Heinz,

Thank you for your timings, which confirm that, even if about an order
of magnitude faster (I use a rather old i7 laptop), the simple squaring
operation takes much longer than it should.

Regards,

Federico Miyara

On 30/11/2023 02:14, Heinz Nabielek wrote:
Thanks. In the 1960s FORTRAN, we would always write A2=A*A rather than A2=A**2.

Below the Federico examples on my M1 Apple silicon iMac:
Heinz

--> tic, u = rand(1,1e7); toc
  ans  =   0.111413

--> tic, v = sqrt(u); toc
  ans  =   0.0384130

-->  tic, v = u.*u; toc
  ans  =   0.023148

--> tic, v = u.*%pi; toc
  ans  =   0.017872

--> tic, v = u.^2; toc
  ans  =   0.156129

--> tic, v = u.^%pi; toc
  ans  =   0.1537830

--> tic, v = log(u); toc
  ans  =   0.093586

--> tic, v = exp(u); toc
  ans  =   0.0821170

--> tic, v = exp(2*log(u)); toc
  ans  =   0.139802





Am 30.11.2023 um 00:46 schrieb Federico Miyara <fmiy...@fceia.unr.edu.ar>:

Dear All,

I was trying to make some simple experiments regarding computational speed of 
several functions and operations and some results puzzled me. To perform the 
tests I used massive data to minimize the effect of idle time due to priority 
handling by the operating system or whatever.

--> tic, u = rand(1,1e7); toc
  ans  =
    0.4948326

This creates ten million random numbers in half a second. Very decent 
performance. Then

--> tic, v = sqrt(u); toc
  ans  =
    0.282802

The algorithm for square root seems quite fast. Multiplication

--> tic, v = u.*u; toc
  ans  =
    0.1218028

--> tic, v = u.*%pi; toc
  ans  =
    0.119245

is really fast. But when it comes to power or exponentiation:

--> tic, v = u.^2; toc
  ans  =
    1.9633435

--> tic, v = u.^%pi; toc
  ans  =
    1.958321

it is quite slow. Logarithm is much faster:

--> tic, v = log(u); toc
  ans  =
    0.5166959

Even the exponential function with base e is much faster:

--> tic, v = exp(u); toc
  ans  =
    0.5451482

I wonder why special cases such as small integer powers are not dealt with by 
simple multiplication. Particularly the square is very frequently used on large 
vectors representing discrete signals (for instance to get energy measures) and 
no warning is issued in the documentation.

I also notice that computing the square using this formula (a cannon to kill a 
mosquito!)

--> tic, v = exp(2*log(u)); toc
  ans  =
    1.2789763

is faster than using the power operator ^.

This seems to be an inconsistent approach, since many special functions are 
painstakingly tailored to be very efficient, yet one of the simplest of all 
operations, raising to power 2, is sluggishly slow...

Regards,

Federico Miyara


Libre de virus.www.avast.com This email and any attachments are intended solely 
for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be 
confidential and/or privileged.
If you are not one of the named recipients or have received this email in error,
(i) you should not read, disclose, or copy it,
(ii) please notify sender of your receipt by reply email and delete this email 
and all attachments,
(iii) Dassault Systèmes does not accept or assume any liability or 
responsibility for any use of or reliance on this email.

Please be informed that your personal data are processed according to our data 
privacy policy as described on our website. Should you have any questions 
related to personal data protection, please contact 3DS Data Protection Officer 
https://www.3ds.com/privacy-policy/contact/

_______________________________________________
users mailing list - users@lists.scilab.org
Click here to unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscr...@lists.scilab.org>
https://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list - users@lists.scilab.org
Click here to unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscr...@lists.scilab.org>
https://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be confidential and/or 
privileged.

If you are not one of the named recipients or have received this email in error,

(i) you should not read, disclose, or copy it,

(ii) please notify sender of your receipt by reply email and delete this email 
and all attachments,

(iii) Dassault Systèmes does not accept or assume any liability or 
responsibility for any use of or reliance on this email.


Please be informed that your personal data are processed according to our data 
privacy policy as described on our website. Should you have any questions 
related to personal data protection, please contact 3DS Data Protection Officer 
https://www.3ds.com/privacy-policy/contact/




--
Este correo electrónico ha sido analizado en busca de virus por el software 
antivirus de Avast.
www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
users mailing list - users@lists.scilab.org
Click here to unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscr...@lists.scilab.org>
https://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be confidential and/or 
privileged.

If you are not one of the named recipients or have received this email in error,

(i) you should not read, disclose, or copy it,

(ii) please notify sender of your receipt by reply email and delete this email 
and all attachments,

(iii) Dassault Systèmes does not accept or assume any liability or 
responsibility for any use of or reliance on this email.


Please be informed that your personal data are processed according to our data 
privacy policy as described on our website. Should you have any questions 
related to personal data protection, please contact 3DS Data Protection Officer 
https://www.3ds.com/privacy-policy/contact/

Reply via email to