[QE-users] SCF energy tolerance of GGA+U for Er2O3

2018-12-16 Thread David Foster
HiI used revpbe to optimize Er2O3 primitive cell. Everything is OK. Now, I need 
DFT+U for DOS and Band. SCF energy fluctuate as 
follows:=estimated scf accuracy    <  39.48681516 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  62.66497979 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  63.09572639 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  65.51102942 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  38.91981596 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  39.16118677 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  65.24746072 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  81.25768469 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  83.63928837 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  78.22312608 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  70.08066621 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  66.42158960 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  55.83405116 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  54.30262362 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  31.70735190 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  35.65134657 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  38.08212833 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  37.82156916 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <   8.30484867 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  17.05143657 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  16.85399058 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  17.27497482 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <   7.37306474 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <   7.95583285 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <   8.03418270 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  15.08314663 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  14.83297715 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  48.43672832 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  52.44897671 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  12.74671487 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  40.31811669 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  19.32262516 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  27.27358109 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 345.44964154 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 123.36609528 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 119.14228290 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 116.83678045 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 117.74401387 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 181.29702486 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 180.04206377 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 151.90818606 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 141.35828132 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 168.85573261 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 135.56334254 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  79.93385392 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  85.33637732 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  95.64968100 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  55.79689175 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  55.26482299 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  54.58782920 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 135.62051557 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 138.39169551 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 166.62307406 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 132.82418933 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 148.82628809 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 114.39893792 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  48.32881238 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 262.66993710 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 176.68031395 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 187.83180834 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 267.53233975 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    < 265.56657262 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  70.58100989 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  74.04771777 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  72.79391958 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  54.58647026 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  63.99394382 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  53.24009783 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  51.00617518 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  44.50595942 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  38.49013470 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  55.18210929 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  56.64217959 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  56.29693753 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  70.43212315 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  66.94323095 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  63.21746180 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  64.75245613 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  65.45080268 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  62.81184523 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  64.90143507 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  71.61145717 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  64.67931817 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  71.57778462 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  67.13110887 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  68.64481698 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  77.40931903 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  74.95430924 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  71.25096191 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  99.82470246 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy    <  95.68431196 Ry
 estimated scf 

[QE-users] ELPA 2018

2018-12-16 Thread David Foster
Hi,1- Is there any help/manual for linking elpa 2018 with QE6.3?2- Is it 
possible to link them without GPU? I see that the make command search about 
cuda libraries.
Thanks
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[QE-users] Calculating the Effective Mass of Silicon

2018-12-16 Thread Sai Pavan Chitta
Dear All,

I have been trying to calculate the effective mass of silicon from the
curvature of LUMO of the silicon band structure along the Gamma - X
direction. From the curvature, the effective mass is calculated by taking
its inverse and multiplying it with the square of hbar.

I have tried to include the data from the bandx.out.gnu file and converting
the appropriate units to SI by using the conversion factors as given in the
bandx.out file. I have not been able to calculate the effective mass
correctly. Kindly help me with this calculation.

Thanks and Regards

Chitta Sai Pavan
Senior Undergraduate
Electrical Engineering
IIT Gandhinagar
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] read ions position from previous runs

2018-12-16 Thread Dr. Thomas Brumme
One can use restart_mode='restart' together with startingpot='atomic'  
and startingwfc='atomic+random'... This will trick the code to use the  
positions but starting with the standard starting potential and wave  
functions. But be careful: the code also reads in other variables such  
as electric field or similar... Give it a try :)


Thomas

Zitat von Paolo Giannozzi :


There is a variable "ion_positions" that could be used for the purpose you
mention, but this is not currently implemented

Paolo

On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 10:05 PM Shenli Zhang  wrote:


Dear QE users,

I'm wondering if there is a way to just import atom's positions from a
previous run without rewriting the charge density and wavefunction
information at the same time?

Thank you so much!
--
Shenli Zhang

Graduate Student of Materials Science
University of California, Davis
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users




--
Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222




___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [QE-users] Fwd: Error in routine d_matrix_so running projwfc.x with SOC

2018-12-16 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
Thank you for reporting this. It was a rather funny bug due to the way
character variables are read by FoX (with the old format there was no such
problem). There is a workaround available in the development version. You
may also try the attached patch that hopefully fixes the bug for good.

Paolo

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:52 AM Davide Sangalli 
wrote:

> Dear pw users,
> I recently tried to run projwfc.x on three systems with SOC and
> systematically run into the following error:
>
>
> %%
>  Error in routine d_matrix_so (7):
>  D_S (j=1/2) for this symmetry operation is not unitary
>
>  
> %%
>
> I reproduced the error onto three different systems:
> MoS2, bulk iron, FeRh
> with both the last git revision ( commit
> 3e920635bff849e891bb3fcec99acc096c3bdcf6)
> and qe-6.2.1
>
> I had a look to the value of "capel" in the subroutine
> "PP/src/d_matrix_so.f90"
> for the case of MoS2 (inputs attached).
>
> In the loop over symmetries, "capel" becomes 2 for the symmetry number 9,
> since
> ZDOTU(2, d12_con(1,m), 1, dyj12(1,n,isym), 1)
> is identically zero for all n and m.
>
> Kind regards,
> D.
>
>
>
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users



-- 
Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222


diffs
Description: Binary data
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] read ions position from previous runs

2018-12-16 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
There is a variable "ion_positions" that could be used for the purpose you
mention, but this is not currently implemented

Paolo

On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 10:05 PM Shenli Zhang  wrote:

> Dear QE users,
>
> I'm wondering if there is a way to just import atom's positions from a
> previous run without rewriting the charge density and wavefunction
> information at the same time?
>
> Thank you so much!
> --
> Shenli Zhang
>
> Graduate Student of Materials Science
> University of California, Davis
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users



-- 
Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users