[Pw_forum] electron-phonon and nspin=2
Dear users, I have a question about el-ph calculation in magnetic systems (nspin). In PH/phq_readin.f90, there is the line IF (elph.AND.lsda) CALL errore ('phq_readin', 'El-ph and spin not & implemented', 1) that stops a el-ph calculation when nspin=2.. But having a look at the file PH/elphon.f90 (containing the routines elphon, elphel and elphsum) I think that the current implementation allows for such a calculation (unless really minor modifications are needed). In fact in the wavefunctions the spin is attached to the k point, and the scf perturbed potential dvscfin (i.e. dV_Hxc(is)) is always spin resolved. So the elph matrix-elements will be spin dependent through the k point, coupling always k and (k+q) states with the same spin. Of course one can always comment out the line, but my question is: Is there a particular reason for this call in PH/phq_readin.f90? Or is it just because k-summed quantities like total \lambda or the linewiths will not be printed in a spin resolved way? Thank for your answer, Andrea --- Dr. Andrea Floris Institut fuer Theoretische Physik Freie Universitaet Berlin Arnimallee 14 D-14195 Berlin Germany e-mail: andrea.floris at fu-berlin.de
[Pw_forum] Problems computing Cholesky decomposition
.733648000 0.0 1 1 1 C 13.943417765 16.100472000 0.0 1 1 1 C 16.267320726 14.758766000 0.0 1 1 1 C 11.619514804 20.12559 0.0 1 1 1 C 13.943417765 18.783884000 0.0 1 1 1 C 9.295611843 24.150708000 0.0 1 1 1 C 11.619514804 22.809002000 0.0 1 1 1 C 6.971708882 28.175826000 0.0 1 1 1 C 9.295611843 26.83412 0.0 1 1 1 C 27.886835530 0.0 0.0 1 1 1 C 30.210738491 -1.341706000 0.0 1 1 1 C 25.562932569 4.025118000 0.0 1 1 1 C 27.886835530 2.683412000 0.0 1 1 1 C 23.239029608 8.050236000 0.0 1 1 1 C 25.562932569 6.70853 0.0 1 1 1 C 20.915126647 12.075354000 0.0 1 1 1 C 23.239029608 10.733648000 0.0 1 1 1 C 18.591223687 16.100472000 0.0 1 1 1 C 20.915126647 14.758766000 0.0 1 1 1 C 16.267320726 20.12559 0.0 1 1 1 C 18.591223687 18.783884000 0.0 1 1 1 C 13.943417765 24.150708000 0.0 1 1 1 C 16.267320726 22.809002000 0.0 1 1 1 C 11.619514804 28.175826000 0.0 1 1 1 C 13.943417765 26.83412 0.0 1 1 1 C 32.534641451 0.0 0.0 1 1 1 C 34.858544412 -1.341706000 0.0 1 1 1 C 30.210738491 4.025118000 0.0 1 1 1 C 32.534641451 2.683412000 0.0 1 1 1 C 27.886835530 8.050236000 0.0 1 1 1 C 30.210738491 6.70853 0.0 1 1 1 C 25.562932569 12.075354000 0.0 1 1 1 C 27.886835530 10.733648000 0.0 1 1 1 C 23.239029608 16.100472000 0.0 1 1 1 C 25.562932569 14.758766000 0.0 1 1 1 C 20.915126647 20.12559 0.0 1 1 1 C 23.239029608 18.783884000 0.0 1 1 1 C 18.591223687 24.150708000 0.0 1 1 1 C 20.915126647 22.809002000 0.0 1 1 1 C 16.267320726 28.175826000 0.0 1 1 1 C 18.591223687 26.83412 0.0 1 1 1 C 2.323902961 12.075354000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 2.323902961 14.758766000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 4.647805922 8.050236000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 4.647805922 10.733648000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 4.647805922 16.100472000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 4.647805922 18.783884000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 6.971708882 12.075354000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 6.971708882 14.758766000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 6.971708882 6.70853 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 6.971708882 20.12559 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 9.295611843 8.050236000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 9.295611843 10.733648000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 9.295611843 16.100472000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 9.295611843 18.783884000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 11.619514804 6.70853 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 11.619514804 12.075354000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 11.619514804 14.758766000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 11.619514804 20.12559 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 13.943417765 8.050236000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 13.943417765 10.733648000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 13.943417765 16.100472000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 13.943417765 18.783884000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 16.267320726 12.075354000 6.670736000 1 1 1 C 16.267320726 14.758766000 6.670736000 1 1 1 K_POINTS automatic 7 7 1 0 0 0 Dr. Fedai Inanir Rize University Deparment of Physics Rize Turkey -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20091214/619cb4fa/attachment.htm
[Pw_forum] GIPAW and spin-density maps
Dear Paolo, Thank you for the explanation and the suggestion. Gregor > -Original Message- > From: pw_forum-bounces at pwscf.org > [mailto:pw_forum-bounces at pwscf.org] On Behalf Of Paolo Giannozzi > Sent: 12. december 2009 15:00 > To: PWSCF Forum > Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] GIPAW and spin-density maps > > > On Dec 9, 2009, at 9:01 , Gregor Mali wrote: > > > Are these reconstructed wavefunctions saved and can they be used by > > postprocessing routines to generate spin-density maps? > > reconstructed wavefunctions are not saved, and not even > calculated, AFAIK, because they consist of two pieces: a > "smooth" part, expanded into plane waves, and an > "augmentation part", defined on radial grids, centered around > the nuclear positions. The info needed to reconstruct > all-electron orbitals is available, though. > > Currently it is possible to plot reconstructed charge > densities using PAW (courtesy of Lorenzo) (PAW, not GIPAW), > but you need a very dense FFT grid to get decent plots. > > Paolo > --- > Paolo Giannozzi, Dept of Physics, University of Udine via > delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy Phone +39-0432-558216, > fax +39-0432-558222 > > > > ___ > Pw_forum mailing list > Pw_forum at pwscf.org > http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum >