Re: [one-users] Sunstone on ONE 4.2 shows no virtual machines
Hi, Could you check in the browser developer console if there is any error? Cheers On 10 February 2015 at 18:00, Andreas Calvo andreas.ca...@scytl.com wrote: Hello, Since this morning, our Opennebula 4.2 Sunstone portal shows no virtual machines. The rest of the information (hosts, networks, templates, images, users, ACLs) are displayed correctly. Looking at the logs doesn't give much hint, all requests are 2xx and no error are handled either in sunstone.error or oned.error. Issuing a onevm list as the oneadmin users shows the current list of VMs running. Any hint or file to look? Thanks -- Andreas Calvo Gómez Systems Engineer Skype/ andreas.calvo.gomez M/ +34 638 499 063 P/ +34 934 230 324 F/ +34 933 251 028 Scytl Secure Electronic Voting Plaça Gal·la Placidia, 1-3, 1st floor · 08006 Barcelona http://www.scytl.com NOTICE: The information in this e-mail and in any of its attachments is confidential and intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or retaining of this message or any part of it, without the prior written consent of Scytl Secure Electronic Voting, SA is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- -- Daniel Molina Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | dmol...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] DataTables warning message Sunstone
I'm experimenting something similar. Which version and base operating system are you using? Sent from OWA on Android From: Users users-boun...@lists.opennebula.org on behalf of Stefan Kooman ste...@bit.nl Sent: 11 February 2015 22:32:33 To: users@lists.opennebula.org Subject: [one-users] DataTables warning message Sunstone Hi List, If I log into sunstone (as oneadmin) I receive the following message: DataTables warning: table id=datatable_marketplace - Requested unknown parameter 'files.0.os-arch' for row 27. For more information about this error, please see http://datatables.net/tn/4 Is this (public) marketplace related or is something else messed up? Anyone has ever seen this? Gr. Stefan -- | BIT BV http://www.bit.nl/Kamer van Koophandel 09090351 | GPG: 0xD14839C6 +31 318 648 688 / i...@bit.nl ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Official Debian packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, just for information, I know there is a pre-compiled version of OpenNebula in your repository, but in the official Debian repository there is only an old version of OpenNebula for Wheezy (3.4) and only the contextualization package for the upcoming Jessie. There is any plan to have the package in the official Jessie repository? Thank you, Alberto -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU27s7AAoJEAzproFXfBTIFYUP/1mw1jw5K4EXk+ZRQS4PWEua CWQMj1AiMYEzct4v8DhblfW5iOrIHpf3DmQmn+ETv0sVip3hEYfL/KbhJSkgk/9L ZxrQ6qIo4Eqz3YLe+DGdy/YWdCm0yQ33PZvx0MLU2Jgcm15GtNeteVaqMhtyQcb4 RHI9e4n2qK+LvDMy0IIpLneDPN94NG9gQYz6ZHYNR0sZDhhPolB8unZdUXUjqqeS phOcQi3YyaH4WI8XGEJoOtOvNXFN5XHUZhlj1Y7VWEo7bo2+n+bvEhcrYkIVJt1c 7e9cr66pfPoq3HYMf4a/KIota18af/XunDqrOk1wio2ihI1276oY8lZ6/sC48a5p SELnkXNRxebqxX65KLVMaIWzi9u3DwO0IuwfcpNdjcEMXGq/sf0SWGJv3etIbgFD cIbymbxdEmr5KR6H6ys0hB/kzkdv92nzozalUgXzHYLGGuMgeOLGy3NlsY8qiLNO 9lFKE1KKPu6bh5NWprwdw808B8QgJapHQJanOIMLf6TC3Z+t9M0EuUGkhJXNPWze wQ6rKdTMDHe7AamUHDaFhTaoRbVGWMSqW0RMGEYDUuPyierkwz7s9Iq1c/HpsQeY FqIjyjYsqV6ZnNVgUveFGFjBh5bLAudqagKOneISwSF42Cq2VkfofIKmA4X6krAs C8Iq3FjKc4+DW+V0j4PP =Eq+K -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] DataTables warning message Sunstone
Hi List, If I log into sunstone (as oneadmin) I receive the following message: DataTables warning: table id=datatable_marketplace - Requested unknown parameter 'files.0.os-arch' for row 27. For more information about this error, please see http://datatables.net/tn/4 Is this (public) marketplace related or is something else messed up? Anyone has ever seen this? Gr. Stefan -- | BIT BV http://www.bit.nl/Kamer van Koophandel 09090351 | GPG: 0xD14839C6 +31 318 648 688 / i...@bit.nl pgpoYcY5Z6mqi.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] DataTables warning popup
Hello, I started getting this JS popup when logging to opennebula portal. This happens on 4.8 and 4.10 DataTables warning (table id = 'datatable_marketplace'): Requested unknown parameter 'files.0.os-arch' from the data source for row 27 It is easy to reproduce when going to marketplace and refresh Is there a solution to this? Best regards Karol ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] DataTables warning message Sunstone
Andreas Calvo andreas.ca...@scytl.com schreef op 11 februari 2015 22:36:44 CET: I'm experimenting something similar. Which version and base operating system are you using? Ubuntu Trusty 14.04 LTS, ONE 4.10.1 Gr. Stefan -- BIT BV http://www.bit.nl/Kamer van Koophandel 09090351 | GPG: 0xD14839C6 +31 318 648 688 / i...@bit.nl ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Looking for support for Sheepdog in Opennebula
Hello, I was wondering what the status of Sheepdog integration in Opennebula is? I have seen the old [0] and new [1] pull request and wonder when the new one will be merged? According to the bugtracker [2], Sheepdog support already exists in Opennebula and the patch originates from May 2014 [3]. We are very keen on testing the sheepdog backend, so if there was a pre-release with sheepdog, we could give you instantly feedback. Cheers, Nico [0] https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/pull/25 [1] https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/pull/40 [2] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/1118 [3] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.distributed.opennebula.devel/120 -- New PGP key: 659B 0D91 E86E 7E24 FD15 69D0 C729 21A1 293F 2D24 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Deleting vcenter VM's in POWEROFF state leaves stray VM's on cluster
Hi Sebastiaan, We are trying to reproduce this problem. From the log it looks like the VM went to poweroff state on its own. Did you power it off from the vCenter? Best, -Tino On Tue Feb 10 2015 at 1:04:33 PM Sebastiaan Smit b...@echelon.nl wrote: Hi list, I’ve encountered strange behavior with my vcenter 4.10.2 demo setup. When I delete a VM which is in POWEROFF state, it disappears as expected from OpenNebula, but remains in poweroff state on my vcenter cluster. The last log lines of the VM are the following: Wed Feb 4 22:32:47 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver operation: pre. Wed Feb 4 22:41:23 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: Successfully execute virtualization driver operation: deploy. Wed Feb 4 22:41:23 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver operation: post. Wed Feb 4 22:41:23 2015 [Z0][LCM][I]: New VM state is RUNNING Tue Feb 10 12:55:06 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: VM running but monitor state is POWEROFF Tue Feb 10 12:55:06 2015 [Z0][DiM][I]: New VM state is POWEROFF Tue Feb 10 12:56:18 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: VM running but monitor state is POWEROFF Tue Feb 10 12:57:30 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: VM running but monitor state is POWEROFF Tue Feb 10 12:57:37 2015 [Z0][DiM][I]: New VM state is DONE. Tue Feb 10 12:57:37 2015 [Z0][LCM][E]: epilog_success_action, VM in a wrong state Has anybody else encountered the same situation? Thanks in advance, -- Sebastiaan Smit Echelon BV E: b...@echelon.nl T: (088) 3243566 (hoofdnummer) T: (088) 3243505 (servicedesk) F: (053) 4336222 W: www.echelon.nl KVK: 06055381 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Deleting vcenter VM's in POWEROFF state leaves stray VM's on cluster
Hi Sebastiaan, Thanks a lot for the testing, this is precious feedback. In this I'm afraid that, by design, and to maintain compatibility with other hypervisors, we cannot change the OpenNebula assumption that if the VM is in poweroff, OpenNebula thinks it has been removed from the hypervisor. There are two alternatives: * at the time of powering off in vCenter, unregister it as well * poweron the VM first, and then delete it Best, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc VP of Engineering | Head of Research at OpenNebula Systems cvazquez@OpenNebula.Systems | @OpenNebula -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of OpenNebula.Systems S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at abuse@opennebula.systems and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. OpenNebula's thanks you for your cooperation. On 11 February 2015 at 11:55, Sebastiaan Smit b...@echelon.nl wrote: Hi Tino, Yes I did. It was a robustness check. One detected the poweroff state, but was not able to clean it up after removal. Best, Sebastiaan Op 11 feb. 2015 om 11:09 heeft Tino Vazquez cvazquez@opennebula.systems het volgende geschreven: Hi Sebastiaan, We are trying to reproduce this problem. From the log it looks like the VM went to poweroff state on its own. Did you power it off from the vCenter? Best, -Tino On Tue Feb 10 2015 at 1:04:33 PM Sebastiaan Smit b...@echelon.nl wrote: Hi list, I’ve encountered strange behavior with my vcenter 4.10.2 demo setup. When I delete a VM which is in POWEROFF state, it disappears as expected from OpenNebula, but remains in poweroff state on my vcenter cluster. The last log lines of the VM are the following: Wed Feb 4 22:32:47 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver operation: pre. Wed Feb 4 22:41:23 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: Successfully execute virtualization driver operation: deploy. Wed Feb 4 22:41:23 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver operation: post. Wed Feb 4 22:41:23 2015 [Z0][LCM][I]: New VM state is RUNNING Tue Feb 10 12:55:06 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: VM running but monitor state is POWEROFF Tue Feb 10 12:55:06 2015 [Z0][DiM][I]: New VM state is POWEROFF Tue Feb 10 12:56:18 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: VM running but monitor state is POWEROFF Tue Feb 10 12:57:30 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: VM running but monitor state is POWEROFF Tue Feb 10 12:57:37 2015 [Z0][DiM][I]: New VM state is DONE. Tue Feb 10 12:57:37 2015 [Z0][LCM][E]: epilog_success_action, VM in a wrong state Has anybody else encountered the same situation? Thanks in advance, -- Sebastiaan Smit Echelon BV E: b...@echelon.nl T: (088) 3243566 (hoofdnummer) T: (088) 3243505 (servicedesk) F: (053) 4336222 W: www.echelon.nl KVK: 06055381 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Getting an HTTP-Error: 500 when executing oneacct -g group
Hello, We are having an issue with oneacct command when we try to get the accounting for a group, for example: [oneadmin@cloud ~]$ oneacct -g ops ops HTTP-Error: 500 Internal Server Error [oneadmin@cloud ~]$ oneacct -g fedcloud.egi.eu fedcloud.egi.eu HTTP-Error: 500 Internal Server Error As far as we have been told, it seems the issue it is hidden deep in libxmlrpc and has almost nothing to do with OpenNebula or its version. The problem is this (briefly): Once the VM history goes over approx. 40k of VMs, libxmlrpc will refuse to allocate enough memory for some OpenNebula responses to RPC commands. Also, the solution proposed is to compile OpenNebula against a newer and patched version of libxmlrpc but to be honest, I would prefer avoid this solution. I understand this is not an OpenNebula issue but I wonder if as OpenNebula developers you have seen this issue before and it there is any other better solution. Also, if some other site has experiment this issue, I would like to know which was the solution applied. Any help is welcome on this since we need to solve this issue asap :) Thanks in advance, Esteban -- ++-++ Esteban Freire García Centro de supercomputación de Galicia Avda. de Vigo s/n. Campus Vida 15705 - Santiago de Compostela. Spain Tlfn.: 981 56 98 10 Extension:274 Fax: 981 59 46 16 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Deleting vcenter VM's in POWEROFF state leaves stray VM's on cluster
Hi Tino, Yes I did. It was a robustness check. One detected the poweroff state, but was not able to clean it up after removal. Best, Sebastiaan Op 11 feb. 2015 om 11:09 heeft Tino Vazquez cvazquez@opennebula.systemsmailto:cvazquez@opennebula.systems het volgende geschreven: Hi Sebastiaan, We are trying to reproduce this problem. From the log it looks like the VM went to poweroff state on its own. Did you power it off from the vCenter? Best, -Tino On Tue Feb 10 2015 at 1:04:33 PM Sebastiaan Smit b...@echelon.nlmailto:b...@echelon.nl wrote: Hi list, I’ve encountered strange behavior with my vcenter 4.10.2 demo setup. When I delete a VM which is in POWEROFF state, it disappears as expected from OpenNebula, but remains in poweroff state on my vcenter cluster. The last log lines of the VM are the following: Wed Feb 4 22:32:47 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver operation: pre. Wed Feb 4 22:41:23 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: Successfully execute virtualization driver operation: deploy. Wed Feb 4 22:41:23 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver operation: post. Wed Feb 4 22:41:23 2015 [Z0][LCM][I]: New VM state is RUNNING Tue Feb 10 12:55:06 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: VM running but monitor state is POWEROFF Tue Feb 10 12:55:06 2015 [Z0][DiM][I]: New VM state is POWEROFF Tue Feb 10 12:56:18 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: VM running but monitor state is POWEROFF Tue Feb 10 12:57:30 2015 [Z0][VMM][I]: VM running but monitor state is POWEROFF Tue Feb 10 12:57:37 2015 [Z0][DiM][I]: New VM state is DONE. Tue Feb 10 12:57:37 2015 [Z0][LCM][E]: epilog_success_action, VM in a wrong state Has anybody else encountered the same situation? Thanks in advance, -- Sebastiaan Smit Echelon BV E: b...@echelon.nlmailto:b...@echelon.nl T: (088) 3243566 (hoofdnummer) T: (088) 3243505 (servicedesk) F: (053) 4336222 W: www.echelon.nlhttp://www.echelon.nl/ KVK: 06055381 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.orgmailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi Carlos,
Below is the last few lines of output before it throwing the error. How do I
proceed to troubleshoot on this.
row[:ip]: 3391983169
doc:
LEASEIP3391983169/IPMAC_PREFIX512/MAC_PREFIXMAC_SUFFIX3391983169/MAC_SUFFIXUSED1/USEDVID1371/VID/LEASE
row[:ip]: 3391983218
doc:
LEASEIP3391983218/IPMAC_PREFIX512/MAC_PREFIXMAC_SUFFIX3391983218/MAC_SUFFIXUSED1/USEDVID1372/VID/LEASE
Exception `ArgumentError' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/ipaddr.rb:481 - address family
mismatch
address family mismatch
Error running fsck version 4.2.0
The database will be restored
--
Regards,
Anandharaj
Server Storage Support Team
MIMOS Berhad
From: Carlos Martín Sánchez [mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 10:49 PM
To: Anandharaj Subramaniam
Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: Re: [one-users] Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi,
I don't know what can be causing the error. Can you to add the following lines
right before line 929 in /usr/lib/one/ruby/onedb/fsck.rb?
warn
warn row[:ip]: #{row[:ip]}
warn doc: #{doc.to_s}
https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/blob/release-4.2/src/onedb/fsck.rb#L929
Maybe that will show if there is something wrong with that IP that is throwing
the error.
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.orghttp://www.OpenNebula.org |
cmar...@opennebula.orgmailto:cmar...@opennebula.org |
@OpenNebulahttp://twitter.com/opennebula
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Anandharaj Subramaniam
anandharaj.man...@mimos.mymailto:anandharaj.man...@mimos.my wrote:
Hi Carlos,
What is your ruby version?
== ruby 1.8.7 (2011-06-30 patchlevel 352) [x86_64-linux]
Are all of your leases IPv4?
== Yes, all IPv4
--
Regards,
Anandharaj
From: Carlos Martín Sánchez
[mailto:cmar...@opennebula.orgmailto:cmar...@opennebula.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:55 PM
To: Anandharaj Subramaniam
Cc: users@lists.opennebula.orgmailto:users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: Re: [one-users] Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi,
What is your ruby version?
Are all of your leases IPv4?
Regards
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.orghttp://www.OpenNebula.org |
cmar...@opennebula.orgmailto:cmar...@opennebula.org |
@OpenNebulahttp://twitter.com/opennebula
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Anandharaj Subramaniam
anandharaj.man...@mimos.mymailto:anandharaj.man...@mimos.my wrote:
Hi All,
When I run using debug mode, I see this message.
….
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sequel-3.46.0/lib/sequel/dataset/actions.rb:151:
warning: instance variable @row_proc not initialized
VNet 25 has used lease 10.1.66.8 (VM 858) but it is free
Exception `ArgumentError' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/ipaddr.rb:481 - address family
mismatch
address family mismatch
Error running fsck version 4.2.0
The database will be restored
--
Regards,
Anandharaj
From: Anandharaj Subramaniam
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 7:34 PM
To: users@lists.opennebula.orgmailto:users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: RE: Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi All,
I restored the mysql database and run the onedb fsck, still the process
terminate with “Error running fsck version 4.2.0” but the messages of the
inconsistency is less.
Appreciate the expert help on this.
Note: We are still using 4.2 because we have our own apps integrated with it.
We already have plan to setup another ONE with version 4.10
--
Regards,
Anandharaj
MIMOS Bhd
From: Anandharaj Subramaniam
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 3:36 PM
To: users@lists.opennebula.orgmailto:users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: RE: Image in used state but no VM associte with it
Hi All,
When I run onedb fck, got the following messages but ended with error.
[oneadmin@server 101]$ onedb fsck -f -S localhost -u oneadmin -d opennebula
MySQL Password:
MySQL dump stored in /var/lib/one/mysql_localhost_opennebula.sql
Use 'onedb restore' or restore the DB using the mysql command:
mysql -u user -h server -P port db_name backup_file
Host 20 is in Cluster 101 host id list, but it should not
VM 373 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 401 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 522 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 531 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 585 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 612 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 655 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 705 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 763 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 787 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 797 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 828 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 964 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 1065 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 1070 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 1199 is using Host 20, but it does not exist
VM 1211 is using VNet 121, but it does not exist
VM 1216 is using VNet 121, but it does not exist
VM 1243 is using
