Yes, read here please:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/vj7twmhm4b10zk0smko4tw8b4klto4bj
On 2024/03/09 08:26:10 Alexander Kriegisch wrote:
> I would have mentioned Asciidoctor, had I believed that it was related
> to the problem. Besides, the Doxia version in the 'generator' tag is
> Doxia-related and so is the 'date' one. So, it came as somewhat of a
> surprise that Asciidoctor, while not messing with the former, overrules
> the setting for the latter, because it has its own timestamp setting.
> That it has it makes sense, because it is also a stand-alone docs
> generator with Doxia out of the picture. That setting just happens to
> write the identical tag. It was hard to diagnose, so it took me a while.
>
> Do you think, you can do something about making the Doxia version or the
> whole 'generator' tag optional?
>
> Regards
> --
> Alexander Kriegisch
> https://scrum-master.de
>
>
> Michael Osipov schrieb am 08.03.2024 um 20:48:
> > On 2024/03/07 10:24:07 Alexander Kriegisch wrote:
> >> Thanks, Michael,
> >>
> >> for challenging my problem description and asking for a reproducer. When
> >> trying to reproduce in a green-field project, skipGenerationDate=true
> >> was actually enough to suppress the timestamp meta tag on pages in
> >> default formats. As soon, however, as HTML pages generated from asciidoc
> >> sources using asciidoctor-maven-plugin come into play, the pages will
> >> contain timestamps. I think, I will investigate further in that
> >> direction about why that happens and whether it can be suppressed.
> >
> > You should have mentioned Asciidoctor much much earlier then I would have
> > told you that it completely circumvents the Doxia Sink API and does its own
> > thing with direct passthrough. Therefore, the output is out of our control.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
