Re: tigervnc won't remove
On 11/15/23 09:03, Barry Scott wrote: What do you get when you do the following commands: rpm -ql rpm-libs dnf list installed rpm-libs I am on FC39 now and I forced updated dnf to the fc39 version $ rpm -ql rpm-libs /usr/lib/.build-id /usr/lib/.build-id/a8 /usr/lib/.build-id/a8/ad83daa16d97f5c842e86a70f9e51cbe02094f /usr/lib/.build-id/ec /usr/lib/.build-id/ec/1c5daeb02d49221df9e4c206be1825dc361f4a /usr/lib64/librpm.so.10 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.10.0.0 /usr/lib64/librpmio.so.10 /usr/lib64/librpmio.so.10.0.0 /usr/lib64/rpm-plugins ~$ dnf list installed rpm-libs Installed Packages rpm-libs.x86_64 4.19.0-1.fc39 @fedora Are you running the ARM version of fedora? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: tigervnc won't remove
On 11/15/23 10:28, Jeffrey Walton wrote: `dnf repolist enabled` may be helpful: $ dnf repolist enabled repo idrepo name fedora Fedora 39 - x86_64 fedora-cisco-openh264 Fedora 39 OpenH264 (from Cisco) - x86_64 updatesFedora 39 - x86_64 - Updates But it looks like they are stock in F39: $ dnf whatprovides 'librpmio.so*' rpm-libs-4.19.0-1.fc39.i686 : Libraries for manipulating RPM packages Repo: fedora Matched from: Provide: librpmio.so.10 rpm-libs-4.19.0-1.fc39.x86_64 : Libraries for manipulating RPM packages Repo: @System Matched from: Provide: librpmio.so.10()(64bit) rpm-libs-4.19.0-1.fc39.x86_64 : Libraries for manipulating RPM packages Repo: fedora Matched from: Provide: librpmio.so.10()(64bit) Jeff Keep in mind that dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=39 failed to update me to the fc39 version of dnf. When I forced the issue, things worked fine. But first I had to get dnf working, which is why the 9--> 10 links. Download grade to fc38 version of dnf before running all your tests ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: tigervnc won't remove
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 12:04 PM Barry Scott wrote: > > On 15 Nov 2023, at 16:18, ToddAndMargo via users > wrote: > > I had the same as you until today when I did a `dnf upgrade`. > Then all hell broke loose and librpmio and librpm got upgraded > to 10. > > On my f38 system there is no .10 > > # dnf install /usr/lib64/librpm.so.10 > Last metadata expiration check: 3:43:48 ago on Wed 15 Nov 2023 13:16:33 GMT. > No match for argument: /usr/lib64/librpm.so.10 > Error: Unable to find a match: /usr/lib64/librpm.so.10 > > What do you get when you do the following commands: > > rpm -ql rpm-libs > dnf list installed rpm-libs > > This is what I see: > > [root@armf38 ~]# rpm -ql rpm-libs > /usr/lib/.build-id > /usr/lib/.build-id/1a > /usr/lib/.build-id/1a/eb222329842e6fb62cf39efa961713445a579e > /usr/lib/.build-id/7b > /usr/lib/.build-id/7b/c93dcd84e2911ac9ce66e44543f2ece1d30a53 > /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 > /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0 > /usr/lib64/librpmio.so.9 > /usr/lib64/librpmio.so.9.4.0 > /usr/lib64/rpm-plugins > [root@armf38 ~]# dnf list installed rpm-libs > Installed Packages > rpm-libs.aarch644.18.1-3.fc38 > @updates > [root@armf38 ~]# > > I am especially interested in the repo that your .so.10 came from. > My .so.9 came from @updates. `dnf repolist enabled` may be helpful: $ dnf repolist enabled repo idrepo name fedora Fedora 39 - x86_64 fedora-cisco-openh264 Fedora 39 OpenH264 (from Cisco) - x86_64 updatesFedora 39 - x86_64 - Updates But it looks like they are stock in F39: $ dnf whatprovides 'librpmio.so*' rpm-libs-4.19.0-1.fc39.i686 : Libraries for manipulating RPM packages Repo: fedora Matched from: Provide: librpmio.so.10 rpm-libs-4.19.0-1.fc39.x86_64 : Libraries for manipulating RPM packages Repo: @System Matched from: Provide: librpmio.so.10()(64bit) rpm-libs-4.19.0-1.fc39.x86_64 : Libraries for manipulating RPM packages Repo: fedora Matched from: Provide: librpmio.so.10()(64bit) Jeff ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: tigervnc won't remove
> On 15 Nov 2023, at 16:18, ToddAndMargo via users > wrote: > > I had the same as you until today when I did a `dnf upgrade`. > Then all hell broke loose and librpmio and librpm got upgraded > to 10. On my f38 system there is no .10 # dnf install /usr/lib64/librpm.so.10 Last metadata expiration check: 3:43:48 ago on Wed 15 Nov 2023 13:16:33 GMT. No match for argument: /usr/lib64/librpm.so.10 Error: Unable to find a match: /usr/lib64/librpm.so.10 What do you get when you do the following commands: rpm -ql rpm-libs dnf list installed rpm-libs This is what I see: [root@armf38 ~]# rpm -ql rpm-libs /usr/lib/.build-id /usr/lib/.build-id/1a /usr/lib/.build-id/1a/eb222329842e6fb62cf39efa961713445a579e /usr/lib/.build-id/7b /usr/lib/.build-id/7b/c93dcd84e2911ac9ce66e44543f2ece1d30a53 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0 /usr/lib64/librpmio.so.9 /usr/lib64/librpmio.so.9.4.0 /usr/lib64/rpm-plugins [root@armf38 ~]# dnf list installed rpm-libs Installed Packages rpm-libs.aarch644.18.1-3.fc38 @updates [root@armf38 ~]# I am especially interested in the repo that your .so.10 came from. My .so.9 came from @updates. Barry ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: tigervnc won't remove
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 9:07 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 11/14/23 18:47, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 11/14/23 16:37, Joe Zeff wrote: On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: How do I fix this? You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the no-longer needed dependencies. dnf is giving me the same output for any command I give it. On 11/14/23 17:19, Roger Heflin wrote: > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 -> > librpm.so.9.4.0 > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 551368 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0 > > so > cd /usr/lib64 > ln -s librpm.so.9.4.0 librpm.so.9 > > Assuming the librpm.so.9.4.0 is still there. But if that link is > missing there is a decent chance that other links and/or files are > also gone. > # ls -al librpm.so* lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10 -> librpm.so.10.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 563032 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10.0.0 Hmmm ... Okay, I got dnf to work again with the following: /usr/lib64# ln -s librpmio.so.10.0.0 librpmio.so.9 /usr/lib64# ln -s librpm.so.10.0.0 librpm.so.9 Now how do I fix it right? Just posted: dnf looking for outdated librpmio and librpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249732 On 11/15/23 08:02, Roger Heflin wrote: > It would have to be some sort of package problem. Unless something > specifically deleted that so.9 link (which seems unlikely). > > Clearly dnf thinks it needs so.9 but you only have so.10 > > I just upgraded my fc38 machine and have so.9 and this rpm version. > > What fedora version do you have and what rpm do you have? > > rpm -qa --filesbypkg | grep -i librpm.so > rpm-libs /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 > rpm-libs /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0 > rpm -qa | grep -i rpm-libs > rpm-libs-4.18.1-3.fc38.x86_64 > I had the same as you until today when I did a `dnf upgrade`. Then all hell broke loose and librpmio and librpm got upgraded to 10. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: tigervnc won't remove
It would have to be some sort of package problem. Unless something specifically deleted that so.9 link (which seems unlikely). Clearly dnf thinks it needs so.9 but you only have so.10 I just upgraded my fc38 machine and have so.9 and this rpm version. What fedora version do you have and what rpm do you have? rpm -qa --filesbypkg | grep -i librpm.so rpm-libs /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 rpm-libs /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0 rpm -qa | grep -i rpm-libs rpm-libs-4.18.1-3.fc38.x86_64 On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 9:07 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > On 11/14/23 18:47, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 11/14/23 16:37, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > > > How do I fix this? > > You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the > no-longer > needed dependencies. > >>> > >>> dnf is giving me the same output for any command I give it. > > > > On 11/14/23 17:19, Roger Heflin wrote: > > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 -> > > > librpm.so.9.4.0 > > > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 551368 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0 > > > > > > so > > > cd /usr/lib64 > > > ln -s librpm.so.9.4.0 librpm.so.9 > > > > > > Assuming the librpm.so.9.4.0 is still there. But if that link is > > > missing there is a decent chance that other links and/or files are > > > also gone. > > > > > > > # ls -al librpm.so* > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10 -> > > librpm.so.10.0.0 > > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 563032 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10.0.0 > > > > > > Hmmm ... > > > > Okay, > > I got dnf to work again with the following: > > /usr/lib64# ln -s librpmio.so.10.0.0 librpmio.so.9 > /usr/lib64# ln -s librpm.so.10.0.0 librpm.so.9 > > Now how do I fix it right? > > Just posted: > dnf looking for outdated librpmio and librpm > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249732 > > > > > > > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: tigervnc won't remove
On 11/14/23 19:06, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 11/14/23 18:47, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 11/14/23 16:37, Joe Zeff wrote: On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: How do I fix this? You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the no-longer needed dependencies. dnf is giving me the same output for any command I give it. On 11/14/23 17:19, Roger Heflin wrote: > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 -> > librpm.so.9.4.0 > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 551368 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0 > > so > cd /usr/lib64 > ln -s librpm.so.9.4.0 librpm.so.9 > > Assuming the librpm.so.9.4.0 is still there. But if that link is > missing there is a decent chance that other links and/or files are > also gone. > # ls -al librpm.so* lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10 -> librpm.so.10.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 563032 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10.0.0 Hmmm ... Okay, I got dnf to work again with the following: /usr/lib64# ln -s librpmio.so.10.0.0 librpmio.so.9 /usr/lib64# ln -s librpm.so.10.0.0 librpm.so.9 Now how do I fix it right? Just posted: dnf looking for outdated librpmio and librpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249732 dnf was still on FC38. The real fix: # dnf upgrade dnf --releasever=39 Failed on its # dnf upgrade --releasever=39 3000+ file later, # dnf upgrade dnf --releasever=39 --best --allowerasing 273 files later, and # rpm -qa dnf dnf-4.18.1-1.fc39.noarch Fixed ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: tigervnc won't remove
On 11/14/23 18:47, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 11/14/23 16:37, Joe Zeff wrote: On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: How do I fix this? You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the no-longer needed dependencies. dnf is giving me the same output for any command I give it. On 11/14/23 17:19, Roger Heflin wrote: > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 -> > librpm.so.9.4.0 > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 551368 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0 > > so > cd /usr/lib64 > ln -s librpm.so.9.4.0 librpm.so.9 > > Assuming the librpm.so.9.4.0 is still there. But if that link is > missing there is a decent chance that other links and/or files are > also gone. > # ls -al librpm.so* lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10 -> librpm.so.10.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 563032 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10.0.0 Hmmm ... Okay, I got dnf to work again with the following: /usr/lib64# ln -s librpmio.so.10.0.0 librpmio.so.9 /usr/lib64# ln -s librpm.so.10.0.0 librpm.so.9 Now how do I fix it right? Just posted: dnf looking for outdated librpmio and librpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249732 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: tigervnc won't remove
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 11/14/23 16:37, Joe Zeff wrote: On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: How do I fix this? You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the no-longer needed dependencies. dnf is giving me the same output for any command I give it. On 11/14/23 17:19, Roger Heflin wrote: > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 -> > librpm.so.9.4.0 > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 551368 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0 > > so > cd /usr/lib64 > ln -s librpm.so.9.4.0 librpm.so.9 > > Assuming the librpm.so.9.4.0 is still there. But if that link is > missing there is a decent chance that other links and/or files are > also gone. > # ls -al librpm.so* lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10 -> librpm.so.10.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 563032 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10.0.0 Hmmm ... ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: tigervnc won't remove
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 -> librpm.so.9.4.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 551368 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0 so cd /usr/lib64 ln -s librpm.so.9.4.0 librpm.so.9 Assuming the librpm.so.9.4.0 is still there. But if that link is missing there is a decent chance that other links and/or files are also gone. On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > On 11/14/23 16:37, Joe Zeff wrote: > > On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > >> > >> How do I fix this? > > > > You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the no-longer > > needed dependencies. > > dnf is giving me the same output for any command I give it. > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: tigervnc won't remove
On 11/14/23 16:39, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 11/14/23 16:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, How do I fix this? Many thanks, -T # rpm -qa tiger\* tigervnc-license-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch tigervnc-icons-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch tigervnc-1.13.1-6.fc38.x86_64 # dnf remove tigervnc-1.13.1-6.fc38.x86_64 tigervnc-icons-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch tigervnc-license-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 61, in from dnf.cli import main File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/__init__.py", line 30, in import dnf.base File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 29, in import libdnf.transaction File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/libdnf/__init__.py", line 14, in from . import conf File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/libdnf/conf.py", line 10, in from . import _conf ImportError: librpm.so.9: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Seems like this is a nnf issue. This give the same output: # dnf whatprovides libplist I removed tigervnc with rpm. Now I am trying to fix dnf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: tigervnc won't remove
On 11/14/23 16:37, Joe Zeff wrote: On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: How do I fix this? You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the no-longer needed dependencies. dnf is giving me the same output for any command I give it. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: tigervnc won't remove
On 11/14/23 16:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, How do I fix this? Many thanks, -T # rpm -qa tiger\* tigervnc-license-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch tigervnc-icons-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch tigervnc-1.13.1-6.fc38.x86_64 # dnf remove tigervnc-1.13.1-6.fc38.x86_64 tigervnc-icons-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch tigervnc-license-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 61, in from dnf.cli import main File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/__init__.py", line 30, in import dnf.base File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 29, in import libdnf.transaction File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/libdnf/__init__.py", line 14, in from . import conf File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/libdnf/conf.py", line 10, in from . import _conf ImportError: librpm.so.9: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Seems like this is a nnf issue. This give the same output: # dnf whatprovides libplist ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: tigervnc won't remove
On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: How do I fix this? You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the no-longer needed dependencies. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
tigervnc won't remove
Hi All, How do I fix this? Many thanks, -T # rpm -qa tiger\* tigervnc-license-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch tigervnc-icons-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch tigervnc-1.13.1-6.fc38.x86_64 # dnf remove tigervnc-1.13.1-6.fc38.x86_64 tigervnc-icons-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch tigervnc-license-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 61, in from dnf.cli import main File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/__init__.py", line 30, in import dnf.base File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 29, in import libdnf.transaction File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/libdnf/__init__.py", line 14, in from . import conf File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/libdnf/conf.py", line 10, in from . import _conf ImportError: librpm.so.9: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
