Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Joshua Spiewak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Looks like an issue was just opened here: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOBERTURA-86 2. Not sure about Jeff, mine hasn't amounted to anything worth checking in, and my effort has fallen by the wayside for the past couple of months. I did not check in my code because I did not have the committer status. I still need to do more validation because I first developed it with an intent to use it with Cargo but this one has some problems with classifier. So I need to build a test POM for the validation. However, if you need it, I can send the code. Jeff joseph22 wrote: We have a very similar need. We have an integration-test module that has dependencies on other modules containing unit tests and would like to have the integration-test module use the instrumented classes from its dependencies to generate a cobertura report. A few questions: 1. Has this issue been logged as a jira bug or task against the plugin? If so, what is the jira number? 2. The work that you or jeff have been doing -- is it checked in anywhere? If so, how could someone check it out. tks Joseph Joshua Spiewak wrote: So in a simplistic attempt to get this to work, I looked at the Clover plugin to see what it did. I tried changing the execute phase of CoberturaCheckMojo and CoberturaReportMojo to verify, like the Clover mojos of the same function. This fails in the package phase: [INFO] Error configuring: org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-war-plugin. Reason: ERROR: Cannot override read-only parameter: classesDirectory in goal: war:war Looking at the Clover plugin a little more, it looks like it manages its separate lifecycle a little differently and only the instrument mojo kicks off the separate lifecycle. And in fact, the instrument mojo is a shell, and there is an internal instrument mojo that does the real work. Do you think that the Cobertura mojo can be incrementally moved to this model? What else were you intending? I would love to get this working, as having code coverage (with checking) is that last step in converting our main project from Ant to Maven. So let me know if you need help! -- Josh Jeff MAURY wrote: Richard, I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work on another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover plugin) that address this issue. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0 version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2). I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can be done. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated! Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented here, too: http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html Thanks, Richard Brewster Senior Associate Perrin Quarles Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] (434) 817-2640 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--cobertura-maven-plugin-2.2-tp14310731s177p15865771.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
1. Looks like an issue was just opened here: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOBERTURA-86 2. Not sure about Jeff, mine hasn't amounted to anything worth checking in, and my effort has fallen by the wayside for the past couple of months. joseph22 wrote: We have a very similar need. We have an integration-test module that has dependencies on other modules containing unit tests and would like to have the integration-test module use the instrumented classes from its dependencies to generate a cobertura report. A few questions: 1. Has this issue been logged as a jira bug or task against the plugin? If so, what is the jira number? 2. The work that you or jeff have been doing -- is it checked in anywhere? If so, how could someone check it out. tks Joseph Joshua Spiewak wrote: So in a simplistic attempt to get this to work, I looked at the Clover plugin to see what it did. I tried changing the execute phase of CoberturaCheckMojo and CoberturaReportMojo to verify, like the Clover mojos of the same function. This fails in the package phase: [INFO] Error configuring: org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-war-plugin. Reason: ERROR: Cannot override read-only parameter: classesDirectory in goal: war:war Looking at the Clover plugin a little more, it looks like it manages its separate lifecycle a little differently and only the instrument mojo kicks off the separate lifecycle. And in fact, the instrument mojo is a shell, and there is an internal instrument mojo that does the real work. Do you think that the Cobertura mojo can be incrementally moved to this model? What else were you intending? I would love to get this working, as having code coverage (with checking) is that last step in converting our main project from Ant to Maven. So let me know if you need help! -- Josh Jeff MAURY wrote: Richard, I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work on another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover plugin) that address this issue. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0 version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2). I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can be done. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated! Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented here, too: http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html Thanks, Richard Brewster Senior Associate Perrin Quarles Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] (434) 817-2640 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--cobertura-maven-plugin-2.2-tp14310731s177p15865771.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
We have a very similar need. We have an integration-test module that has dependencies on other modules containing unit tests and would like to have the integration-test module use the instrumented classes from its dependencies to generate a cobertura report. A few questions: 1. Has this issue been logged as a jira bug or task against the plugin? If so, what is the jira number? 2. The work that you or jeff have been doing -- is it checked in anywhere? If so, how could someone check it out. tks Joseph Joshua Spiewak wrote: So in a simplistic attempt to get this to work, I looked at the Clover plugin to see what it did. I tried changing the execute phase of CoberturaCheckMojo and CoberturaReportMojo to verify, like the Clover mojos of the same function. This fails in the package phase: [INFO] Error configuring: org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-war-plugin. Reason: ERROR: Cannot override read-only parameter: classesDirectory in goal: war:war Looking at the Clover plugin a little more, it looks like it manages its separate lifecycle a little differently and only the instrument mojo kicks off the separate lifecycle. And in fact, the instrument mojo is a shell, and there is an internal instrument mojo that does the real work. Do you think that the Cobertura mojo can be incrementally moved to this model? What else were you intending? I would love to get this working, as having code coverage (with checking) is that last step in converting our main project from Ant to Maven. So let me know if you need help! -- Josh Jeff MAURY wrote: Richard, I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work on another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover plugin) that address this issue. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0 version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2). I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can be done. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated! Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented here, too: http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html Thanks, Richard Brewster Senior Associate Perrin Quarles Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] (434) 817-2640 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--cobertura-maven-plugin-2.2-tp14310731s177p15836604.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
So in a simplistic attempt to get this to work, I looked at the Clover plugin to see what it did. I tried changing the execute phase of CoberturaCheckMojo and CoberturaReportMojo to verify, like the Clover mojos of the same function. This fails in the package phase: [INFO] Error configuring: org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-war-plugin. Reason: ERROR: Cannot override read-only parameter: classesDirectory in goal: war:war Looking at the Clover plugin a little more, it looks like it manages its separate lifecycle a little differently and only the instrument mojo kicks off the separate lifecycle. And in fact, the instrument mojo is a shell, and there is an internal instrument mojo that does the real work. Do you think that the Cobertura mojo can be incrementally moved to this model? What else were you intending? I would love to get this working, as having code coverage (with checking) is that last step in converting our main project from Ant to Maven. So let me know if you need help! -- Josh Jeff MAURY wrote: Richard, I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work on another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover plugin) that address this issue. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0 version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2). I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can be done. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated! Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented here, too: http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html Thanks, Richard Brewster Senior Associate Perrin Quarles Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] (434) 817-2640 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--cobertura-maven-plugin-2.2-tp14310731s177p14826260.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
Hi guys, Any more news on this? This is a really important feature. We've been battling on this one for a week ate work. Any workarrounds, any news? Thanks, On Dec 13, 2007 3:34 PM, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thus you'll have my help ;-) On Dec 13, 2007 4:29 PM, Jeff MAURY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would prefer extending the current one. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 4:26 PM, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: another cobertura plugin or an extension of the current one ? otherwise you have my +1 to have the possibility to include integration tests in reports Arnaud On Dec 13, 2007 3:58 PM, Jeff MAURY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard, I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work on another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover plugin) that address this issue. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0 version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2 ). I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can be done. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated! Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented here, too: http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html Thanks, Richard Brewster Senior Associate Perrin Quarles Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] (434) 817-2640 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com -- .. Arnaud HERITIER .. OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | blog.octo.com .. ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org www.apache.org | maven.apache.org ... -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com -- .. Arnaud HERITIER .. OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | blog.octo.com .. ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org www.apache.org | maven.apache.org ... -- Pedro Viegas Walking on water and developing software from a specification are easy if both are frozen. - Edward V. Berard
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
Hello, I have extended the corbertura-maven-plugin in order to do that but I'm facing an issue with the cargo plugin: my cobertura plugin will not generate a new artifact with a specific classifier (like the clover plugin) but when the cargo plugin starts a container, it will deploy both artifacts, the original one and the one generated with corbertura. I need to continue working on it in order to find a solution. Jeff On Dec 20, 2007 7:41 PM, Pedro Viegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, Any more news on this? This is a really important feature. We've been battling on this one for a week ate work. Any workarrounds, any news? Thanks, On Dec 13, 2007 3:34 PM, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thus you'll have my help ;-) On Dec 13, 2007 4:29 PM, Jeff MAURY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would prefer extending the current one. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 4:26 PM, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: another cobertura plugin or an extension of the current one ? otherwise you have my +1 to have the possibility to include integration tests in reports Arnaud On Dec 13, 2007 3:58 PM, Jeff MAURY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard, I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work on another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover plugin) that address this issue. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0 version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2 ). I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can be done. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated! Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented here, too: http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html Thanks, Richard Brewster Senior Associate Perrin Quarles Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] (434) 817-2640 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com -- .. Arnaud HERITIER .. OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | blog.octo.com .. ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org www.apache.org | maven.apache.org ... -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com -- .. Arnaud HERITIER .. OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | blog.octo.com .. ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org www.apache.org | maven.apache.org ... -- Pedro Viegas
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
Thanks Jeff, Please post back when you have any more news. Best of luck. Regards, On Dec 20, 2007 7:45 PM, Jeff MAURY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have extended the corbertura-maven-plugin in order to do that but I'm facing an issue with the cargo plugin: my cobertura plugin will not generate a new artifact with a specific classifier (like the clover plugin) but when the cargo plugin starts a container, it will deploy both artifacts, the original one and the one generated with corbertura. I need to continue working on it in order to find a solution. Jeff On Dec 20, 2007 7:41 PM, Pedro Viegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, Any more news on this? This is a really important feature. We've been battling on this one for a week ate work. Any workarrounds, any news? Thanks, On Dec 13, 2007 3:34 PM, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thus you'll have my help ;-) On Dec 13, 2007 4:29 PM, Jeff MAURY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would prefer extending the current one. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 4:26 PM, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: another cobertura plugin or an extension of the current one ? otherwise you have my +1 to have the possibility to include integration tests in reports Arnaud On Dec 13, 2007 3:58 PM, Jeff MAURY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard, I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work on another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover plugin) that address this issue. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0 version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2 ). I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can be done. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated! Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented here, too: http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html Thanks, Richard Brewster Senior Associate Perrin Quarles Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] (434) 817-2640 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com -- .. Arnaud HERITIER .. OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | blog.octo.com .. ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org www.apache.org | maven.apache.org ... -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com -- .. Arnaud HERITIER .. OCTO Technology -
Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0 version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2). I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can be done. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated! Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented here, too: http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html Thanks, Richard Brewster Senior Associate Perrin Quarles Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] (434) 817-2640 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
Richard, I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work on another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover plugin) that address this issue. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0 version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2). I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can be done. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated! Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented here, too: http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html Thanks, Richard Brewster Senior Associate Perrin Quarles Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] (434) 817-2640 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
I would prefer extending the current one. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 4:26 PM, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: another cobertura plugin or an extension of the current one ? otherwise you have my +1 to have the possibility to include integration tests in reports Arnaud On Dec 13, 2007 3:58 PM, Jeff MAURY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard, I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work on another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover plugin) that address this issue. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0 version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2 ). I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can be done. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated! Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented here, too: http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html Thanks, Richard Brewster Senior Associate Perrin Quarles Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] (434) 817-2640 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com -- .. Arnaud HERITIER .. OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | blog.octo.com .. ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org www.apache.org | maven.apache.org ... -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
another cobertura plugin or an extension of the current one ? otherwise you have my +1 to have the possibility to include integration tests in reports Arnaud On Dec 13, 2007 3:58 PM, Jeff MAURY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard, I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work on another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover plugin) that address this issue. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0 version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2). I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can be done. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated! Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented here, too: http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html Thanks, Richard Brewster Senior Associate Perrin Quarles Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] (434) 817-2640 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com -- .. Arnaud HERITIER .. OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | blog.octo.com .. ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org www.apache.org | maven.apache.org ...
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
Thus you'll have my help ;-) On Dec 13, 2007 4:29 PM, Jeff MAURY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would prefer extending the current one. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 4:26 PM, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: another cobertura plugin or an extension of the current one ? otherwise you have my +1 to have the possibility to include integration tests in reports Arnaud On Dec 13, 2007 3:58 PM, Jeff MAURY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard, I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work on another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover plugin) that address this issue. Jeff On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0 version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2 ). I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can be done. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated! Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented here, too: http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html Thanks, Richard Brewster Senior Associate Perrin Quarles Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] (434) 817-2640 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com -- .. Arnaud HERITIER .. OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | blog.octo.com .. ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org www.apache.org | maven.apache.org ... -- La mélancolie c'est communiste Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste C'est même gratuit pour les perdants La mélancolie c'est pacifiste On ne lui rentre jamais dedans La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe Elle se prend même avec des gants La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes Il faut juste sa carte de permanent Miossec (2006) http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com -- .. Arnaud HERITIER .. OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | blog.octo.com .. ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org www.apache.org | maven.apache.org ...
