[one-users] Deploying Sunstone in different machine
Dear All, I tried to deploy sunstone server in another server by referring to this [1] Front-end - CentOS 6.5 (IP Address: 192.168.113.214) Sunstone-server - Ubuntu 12.04 (IP Address: 192.168.113.172) This is the steps I had taken: 1. add repo and apt-get update on (.172) 2. apt-get install opennebula-sunstone on (.172) 3. disable selinux and firewall on front-end (.214) 4. copy sunstone.auth from front-end to 192.168.113.172:/var/lib/one/.one 5. modify (.172) sunstone-server :one_xmlrpc: http://192.168.113.214:2633/RPC2 6. start sunstone-server on .172 7. try to login in sunstone - got error The error in the log: [UserPoolInfo] User couldn't be authenticated, aborting call. Is there any steps I have missing? Thank you Regards, Fazli [1] http://docs.opennebula.org/4.6/advanced_administration/scalability/suns_advance.html#deploying-sunstone-in-a-different-machine ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Sunstone server crash on ruby
Hi, The problem is now solve after I upgrade my ruby from 1.9.3 to 2.1.1 using RVM. Thank you On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Daniel Molina dmol...@opennebula.orgwrote: Hi, On 7 April 2014 06:39, M Fazli A Jalaluddin fazli.jalalud...@gmail.comwrote: My current version for OpenNebula is 4.4.1 and my ruby is currently 1.9.3p0 I have been experiencing some bug in ruby that would crash Sunstone Server several times. May I know if the problem is because of ruby version 1.9.3p0 or ruby 1.9.1 because my ruby version is 1.9.3p0 (ruby --version) but in log file (sunstone.error), it shows 1.9.1 most of the time. Attached is the sunstone.error dump. It looks like a bug in ruby, could you try upgrading your ruby version Cheers -- Daniel Molina Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | dmol...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Hybrid Cloud (OpenNebula + Amazon EC2)
Hi all, I would like to ask some questions, it might sound silly but here goes; 1. I have very little knowledge about hybrid cloud, so I watched this youtube video [1] and the question is, the VM that was instantiated is resides on EC2 or OpenNebula? 2. If the VM is on EC2, is it free or I have to pay per use? Also can I accessed it from anywhere (public cloud) provided I have Internet connection? 3. As far as I know, EC2 use .ami image. Do I have to convert my image from .qcow2 to .ami? Thank you Best regards, Fazli [1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U01dw_crqRc ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] BSOD when deploy Windows XP VM in OpenNebula 4.2
Thank you for your suggestion regarding the controller. I have change the IDE controller in VirtualBox to ICH6 [1] and I was able to boot Windows XP properly on OpenNebula. Best regards [1] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1437758 On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Lorenzo Faleschini lorenzo.falesch...@nordestsystems.com wrote: If you've created the XP machine in VBox it's easy that it has been configured with IDE channel. So it's a matter of controller if BSOD, not matter of QCOW2 or RAW image. to boot in ONE just set DEV_PREFIX=hda in the template or in the image of your xp machine. if still not booting check if you uninstalled the VBoxTools before converting it. if you want (and you better do so if you want a bit of performance) switch to virtio controller for storage you have to do the following steps (in order to let the poor xp load correctly the drivers) - boot xp using DEV_PREFIX=hd in order to test if it works correctly - shutdown and add any image (eg: a cdrom) with virtio DEV_PREFIX=vd - when it loads XP will find a new hardware and ask you for drivers: load them from the virtio cdrom http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/virtio-win/latest/images/ this will let XP know how to access a VirtIO SCSI drive in boot phase - shutdown after installing drivers, remove the fake image you used with vd prefix, and change DEV_PREFIX=vd for the WinXP System drive image - instantiate and enjoy xp with virtio bye (this works for win 7 too) Il 30/11/2013 02:15, M Fazli A Jalaluddin ha scritto: Hi, I also have deployed Windows 7 qcow2 format on OpenNebula without the any problem. which I used VirtualBox to create the image first and convert it from .vdi to .qcow2 using qemu-utils. May I know how to use IDE instead? PS: I have tried using both qcow2 and raw format but still blue screen. The Blue screen appears shortly after the Windows XP loading bar splash screen. Best regards On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Shankhadeep Shome shank15...@gmail.comwrote: For windows VMs you need to make sure the correct virtio block drivers are installed, you might get lucky with using ide instead. Remove the virtualbox guest tools before moving the vm over. On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 6:25 AM, André Monteiro andre.mont...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I have some experience on Windows machines, and all are running on qcow2 without problems. When does exactly the VM blue screen appears? While not discarding a qemu problem, Windows OS is very sensible to hardware changes and the problem can be at the loading drivers step, which are not part of the new system. I have two suggestions: - Try to replicate Virtualbox hardware as close as possible on OpenNebula and boot in Safe Mode - Try to install a clean image on OpenNebula to check XP compatibility Regards, -- André Monteiro On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:34 AM, M Fazli A Jalaluddin fazli.jalalud...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I was trying to install Windows XP in VirtualBox and convert it to qcow2. After I upload the qcow2 image to OpenNebula and instantiate the template, the image goes BSOD while in Virtualbox, the VM works fine. I done some google and found out that there was some bug in qemu which cause this [1]. Is there any possible solutions to this? Please help advise. Thank you Best regards [1] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1437758 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing listUsers@lists.opennebula.orghttp://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Lorenzo Faleschini Responsabile Sistemi Informativi skype: falegalizeit mobile: +39 335 6055225 tel: +39 0427 807934 fax: +39 0434 1820145 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] BSOD when deploy Windows XP VM in OpenNebula 4.2
Dear All, I was trying to install Windows XP in VirtualBox and convert it to qcow2. After I upload the qcow2 image to OpenNebula and instantiate the template, the image goes BSOD while in Virtualbox, the VM works fine. I done some google and found out that there was some bug in qemu which cause this [1]. Is there any possible solutions to this? Please help advise. Thank you Best regards [1] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1437758 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] BSOD when deploy Windows XP VM in OpenNebula 4.2
Hi, I also have deployed Windows 7 qcow2 format on OpenNebula without the any problem. which I used VirtualBox to create the image first and convert it from .vdi to .qcow2 using qemu-utils. May I know how to use IDE instead? PS: I have tried using both qcow2 and raw format but still blue screen. The Blue screen appears shortly after the Windows XP loading bar splash screen. Best regards On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Shankhadeep Shome shank15...@gmail.comwrote: For windows VMs you need to make sure the correct virtio block drivers are installed, you might get lucky with using ide instead. Remove the virtualbox guest tools before moving the vm over. On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 6:25 AM, André Monteiro andre.mont...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I have some experience on Windows machines, and all are running on qcow2 without problems. When does exactly the VM blue screen appears? While not discarding a qemu problem, Windows OS is very sensible to hardware changes and the problem can be at the loading drivers step, which are not part of the new system. I have two suggestions: - Try to replicate Virtualbox hardware as close as possible on OpenNebula and boot in Safe Mode - Try to install a clean image on OpenNebula to check XP compatibility Regards, -- André Monteiro On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:34 AM, M Fazli A Jalaluddin fazli.jalalud...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I was trying to install Windows XP in VirtualBox and convert it to qcow2. After I upload the qcow2 image to OpenNebula and instantiate the template, the image goes BSOD while in Virtualbox, the VM works fine. I done some google and found out that there was some bug in qemu which cause this [1]. Is there any possible solutions to this? Please help advise. Thank you Best regards [1] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1437758 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] USB Redirection and Sound Driver in OpenNebula's VMs
I am using Ubuntu Desktop 12.04 64-bit. I have installed this packages, qemu-kvm-spice in a node which then I was able to connect to the VMs by using spicy in a host (installed with spice-client-gtk) Also, by follow your links, I have installed additional packages by using sudo apt-get install; seabios libusb-1.0-0 libusb-1.0-0-dev libusbredir libusbredir-dev libspice-protocol-dev libspice-server-dev libspice-client-glib-2.0-4 libspice-client-glib-2.0-dev libspice-client-gtk-2.0-1 libspice-client-gtk-2.0-dev libspice-client-gtk-3.0-1 libspice-client-gtk-3.0-dev python-spice-client-gtk spice-client-gtk I am a newbies in Linux so my knowledge might not sufficient. Thank you On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Carlo Daffara carlo.daff...@cloudweavers.eu wrote: Which linux distribution are you using? Under Ubuntu you will have to install additional packages or compile your own: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/spice cheers, carlo - Messaggio originale - Da: M Fazli A Jalaluddin fazli.jalalud...@gmail.com A: Carlos Martín Sánchez cmar...@opennebula.org Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org Inviato: Mercoledì, 23 ottobre 2013 4:23:43 Oggetto: Re: [one-users] USB Redirection and Sound Driver in OpenNebula's VMs Hi, Thanks for the reply. Yes, I have refer to the post, but my spicy client do not have this input options: Inline image 1 This is my spicy client looks like: Inline image 2 BTW, my spicy version is 0.9 Thank you. Best Regards On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Carlos Martín Sánchez cmar...@opennebula.org wrote: Hi, In this post Carlo Daffara explained in detail how to setup USB redirection: http://blog.opennebula.org/?p=5136 Best regards -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:41 AM, M Fazli A Jalaluddin fazli.jalalud...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, My current configuration is using OpenNebula 4.2 and KVM as its hypervisor. May I know any options on enabling USB redirection and sound in Windows VMs? I have tried to use SPICE and spicy gtk-client. Is there any further configuration needed to enable the features? Thank you in advance. Best regards ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] USB Redirection and Sound Driver in OpenNebula's VMs
Hi all, My current configuration is using OpenNebula 4.2 and KVM as its hypervisor. May I know any options on enabling USB redirection and sound in Windows VMs? I have tried to use SPICE and spicy gtk-client. Is there any further configuration needed to enable the features? Thank you in advance. Best regards ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] OpenNebula and DHCP Server
Hi Valentin, Your assumption is correct. My method is to use OpenNebula Virtual Router by refer to this page [1] and Openvswitch. I have installed Openvswitch in the host and I was able to deploy VM in isolated network. I try to deploy the VirtualRouter in a virtual network. My problem is, I cannot ping it and cannot SSH into it. From the documentation, I understand that the VirtualRouter needs to be deploy as a VM in a specific virtual network and it will act as the DHCP for the VMs in the same virtual network. I also have included the example context in the VirtualRouter template. My VirtualRouter template: NIC=[NETWORK_ID=0] NIC=[NETWORK_ID=9,IP=10.0.10.1] INPUT=[BUS=usb,TYPE=tablet] MEMORY=512 OS=[ARCH=x86_64,BOOT=hd] GRAPHICS=[LISTEN=0.0.0.0,TYPE=SPICE] DISK=[IMAGE_ID=24] CPU=0.5 CONTEXT=[TARGET=hdb,NETWORK=YES,FORWARDING=8080:10.0.10.2:80 10.0.10.2:22,DHCP=YES,PRIVNET=$NETWORK[TEMPLATE, NETWORK=\ovs .10\],TEMPLATE=TEMPLATE,SSH_PUBLIC_KEY=ssh-rsa B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAABAQCk+MN96iAn4uXRieJqyJG7WY32zW0LTXJBdISdjDLlp8QgFrxOdi9Aw2+eu+QSbVHwBsqOTimpOuzknisOhD4RPCTCT7G2/xaEUxWg0AB3ySrMZC3Dv5AgBy0CikFk50/CbwBtMjj2pRINm0axfP+cUT/VBhJRAiwVe2wsIOL/t2PGOy0O8Q2zjG1XfCVZPCYPOxj9Jk0y8DoMHp0ILA6gM7hGN4CKAQiXnbjv8WD9uFpRr7eruXQUdMuPn2wnyDMcCnzUEMtPUoPIy6gyAer3biRyEQkAXNJ+R1WXvX6Ah848MTyoICoA7KKIm9e3xe/SXMJxxOPHZLWSJSIRmhcd hpc1@hpc-workstation1,PUBNET=$NETWORK[TEMPLATE, NETWORK=\Virtual Network .113\],DNS=8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4] May I know how to actually use the VirtualRouter? [1] http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.2:router On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Valentin Bud valentin@gmail.com wrote: Hello Fazli, I will make some assumptions about your infrastructure and provide possible approach(es). * Your KVM nodes have a single Ethernet interface, eth0, connected in a switch and a router used as the default gateway for the 192.168.1/24 network, * Also the frontend is connected via the same switch with the rest of the nodes, * You have a br0 bridge with eth0 connected to it on each node and also the frontend, * Your frontend is also a node. If you have access to the router the simplest way would be to add an IP Address alias on the router interface as the default gateway for the new network. Configure a new network inside OpenNebula for that using the chosen subnet and the same bridge, br0. I don't know if you have any kind of security policies in place but be careful that in this way there is no Layer 2 separation and traffic between the two subnets is visible with tcpdump or other sniffers. The second approach I can think about is to have the frontend configured with the first IP Address from the new subnet on br0 and define a new network inside OpenNebula like the above. I don't know if this would work though.The NAT must be done for 10.100.0/24 over 192.168.1.X (the IP Address of frontend from 192.168.1/24 subnet). What I don't know is if iptables can MASQUERADE subnets on the same interface. Never tried it, it might work. Another approach that come to mind is to use the Virtual Router and define a new subnet on the same br0 bridge. The Virtual Router would have an interface connected to 192.168.1/24 network and one in the 10.100.0/24 one. Setup it up to have the first IP Address from the 10.100.0/24 network so it is the default gateway. The same applies, traffic over L2 is not separated in anyway. One more idea :-) would be to use Open vSwitch and GRE tunnels between the nodes. In this way you can use VLANs and transport over GRE between nodes. You can also setup IPSec encrypted GRE tunnels if you want security. It might be overkill but again it depends on your requirements. Another working setup I have done is to use tinc VPN [1] between nodes in switch mode and connect it to the Open vSwitch from each host as a port. This way traffic that travels between nodes is fully encrypted and you can use the same L2 network in a secure fashion. But maybe the best approach would be to have a second network card, eth1, in each node. Connect that second card in an Open vSwitch and use VLANs with the frontend being the router, or any other node for that matter. [1]: http://www.tinc-vpn.org/ Good Will, Valentin On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:18:41AM +0800, M Fazli A Jalaluddin wrote: Hello Valentin, My setup for OpenNebula is 1 Front-end and several KVM nodes. The front-end and nodes are using IP address 192.168.1.xxx and are able to connect to the internet. The current networking setup for the VM is using dummy and bridge, br0. So, for the VM able to access to the internet, is by assigning them 192.168.1.xxx IP addresses. If I have many VMs, IP address 192.168.1.xxx will be depleted. Hence, I need to make a new private network such as, 10.0.1.xxx which will map to only a single 192.168.1.xxx, e.g 192.168.1.5. Thank you. Regards, Fazli On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Valentin Bud
Re: [one-users] OpenNebula and DHCP Server
Hi, Is there any tutorial on how to use the VirtualRouter? I have download the image from Marketplace and Deploy a VM out of it. Then what should I do? My concern is that the Multiple VM will be able to be assigned a private IP address (at the same time connect to the internet) while the KVM host is using public IP address. Thank you On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Carlos Martín Sánchez cmar...@opennebula.org wrote: Hi, On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:56 AM, M Fazli A Jalaluddin fazli.jalalud...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, May I know if the Virtual Router provide NAT? Yes, look for the Full Router section in the documentation: http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.2:router PS: Please reply also to the mailing list Regards. -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebulahttp://twitter.com/opennebulacmar...@opennebula.org On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:56 AM, M Fazli A Jalaluddin fazli.jalalud...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, May I know if the Virtual Router provide NAT? Thank you On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Carlos Martín Sánchez cmar...@opennebula.org wrote: Hi, Actually, we do provide a Virtual Router appliance that contains a DHCP server. It knows the correct IP assigned by OpenNebula to each MAC. See http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.2:router Regards -- Join us at OpenNebulaConf2013 http://opennebulaconf.com in Berlin, 24-26 September, 2013 -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open-source Solution for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebulahttp://twitter.com/opennebulacmar...@opennebula.org On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Ionut Popovici io...@hackaserver.comwrote: No opennebula don't provide DHCP , you could use vlans to brake the network, and u can use contextualization to get the ip for virtual machines, if u use bridge mode is u should make rules in iptables(ebtables) for udp dst port 67 and allow only response from your DHCP server. Chears. On 9/5/2013 9:49 AM, Mohammad Fazli Ahmat Jalaluddin wrote: Hi guys, I just want to ask few questions. Does OpenNebula act as a DHCP Server and give IP address to the VM if it is not contextualized in the first place? When the VM is deploy (without context), e.g Ubuntu server default network configuration is using DHCP, and thus the IP for the VM is different with the one that OpenNebula uses from the vnet lease. Is the IP address in the VM is given by OpenNebula (act as the DHCP server) or given by our network existing DHCP server? The reason I'm asking is because our network is poisoned since there are 2 DHCP server. BTW, our OpenNebula configuration for the network is using dummy and using bridge in the frontend Thank you very much. Regards, Fazli ___ Users mailing listUsers@lists.opennebula.orghttp://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] OpenNebula and DHCP Server
Hello Valentin, My setup for OpenNebula is 1 Front-end and several KVM nodes. The front-end and nodes are using IP address 192.168.1.xxx and are able to connect to the internet. The current networking setup for the VM is using dummy and bridge, br0. So, for the VM able to access to the internet, is by assigning them 192.168.1.xxx IP addresses. If I have many VMs, IP address 192.168.1.xxx will be depleted. Hence, I need to make a new private network such as, 10.0.1.xxx which will map to only a single 192.168.1.xxx, e.g 192.168.1.5. Thank you. Regards, Fazli On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Valentin Bud valentin@gmail.com wrote: Hello Fazli, The Virtual Router documentation [1] is definitely a good place to start. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:57 PM, M Fazli A Jalaluddin fazli.jalalud...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is there any tutorial on how to use the VirtualRouter? I have download the image from Marketplace and Deploy a VM out of it. Then what should I do? My concern is that the Multiple VM will be able to be assigned a private IP address (at the same time connect to the internet) while the KVM host is using public IP address. I don't really understand your concern. Could you be more specific? Yes, every VM will get a private IP address from the Router in case you connect it to the private network. If you connect the VM to the public network too you'd have to setup the IP address on the VM. If context package is installed in the VM it'll autoconfigure the public IP also. [1]: http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.2:router Good Will, Thank you On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Carlos Martín Sánchez cmar...@opennebula.org wrote: Hi, On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:56 AM, M Fazli A Jalaluddin fazli.jalalud...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, May I know if the Virtual Router provide NAT? Yes, look for the Full Router section in the documentation: http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.2:router PS: Please reply also to the mailing list Regards. -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebulahttp://twitter.com/opennebulacmar...@opennebula.org On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:56 AM, M Fazli A Jalaluddin fazli.jalalud...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, May I know if the Virtual Router provide NAT? Thank you On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Carlos Martín Sánchez cmar...@opennebula.org wrote: Hi, Actually, we do provide a Virtual Router appliance that contains a DHCP server. It knows the correct IP assigned by OpenNebula to each MAC. See http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.2:router Regards -- Join us at OpenNebulaConf2013 http://opennebulaconf.com in Berlin, 24-26 September, 2013 -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open-source Solution for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebulahttp://twitter.com/opennebulacmar...@opennebula.org On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Ionut Popovici io...@hackaserver.comwrote: No opennebula don't provide DHCP , you could use vlans to brake the network, and u can use contextualization to get the ip for virtual machines, if u use bridge mode is u should make rules in iptables(ebtables) for udp dst port 67 and allow only response from your DHCP server. Chears. On 9/5/2013 9:49 AM, Mohammad Fazli Ahmat Jalaluddin wrote: Hi guys, I just want to ask few questions. Does OpenNebula act as a DHCP Server and give IP address to the VM if it is not contextualized in the first place? When the VM is deploy (without context), e.g Ubuntu server default network configuration is using DHCP, and thus the IP for the VM is different with the one that OpenNebula uses from the vnet lease. Is the IP address in the VM is given by OpenNebula (act as the DHCP server) or given by our network existing DHCP server? The reason I'm asking is because our network is poisoned since there are 2 DHCP server. BTW, our OpenNebula configuration for the network is using dummy and using bridge in the frontend Thank you very much. Regards, Fazli ___ Users mailing listUsers@lists.opennebula.orghttp://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Valentin Bud http://databus.pro | valen...@databus.pro ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http
