[one-users] updated from 3.2 to 4.6
Hi. I have a VM that runn opennebula utils (onevm, onevnet, oneimage) from 3.2 version. This utils conect to Opennebula server that yesterday had a 4.6 version, and worked fine (conect using RPC) but now, we updated server to 4.8 and onevnet stop working (if a did a onevnet show ID_net) The problem: I decided to update to 4.8 the utils at MV, remember that 3.2 was installing using a tar.gz, but now we use a yum install opennebula. All was fine at VM, but after that... the Opennebula utils say that are a 3.2 version (I can see that using onevnet -h)... but rpm say that was installed 4.8 any idea? i think there are a problem at ruby or similar... Thanks in advance. -- Alejandro Feijóo Fraga Systems Technician CESGA ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Fwd: 4.8 with vSphere single node datastores
Hi Stan, This is looking like an installation problem indeed. The vi_driver.rb should not be in /usr/lib/one/ruby/vi_driver.rb, but only in /var/lib/one/remotes/vmm/vmware/vi_driver.rb. Please erase the former, and if it is still failling due to not finding vi_driver, please send the contents of /var/lib/one/remotes/vmm/vmware/vi_driver.rb, as well as the output of: $ ls -la /var/lib/one/remotes/vmm/vmware/ Best, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 22 September 2014 14:56, Stan Yarbrough stan.yarbro...@oriontech.com wrote: Tino: I have added the line puts RUBY_LIB_LOCATION at 26 in /var/lib/one/remotes/im/vmware.d/vmware.rb. Similar error is presented. ONE_LOCATION=ENV[ONE_LOCATION] if !defined?(ONE_LOCATION) if !ONE_LOCATION RUBY_LIB_LOCATION=/usr/lib/one/ruby if !defined?(RUBY_LIB_LOCATION) else RUBY_LIB_LOCATION=ONE_LOCATION+/lib/ruby if !defined?(RUBY_LIB_LOCATION) end puts RUBY_LIB_LOCATION $: ../../vmm/vmware/ require 'vi_driver' ... [root@itwcsfe01-inthewoods-local oneadmin]# vi /var/lib/one/remotes/im/vmware.d/vmware.rb [root@itwcsfe01-inthewoods-local oneadmin]# gem uninstall rbvmomi Remove executables: rbvmomish in addition to the gem? [Yn] y Removing rbvmomish Successfully uninstalled rbvmomi-1.8.1 [root@itwcsfe01-inthewoods-local oneadmin]# /var/lib/one/remotes/im/vmware.d/vmware.rb itwesx01 /usr/lib/one/ruby /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:53:in `require': cannot load such file -- vi_driver (LoadError) from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:53:in `require' from /var/lib/one/remotes/im/vmware.d/vmware.rb:29:in `main' [root@itwcsfe01-inthewoods-local oneadmin]# Stan Yarbrough Chief Technology Officer Orion Technology Services 704-307-1633 600 Galleria Parkway SE | Suite 1450 Atlanta, Georgia 30339 stan.yarbro...@oriontech.com | www.oriontech.com The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. -Original Message- From: Tino Vazquez [mailto:cvazq...@c12g.com] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 8:33 AM To: Stan Yarbrough Cc: users Subject: Re: [one-users] Fwd: 4.8 with vSphere single node datastores Hi Stan, rbvmomi is vendorized inside OpenNebula, so let's uninstall it gem uninstall rbvmomi The driver not finding rbvmomi is equivalent to not finding the vi_driver.rb , something wrong with the library path. Let's check that, please add the following line into line 26 (and remember to remove it after the test) of /var/lib/one/remotes/im/vmware.d/vmware.rb: puts RUBY_LIB_LOCATION and then send us the output of /var/lib/one/remotes/im/vmware.d/vmware.rb itwesx01 Best, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 18 September 2014 16:55, Stan Yarbrough stan.yarbro...@oriontech.com wrote: Tino: What can I do next
Re: [one-users] Where are the CentOS one-context-4.8.0-1.noarch rpm files?
The images from the marketpace already come with the context packages installed. To download the packages you can go to one of these places: http://dev.opennebula.org/projects/opennebula/files https://github.com/OpenNebula/addon-context-linux/releases/tag/v4.8.1 On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Pavel Tankov pavel.tan...@strategyobject.com wrote: Hello, I am installing a CentOS 6.5 VM from scratch. I would like, of course, to contextualize it. Where can I download the one-context-4.8.0-1.noarch.rpm from? It is installed by default on a CentOS 6.5 VM that I deploy from the Marketplace. Thank you. -- Pavel Tankov ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Javier Fontán Muiños Developer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Live migrate with Snapshot
Guys, Could we migrate vm with snapshots?how to make it works?thanks. Rhesa. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Where are the CentOS one-context-4.8.0-1.noarch rpm files?
Thank you for the response! I was just about to reply to my thread that I'd found the package and help other people but, fortunately, you were faster. I would have given false information. Anyway, please, see below how I got confused: I wasn't getting a response for a while and thought I was asking a too obvious question, so I went to re-read the documentation once again more carefully. The documentation here: (1) http://docs.opennebula.org/4.8/user/virtual_machine_setup/bcont.html says: Install from our repositories package one-context in Ubuntu/Debian or opennebula-context in CentOS/RedHat. Instructions to add the repository at the installation guide. where installation guide is a hyperlink to (2) http://docs.opennebula.org/4.8/design_and_installation/building_your_cloud/ignc.html#ignc However, (2) explains how to add the opennebula repo for CentOS and the link to the repo is: (3) http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/4.8/CentOS/6/x86_64. But (3) DOES NOT have the contextualization rpm packages. On the other hand, (1) also says: Download and install the package for your distribution: DEB: Compatible with Ubuntu 11.10 to 14.04 and Debian 6/7 RPM: Compatible with CentOS and RHEL 6/7 where RPM is a hyperlink to (4) http://dev.opennebula.org/attachments/download/804/one-context_4.8.0.rpm which, apparently according to your mail, is not the latest version. Please, fix the documentation in (1) to mention http://dev.opennebula.org/projects/opennebula/files instead. -- Pavel Tankov On 09/23/2014 12:22 PM, Javier Fontan wrote: The images from the marketpace already come with the context packages installed. To download the packages you can go to one of these places: http://dev.opennebula.org/projects/opennebula/files https://github.com/OpenNebula/addon-context-linux/releases/tag/v4.8.1 On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Pavel Tankov pavel.tan...@strategyobject.com wrote: Hello, I am installing a CentOS 6.5 VM from scratch. I would like, of course, to contextualize it. Where can I download the one-context-4.8.0-1.noarch.rpm from? It is installed by default on a CentOS 6.5 VM that I deploy from the Marketplace. Thank you. -- Pavel Tankov ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Pavel Tankov ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Real CPU/MEM = 0 after upgrade
As additional info, I tested ganglia_probe, and it looks fine: oneadmin@genokvm4:/var/lib/one/remotes/im/ganglia.d$ ./ganglia_probe kvm 14 genokvm7 TOTALCPU=2400 CPUSPEED=2666 TOTALMEMORY=99202048 USEDMEMORY=98827836 FREEMEMORY=374212 FREECPU=2181.6 USEDCPU=218.40001 NETTX=9129152.00 NETRX=9256168.00 VMS_INFORMATION= On 09/23/2014 10:56 AM, Olivier Sallou wrote: Hi, I have upgraded from 4.2 to 4.8, and all processes are fine BUT: the REAL CPU and MEM values of all my hosts remain at 0 (while allcoated is ok). I use the ganglia driver, I don't know if it is used for real values. Messages look fine: Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Monitoring host genokvm6 (13) Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Monitoring host genokvm7 (14) Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Monitoring host genokvm3 (21) Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Monitoring host genokvm8 (22) Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Monitoring host genokvm9 (24) Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Monitoring host genokvm10 (25) Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Monitoring host genokvm11 (26) Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Host genokvm6 (13) successfully monitored. Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Host genokvm7 (14) successfully monitored. Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Host genokvm3 (21) successfully monitored. Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Host genokvm8 (22) successfully monitored. Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Host genokvm9 (24) successfully monitored. Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Host genokvm10 (25) successfully monitored. Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Host genokvm11 (26) successfully monitored. I have waited for quite a long time, so it should not be a problem Any idea how to debug this ? This prevent VM scheduling Thanks Olivier -- Olivier Sallou IRISA / University of Rennes 1 Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] updated from 3.2 to 4.6
Make sure that PATH is not pointing to the old OpenNebula installation and ONE_LOCATION environment variable is unset. On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Alejandro Feijóo alfei...@cesga.es wrote: Hi. I have a VM that runn opennebula utils (onevm, onevnet, oneimage) from 3.2 version. This utils conect to Opennebula server that yesterday had a 4.6 version, and worked fine (conect using RPC) but now, we updated server to 4.8 and onevnet stop working (if a did a onevnet show ID_net) The problem: I decided to update to 4.8 the utils at MV, remember that 3.2 was installing using a tar.gz, but now we use a yum install opennebula. All was fine at VM, but after that... the Opennebula utils say that are a 3.2 version (I can see that using onevnet -h)... but rpm say that was installed 4.8 any idea? i think there are a problem at ruby or similar... Thanks in advance. -- Alejandro Feijóo Fraga Systems Technician CESGA ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Javier Fontán Muiños Developer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] CentOS-7 mainline GenericCloud test image
IP, hostname and SSH key configuration work but not DNS configuration. I think it worked in older versions of the image. Any change in the cloud-init code? On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: hi, http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/devel/CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-20140917_02.qcow2 sha256: 836934ff633a7c8accabe44a1196f0b89b4553c29fb270c7d44798000ea6f35a This is the last Release Candidate for the Generic cloud mainline image, these will be build and released monthly to include all security updates and bugfix's. These are compressed qcow2 images, with cloud-init and growpart utils installed, root logins are deprecated in favour of default 'centos' logins. Please test, and I will monitor this thread for comments. unless there is a major blocker, I will move to release this early next week. Please note : this is a common image, and repsents an identical footprint on all official centos images in public and private clouds. Regards and thanks for the work that Javier Fontan did to bring in the opennebula support to cloud-init, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Javier Fontán Muiños Developer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] ec2 server behavior issue after upgrade
After my upgrade to 4.8, I tried to use the ec2 server (I used it before).
I try to use the new config e.g. the ec2 templates instead of old
template files.
I face an issue when trying to list the availableimages, I have an empty
list. However, before, I had a correct list.
ec2 = AWS::EC2::Base.new(:access_key_id = ec2_access_key,
:secret_access_key = ec2_secret_key, :server = my_host, :port =
4567, :use_ssl = false)
puts ec2.describe_images
{xmlns=http://ec2.amazonaws.com/doc/2010-08-31/;,
requestId=053c778c-986b-4577-9954-a7fae1fab192, imagesSet=nil}
Should something be updated ? Is it a bug ?
Thanks
Olivier
--
gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] CentOS-7 mainline GenericCloud test image
There is another bigger problem. I've found out that I had a DHCP server running in my machine. Deactivating it configures the IP correctly (can be pinged) but SSH is inaccessible (port closed?). It also adds the DNS configuration but there is already a nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf in the original image. Can you delete or make the file /etc/resolv.conf empty in the image? After restarting the VM it works correctly. I'm looking into the SSH problem. On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Javier Fontan jfon...@opennebula.org wrote: IP, hostname and SSH key configuration work but not DNS configuration. I think it worked in older versions of the image. Any change in the cloud-init code? On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: hi, http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/devel/CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-20140917_02.qcow2 sha256: 836934ff633a7c8accabe44a1196f0b89b4553c29fb270c7d44798000ea6f35a This is the last Release Candidate for the Generic cloud mainline image, these will be build and released monthly to include all security updates and bugfix's. These are compressed qcow2 images, with cloud-init and growpart utils installed, root logins are deprecated in favour of default 'centos' logins. Please test, and I will monitor this thread for comments. unless there is a major blocker, I will move to release this early next week. Please note : this is a common image, and repsents an identical footprint on all official centos images in public and private clouds. Regards and thanks for the work that Javier Fontan did to bring in the opennebula support to cloud-init, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Javier Fontán Muiños Developer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan -- Javier Fontán Muiños Developer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] ec2 server behavior issue after upgrade
Found !
Needs to register old images with econe-register.
Olivier
On 09/23/2014 03:43 PM, Olivier Sallou wrote:
After my upgrade to 4.8, I tried to use the ec2 server (I used it before).
I try to use the new config e.g. the ec2 templates instead of old
template files.
I face an issue when trying to list the availableimages, I have an empty
list. However, before, I had a correct list.
ec2 = AWS::EC2::Base.new(:access_key_id = ec2_access_key,
:secret_access_key = ec2_secret_key, :server = my_host, :port =
4567, :use_ssl = false)
puts ec2.describe_images
{xmlns=http://ec2.amazonaws.com/doc/2010-08-31/;,
requestId=053c778c-986b-4577-9954-a7fae1fab192, imagesSet=nil}
Should something be updated ? Is it a bug ?
Thanks
Olivier
--
Olivier Sallou
IRISA / University of Rennes 1
Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE
Tel: 02.99.84.71.95
gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] networking restart issue on Market images
I'm not sure about the Debian image but the Ubuntu 14.04 - OpenNebula 4.8 uses newer context packages that are not compatible with old OpenNebula versions. They now need the MAC address from the interface to find the correct interface with the new interface naming scheme. Until OpenNebula 4.6 this information is not added to the Context section. I have updated the Ubuntu 14.04 - OpenNebula 4.8 as it had some other problems. Try this image, it should be compatible with your OpenNebula version: http://appliances.c12g.com/Ubuntu-14.04/ubuntu14.04.qcow2.gz On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Olivier Sallou olivier.sal...@irisa.fr wrote: Hi, I have tried to use the following images from Market in my OpenNebula private cloud (4.2). The Debian image boots but it is impossible to connect. As this image has a login/root available, I connected to the VNC and saw that network files (/etc/network/interfaces) were correctly setup, but the ifconfig command shows an errouneous config. If I execute a service networking restart, the network restart and interfaces from ifconfig are fine (and network access too). So everything done at startup by one-context.d files is correct, but it seems that the service networking stop/start from contextualisation fails (though I see nothing in /var/log). On the Ubuntu image, from the market too, I cannot be sure, as there is no root password to access. I only see the same symptoms (cannot connect to the VM). I have no issues with my own/local VMs. I saw a previous post ( http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/2014-March/044229.html) about networking issues and I wonder if this is the same problem and market image were not updated. Appliance - debian-7.1-amd64-kvm ID 52168fb81d2be703 URL link http://marketplace.c12g.com/appliance/52168fb81d2be703 Publisher Demo-TIC Downloads 1637 OS Debian 7.1 Arch x86_64 Size 5GB Hypervisor KVM Appliance - Ubuntu 14.04 - KVM - OpenNebula 4.8 ID 53e7c1b28fb81d6a6903 URL link http://marketplace.c12g.com/appliance/53e7c1b28fb81d6a6903 Publisher C12G Labs Downloads 573 OS Arch x86_64 Size 10GB Hypervisor KVM Regards Olivier ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Javier Fontán Muiños Developer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] networking restart issue on Market images
On 09/23/2014 03:59 PM, Javier Fontan wrote: I'm not sure about the Debian image but the Ubuntu 14.04 - OpenNebula 4.8 uses newer context packages that are not compatible with old OpenNebula versions. They now need the MAC address from the interface to find the correct interface with the new interface naming scheme. Until OpenNebula 4.6 this information is not added to the Context section. I have just upgraded to 4.8, so I gonna retry. I have updated the Ubuntu 14.04 - OpenNebula 4.8 as it had some other problems. Try this image, it should be compatible with your OpenNebula version: http://appliances.c12g.com/Ubuntu-14.04/ubuntu14.04.qcow2.gz On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Olivier Sallou olivier.sal...@irisa.fr mailto:olivier.sal...@irisa.fr wrote: Hi, I have tried to use the following images from Market in my OpenNebula private cloud (4.2). The Debian image boots but it is impossible to connect. As this image has a login/root available, I connected to the VNC and saw that network files (/etc/network/interfaces) were correctly setup, but the ifconfig command shows an errouneous config. If I execute a service networking restart, the network restart and interfaces from ifconfig are fine (and network access too). So everything done at startup by one-context.d files is correct, but it seems that the service networking stop/start from contextualisation fails (though I see nothing in /var/log). On the Ubuntu image, from the market too, I cannot be sure, as there is no root password to access. I only see the same symptoms (cannot connect to the VM). I have no issues with my own/local VMs. I saw a previous post (http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/2014-March/044229.html) about networking issues and I wonder if this is the same problem and market image were not updated. Appliance - debian-7.1-amd64-kvm ID52168fb81d2be703 URL link http://marketplace.c12g.com/appliance/52168fb81d2be703 Publisher Demo-TIC Downloads 1637 OSDebian 7.1 Arch x86_64 Size 5GB HypervisorKVM Appliance - Ubuntu 14.04 - KVM - OpenNebula 4.8 ID53e7c1b28fb81d6a6903 URL link http://marketplace.c12g.com/appliance/53e7c1b28fb81d6a6903 Publisher C12G Labs Downloads 573 OS Arch x86_64 Size 10GB HypervisorKVM Regards Olivier ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Javier Fontán Muiños Developer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan http://github.com/jfontan -- Olivier Sallou IRISA / University of Rennes 1 Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Fwd: 4.8 with vSphere single node datastores
Hi Stan, Thanks for the detailed info. The installation seems correct, at least it doesn't explain why the driver is not been found. Let's try adding the ruby path, in the vi_driver.rb, add the following in line 39: $: . and try the monitoring again. Best, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 23 September 2014 16:22, Stan Yarbrough stan.yarbro...@oriontech.com wrote: That is correct. The same issue presented with 6.5 and ruby 1.8.7 I have completed another install that yields the same driver issue. Here are the exact steps that I took to perform the installation on a fresh install of Centos 7. Can you have a look and tell me where I am failing? 1. Install Centos 7 a. Infrastructure Server with no options b. Add oneadmin user i. Home Dir = /var/lib/one ii. Create UID = 1000 iii.Create GID = 1000 iv. Add to group oneadmin v. Make administrator vi. Password = PASSWORD_HERE vii.Root password = rootpassword 2. Update release and install repos a. su b. yum update c. yum install epel-release d. add opennebula repo: cat EOT /etc/yum.repos.d/opennebula.repo [opennebula] name=opennebula baseurl=http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/4.8/CentOS/7/x86_64 enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 EOT 3. Install opennebula and libraries yum install opennebula-server opennebula-sunstone opennebula-ruby yum install opennebula-flow /usr/share/one/install_gems 4. Add oneadmin to sudo users visudo add “oneadmin ALL=(ALL) ALL” to ##Allow root to run any commands anywhere 5. Setup oneadmin user a. Ensure home directory is /var/lib/one mkdir ~/.one echo oneadmin:PASSWORD_HERE ~/.one/one_auth chmod 600 ~/.one/one_auth cat ~/.one/one_auth [oneadmin:PASSWORD_HERE] 6. Start one and verify oneadmin user access one start onevm list [ ID USER GROUPNAMESTAT UCPUUMEM HOST TIME] 7. Setup SSH a. Use ssh-keygen to generate an ssh hash. Use blank password ssh-keygen cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub ~/.ssh/authorized_keys chmod 700 ~/.ssh/ chmod 600 ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub chmod 600 ~/.ssh/id_dsa chmod 600 ~/.ssh/authorized_keys 8. Configure one server a. Verify the ID of oneadmin id [uid=1000(oneadmin) gid=1000(oneadmin) groups=1000(oneadmin) context=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023] b. Set SELinux to disabled as root vi /etc/sysconfig/selinux ... SELINUX=disabled ... setenforce 0 getenforce [Permissive] c. Create NFS Exports As root: systemctl stop firewalld systemctl enable rpcbind systemctl enable nfs-server systemctl enable nfs-lock systemctl enable nfs-idmap systemctl start rpcbind systemctl start nfs-server systemctl start nfs-lock systemctl start nfs-idmap As oneadmin sudo su - oneadmin sudo vi /etc/exports /var/lib/one/datastores/0 *(rw,sync,no_subtree_check,root_squash,anonuid=1000,anongid=1000) /var/lib/one/datastores/1 *(rw,sync,no_subtree_check,root_squash,anonuid=1000,anongid=1000) sudo exportfs –a showmount –e [/var/lib/one/datastores/1 * /var/lib/one/datastores/0 *] d. Edit config files Sudo vi /etc/one/oned.conf #*** # DataStore Configuration #*** # DATASTORE_LOCATION: *Default* Path for Datastores in the hosts. It IS the # same for all the hosts in the cluster. DATASTORE_LOCATION IS ONLY FOR THE # HOSTS AND *NOT* THE FRONT-END. It defaults to /var/lib/one/datastores (or # $ONE_LOCATION/var/datastores in self-contained mode) # # DATASTORE_BASE_PATH: This is the base path for the SOURCE attribute of # the images registered in a Datastore. This is a default value, that can be # changed when the datastore is created. #*** DATASTORE_LOCATION = /vmfs/volumes DATASTORE_BASE_PATH = /vmfs/volumes
Re: [one-users] Real CPU/MEM = 0 after upgrade
Ganglia IM drivers are no longer included in the distribution and we have not modified them for quite some time so I'm not sure they will work. There may be also a problem related with the new collectd system to get information, now monitoring is pushed from the nodes and is active by default. Check these documents: http://docs.opennebula.org/4.8/administration/monitoring/mon.html http://docs.opennebula.org/4.8/administration/monitoring/imudppushg.html On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Olivier Sallou olivier.sal...@irisa.fr wrote: As additional info, I tested ganglia_probe, and it looks fine: oneadmin@genokvm4:/var/lib/one/remotes/im/ganglia.d$ ./ganglia_probe kvm 14 genokvm7 TOTALCPU=2400 CPUSPEED=2666 TOTALMEMORY=99202048 USEDMEMORY=98827836 FREEMEMORY=374212 FREECPU=2181.6 USEDCPU=218.40001 NETTX=9129152.00 NETRX=9256168.00 VMS_INFORMATION= On 09/23/2014 10:56 AM, Olivier Sallou wrote: Hi, I have upgraded from 4.2 to 4.8, and all processes are fine BUT: the REAL CPU and MEM values of all my hosts remain at 0 (while allcoated is ok). I use the ganglia driver, I don't know if it is used for real values. Messages look fine: Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Monitoring host genokvm6 (13) Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Monitoring host genokvm7 (14) Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Monitoring host genokvm3 (21) Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Monitoring host genokvm8 (22) Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Monitoring host genokvm9 (24) Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Monitoring host genokvm10 (25) Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Monitoring host genokvm11 (26) Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Host genokvm6 (13) successfully monitored. Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Host genokvm7 (14) successfully monitored. Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Host genokvm3 (21) successfully monitored. Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Host genokvm8 (22) successfully monitored. Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Host genokvm9 (24) successfully monitored. Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Host genokvm10 (25) successfully monitored. Tue Sep 23 10:54:57 2014 [Z0][InM][D]: Host genokvm11 (26) successfully monitored. I have waited for quite a long time, so it should not be a problem Any idea how to debug this ? This prevent VM scheduling Thanks Olivier -- Olivier Sallou IRISA / University of Rennes 1 Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Javier Fontán Muiños Developer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Datastore and Gluster + Cluster
thanks javier. i'm really appreciate it. i did almost same configuration without using this guide http://docs.opennebula.org/4.8/administration/storage/gluster_ds.html. where by i just do normal mount via fstab and create empty system and images in the sunstone. it works. by the way is that correct way or i still need to ensure the details of gluster must be in the sunstone setting? my first attempt did not work that time. On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Javier Fontan jfon...@opennebula.org wrote: GlusterFS is a bit different to the other shared storage as it needs to see the same files in both the system and images datastores. It needs both. Cluster 0 Mount gluster_vol_0 in /storage Link /storage - /var/lib/one/datastores/100 (system) Link /storage - /var/lib/one/datastores/101 (images) Cluster 1 Mount gluster_vol_1 in /storage Link /storage - /var/lib/one/datastores/102 (system) Link /storage - /var/lib/one/datastores/103 (images) Cluster 2 Mount gluster_vol_2 in /storage Link /storage - /var/lib/one/datastores/104 (system) Link /storage - /var/lib/one/datastores/105 (images) Frontend Mount gluster_vol_0 in /storage/0 Mount gluster_vol_0 in /storage/1 Mount gluster_vol_0 in /storage/2 Link /storage/0 - /var/lib/one/datastores/100 (system) Link /storage/0 - /var/lib/one/datastores/101 (images) Link /storage/1 - /var/lib/one/datastores/102 (system) Link /storage/1 - /var/lib/one/datastores/103 (images) Link /storage/2 - /var/lib/one/datastores/104 (system) Link /storage/2- /var/lib/one/datastores/105 (images) On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Amier Anis myma...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Team, I would like to know little bit more about system datastore + gluster and cluster. node 0 - FrontEnd node 1 - Hypervisor 1 node 2 - Hypervisor 2 Cluster 1 node 3 Hypervisor 3 node 4 Hypervisor 4 Cluster 2 node 5 Hypervisor 5 node 6 Hypervisor 6 GlusterFS Storage 1 - mount to frontend to datastore 0 GlusterFS Storage 2 - mount to frontend to datastore 100 - for Cluster 1 GlusterFS Storage 3 - mount to frontend to datastore 101 - for Cluster 2 I believe that all glusterfs storage need to mount to Frontend and hypervisor node. my question is Should I mount datastore 0 to all hypervisor node even it is clusters? or Do i only mount for each datastore to each clusters. let say GlusterFS Storage 1 for non-cluster node, glusterfs 2 for cluster 2 and etc. In cluster 1, I only mount glusterfs 2 and set it as system datastore and image datastore. no datastore 0,1,2 in cluster 2. Which is the proper one? How do I set glusterfs as system and image datastore in opennebula. I only can set images datastore. Thanks in advance your kind help. Thanks you. Regards Best Wishes, .: Amier Anis :. Mobile: +6012-260-0819 IMPORTANT: This e-mail (including any attachment hereto) is intended solely for the addressee and is confidential and privileged. If this should have been sent to you in error, you are not to reproduce, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Kindly notify us and delete the e-mail and all attachments immediately. As e-mail and/or attachments may contain viruses and other interfering or damaging elements, the receipt and/or downloading of e-mail and/or attachments will be at your own risk and we accept no liability for any damage sustained as a result of any such viruses; you should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Javier Fontán Muiños Developer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] ONE Virtual Router routing from inside to outside
Hi, I have a Virtual Router Appliance working with a VLAN isolated (powered by open vSwitch) network of VMs. I can route/forward from the outside network to the inner VMs. Now I am facing the requirement to make a connection from a VM inside the isolation network to a VM in the outside world. Is there an easy or defined way to do that (e.g. easily activating NATting in the VR appliance)? Or would I rather have to build something on my own with iptables etc? Cheers, Christian --- Christian Hüning, BSc. Fakultät Technik und Informatik, Department Informatik Berliner Tor 7 20099 Hamburg Tel.: +49 40 / 42875 - 8436 Mobil: +49 40 / 180 55 44 5 Web: http://www.mars-group.org http://www.mars-group.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
