.fedoraproject.org * rpmfusion-free: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-free-debuginfo: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-free-source: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-free-updates: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-nonfree: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: lug.mtu.edu * updates: dl.fedoraproject.org * updates-debuginfo: dl.fedoraproject.org * updates-source: dl.fedoraproject.org 0 packages excluded due to repository protections repo id repo name status _localAutomatic local repo. (manged by the "local" yum plugin). 64 fedora/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - x86_64 38,597 fedora-debuginfo/20/x86_64Fedora 20 - x86_64 - Debug 6,881 fedora-source/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - Source 0 google-earth google-earth 1 rpmfusion-free/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Free468 rpmfusion-free-debuginfo/20/x86_64RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Free - Debug166 rpmfusion-free-source/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Free - Source 0 rpmfusion-free-updates/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Free - Updates 683 rpmfusion-nonfree/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Nonfree 203 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Nonfree - Updates 561 skype Skype Repository 1 updates/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - x86_64 - Updates 22,459 updates-debuginfo/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - x86_64 - Updates - Debug 3,079 updates-source/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - Updates Source 0 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/17/2015 05:21 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: Well, you really should be using "dnf repolist", but it's pretty obvious you have F20 repos for the most part. On a mostly-Fedora-20 system, I wouldn't expect dnf to be installed. Your machine is in a weird state, so these are somewhat draconian measures to try to drag it into currency. The alternative is a good backup followed by a fresh install of F22 or whatever you want to use. That I agree with. This install is probably 12-18 months old, without an audit trail for changes. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/17/2015 03:41 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/16/2015 11:40 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: yum repolist $ yum repolist Less useful than I hoped, but I missed this from your first message: /var/cache/system-upgrade/fedora/packages/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 a2jmidid-8-9.fc23.x86_64.rpm The "fedora" repo is the one with the bad URL. Check the definition of that repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/17/2015 06:21 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 09/17/2015 03:41 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/16/2015 11:40 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: yum repolist $ yum repolist Loaded plugins: aliases, auto-update-debuginfo, changelog, fastestmirror, filter-data, fs-snapshot, keys, langpacks, list-data, : local, merge-conf, post-transaction-actions, priorities, protectbase, refresh-packagekit, refresh-updatesd, : remove-with-leaves, rpm-warm-cache, show-leaves, tmprepo, tsflags, upgrade-helper, verify, versionlock _local | 2.9 kB 00:00:00 fedora/20/x86_64/metalink | 3.5 kB 00:00:00 fedora-debuginfo/20/x86_64/metalink | 2.4 kB 00:00:00 fedora-debuginfo | 3.1 kB 00:00:00 fedora-source/20/x86_64/metalink | 2.8 kB 00:00:00 fedora-source | 3.0 kB 00:00:00 google-earth | 951 B 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-debuginfo | 2.7 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-source | 2.7 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-updates | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 skype | 1.2 kB 00:00:00 updates/20/x86_64/metalink | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 updates-debuginfo/20/x86_64/metalink | 2.3 kB 00:00:00 updates-debuginfo | 3.0 kB 00:00:00 updates-source/20/x86_64/metalink | 2.6 kB 00:00:00 updates-source | 3.7 kB 00:00:00 (1/4): updates-debuginfo/20/x86_64/primary_db | 859 kB 00:00:01 (2/4): fedora-debuginfo/20/x86_64/primary_db | 1.9 MB 00:00:02 (3/4): updates-source/20/x86_64/primary_db | 1.8 MB 00:00:02 (4/4): fedora-source/20/x86_64/primary_db | 4.7 MB 00:00:02 (1/4): rpmfusion-free-debuginfo/20/x86_64/primary_db | 49 kB 00:00:01 (2/4): rpmfusion-free-source/20/x86_64/primary_db | 87 kB 00:00:01 (3/4): updates-source/20/x86_64/updateinfo | 2.0 MB 00:00:01 (4/4): updates-source/20/x86_64/pkgtags | 1.6 MB 00:00:00 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * fedora: dl.fedoraproject.org * fedora-debuginfo: dl.fedoraproject.org * fedora-source: dl.fedoraproject.org * rpmfusion-free: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-free-debuginfo: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-free-source: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-free-updates: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-nonfree: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: lug.mtu.edu * updates: dl.fedoraproject.org * updates-debuginfo: dl.fedoraproject.org * updates-source: dl.fedoraproject.org 0 packages excluded due to repository protections repo id repo name status _localAutomatic local repo. (manged by the "local" yum plugin). 64 fedora/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - x86_64 38,597 fedora-debuginfo/20/x86_64Fedora 20 - x86_64 - Debug 6,881 fedora-source/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - Source 0 google-earth google-earth 1 rpmfusion-free/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Free468 rpmfusion-free-debuginfo/20/x86_64RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Free - Debug166 rpmfusion-free-source/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Free - Source 0 rpmfusion-free-updates/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Free - Updates 683 rpmfusion-nonfree/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Nonfree 203 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Nonfree - Updates 561 skype Skype Repository 1 updates/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - x86_64 - Updates 22,459 updates-debuginfo/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - x86_64 - Updates - Debug 3,079 updates-source/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - Updates Source 0 Well, you really should be using "dnf repolist", but it's pretty obvious you have F20 repos for the most part. You also seem to have a local repo and that may be where your F23 stuff is coming from. I did not create the local repo. It is present in /etc/yum.repos.d/_local and it contains: [_local] name=Automatic local repo. (manged by the "local" yum plugin). baseurl=file:/var/lib/yum/plugins/local enabled=1 gpgcheck=true # Metadata expire could be set to "never" because the local plugin will # automatically cause a cache refresh when new packages are added. However # it's really cheap to check, and this way people can dump stuff in whenever # and it never gets out of sync. for long. metadata_expire=1h # Make cost smaller, as we know it's "local". If you really want to be sure, # you can do this ... but the name will do pretty much the same thing, and that # way we can also see the other packages (with: --showduplicates list). # cost=500 But I guarantee you I did not create that beast. So, I went ahead and deleted it and restarted fedup (which you say should not behave as it does),
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/17/2015 07:19 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 09/17/2015 03:41 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/16/2015 11:40 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: yum repolist $ yum repolist Less useful than I hoped, but I missed this from your first message: /var/cache/system-upgrade/fedora/packages/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 a2jmidid-8-9.fc23.x86_64.rpm The "fedora" repo is the one with the bad URL. Check the definition of that repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/ The fedora repos: [fedora] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch failovermethod=priority #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/$releasever/Everything/$basearch/os/ metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-$releasever=$basearch enabled=1 #metadata_expire=7d gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$releasever-$basearch skip_if_unavailable=False [fedora-debuginfo] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - Debug failovermethod=priority #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/$releasever/Everything/$basearch/debug/ metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-debug-$releasever=$basearch enabled=0 metadata_expire=7d gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$releasever-$basearch skip_if_unavailable=False [fedora-source] name=Fedora $releasever - Source failovermethod=priority #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/$releasever/Everything/source/SRPMS/ metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-source-$releasever=$basearch enabled=0 metadata_expire=7d gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$releasever-$basearch skip_if_unavailable=False [updates] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - Updates failovermethod=priority #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/$releasever/$basearch/ metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-f$releasever=$basearch enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 metadata_expire=6h gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$releasever-$basearch skip_if_unavailable=False [updates-debuginfo] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - Updates - Debug failovermethod=priority #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/$releasever/$basearch/debug/ metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-debug-f$releasever=$basearch enabled=0 gpgcheck=1 metadata_expire=6h gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$releasever-$basearch skip_if_unavailable=False [updates-source] name=Fedora $releasever - Updates Source failovermethod=priority #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/$releasever/SRPMS/ metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-source-f$releasever=$basearch enabled=0 gpgcheck=1 metadata_expire=6h gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$releasever-$basearch skip_if_unavailable=False Rawhide and Testing have enabled=0 in all stanzas. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/17/2015 03:41 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/16/2015 11:40 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: yum repolist $ yum repolist Loaded plugins: aliases, auto-update-debuginfo, changelog, fastestmirror, filter-data, fs-snapshot, keys, langpacks, list-data, : local, merge-conf, post-transaction-actions, priorities, protectbase, refresh-packagekit, refresh-updatesd, : remove-with-leaves, rpm-warm-cache, show-leaves, tmprepo, tsflags, upgrade-helper, verify, versionlock _local | 2.9 kB 00:00:00 fedora/20/x86_64/metalink | 3.5 kB 00:00:00 fedora-debuginfo/20/x86_64/metalink | 2.4 kB 00:00:00 fedora-debuginfo | 3.1 kB 00:00:00 fedora-source/20/x86_64/metalink | 2.8 kB 00:00:00 fedora-source | 3.0 kB 00:00:00 google-earth | 951 B 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-debuginfo | 2.7 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-source | 2.7 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-updates | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 skype | 1.2 kB 00:00:00 updates/20/x86_64/metalink | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 updates-debuginfo/20/x86_64/metalink | 2.3 kB 00:00:00 updates-debuginfo | 3.0 kB 00:00:00 updates-source/20/x86_64/metalink | 2.6 kB 00:00:00 updates-source | 3.7 kB 00:00:00 (1/4): updates-debuginfo/20/x86_64/primary_db | 859 kB 00:00:01 (2/4): fedora-debuginfo/20/x86_64/primary_db | 1.9 MB 00:00:02 (3/4): updates-source/20/x86_64/primary_db | 1.8 MB 00:00:02 (4/4): fedora-source/20/x86_64/primary_db | 4.7 MB 00:00:02 (1/4): rpmfusion-free-debuginfo/20/x86_64/primary_db | 49 kB 00:00:01 (2/4): rpmfusion-free-source/20/x86_64/primary_db | 87 kB 00:00:01 (3/4): updates-source/20/x86_64/updateinfo | 2.0 MB 00:00:01 (4/4): updates-source/20/x86_64/pkgtags | 1.6 MB 00:00:00 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * fedora: dl.fedoraproject.org * fedora-debuginfo: dl.fedoraproject.org * fedora-source: dl.fedoraproject.org * rpmfusion-free: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-free-debuginfo: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-free-source: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-free-updates: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-nonfree: lug.mtu.edu * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: lug.mtu.edu * updates: dl.fedoraproject.org * updates-debuginfo: dl.fedoraproject.org * updates-source: dl.fedoraproject.org 0 packages excluded due to repository protections repo id repo name status _localAutomatic local repo. (manged by the "local" yum plugin). 64 fedora/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - x86_64 38,597 fedora-debuginfo/20/x86_64Fedora 20 - x86_64 - Debug 6,881 fedora-source/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - Source 0 google-earth google-earth 1 rpmfusion-free/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Free468 rpmfusion-free-debuginfo/20/x86_64RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Free - Debug166 rpmfusion-free-source/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Free - Source 0 rpmfusion-free-updates/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Free - Updates 683 rpmfusion-nonfree/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Nonfree 203 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates/20/x86_64 RPM Fusion for Fedora 20 - Nonfree - Updates 561 skype Skype Repository 1 updates/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - x86_64 - Updates 22,459 updates-debuginfo/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - x86_64 - Updates - Debug 3,079 updates-source/20/x86_64 Fedora 20 - Updates Source 0 Well, you really should be using "dnf repolist", but it's pretty obvious you have F20 repos for the most part. You also seem to have a local repo and that may be where your F23 stuff is coming from. I'm still not sure why your fedup is not puking when you specify the "--product" flag. It is NOT allowed with the current 0.9.2 versions, so the first thing I'd do is sort out which fedup you're getting. Could you possibly have an old fedup that's getting called instead of the one in /bin (perhaps in /usr/local/bin or something)? You could try "which fedup" to see which one is being called. Second, I wouldn't even attempt an update to F22 from here. I would upgrade to F21 first with the local repo disabled. You might be able to disable it at the command line: fedup --network 21 --disablerepo=\*local\* or you may have to edit the repo config file and set "enabled=0" in it for all the stanzas. Make sure you have a RELIABLE backup before you attempt any of these upgrades. However you disabled the local repo, if the upgrade is successful then go through the whole distrosync and everything to make SURE it's an F21 system. Finally, you
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/16/2015 10:40 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: I know you said that rawhide isn't enabled, but that's really the only likely explanation. You may have installed or enabled some rawhide repository to fetch the kernel src.rpm, and now yum related tools will pull packages from that repository. If that were true, wouldn't he be seeing rawhide packages in his regular updates? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
Hi On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > > If that were true, wouldn't he be seeing rawhide packages in his regular > updates? > > Only if he let it remain enables as opposed to cherry picking updates by temporarily enabling for a single update session. If you do such things, running fedup probably isn't going to work out very well or atleast it is not something that has been tested during the QA process. Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/15/2015 04:14 PM, jd1008 wrote: So, my question remains: Why fc23 yum repolist I know you said that rawhide isn't enabled, but that's really the only likely explanation. You may have installed or enabled some rawhide repository to fetch the kernel src.rpm, and now yum related tools will pull packages from that repository. But since none of us can tell what state your system is in, a clean install of Fedora 22 is the best option. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/15/2015 04:14 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 09/15/2015 04:20 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 09/15/2015 03:17 PM, jd1008 wrote: Why All the packages it downloaded are from the unreleased fedora 23. For example, this is what it downloaded into /var/cache/system-upgrade/fedora/packages/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 a2jmidid-8-9.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-2.004-5.fc23.noarch.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 aalib-devel-1.4.0-0.27.rc5.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 aalib-libs-1.4.0-0.27.rc5.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.0.16-3.fc23.noarch.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abiword-3.0.1-4.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abrt-2.6.2-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abrt-addon-ccpp-2.6.2-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 packages/abrt-addon-coredump-helper-2.6.2-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm As you can see, all of them of length 0. Is the repo of 22 being diverted to 23? The correct update from F21 to F22 is: fedup --network 22 fedup should have puked on "--product=nonproduct" as that's not a supported option since F21. Also check your repos.d files and make sure you haven't enabled rawhide. Hi Rick, None of rawhide repos are enabled. The latest version of fedup in f21 is fedpkg-1.20-1.fc21.noarch.rpm fedpkg is NOT fedup. fedpkg is to permit you to download sources from koji or git. # rpm -q fedup fedup-0.9.2-1.fc21.noarch I have the same version: [root@prophead ~]# rpm -qa | grep fedup fedup-0.9.2-1.fc21.noarch # fedup --network 22 usage: fedup [options] fedup: error: This installation of Fedora does not belong to a product, so you must provide the =PRODUCTNAME option to specify what product you want to upgrade to. PRODUCTNAME should be one of: workstation: the default Fedora experience for laptops and desktops, powered by GNOME. server: the default Fedora experience for servers cloud: a base image for use on public and private clouds nonproduct: choose this if none of the above apply; in particular, choose this if you are using an alternate-desktop spin of Fedora Selecting a product will also install its standard package-set in addition to upgrading the packages already on your system. If you prefer to maintain your current set of packages, select 'nonproduct'. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading for more information. That's not what THAT version of fedup should report. It should look like: [root@prophead ~]# fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct usage: fedup [options] fedup: error: unrecognized arguments: --product=nonproduct [root@prophead ~]# fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 usage: fedup [options] fedup: error: unrecognized arguments: --product=nonproduct (I did it twice, swapping around where you stuck "--product=nonproduct" just to show you). So you are running an incorrect version of fedup. Get that resolved first. That's in the upgrade instructions. Also in the upgrade instructions, they tell you that you MUST make sure you're running the current system or you're going to get a bunch of very weird things going on. Right now it appears you have a very curious mix of F20 and F21 on your machine and you're going to have problems trying to fedup. However, when I set the product=workstation, it started to download - but ALL the downloads were failing with messages like these: anaconda-core-23.19.2-2.fc23.x FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-23.19.2-2.fc23.x86_64 FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-gui-23.19.2-2.fc23.x8 FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-core-23.19.2-2.fc23.x FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-tui-23.19.2-2.fc23.x8 FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA amtterm-1.3-10.fc23.x86_64.rpm FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-gui-23.19.2-2.fc23.x8 FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-core-23.19.2-2.fc23.x FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-gui-23.19.2-2.fc23.x8 FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-tui-23.19.2-2.fc23.x8 FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA amtterm-1.3-10.fc23.x86_64.rpm FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-gui-23.19.2-2.fc23.x8 FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA My computer is connected to high speed internet, and am having no problems browsing the web, and sending this email. So, my question remains: Why fc23 Again, you are running an old version of fedup, your machine is NOT a clean F21 system and most likely fedup is getting very, very confused. As others have suggested: 1. Make a backup of your system. 2. Bring it up to current F21 standards using yum or dnf. You might even have to do a "dnf --distro-sync" to drag it kicking and screaming up to F21. 3. Make sure you're running the LATEST fedup and try the upgrade again,
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/15/2015 04:14 PM, jd1008 wrote: The correct update from F21 to F22 is: fedup --network 22 fedup should have puked on "--product=nonproduct" as that's not a supported option since F21. Also check your repos.d files and make sure you haven't enabled rawhide. Hi Rick, None of rawhide repos are enabled. The latest version of fedup in f21 is fedpkg-1.20-1.fc21.noarch.rpm # rpm -q fedup fedup-0.9.2-1.fc21.noarch Now I'm confused. Quoting from your earlier message On 09/14/2015 01:04 PM, jd1008 wrote: > On a laptop with > 02:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM43224 802.11a/b/g/n > (rev 01) > and kernel: kernel-4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1 > > and compiled modules: > /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/phy/bcm7xxx.ko.xz > > /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/phy/bcm87xx.ko.xz you seem to be running Fedora 20, not Fedora 21. Have you updated part of your system to Fedora 21? If that is the case, I agree with Gordon. You should do a clean install of Fedora 22. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/15/2015 04:20 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 09/15/2015 03:17 PM, jd1008 wrote: Why All the packages it downloaded are from the unreleased fedora 23. For example, this is what it downloaded into /var/cache/system-upgrade/fedora/packages/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 a2jmidid-8-9.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-2.004-5.fc23.noarch.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 aalib-devel-1.4.0-0.27.rc5.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 aalib-libs-1.4.0-0.27.rc5.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.0.16-3.fc23.noarch.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abiword-3.0.1-4.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abrt-2.6.2-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abrt-addon-ccpp-2.6.2-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 packages/abrt-addon-coredump-helper-2.6.2-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm As you can see, all of them of length 0. Is the repo of 22 being diverted to 23? The correct update from F21 to F22 is: fedup --network 22 fedup should have puked on "--product=nonproduct" as that's not a supported option since F21. Also check your repos.d files and make sure you haven't enabled rawhide. Hi Rick, None of rawhide repos are enabled. The latest version of fedup in f21 is fedpkg-1.20-1.fc21.noarch.rpm # rpm -q fedup fedup-0.9.2-1.fc21.noarch # fedup --network 22 usage: fedup [options] fedup: error: This installation of Fedora does not belong to a product, so you must provide the =PRODUCTNAME option to specify what product you want to upgrade to. PRODUCTNAME should be one of: workstation: the default Fedora experience for laptops and desktops, powered by GNOME. server: the default Fedora experience for servers cloud: a base image for use on public and private clouds nonproduct: choose this if none of the above apply; in particular, choose this if you are using an alternate-desktop spin of Fedora Selecting a product will also install its standard package-set in addition to upgrading the packages already on your system. If you prefer to maintain your current set of packages, select 'nonproduct'. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading for more information. === However, when I set the product=workstation, it started to download - but ALL the downloads were failing with messages like these: anaconda-core-23.19.2-2.fc23.x FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-23.19.2-2.fc23.x86_64 FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-gui-23.19.2-2.fc23.x8 FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-core-23.19.2-2.fc23.x FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-tui-23.19.2-2.fc23.x8 FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA amtterm-1.3-10.fc23.x86_64.rpm FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-gui-23.19.2-2.fc23.x8 FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-core-23.19.2-2.fc23.x FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-gui-23.19.2-2.fc23.x8 FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-tui-23.19.2-2.fc23.x8 FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA amtterm-1.3-10.fc23.x86_64.rpm FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA anaconda-gui-23.19.2-2.fc23.x8 FAILED ] 3.5 MB/s | 27 MB 00:24:40 ETA My computer is connected to high speed internet, and am having no problems browsing the web, and sending this email. So, my question remains: Why fc23 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/16/15 07:26, Susi Lehtola wrote: > On 09/15/2015 04:14 PM, jd1008 wrote: >>> The correct update from F21 to F22 is: >>> >>> fedup --network 22 >>> >>> fedup should have puked on "--product=nonproduct" as that's not a >>> supported option since F21. >>> >>> Also check your repos.d files and make sure you haven't enabled rawhide. >> >> Hi Rick, >> None of rawhide repos are enabled. >> The latest version of fedup in f21 is fedpkg-1.20-1.fc21.noarch.rpm >> # rpm -q fedup >> fedup-0.9.2-1.fc21.noarch > > Now I'm confused. Quoting from your earlier message > > On 09/14/2015 01:04 PM, jd1008 wrote: > > On a laptop with > > 02:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM43224 802.11a/b/g/n > > (rev 01) > > and kernel: kernel-4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1 > > > > and compiled modules: > > /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/phy/bcm7xxx.ko.xz > > > > /lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/phy/bcm87xx.ko.xz > > you seem to be running Fedora 20, not Fedora 21. Have you updated part of > your system to Fedora 21? If that is the case, I agree with Gordon. You > should do a clean install of Fedora 22. And, if you noticed, the kernel he is using is recompiled for F20 from a downloaded srpm from koji which is targeted for F24. So, who knows what other "modifications" have been done to this system? -- It seems most people that say they are "done talking about it" never really are until given the last word. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
On 09/15/2015 03:17 PM, jd1008 wrote: Why All the packages it downloaded are from the unreleased fedora 23. For example, this is what it downloaded into /var/cache/system-upgrade/fedora/packages/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 a2jmidid-8-9.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-2.004-5.fc23.noarch.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 aalib-devel-1.4.0-0.27.rc5.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 aalib-libs-1.4.0-0.27.rc5.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.0.16-3.fc23.noarch.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abiword-3.0.1-4.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abrt-2.6.2-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abrt-addon-ccpp-2.6.2-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 packages/abrt-addon-coredump-helper-2.6.2-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm As you can see, all of them of length 0. Is the repo of 22 being diverted to 23? The correct update from F21 to F22 is: fedup --network 22 fedup should have puked on "--product=nonproduct" as that's not a supported option since F21. Also check your repos.d files and make sure you haven't enabled rawhide. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - -- -When you don't know what to do, walk fast and look worried. - -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
fedup --product=nonproduct --network 22 is upgrading to the unreleased fc23 !!!
Why All the packages it downloaded are from the unreleased fedora 23. For example, this is what it downloaded into /var/cache/system-upgrade/fedora/packages/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 a2jmidid-8-9.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-2.004-5.fc23.noarch.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 aalib-devel-1.4.0-0.27.rc5.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 aalib-libs-1.4.0-0.27.rc5.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.0.16-3.fc23.noarch.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abiword-3.0.1-4.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abrt-2.6.2-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 abrt-addon-ccpp-2.6.2-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root jd 0 Sep 15 16:12 packages/abrt-addon-coredump-helper-2.6.2-6.fc23.x86_64.rpm As you can see, all of them of length 0. Is the repo of 22 being diverted to 23? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
