Re: [one-users] VNC proxy is working but Sustone VNC window does show error
Hi Daniel, We did not have time to check this - I just switched off secure connection. Thanks for hint, I will check the issue you have sent. Thanks again Pawel --- Paweł Orzechowski pawel.orzechow...@budikom.net BUDIKOM.NET ul. Trzy Lipy 3, GPNT, bud. C 80-172 Gdańsk tel.: +48 58 58 58 708 email: bi...@budikom.net W dniu 2014-08-11 10:50, Daniel Molina napisał(a): Hi Pawel, Did you fix the problem? We found a bug in distribution running ruby 1.8.7 (i.e: CentOS 6.6), you can check the fix here: http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/3128 [15] Cheers On 24 July 2014 19:02, pawel.orzechow...@budikom.net wrote: Daniel, I have the same error VNC Server disconnected (code: 1006). I will check the link Valentin has provided and let you know. Thanks Pawel --- Paweł Orzechowski pawel.orzechow...@budikom.net BUDIKOM.NET [1] ul. Trzy Lipy 3, GPNT, bud. C 80-172 Gdańsk tel.: +48 58 58 58 708 email: bi...@budikom.net W dniu 2014-07-24 07:07, Valentin Bud napisał(a): Hello Paweł, Maybe your issue is somehow connected to the Same-Origin-Policy discussed in the following thread: http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/2014-February/026405.html [16] Best, Valentin On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Daniel Molina dmol...@opennebula.org wrote: On 22 July 2014 16:44, pawel.orzechow...@budikom.net wrote: I had similar situation. When I switched on secure websockets connection in my profile settings I could not open VNC connection to any virtual machine. Isn't it a bug? What is the error message that is shown in Susntone? Cheers Pawel I have found my mistake! It was silly - Some time ago I pressed Secure websockets connection chekbox in configuration tab and forgot about it. So now it's working! THANK YOU. 23.08.2012, 17:17, Пярн Артур dekkart at yandex.ru [2]: If I go direclty from browser to http://10.18.1.7:35792/ [3] it shows me in websockify output the following message: Normal web request received but disallowed 23.08.2012, 16:54, Пярн Артур dekkart at yandex.ru [2]: Just in case, my configuration: 10.2.2.2 - KVM host with VMs 10.18.1.7 - only OpenNebula and Sunstone front-end * Can you connect directly without no VNC to those VMs (10.2.2.2:5916 [4] for example) with a standard vnc client Yes, with no problem If I start proxy manualy /srv/cloud/one/share/noVNC/utils/websockify 35792 10.2.2.2:5916 [4], I can't connetct from VNC client to 10.18.1.7:35792 [5], it shows me ignoring socket not ready: root at ubuntu [2]:/srv/cloud/one/share/noVNC/utils# /srv/cloud/one/share/noVNC/utils/websockify 35792 10.2.2.2:5916 [4] WARNING: no 'numpy' module, HyBi protocol is slower or disabled WebSocket server settings: - Listen on :35792 - Flash security policy server - No SSL/TLS support (no cert file) - proxying from :35792 to 10.2.2.2:5916 [4] 1: 10.2.0.3 [6]: ignoring socket not ready 2: 10.2.0.3 [6]: ignoring socket not ready I found that I can connect to 10.18.1.7 [7]: 35792 from browser (http://10.18.1.7:6080/vnc.html [8]) when I start both launch.sh script and also websockify 35792 10.2.2.2:5916 [4] 23.08.2012, 16:20, Hector Sanjuan hsanjuan at opennebula.org [2]: Your working screenshot shows a VNC session to a VM deployed in the same host as the sunstone frontend (10.18.1.7:6080 [9]), but from sunstone you are trying to open connections to VMs in a different host (10.2.2.2). My questions then, * Can you connect directly without no VNC to those VMs (10.2.2.2:5916 [4] for example) with a standard vnc client * If you manually launch the proxy with the webserver option like you did, would something like http://10.18.1.7:6080/vnc.html?host=10.2.2.2port=5916 [10] work? This should not work if sunstone doesnt. Perhaps you can get some useful info from the websockify stdout when attempting it if it doesnt work. (in response to your latest email, dont worry about the timeout thing) Hector En Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:08:05 +0200, Пярн Артур dekkart at yandex.ru [2] escribió: Sure, logs below. sunstone.error is empty. It's our DEMO network, no firewall, so no way. -- Server configuration -- {:vnc_proxy_path=/srv/cloud/one/share/noVNC/utils/websockify, :auth=sunstone, :vnc_proxy_key=nil, :vnc_proxy_support_wss=false, :debug_level=3, :vnc_proxy_base_port=29876, :host=0.0.0.0, :port=, :one_xmlrpc=http://localhost:2633/RPC2 [11], :core_auth=cipher, :lang=en_US, :vnc_proxy_cert=nil} == Sinatra/1.3.2 has taken the stage on for development with backup from Thin Thu Aug 23 12:04:43 2012 [I]: 10.2.0.3 - - [23/Aug/2012 12:04:43] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 1595 0.0075 Thu Aug 23 12:04:43 2012 [I]: 10.2.0.3 - - [23/Aug/2012 12:04:43] GET /css/login.css HTTP/1.1 304 - 0.0022 Thu Aug 23 12:04:43 2012 [I]: 10.2.0.3 - - [23/Aug/2012 12:04:43] GET
Re: [one-users] Full system datastore
Hi, Again, does anybody has some ideas about this. We need to recreate all VM's and it is not solution for production environment (good that it was just a begining of migration from XenServer) . Here are the steps we did: * no machine can be run because ON says that system data store is full (it shows it has 500GB instead of 7GB), * we stopped all the VM's and then restarted frontend - it did not helped * the we restarted kvm - it did not helped * we deleted this 500GB /var/tmp/8d187572e1d5ec159420701f9177150c file - again machines were unable to start * so we deleted VMs and created them again - good they had a template, but unfortunately now the VM's got new IP addresses so it blocked access to them from outside world due to firewall rules * now after above steps system datastore has magically moved to frontend and has again correct capacity of 7GB So the questions now: * how can system datastore move from frontend to kvm? Can it be moved manually? * what is the system datastore used for? * wouldn't it be better if system datastore be placed on ceph and is it possible that it can be placed on ceph? Regards Pawel --- Paweł Orzechowski pawel.orzechow...@budikom.net BUDIKOM.NET ul. Trzy Lipy 3, GPNT, bud. C 80-172 Gdańsk tel.: +48 58 58 58 708 email: bi...@budikom.net W dniu 2014-08-05 08:32, Mateusz Skała napisał(a): Hi, I run some VM's on OpenNebula, but after few machines system datastore are full. As Image backend we are using ceph datastore (and there is enough disk space), but system datastore is probably from kvm host, from file /var/tmp/8d187572e1d5ec159420701f9177150c. How can I make some free space? It is possible to move system datastore on Ceph? ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Could not read from CDROM (code 0004)
Hi, can you send us this file from the hypervisor: /var/lib/one/datastores/0/vmid/deployment.0 and run this command: $ file /var/lib/one/datastores/0/vmid/* On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:25 PM, IBC Service Network / Zolotuhin Aleksey a.zolotu...@ibc.ru wrote: Hello! I set up a cluster of 3 nodes Opennebula and Ceph. Operating system Ubuntu 14.04. libvirt version: libvirt-bin - 1.2.2-0ubuntu13.1.2 libvirt0 - 1.2.2-0ubuntu13.1.2 qemu version: qemu - 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 qemu-common - 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 qemu-keymaps - 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 qemu-kvm - 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 qemu-system - 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 qemu-system-arm - 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 qemu-system-common - 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 qemu-system-mips - 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 qemu-system-misc - 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 qemu-system-ppc - 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 qemu-system-sparc - 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 qemu-system-x86 - 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 qemu-user - 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 qemu-utils - 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 Try to install Debian using debian iso. VM template: CPU=0.5 DISK=[ IMAGE=debian 7, IMAGE_UNAME=jakal ] DISK=[ IMAGE=Debian, IMAGE_UNAME=jakal, READONLY=yes ] FEATURES=[ ACPI=yes ] GRAPHICS=[ LISTEN=0.0.0.0, TYPE=VNC ] MEMORY=512 NIC=[ NETWORK=LAN, NETWORK_UNAME=jakal ] OS=[ BOOT=cdrom ] But when the virtual machine starts, I get the following message: Booting from DVD/CD... Boot failed: Could not read from CDROM (code 0004) No bootable device. I tried looking for this problem on the internet and I have not found the cause of this error. Tell me, please, what can I do to resolve this situation? Thanks in advance for your assistance. Best regards, Aleksey Zolotukhin ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Opennebula using iSCSI Storage
But, does it have a distributed file system? If I'm understanding correctly, in your setup you could corrupt the filesystem quite easily On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Adam Fyfe adam.fy...@gmail.com wrote: so is it supported that, i copy /var/lib/one to the iscsi storage, and then symlink it from the master node and other nodes ? therefore all my storage is on the san On 11 July 2014 16:30, Adam Fyfe adam.fy...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have 1 ON server and 1 additional ON host. I would like the setup so that ALL storage / datastores are on the iSCSI SAN. The iSCSI volume is mounted on each server ext4 netdev iSCSI using native CentOS drivers. The question is, i read that the /var/lib/one should be shared using NFS from the master server and then mounted on the hosts Does anyone have any experience of this type of setup and could share their experienece ? thanks adam ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] /var/lib/one/vms directory
Hi Thomas, yes, it's created in the package. What package exactly did you use? On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Thomas Stein himbe...@meine-oma.de wrote: Hola. Is the dirrectory /var/lib/one/vms supposed to be created during installation process? I'm asking because this directory was missing on my installation and deploying of vms failed because of the very that reason. cheers t. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Full system datastore
Hi, Can you run these commands and send us the output: (in OpenNebula frontend) $ for i in /var/lib/one/datastores/{,*}; do echo $i; df -h $i; done (in a KVM hypervisor) $ for i in /var/lib/one/datastores/{,*}; do echo $i; df -h $i; done Also, what OpenNebula version do you have currently installed? (Distro and package version) Answering your questions: how can system datastore move from frontend to kvm? Can it be moved manually? By default OpenNebula assumes that the default system datastore: /var/lib/one/datastores/0 is shared accross all the nodes using a distributed file system. It can be set up as local to the hypervisors by changing the TM_MAD of the system datastore to 'ssh' instead of 'shared'. what is the system datastore used for? To hold volatile disks (swap disks etc created on the fly not associated for an Image), to hold vm checkpoints for migrations/suspends and primarily stores cloned disks. wouldn't it be better if system datastore be placed on ceph and is it possible that it can be placed on ceph? It can be placed on CephFS, yes. As long as you setup a shared filesystem accross all the nodes, including frontend of /var/lib/one/datastores/0 it doesn't really matter what technology you're using: NFS, CephFS, GlusterFS, etc... cheers, Jaime On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:25 AM, pawel.orzechow...@budikom.net wrote: Hi, Again, does anybody has some ideas about this. We need to recreate all VM's and it is not solution for production environment (good that it was just a begining of migration from XenServer) . Here are the steps we did: - no machine can be run because ON says that system data store is full (it shows it has 500GB instead of 7GB), - we stopped all the VM's and then restarted frontend - it did not helped - the we restarted kvm - it did not helped - we deleted this 500GB /var/tmp/8d187572e1d5ec159420701f9177150c file - again machines were unable to start - so we deleted VMs and created them again - good they had a template, but unfortunately now the VM's got new IP addresses so it blocked access to them from outside world due to firewall rules - now after above steps system datastore has magically moved to frontend and has again correct capacity of 7GB So the questions now: - how can system datastore move from frontend to kvm? Can it be moved manually? - what is the system datastore used for? - wouldn't it be better if system datastore be placed on ceph and is it possible that it can be placed on ceph? Regards Pawel --- Paweł orzechowskipawel.orzechow...@budikom.net*budikom.net http://budikom.net* ul. Trzy Lipy 3, GPNT, bud. C 80-172 Gdańsk tel.: +48 58 58 58 708 email: bi...@budikom.net W dniu 2014-08-05 08:32, Mateusz Skała napisał(a): Hi, I run some VM's on OpenNebula, but after few machines system datastore are full. As Image backend we are using ceph datastore (and there is enough disk space), but system datastore is probably from kvm host, from file /var/tmp/8d187572e1d5ec159420701f9177150c. How can I make some free space? It is possible to move system datastore on Ceph? ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Problem with network bridge from VMs to physical network.
Great news! I was a bit at loss :) Looking forward to reading the answer On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Diego M. thedragonsreb...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi all, Thanks for the time used to read my messages. I found the source of my issues and I'm creating an entry on my blog to summarize the issue and the resolution so it can easily be found by other people with the same issue. I will share the link to the post here as soon as I finish with it. Best regards! Diego Marciano -- From: thedragonsreb...@hotmail.com To: jme...@opennebula.org Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 09:11:03 -0300 CC: users@lists.opennebula.org Subject: Re: [one-users] Problem with network bridge from VMs to physical network. Hi Jaime, Thanks for your reply! Still not, I'm trying to figure it out right now. The ip route output is the following: root@Host1:~# ip route show default via 192.168.7.254 dev eth0 192.168.7.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.7.1 192.168.7.0/24 dev Vbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.7.2 192.168.254.0/24 dev Vbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.254.254 Term1 routes: C:\Users\User1route PRINT IPv4 Route Table === Active Routes: Network DestinationNetmask Gateway Interface 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.7.254 192.168.7.50 10.142.168.0255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.7.50 === 192.168.7.254 routes: admin@Gateway:/tmp/home/root# ip route show 130.255.155.1 dev eth0 scope link 192.168.7.0/24 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.7.254 130.255.155.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 130.255.155.33 192.168.254.0/24 via 192.168.7.2 dev br0 metric 1 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link default via 130.255.155.1 dev eth0 I'm thinking that this issue could be caused as I'm routing the traffic to the virtual machines from 192.168.7.254 (The gateway of my network) to Host1 through 192.168.7.2, but actually the traffic comming from Host1 is through 192.168.7.1, maybe that could be causing my problem? -- From: jme...@opennebula.org Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 11:33:01 +0200 Subject: Re: [one-users] Problem with network bridge from VMs to physical network. To: thedragonsreb...@hotmail.com CC: users@lists.opennebula.org Hi, did you manage to figure this out? otherwise, can you send us the output of ip route in the VM, Host 1 and Term 1? cheers, Jaime On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Diego M. thedragonsreb...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to implement opennebula on my personal lab as we have some projects with a colleague and it is nice to have disposable VMs, and also we are taking the oportunity to learn about OpenNebula to keep up-to-date :) I would like to ask you a question I have, regarding networking, because I'm pretty sure that I'm missing something on the configurations but I cannot realize what. We have the following infrastructure: And the problem is that from the clients on 192.168.7.0/24 subnet I can ping the VMs on 192.168.254.0/24, but the problem is that from the VM I can only ping 192.168.7.1, 192.168.7.2, and 192.168.7.254 of the 192.168.7.0/24 subnet, and all the other clients from some reason are not reacheable. I'm for sure missing something somewhere, but I cannot figure what. I had already enabled the ip4 forwarding on Host1 for all interfaces, and the following are the contents of /etc/network/interfaces file: # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface allow-hotplug eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.7.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.168.7.254 auto Vbr0 iface Vbr0 inet static address 192.168.7.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 192.168.7.0 broadcast 192.168.7.255 gateway 192.168.7.254 bridge_ports eth1 bridge_fd 9 bridge_hello 2 bridge_maxage 12 bridge_maxwait 5 bridge_stp off auto Vbr0:1 iface Vbr0:1 inet static address 192.168.254.254 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.168.7.2 And this is the vnet template I'm using for the VMs: onevnet show Public VIRTUAL NETWORK 48 INFORMATION ID : 48 NAME : Public USER : oneadmin GROUP : users CLUSTER: - TYPE : RANGED BRIDGE : Vbr0 VLAN : No USED LEASES: 1 PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : u-- OTHER : --- VIRTUAL NETWORK TEMPLATE BRIDGE=Vbr0 DESCRIPTION= DNS=192.168.7.254 GATEWAY=192.168.254.254 NETWORK_ADDRESS=192.168.254.0 NETWORK_MASK=255.255.255.0 PHYDEV= VLAN=NO VLAN_ID= RANGE
Re: [one-users] opennebula openvswitch loosing connectivity.
Hi Leszek, this is quite intriguing. It looks more like it's an issue related to Open VSwitch... have you asked around there? did you get any debugging tips for this? cheers, Jaime On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Leszek Master keks...@gmail.com wrote: I've got weird problem. My OpenNebula cloud is now used widely, and we noticed weird things happening. I'm using openvswitch with vlans and i did 2 vm's one with haproxy and second one with apache. Sometimes my haproxy are serving 504 errors, like it have lost connection with apache backend, but it hasn't (no ping lost since last 24h). Also my scp script to upload files to apache backend shows me connection lost error sometimes. Did anyone had connection issues similiar to me? How to track down the problem root? Any clues will be helpfull. I'm out of ideas. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] deploy Non-persistent vm on 4.6.2 base glusterfs no running
Hi, did this work for you? cheers, Jaime On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:38 AM, clm_t...@hotmail.com clm_t...@hotmail.com wrote: Thank you for your reply. Regards. *From:* vincent vinc...@vanderkussen.org *Date:* 2014-07-12 18:30 *To:* clm_tuan clm_t...@hotmail.com *CC:* users users@lists.opennebula.org *Subject:* Re: [one-users] deploy Non-persistent vm on 4.6.2 base glusterfs no running On 2014-07-11 10:17, clm_t...@hotmail.com wrote: Dear All, I tried to deploy opennebula 4.6.2 base glusterfs 3.5.1 all three server: 1. one server,ip is 192.168.0.198; 2. node0,ip is 192.168.0.199; 3. node1,ip is 192.168.0.200; Datastores configuration: [oneadmin@fc-server ]$ onedatastore show 102 DATASTORE 102 INFORMATION ID : 102 NAME : sys USER : oneadmin GROUP : oneadmin CLUSTER : c1 TYPE : SYSTEM DS_MAD : - TM_MAD : shared BASE PATH : /var/lib/one//datastores/102 DISK_TYPE : FILE DATASTORE CAPACITY TOTAL: : 131.3G FREE: : 123.3G USED: : 41M LIMIT: : - PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : u-- OTHER : --- DATASTORE TEMPLATE BASE_PATH=/var/lib/one//datastores/ GLUSTER_HOST=192.168.0.199:24007 GLUSTER_VOLUME=fc-sys SHARED=YES TM_MAD=shared TYPE=SYSTEM_DS [oneadmin@fc-server ]$ onedatastore show 103 DATASTORE 103 INFORMATION ID : 103 NAME : img USER : oneadmin GROUP : oneadmin CLUSTER : c1 TYPE : IMAGE DS_MAD : fs TM_MAD : shared BASE PATH : /var/lib/one//datastores/103 DISK_TYPE : DATASTORE CAPACITY TOTAL: : 131.3G FREE: : 123.3G USED: : 41M LIMIT: : - PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : u-- OTHER : --- DATASTORE TEMPLATE BASE_PATH=/var/lib/one//datastores/ CLONE_TARGET=SYSTEM DISK_TYPE=GLUSTER DS_MAD=fs GLUSTER_HOST=192.168.0.199:24007 GLUSTER_VOLUME=fc-img LN_TARGET=NONE TM_MAD=shared TYPE=IMAGE_DS 192.168.0.199:/fc-sys on /var/lib/one/datastores/102 type fuse.glusterfs (rw,default_permissions,allow_other,max_read=131072) 192.168.0.199:/fc-img on /var/lib/one/datastores/103 type fuse.glusterfs (rw,default_permissions,allow_other,max_read=131072) deploy image to PERSISTENT, it's ok. [oneadmin@fc-server ]$ oneimage show 1 IMAGE 1 INFORMATION ID : 1 NAME : ttylinux USER : oneadmin GROUP : oneadmin DATASTORE : img TYPE : OS REGISTER TIME : 07/11 21:35:11 PERSISTENT : Yes SOURCE : /var/lib/one//datastores/103/4c40e4068ad2ff41c8767c40f85ae786 PATH : http://marketplace.c12g.com/appliance/4fc76a938fb81d351703/download/0 SIZE : 40M STATE : used RUNNING_VMS : 1 PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : --- OTHER : --- IMAGE TEMPLATE DEV_PREFIX=hd FROM_APP=4fc76a938fb81d351703 FROM_APP_FILE=0 FROM_APP_NAME=ttylinux - kvm MD5=04c7d00e88fa66d9aaa34d9cf8ad6aaa VIRTUAL MACHINES ID USER GROUP NAME STAT UCPU UMEM HOST TIME 8 oneadmin oneadmin tt runn 0 512M 192.168.0. -1d 16h32 [oneadmin@fc-server tm]$ [oneadmin@fc-server 8]$ ll total 366 -rw-rw-r-- 1 oneadmin oneadmin 992 Jul 11 13:44 deployment.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 oneadmin oneadmin 60 Jul 11 13:44 disk.0 - /var/lib/one/datastores/103/4c40e4068ad2ff41c8767c40f85ae786 -rw-r--r-- 1 oneadmin oneadmin 372736 Jul 11 13:44 disk.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 oneadmin oneadmin 36 Jul 11 13:44 disk.1.iso - /var/lib/one/datastores/102/8/disk.1 but deploy image to Non-persistent, it's no running. [oneadmin@fc-server 102]$ oneimage show 1 IMAGE 1 INFORMATION ID : 1 NAME : ttylinux USER : oneadmin GROUP : oneadmin DATASTORE : img TYPE : OS REGISTER TIME : 07/11 21:35:11 PERSISTENT : No SOURCE : /var/lib/one//datastores/103/4c40e4068ad2ff41c8767c40f85ae786 PATH : http://marketplace.c12g.com/appliance/4fc76a938fb81d351703/download/0 SIZE : 40M STATE : used RUNNING_VMS : 1 PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : --- OTHER : --- IMAGE TEMPLATE DEV_PREFIX=hd FROM_APP=4fc76a938fb81d351703 FROM_APP_FILE=0 FROM_APP_NAME=ttylinux - kvm MD5=04c7d00e88fa66d9aaa34d9cf8ad6aaa VIRTUAL MACHINES ID USER GROUP NAME STAT UCPU UMEM HOST TIME 10 oneadmin oneadmin tt fail 0 0K 0d 00h00 [oneadmin@fc-server 102]$ ls 10 [oneadmin@fc-server 102]$ cd 10 [oneadmin@fc-server 10]$ ll total 41325 -rw-rw-r-- 1 oneadmin oneadmin 971 Jul 11 14:35 deployment.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 oneadmin oneadmin 41943040 Jul 11 14:35 disk.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 oneadmin oneadmin 372736 Jul 11 14:35 disk.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 oneadmin oneadmin 37 Jul 11 14:35 disk.1.iso - /var/lib/one/datastores/102/10/disk.1 show log : Fri Jul 11 14:35:26 2014 [DiM][D]: Deploying VM 10 Fri Jul 11 14:35:26 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:8400 UID:0 VirtualMachineDeploy result SUCCESS, 10 Fri Jul 11 14:35:31 2014 [TM][D]: Message received: TRANSFER SUCCESS 10 - Fri Jul 11 14:35:32 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 10 ExitCode: 0 Fri Jul 11 14:35:32 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 10 Successfully execute network driver
Re: [one-users] (live) migration
Ah, got it. Too bad CephFS isn't stable yet te replace NFS/iSCSI On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Campbell, Bill bcampb...@axcess-financial.com wrote: What are you using as a system datastore (shared or SSH)? If you are using shared, you'll need to ensure the /var/lib/one directory is shared among all of your nodes (particularly the ONE server and your hypervisors). If you are using SSH as your system datastore, then you need to modify the SSH transfer manager pre and post migrate scripts to include moving the checkpoint files from one hypervisor node to another (and cleaning up after migration). http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/2013-April/022705.html -- *Bill Campbell *Infrastructure Architect Axcess Financial Services, Inc. 7755 Montgomery Rd., Suite 400 Cincinnati, OH 45236 -- *From: *Johan Kooijman m...@johankooijman.com *To: *users@lists.opennebula.org *Sent: *Monday, August 11, 2014 3:18:37 PM *Subject: *[one-users] (live) migration All, I'm testing with a ONE right now, and running into an issue I can't explain. I created VM's on a Ceph datastore, that works fine. Cloning snapshotting does. But when I want to migrate a VM to another host: Mon Aug 11 21:16:24 2014 : Error restoring VM: Could not restore from /var/lib/one//datastores/105/99/checkpoint Am I missing something here? -- Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards, Johan Kooijman ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org *NOTICE: Protect the information in this message in accordance with the company's security policies. If you received this message in error, immediately notify the sender and destroy all copies.* -- Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards, Johan Kooijman T +31(0) 6 43 44 45 27 E m...@johankooijman.com ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] live migration without shared storage
Hi, yes, you need shared storage for live migration. However, please note that regular migration will work perfectly and the machine state will be preserved. cheers, Jaime On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Thomas Stein himbe...@meine-oma.de wrote: Hello Is it right opennebula currently does not support live migration without shared storage? I get this error when trying. Fri Jul 11 22:14:32 2014 [VMM][E]: migrate: Command virsh --connect qemu:///system migrate --live one-11 qemu+ssh://192.168.122.200/system failed: error: unable to resolve '/var/lib/one//datastores/0/11/disk.1': No such file or directory thanks and best regards t. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Xen4 issues with nic-attach and ebtables vnm driver
Hi Jorge, this is due to a bug in OpenNebula that has been fixed in 4.8. You have apply this change in /var/lib/one/remotes/vnm/OpenNebulaNetwork.rb: - :xm = sudo xm, + :xm = sudo xl, And remember to update the hosts with: onehost sync --force cheers, Jaime On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Jorge Calás Lozano ca...@speedyrails.com wrote: Hello, We are testing opennebula 4.6 with xen4 drivers on debian 7 servers, it looks really great. We created our own storage drivers to match our current setup, we did it using ruby and they are working great so far. We are now testing the network drivers as well as adding/removing nics/ips to a running vm. In our current setup we add ip aliases to the vm's eth0 nic and add some ebtables rules on the hypervisor host. How is this supposed to be done in opennebula? We tried the onevm nic-attach command and it hot-plugged the nic correctly, but it is lost from the vm once it is rebooted. The vm template keeps the nic, but xen is not aware of it, the deployment file is not changed. If we re-deploy (undeploy resume) the deployment file is correctly updated and xen is aware of the interface, but it needs a downtime we can not always afford. Is this a bug? is there something I'm missing? Does anyone have a similar issue/solution? Another issue we have found is with the ebtables VNM driver, it just won't add any rule. Firewall rules are correctly implemented but not the ebtables ones. On the logs we found the following message: [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG E 10 A different toolstack (xl) have been selected! We found that NicXen class on OpenNebulaNic.rb doesn't use the new xl command but xm from xen3, we changed the code to use xl command but we still get the same message and no rules are added. I guess there other piece of code still using xm but I couldn't find it. Do you have any advice on where to look? Thanks in advance, Jorge ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] VMware networking w/o Nsx?
Hi Lucas, Now the question is, does opennebula support the automatic creation of portgroups and their associated Vlans (on a distributed vswitch or in a pinch replicated among all relevant standard hosts vswitches) without needing VMware NSX? I can confirm that OpenNebula interacting with a ESX hypervisor, using the dynamic network mode [1], will create portgroups -if needed- associated with VLANs in each ESX where the VM is placed, without requiring NSX. What version of OpenNebula are you using? We recommend using the latest stable version, v4.8, just released [2]. Let us know about the state of your installation, we will happily help you to achieve a successful PoC. Best, -Tino [1] http://docs.opennebula.org/4.8/administration/virtualization/evmwareg.html [2] http://opennebula.org/opennebula-4-8-lemon-slice-is-out/ -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] onegroup list --xml command is not showing a valid XML document
Hi Carlos, Sorry for the delay in answering you. Thanks you very much for letting us know and for checking it. Cheers, Esteban On 09/07/14 16:11, Carlos Martín Sánchez wrote: Hi guys, The problem was in the fsck tool. If you need to, you can download the fixed version from here: https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/blob/one-4.6/src/onedb/fsck.rb Thank you for reporting it. -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Esteban Freire esfre...@cesga.es mailto:esfre...@cesga.es wrote: Hi Carlos, Boris, Carlos, thanks a lot for opening a ticket about it. About the nokogiri gem version, it is the following one: [oneadmin@cloud ~]$ gem list | grep nokogiri nokogiri (1.5.10) Yes, as Boris said, this is the only broken pool for us. Please, let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Esteban On 30/06/14 10:59, Carlos Martín Sánchez wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Boris Parak 256...@mail.muni.cz mailto:256...@mail.muni.cz wrote: Hi Javi, Esteban, this issue might be related to the upgrade process from 4.4 (or 4.2) to 4.6, I wasn't able to reproduce it in clean 4.6 installations. Cheers, Boris I just opened a ticket to solve this: http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/3014 Boris, Esteban: Can you please tell me your nokogiri gem version? Also, Esteban said this only happened for the group pool. Was this the only broken pool for you too, Boris? Thanks, Carlos -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ | cmar...@opennebula.org mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Esteban Freire esfre...@cesga.es mailto:esfre...@cesga.es wrote: Hi Javi, No, we only have found this issue with onegroup list --xml command, other pools seem to be OK . Boris Parak from CESNET (in CC) also have found the same issue. I send you the required output : [oneadmin@cloud ~]$ ruby --version ruby 1.9.3p545 (2014-02-24 revision 45159) [x86_64-linux] [oneadmin@cloud ~]$ gem list *** LOCAL GEMS *** activesupport (3.2.14) amazon-ec2 (0.9.17) antlr3 (1.9.2) aws-sdk (1.15.0) backports (3.3.3) bigdecimal (1.1.0) builder (3.2.2) bundler (1.6.3, 1.5.3) bundler-unload (1.0.2) curb (0.8.5) daemon_controller (1.1.5) daemons (1.1.9) diff-lcs (1.2.4) erubis (2.7.0) eventmachine (1.0.3) executable-hooks (1.3.1) gem-wrappers (1.2.4) hashie (1.2.0) highline (1.6.19) httparty (0.11.0) i18n (0.6.5) io-console (0.3) json (1.8.0, 1.5.5) memcache-client (1.8.5) minitest (2.5.1) multi_json (1.7.9) multi_xml (0.5.5) mysql (2.9.1) net-ldap (0.6.0) nokogiri (1.5.10) oca (3.4.1) occi (2.5.19) ox (2.1.1) parse-cron (0.1.4) passenger (4.0.13) polyglot (0.3.4) rack (1.5.2) rack-protection (1.5.0) rack-test (0.6.2) rake (10.1.0, 0.9.2.2) rdoc (3.9.5) rspec (2.14.1) rspec-core (2.14.5) rspec-expectations (2.14.2) rspec-http (0.10.0) rspec-mocks (2.14.3) rubygems-bundler (1.4.2) rvm (1.11.3.9) sequel (4.9.0) simplecov (0.7.1) simplecov-html (0.7.1) sinatra (1.3.6) sinatra-contrib (1.3.2) sinatra-cross_origin (0.2.0) sqlite3 (1.3.9) thin (1.6.2) tilt (1.4.1) treetop (1.5.3) trollop (2.0) uuidtools (2.1.4) xml-simple (1.1.2) xmlparser (0.7.2.1) yard (0.8.7) yard-sinatra (1.0.0) [oneadmin@cloud ~]$ Thanks in advance, Esteban On 06/26/2014 12:41 PM, Javier Fontan wrote: I am not able to reproduce it. Does it also happen with other pools like VMs or images? We need the output of these commands to investigate further: $ ruby --version $ gem list Cheers On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Esteban Freire esfre...@cesga.es mailto:esfre...@cesga.es wrote: Hi all, Probably,
[one-users] Problem to create CDROM image
Hello, I'am working with OpenNebula 4.6.2 and when I create an image TYPE: CDROM with an ISO from Sunstone shows this message Image upload successfully but finally this image not appears. What it's the problem? With image type DATABLOCK or OS not fails... Thank you! María Jular Castañeda Técnico de Sistemas Tfn: +34-987-29 33 23 / e-mail: maria.ju...@fcsc.esmailto:x...@fcsc.es http://www.fcsc.es Edificio CRAI-TIC. Campus de Vegazana, s/n. Universidad de León 24071 León [cid:image001.jpg@01CFB706.67C208D0] [cid:image002.png@01CFB706.67C208D0] Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si Vd. no es el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización está prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. El correo electrónico vía Internet no permite asegurar la confidencialidad de los mensajes que se transmiten ni su integridad o correcta recepción. La Fundación Centro de Supercomputación de Castilla y León no asume ninguna responsabilidad por estas circunstancias. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain information that is CONFIDENTIAL and protected by a professional privilege or whose disclosure is prohibited by law. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any read, dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited by law. If this message has been received in error, please immediately notify us via e-mail and delete it. Internet e-mail neither guarantees the confidentiality nor the integrity or proper receipt of the messages sent. Fundación Centro de Supercomputación de Castilla y León does not assume any liability for those circumstances. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Problem to create CDROM image
Hi Maria, you might be affected by the 2984 bug: http://docs.opennebula.org/4.6/release_notes/release_notes/known_issues.html#sunstone Can you try applying the fix described in that document and try again? On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Maria Jular maria.ju...@fcsc.es wrote: Hello, I’am working with OpenNebula 4.6.2 and when I create an image TYPE: CDROM with an ISO from Sunstone shows this message “Image upload successfully” but finally this image not appears. What it’s the problem? With image type DATABLOCK or OS not fails… Thank you! *María Jular Castañeda* *Técnico de Sistemas* Tfn: +34-987-29 33 23 / e-mail: maria.ju...@fcsc.es x...@fcsc.es http://www.fcsc.es Edificio CRAI-TIC. Campus de Vegazana, s/n. Universidad de León 24071 León [image: cid:image004.jpg@01CEDEE4.54E4BEB0] [image: logoFCSCL_bn.png] Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si Vd. no es el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización está prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. El correo electrónico vía Internet no permite asegurar la confidencialidad de los mensajes que se transmiten ni su integridad o correcta recepción. La Fundación Centro de Supercomputación de Castilla y León no asume ninguna responsabilidad por estas circunstancias. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain information that is CONFIDENTIAL and protected by a professional privilege or whose disclosure is prohibited by law. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any read, dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited by law. If this message has been received in error, please immediately notify us via e-mail and delete it. Internet e-mail neither guarantees the confidentiality nor the integrity or proper receipt of the messages sent. Fundación Centro de Supercomputación de Castilla y León does not assume any liability for those circumstances. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] OpenNebula with Ceph
Hi OpenNebula Users, Currently, we have a cloud infrastructure with opennebula for the compute nodes and ceph for the storage solution. Is it possible to use LVM in a VM while using ceph as a datastore? Regards, Pons Apollo Global Corp. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org