Re: [Scilab-users] Subplot figure size

[Serge Steer]

Le 08/12/2015 10:41, petarf a écrit :

Hello,

How to change subplot size of figure but not to change the whole size
figure? I have managed to change one subplot size but I also changed the
whole figure to that size.

Thanks, Petar



--
View this message in context: 
http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Subplot-figure-size-tp4033189.html
Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users


The axes size is controlled by the axes_bounds property of the axes entity
example

fig=scf(0);
ax=gca()
ax.axes_visible="on";
ax.axes_bounds=[0 0 1/2 1/3];
ax1=newaxes();
ax1.axes_visible="on";
ax1.axes_bounds=[0.3 0.5 1/2 1/3];

The axes_bounds values are given in proportions of the axes_size 
property of the figure entity.


Serge
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Scilab-users] integrals

[Rafael Guerra]

What about Mathematica?  Or just the free Wolfram Alpha?

-Original Message-
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.scilab.org] On Behalf Of Tim Wescott
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 8:01 PM
To: Pablo Fonovich 
Cc: Users mailing list for Scilab 
Subject: Re: [Scilab-users] integrals

+1 on what Pablo said -- Maxima and/or WxMaxima was what I was going to
recommend (WxMaxima is not only a nice point-and-click interface for
Maxima, it's also a good training tool -- if you try, you can use
WxMaxima to train you up on the Maxima command line.)

Just as a warning: I've used both Maxima and Maple (the commercial
'replacement' for Maxima), and both of them will leave you unsatisfied
if your expectations are too high.  Both applications can reduce "easy"
problems, but as you get to more difficult problems to solve, or if
you're looking for specific simplifications, they fall down.  You can
push their usefulness further by using them as handy calculators for
parts of your problem, or as a check on your work, but ultimately if the
problem at hand is difficult enough there'll have to be some human
neurons hard at work to find the solution.

On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 14:12 -0300, Pablo Fonovich wrote:
> Hi:
> As tim stated before, scilab does numerical calculation of integrals,
> very usefull for ingeneering problems for example... but does not
> provide any function for symbolic calculation of integrals. If you
> really need symbolic computation of an integral, i would recommend you
> using maxima, or wxmaxima if you are a begginner... There is also a
> toolbox for doing symbolic calculation trhough maxima in scilab called
> "scimax", you could try it if you want to do everything in scilab, but
> i think is a bit outdated.
> 
> May i ask you why you need to do a symbolic calculation?
> 
> 
> __
> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 08:48:15 -0600
> From: btove...@gmail.com
> To: t...@wescottdesign.com; users@lists.scilab.org
> Subject: Re: [Scilab-users] integrals
> 
> symbolic solutions
> 
> ___ users mailing list
> users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 

Tim Wescott
www.wescottdesign.com
Control & Communications systems, circuit & software design.
Phone: 503.631.7815
Cell:  503.349.8432


___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users