Re: [strongSwan] traffic shaping on tunnels

2009-08-20 Thread Martin Kellermann
no one?

 hi list,

 setup is strongswan 4.1.11 running on a linux box with kernel 2.6.24.3
 since the not ipsec-related traffic gets higher on this box, i wanted 
 to know
 which is the easiest way to do some traffic shaping like reserve x mbit for
 tunnel A, y mbit for tunnel B etc. and let re remaining bandwidth be used by
 other services, so that there is an individual defined guaranteed 
 minimum bandwith
 for the active tunnels?

 if this question is some kind of off-topic, please can someone point me 
 to the
 right direction/place?

 thanks in advance


 martin
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.strongswan.org
 https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

   
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.strongswan.org
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[strongSwan] traffic shaping on tunnels

2009-08-17 Thread Martin Kellermann
hi list,

setup is strongswan 4.1.11 running on a linux box with kernel 2.6.24.3
since the not ipsec-related traffic gets higher on this box, i wanted 
to know
which is the easiest way to do some traffic shaping like reserve x mbit for
tunnel A, y mbit for tunnel B etc. and let re remaining bandwidth be used by
other services, so that there is an individual defined guaranteed 
minimum bandwith
for the active tunnels?

if this question is some kind of off-topic, please can someone point me 
to the
right direction/place?

thanks in advance


martin
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.strongswan.org
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users