Re: [Scilab-users] Atoms Modules

2020-12-19 Thread Claus Futtrup 

Hi there

I am personally not the most vivid user of the IPCV, but I can see among 
my scripts that I was playing around with it in October 2018. I have 
used IPCV to manipulate a piece of graphics that I made, and in a 
programmatic way (something totally impractical in any other way). The 
results: https://www.cfuttrup.com/blogspot.html#think_global


I think the IPCV belongs in the toolbox for Scilab.

When it comes to ATOMS, I think the concept is fundamentally good. I am 
not qualified to give feedback to any of the specifics within ATOMS as I 
found it very difficult to read up on how to create an ATOMS module, so 
what I say is that as a tool for community driven development, it needs 
a lot better support.


With kind regards,
Claus

On 18-12-2020 19:22, Samuel Gougeon wrote:

Dear Chin Luh,

Thank you so much for addressing the critical topic of external 
modules maintenance.

While IPCV is the most downloaded module, your fair question
>So should IPCV continue to be maintained ...?
sounds desperate to me. I rather share the same feeling: Almost 5 days 
after your message, not a single answer from users...!


So, apparently, the answer is likely: No, it's not worth maintaining 
the most downloaded module, and therefore No, it's not worth 
maintaining any other external module.
Let's stop maintaining ATOMS for 2021. The ghosts of silent users are 
certainly rich enough to pay commercial equivalent tools.


Since there are 12 days left before 2021, i will answer for particular 
cases in separate (sub-)threads.


Best regards
Samuel

Le 14/12/2020 à 05:44, Chin Luh Tan a écrit :
Sometimes it is hard to decide whether to continue maintaining an 
atoms module or not So I did "snapshots" of downloads on 
9/11/2020 21:44 and 14/12/2020 12:20 respectively to see which 
modules are in the actual top downloads.


Still, this is not a fair result, such as IPCV having some "patches" 
which will increase the download number, and some other factors as well.


So should IPCV continue to be maintained ...?

Here's the results.

Image Processing and Computer Vision Toolbox4620
CPGE3176
MinGw toolbox   2946
Arduino 2936
CelestLab   2841
iodelay toolbox 2429
Coselica1812
SIMM1800
Image Processing Design Toolbox 1394
Fuzzy Logic Toolbox 1186
Scilab Computer Vision Module   1129
GUI Builder 972
Scilab Image and Video Processing toolbox   860
Distfun 855
Apifun  804
Serial Communication Toolbox781
Time Frequency Toolbox  776
Free Access Chemometric Toolbox 770
Autoelem Toolbox768
Specfun 738




___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users



___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Scilab-users] Increasing Scilab default Java heap memory to 512 MB?

2020-12-19 Thread Samuel Gougeon 

Le 16/12/2020 à 14:16, Antoine Monmayrant a écrit :


That's the very first thing we change after installing scilab on all 
the computers in our group, so I agree we need to change it.


I conclude that 512 MB is enough. Otherwise you would not have 
experienced and reported the issue.
A patch with this value is submitted for Scilab 6.1.1 @ 
https://codereview.scilab.org/21650


Samuel

___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Scilab-users] Problem with dos function

2020-12-19 Thread arctica1963 
HI Samuel,

Tried the unix_*() options with no success, redirect also did not work.

Lester



--
Sent from: 
http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Scilab-users-Mailing-Lists-Archives-f2602246.html
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Scilab-users] Problem with dos function

2020-12-19 Thread Samuel Gougeon 

Le 19/12/2020 à 09:14, arctica1963 a écrit :

Not sure what else to try unless it's an installation issue?



In addition to unix_*(), you may also try to redirect the standard error 
stream to the standard output:


[s,bOK] = dos('grdinfo crop1.grd 2>&1')


___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Scilab-users] Problem with dos function

2020-12-19 Thread Samuel Gougeon 

Le 19/12/2020 à 09:14, arctica1963 a écrit :

Not sure what else to try unless it's an installation issue?



unix_w, unix_g ... functions


___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Scilab-users] Problem with dos function

2020-12-19 Thread arctica1963 
Hi Samuel,

Tested with consolebox on and it is empty, so it's not sending data there.

As a test, I did a simple windows copy: dos('copy crop1.grd
crop1a.grd','-echo') and that worked, so no issue with basic windows
commands.

Not sure what else to try unless it's an installation issue?

Lester



--
Sent from: 
http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Scilab-users-Mailing-Lists-Archives-f2602246.html
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users