Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS vs Asterisk as SIP server

2015-07-26 Thread Qasim Ayyaz
The advantages are better performance and better low level control over 
underline sip communication.

Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from Warid.

-Original Message-
From: Nabeel 
Sender: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 11:34:12 
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Reply-To: OpenSIPS users mailling list 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS vs Asterisk as SIP server

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS vs Asterisk as SIP server

2015-07-26 Thread Schneur Rosenberg
One disadvantage is performance for example if you have too many
registrations on Asterisk the system will just crash.
On Jul 26, 2015 1:34 PM, "Nabeel"  wrote:

> Perhaps a better way to word my question: what are advantages of using
> OpenSIPS over Asterisk for a basic SIP service?
> On 25 Jul 2015 21:33, "Nabeel"  wrote:
>
>> I understand that Asterisk is a PBX but it also has core SIP
>> functionality.  What are the disadvantages of using Asterisk over OpenSIPS
>> for a basic SIP service?
>>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS vs Asterisk as SIP server

2015-07-26 Thread Nabeel
Perhaps a better way to word my question: what are advantages of using
OpenSIPS over Asterisk for a basic SIP service?
On 25 Jul 2015 21:33, "Nabeel"  wrote:

> I understand that Asterisk is a PBX but it also has core SIP
> functionality.  What are the disadvantages of using Asterisk over OpenSIPS
> for a basic SIP service?
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users