Re: upgrade 30 to 32
On Tue, 02 Jun 2020 19:29:51 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > Patrick Dupre wrote: > >> This has been solved by > >> > >> rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 > > Michael Schwendt: > > The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the > > most common use case. > > Don't you have to do up to the first dot? > > i.e. rpm -q perl-PDL-LAPACK-0 No. The simplified package naming scheme here is N-V-R.A as in "Name-Version-Release.Arch", and specifying the name would be enough when only a single package of that name is installed. Even if the name included one or more characters like '-', '_' or '.'. In dependencies related output you will also see N:E-V-R.Arch if the Epoch tag is set for a package, but when using rpm/dnf, specifying the Epoch is only needed in corner-cases. Putting a numerical "Version" and '.' characters into the package name can break quite some tools and scripts that strictly expect a simple N-V-R scheme. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
Patrick Dupre wrote: >> This has been solved by >> >> rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 Michael Schwendt: > The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the > most common use case. Don't you have to do up to the first dot? i.e. rpm -q perl-PDL-LAPACK-0 -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1127.8.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 12 16:57:42 UTC 2020 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
On 6/2/20 12:57 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 00:25:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the most common use case. Maybe you missed the original message where he tried the equivalent of that with dnf. There's something funny with the package name. I'm guessing that the version is part of the name for some reason. Then whoever created that package needs to be told. ;-) My understanding was that it was a package he made himself, so I think he's been told. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 00:25:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > >> rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 > > > > The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the > > most common use case. > > Maybe you missed the original message where he tried the equivalent of > that with dnf. There's something funny with the package name. I'm > guessing that the version is part of the name for some reason. Then whoever created that package needs to be told. ;-) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
On 6/2/20 12:14 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 23:12:06 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: This has been solved by rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the most common use case. Maybe you missed the original message where he tried the equivalent of that with dnf. There's something funny with the package name. I'm guessing that the version is part of the name for some reason. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 23:12:06 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > This has been solved by > > rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the most common use case. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
On 6/1/20 3:25 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: What I would like is to have an automatic removing of my own packages telling me which packages have been removed. Add "--allowerasing" to the dnf command and check the list of removed packages. It will also be in the dnf history. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
Hello, What I would like is to have an automatic removing of my own packages telling me which packages have been removed. Then I will rebuild my packages. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === > Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 at 11:37 PM > From: "Samuel Sieb" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: upgrade 30 to 32 > > On 6/1/20 2:15 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Every time that I upgrade my system I have to do remove > > all my own packages (40). > > If they are compiled against versions of libraries that are getting > replaced, then yes. You could setup a vm to compile the libraries on > the new release and include those in the update. > > > Would dnf module reset \* > > do the job? > > > > This is really annoying. > > It's also unnecessary. dnf will automatically do that for this release. > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
On 6/1/20 2:15 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Every time that I upgrade my system I have to do remove all my own packages (40). If they are compiled against versions of libraries that are getting replaced, then yes. You could setup a vm to compile the libraries on the new release and include those in the update. Would dnf module reset \* do the job? This is really annoying. It's also unnecessary. dnf will automatically do that for this release. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
Every time that I upgrade my system I have to do remove all my own packages (40). Would dnf module reset \* do the job? This is really annoying. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === > Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 at 11:08 PM > From: "Michael Young" > To: "Community support for Fedora users" > Subject: Re: upgrade 30 to 32 > > On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > running: > > dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 > > I get: > > > > Modular dependency problem: > > > > Problem: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > > gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0.x86_64 > > This can be solved by > dnf module reset \* > > > Error: > > Problem 1: package perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 requires > > libperl.so.5.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > - package perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 requires > > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.2), but none of the providers can be installed > > - perl-libs-4:5.28.2-444.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > > repository > > - problem with installed package perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 > > - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-442.module_f32+8059+8a5cccba.x86_64 is > > filtered out by modular filtering > > - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-442.module_f32+8111+66b92dcd.x86_64 is > > filtered out by modular filtering > > - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-444.module_f32+8513+01a85d28.x86_64 is > > filtered out by modular filtering > > It looks like there is no perl-PDL-LAPACK package in Fedora 32, so you > will probably have to delete that package for the update to work. > > Michael Young > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
This has been solved by rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === > Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 at 11:09 PM > From: "Samuel Sieb" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: upgrade 30 to 32 > > On 6/1/20 2:00 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > running: > > dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 > > I get: > > > > Modular dependency problem: > > > > Problem: conflicting requests > >- nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > > gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0.x86_64 > > This can be ignored. dnf will resolve it in the end. > > > Error: > > Problem 1: package perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 requires > > libperl.so.5.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > >- package perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 requires > > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.2), but none of the providers can be installed > > This must be something you installed yourself. It's not from Fedora. > > > dnf remove perl-PDL-LAPACK > > No match for argument: perl-PDL-LAPACK > > You can either try adding "--allowerasing" to the system-upgrade command > or try: > dnf remove perl-PDL-LAPACK* > Maybe the version number is part of the name. > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
On 6/1/20 2:00 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: running: dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 I get: Modular dependency problem: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0.x86_64 This can be ignored. dnf will resolve it in the end. Error: Problem 1: package perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.2), but none of the providers can be installed This must be something you installed yourself. It's not from Fedora. dnf remove perl-PDL-LAPACK No match for argument: perl-PDL-LAPACK You can either try adding "--allowerasing" to the system-upgrade command or try: dnf remove perl-PDL-LAPACK* Maybe the version number is part of the name. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upgrade 30 to 32
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, running: dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 I get: Modular dependency problem: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0.x86_64 This can be solved by dnf module reset \* Error: Problem 1: package perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.2), but none of the providers can be installed - perl-libs-4:5.28.2-444.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-442.module_f32+8059+8a5cccba.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-442.module_f32+8111+66b92dcd.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-444.module_f32+8513+01a85d28.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering It looks like there is no perl-PDL-LAPACK package in Fedora 32, so you will probably have to delete that package for the update to work. Michael Young ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
upgrade 30 to 32
Hello, running: dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 I get: Modular dependency problem: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0.x86_64 Error: Problem 1: package perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.2), but none of the providers can be installed - perl-libs-4:5.28.2-444.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-442.module_f32+8059+8a5cccba.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-442.module_f32+8111+66b92dcd.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-444.module_f32+8513+01a85d28.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering However gimp is not installed dnf remove perl-PDL-LAPACK Modular dependency problem: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0.x86_64 No match for argument: perl-PDL-LAPACK No packages marked for removal. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! How to solve the issue? === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
