Hi, On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 03:24:07PM -0400, Luis Vitorio Cargnini wrote: > Thanks, but I really do not want to use Boost. > Is easier ? certainly is, but I want to make it using only MPI > itself > and not been dependent of a Library, or templates like the majority > of > boost a huge set of templates and wrappers for different libraries, > implemented in C, supplying a wrapper for C++. > I admit Boost is a valuable tool, but in my case, as much > independent I > could be from additional libs, better. >
If you do not want to use boost, then I suggest not using nested vectors but just ones that contain PODs as value_type (or even C-arrays). If you insist on using complicated containers you will end up writing your own MPI-C++ abstraction (resulting in a library). This will be a lot of (unnecessary and hard) work. Just my 2 cents. Cheers, Markus
