Re: firefox-72.0.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does nothing
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 07:18:48PM -0700, stan via users wrote: On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 17:03:05 -0500 Sam Varshavchik wrote: I reproduced this on three different machines, this sequence of events: firefix update is broke by itself, but starts working once all available Fedora updates are installed. Or if I downgrade to 71.0.15. But I ran out of available machines to experiment with. They're all now fully updated. But I grabbed the complete list of packages that was updated on one of the boxes, if anyone wishes to find the ABI breakage violator. One of the following packages must have an ABI break in it, that the current firefox build has a dependency on: My guess is nspr and nss. Thanks for the hint! Can confirm it: seems upgrading nss helped: Updated to Firefox 72.0.1-1.fc30 here, and got empty pages. Updated then nss, which in turn also upgraded a few more nss* packages plus nspr, and Firefox loads pages again. Working here, so far: % dnf -C list --installed firefox nss\* nspr\* Installed Packages firefox.x86_6472.0.1-1.fc30 @updates nspr.x86_64 4.24.0-1.fc30 @updates nss.x86_643.48.0-1.fc30 @updates nss-mdns.x86_64 0.14.1-3.fc30 @fedora nss-pem.x86_641.0.5-1.fc30 @fedora nss-softokn.x86_643.48.0-1.fc30 @updates nss-softokn-freebl.x86_64 3.48.0-1.fc30 @updates nss-sysinit.x86_643.48.0-1.fc30 @updates nss-tools.x86_64 3.48.0-1.fc30 @updates nss-util.x86_64 3.48.0-1.fc30 @updates Thanks again! Wolfgang ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: firefox-72.0.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does nothing
Stephen Morris writes: Just for info, I installed F29 in a vm from scratch, and then upgraded to F31 from F29. The upgrade installed Firefox V72 and for me it worked fine (except under Wayland along with other packages). I don't normally use this version of Firefox, I use the nightly version of Firefox which is V74.0a1, and other than the Wayland issues it seems to work fine). The upgrade would've installed all the latest updates, which wouldn't reproduce this exact scenario. pgppssPo_R9QP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: firefox-72.0.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does nothing
On 12/1/20 13:18, stan via users wrote: On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 17:03:05 -0500 Sam Varshavchik wrote: I held all Fedora updates for the last couple of weeks, and only updated firefox in order to pick up the critical vulnerability fix. I was planning to update fully again next week, but decided to just grab the firefox update now. The firefox 72 rpm installed without conflicts, but firefox just kept flipping me the finger, shaped like a blank page. It was not crashing, and there were no error messages if I ran it from a terminal. Just a big F. U. white screen. On a few occasions, Firefox started to load my home page, but reached the conclusion that https://mail.google.com/u/0 – my home page – was corrupted. I determined that this ust be a hidden ABI breakage with one of the dependent packages. Firefox 72 started working again after I installed all available updates. I reproduced this on three different machines, this sequence of events: firefix update is broke by itself, but starts working once all available Fedora updates are installed. Or if I downgrade to 71.0.15. But I ran out of available machines to experiment with. They're all now fully updated. But I grabbed the complete list of packages that was updated on one of the boxes, if anyone wishes to find the ABI breakage violator. One of the following packages must have an ABI break in it, that the current firefox build has a dependency on: Just for info, I installed F29 in a vm from scratch, and then upgraded to F31 from F29. The upgrade installed Firefox V72 and for me it worked fine (except under Wayland along with other packages). I don't normally use this version of Firefox, I use the nightly version of Firefox which is V74.0a1, and other than the Wayland issues it seems to work fine). regards, Steve My guess is nspr and nss. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: firefox-72.0.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does nothing
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 17:03:05 -0500 Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I held all Fedora updates for the last couple of weeks, and only > updated firefox in order to pick up the critical vulnerability fix. I > was planning to update fully again next week, but decided to just > grab the firefox update now. The firefox 72 rpm installed without > conflicts, but firefox just kept flipping me the finger, shaped like > a blank page. It was not crashing, and there were no error messages > if I ran it from a terminal. Just a big F. U. white screen. > > On a few occasions, Firefox started to load my home page, but reached > the conclusion that https://mail.google.com/u/0 – my home page – was > corrupted. > > I determined that this ust be a hidden ABI breakage with one of the > dependent packages. Firefox 72 started working again after I > installed all available updates. > > I reproduced this on three different machines, this sequence of > events: firefix update is broke by itself, but starts working once > all available Fedora updates are installed. Or if I downgrade to > 71.0.15. But I ran out of available machines to experiment with. > They're all now fully updated. > > But I grabbed the complete list of packages that was updated on one > of the boxes, if anyone wishes to find the ABI breakage violator. > > One of the following packages must have an ABI break in it, that the > current firefox build has a dependency on: My guess is nspr and nss. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: firefox-72.0.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does nothing
Tom Horsley writes: On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 15:42:02 -0500 Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Is anyone also having problems with this update. No problem here with firefox-72.0.1-1.fc31.x86_64 I just went to cnn.com and it displayed stuff normally (I don't usually use firefox, so this is probably the first time I months I've run it). I held all Fedora updates for the last couple of weeks, and only updated firefox in order to pick up the critical vulnerability fix. I was planning to update fully again next week, but decided to just grab the firefox update now. The firefox 72 rpm installed without conflicts, but firefox just kept flipping me the finger, shaped like a blank page. It was not crashing, and there were no error messages if I ran it from a terminal. Just a big F. U. white screen. On a few occasions, Firefox started to load my home page, but reached the conclusion that https://mail.google.com/u/0 – my home page – was corrupted. I determined that this ust be a hidden ABI breakage with one of the dependent packages. Firefox 72 started working again after I installed all available updates. I reproduced this on three different machines, this sequence of events: firefix update is broke by itself, but starts working once all available Fedora updates are installed. Or if I downgrade to 71.0.15. But I ran out of available machines to experiment with. They're all now fully updated. But I grabbed the complete list of packages that was updated on one of the boxes, if anyone wishes to find the ABI breakage violator. One of the following packages must have an ABI break in it, that the current firefox build has a dependency on: Installing: kernel x86_64 5.4.8-200.fc31 updates-released-local 42 k kernel-corex86_64 5.4.8-200.fc31 updates-released-local 31 M kernel-modules x86_64 5.4.8-200.fc31 updates-released-local 29 M Upgrading: alsa-firmware noarch 1.2.1-4.fc31 updates-released-local 3.8 M blender-fonts noarch 1:2.81a-3.fc31 updates-released-local 4.7 M dconf-editor x86_64 3.34.3-1.fc31 updates-released-local 641 k eogx86_64 3.34.2-1.fc31 updates-released-local 3.1 M epiphany-runtime x86_64 1:3.34.3.1-1.fc31 updates-released-local 1.4 M exox86_64 0.12.11-1.fc31 updates-released-local 690 k firefoxx86_64 72.0.1-1.fc31 updates-released-local 98 M geolite2-city noarch 20191217-1.fc31updates-released-local 23 M geolite2-country noarch 20191217-1.fc31updates-released-local 1.7 M gjsx86_64 1.58.4-1.fc31 updates-released-local 453 k glib-networkingx86_64 2.62.3-1.fc31 updates-released-local 155 k glib2 x86_64 2.62.4-1.fc31 updates-released-local 2.6 M gnome-autoar x86_64 0.2.4-1.fc31 updates-released-local 56 k gnome-desktop3 x86_64 3.34.3-1.fc31 updates-released-local 555 k gnome-shellx86_64 3.34.3-1.fc31 updates-released-local 1.5 M hwdata noarch 0.331-1.fc31 updates-released-local 1.4 M iagno x86_64 3.34.4-1.fc31 updates-released-local 609 k ibus-typing-boosternoarch 2.7.4-1.fc31 updates-released-local 593 k iptables x86_64 1.8.3-7.fc31 updates-released-local 466 k iptables-libs x86_64 1.8.3-7.fc31 updates-released-local 56 k iptables-services x86_64 1.8.3-7.fc31 updates-released-local 16 k kernel-headers x86_64 5.4.7-200.fc31 updates-released-local 1.2 M kf5-kdeclarative x86_64 5.64.0-2.fc31 updates-released-local 297 k kf5-kwayland x86_64 5.64.0-2.fc31 updates-released-local 510 k kf5-kxmlguix86_64 5.64.0-2.fc31 updates-released-local 805 k kwin x86_64 5.17.4-2.fc31 updates-released-local 35 k kwin-commonx86_64 5.17.4-2.fc31 updates-released-local 2.7 M kwin-libs x86_64 5.17.4-2.fc31 updates-released-local 1.5 M langtable noarch 0.0.50-1.fc31 updates-released-local 46 k libinput x86_64 1.15.0-1.fc31 updates-released-local 204 k libnfsidmapx86_64 1:2.4.2-3.rc3.fc31 updates-released-local 72 k libtirpc x86_64 1.2.5-0.fc31 updates-released-local 97 k libxml2x86_64 2.9.10-2.fc31 updates-released-local 693 k mkpasswd x86_64 5.5.4-1.fc31 updates-released-local 41 k mutter x86_64 3.34.3-1.fc31 updates-released-local 2.6 M nfs-utils x86_64 1:2.4.2-3.rc3.fc31 updates-released-local 451 k nspr x86_64 4.24.0-1.fc31 updates-released-local 138 k nssx86_64 3.48.0-1.fc31 updates-released-local 665 k nss-softoknx86_64 3.48.0-1.fc31
Re: firefox-72.0.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does nothing
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 15:42:02 -0500 Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Is anyone also having problems with this update. No problem here with firefox-72.0.1-1.fc31.x86_64 I just went to cnn.com and it displayed stuff normally (I don't usually use firefox, so this is probably the first time I months I've run it). ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
firefox-72.0.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does nothing
Is anyone also having problems with this update. It does …nothing. Opening any URL results in a brief "connecting", then an empty page. dnf downgrade returns me back to 69.0.1, looking for a more recent build in bodhi… pgpdfk2dA7lnd.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
