Re: JSF Performance: Mojarra improves dramatically with latest release
I'm not sure MyFaces needs to respond to this. Did you look at the blog link you posted? MyFaces is still faster than the improved Mojarra... On 5/22/13, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com wrote: FYI, JSF Performance: Mojarra improves dramatically with latest release[1] What is MyFaces response to this? :) When I was using Mojarra months ago (before I migrated to MyFaces), I think I voted for this JIRA for tracking purposes, so I still get updates/comments on this JIRA. [1] http://blog.oio.de/2013/05/16/jsf-performance-mojarra-improves-dramatically-with-latest-release/ -- Ted.
Re: JSF Performance: Mojarra improves dramatically with latest release
Agreed/understood..MyFaces is 'still' faster than the enhanced Mojarra. I just like MyFaces users/list to see/know what others are saying and what others are trying to achieve. I migrated from Mojarra to MyFaces, months ago, after reading a similar blog and being advised by some other/expert JSF developers to 'try' MyFaces since/when Mojarra fails at this/that. With all that said, would MyFaces (committers) rather just wait for Mojarra to keep-on-improving and possibly/eventually perform better than MyFaces...before MyFaces become concerned, or this latest Mojarra performance enhancement really does not concern MyFaces committers? :) On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Ted r6squee...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure MyFaces needs to respond to this. Did you look at the blog link you posted? MyFaces is still faster than the improved Mojarra... On 5/22/13, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com wrote: FYI, JSF Performance: Mojarra improves dramatically with latest release[1] What is MyFaces response to this? :) When I was using Mojarra months ago (before I migrated to MyFaces), I think I voted for this JIRA for tracking purposes, so I still get updates/comments on this JIRA. [1] http://blog.oio.de/2013/05/16/jsf-performance-mojarra-improves-dramatically-with-latest-release/ -- Ted.
Re: JSF Performance: Mojarra improves dramatically with latest release
Forgot to mention (below/inline) On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com wrote: Agreed/understood..MyFaces is 'still' faster than the enhanced Mojarra. I just like MyFaces users/list to see/know what others are saying and what others are trying to achieve. I migrated from Mojarra to MyFaces, months ago, after reading a similar blog and being advised by some other/expert JSF developers to 'try' MyFaces since/when Mojarra fails at this/that. With all that said, would MyFaces (committers) rather just wait for Mojarra to keep-on-improving and possibly/eventually perform better than MyFaces...before MyFaces become concerned, or this latest Mojarra performance enhancement really does not concern MyFaces committers? :) Just sharing... I tend to be 'very' loyal to a 'brand' if I find success with/via that brand. So, when I first started developing JSF web app, of course, I was using 'Oracle's NetBeans, Glassfish, and Mojarra (reference implementation 'bundle'...smile). So, when I saw 'try' MyFaces in PrimeFaces forum, I used to be 'very' opposed to leaving this Mojarra (brand) and going off to 'try' another brand (MyFaces). Finally, 'try' MyFaces and blog about performance comparison between wicket, MyFaces, and Mojarra...had me sold to finally 'try' MyFaces. Yes, it was a struggle, migrating from Mojarra to myFaces, but I have been pleased ever since, and honestly, I prefer 'not' to go back to the RI, Mojarra, if I can help it. I have heard/read/seen some popular/known JSF experts prefer/recommend Mojarra and even contribute to Mojarra by reporting issues/bugs/defects/etc..., but when I think back, I seem to recall 'more' Mojarra bugs than I remember 'MyFaces' bugs (that 'impacted me and my JSF web app'). So, with all that said...I'm sure you know where I stand. :)
Re: JSF Performance: Mojarra improves dramatically with latest release
Hi I read the article some days ago, but the tests done using the demo booking application shows this: Mojarra 2.1.20 90% line : 79 Througput (Bytes per sec) : 1107.97 Mojarra 2.1.22 90% line : 76 Througput (Bytes per sec) : 1159.97 The fix done improves just a bit, but fundamentally nothing changes. It is good that Mojarra guys fix that, but the improvement only has effect when you have very large component trees. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2013/5/21 Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com Agreed/understood..MyFaces is 'still' faster than the enhanced Mojarra. I just like MyFaces users/list to see/know what others are saying and what others are trying to achieve. I migrated from Mojarra to MyFaces, months ago, after reading a similar blog and being advised by some other/expert JSF developers to 'try' MyFaces since/when Mojarra fails at this/that. With all that said, would MyFaces (committers) rather just wait for Mojarra to keep-on-improving and possibly/eventually perform better than MyFaces...before MyFaces become concerned, or this latest Mojarra performance enhancement really does not concern MyFaces committers? :) On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Ted r6squee...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure MyFaces needs to respond to this. Did you look at the blog link you posted? MyFaces is still faster than the improved Mojarra... On 5/22/13, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com wrote: FYI, JSF Performance: Mojarra improves dramatically with latest release[1] What is MyFaces response to this? :) When I was using Mojarra months ago (before I migrated to MyFaces), I think I voted for this JIRA for tracking purposes, so I still get updates/comments on this JIRA. [1] http://blog.oio.de/2013/05/16/jsf-performance-mojarra-improves-dramatically-with-latest-release/ -- Ted.
Re: JSF Performance: Mojarra improves dramatically with latest release
That's the response I was looking for! Thanks Leonardo for the clarification-n-correction! :) On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I read the article some days ago, but the tests done using the demo booking application shows this: Mojarra 2.1.20 90% line : 79 Througput (Bytes per sec) : 1107.97 Mojarra 2.1.22 90% line : 76 Througput (Bytes per sec) : 1159.97 The fix done improves just a bit, but fundamentally nothing changes. It is good that Mojarra guys fix that, but the improvement only has effect when you have very large component trees. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2013/5/21 Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com Agreed/understood..MyFaces is 'still' faster than the enhanced Mojarra. I just like MyFaces users/list to see/know what others are saying and what others are trying to achieve. I migrated from Mojarra to MyFaces, months ago, after reading a similar blog and being advised by some other/expert JSF developers to 'try' MyFaces since/when Mojarra fails at this/that. With all that said, would MyFaces (committers) rather just wait for Mojarra to keep-on-improving and possibly/eventually perform better than MyFaces...before MyFaces become concerned, or this latest Mojarra performance enhancement really does not concern MyFaces committers? :) On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Ted r6squee...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure MyFaces needs to respond to this. Did you look at the blog link you posted? MyFaces is still faster than the improved Mojarra... On 5/22/13, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com wrote: FYI, JSF Performance: Mojarra improves dramatically with latest release[1] What is MyFaces response to this? :) When I was using Mojarra months ago (before I migrated to MyFaces), I think I voted for this JIRA for tracking purposes, so I still get updates/comments on this JIRA. [1] http://blog.oio.de/2013/05/16/jsf-performance-mojarra-improves-dramatically-with-latest-release/ -- Ted.
