Re: Data Provenance is not available

[Jeff]

Pablo,

Also, keep in mind that policies are inherited by child components
(processors, process groups, etc), so you can enable viewing of Data
Provenance for the whole flow for a given user by adding the user to the
root group's "view the data" policy.  Unless that policy is explicitly
overridden for a child component, that user will be able to see data
provenance for all components.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:07 PM Jeff  wrote:

> Hi Pablo
>
> From the global policies menu, you can add the users that need to able to
> query Data Provenance to the "query provenance" policy.
>
> For any component, such as the root group, or a particular processor,
> you'll also want to add the user to "view the data" policies for the
> respective components.
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:52 PM Pablo Lopez 
> wrote:
>
> Ok. Thanks for that.
> Would you know how can I enable this again?
>
> Pablo.
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Andrew Grande  wrote:
>
> Yes.
>
> It's a combination of a generic view data permission in the global menu
> and specific access in the processing group.
>
> Andrew
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016, 12:28 PM Pablo Lopez 
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Any ideas as of why Data Provenance option is grayed out (not available)
> and none of the processors show the option in the context menu? Is this
> something to do with security?
>
> Thanks,
> Pablo.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Pablo Lopez.
> Integration Architect
> Integrado Pty Ltd
> M: 044 84 52 479
> pablo.lo...@integrado.com.au
>
>

Re: Data Provenance is not available

[Jeff]

Hi Pablo

>From the global policies menu, you can add the users that need to able to
query Data Provenance to the "query provenance" policy.

For any component, such as the root group, or a particular processor,
you'll also want to add the user to "view the data" policies for the
respective components.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:52 PM Pablo Lopez 
wrote:

> Ok. Thanks for that.
> Would you know how can I enable this again?
>
> Pablo.
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Andrew Grande  wrote:
>
> Yes.
>
> It's a combination of a generic view data permission in the global menu
> and specific access in the processing group.
>
> Andrew
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016, 12:28 PM Pablo Lopez 
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Any ideas as of why Data Provenance option is grayed out (not available)
> and none of the processors show the option in the context menu? Is this
> something to do with security?
>
> Thanks,
> Pablo.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Pablo Lopez.
> Integration Architect
> Integrado Pty Ltd
> M: 044 84 52 479
> pablo.lo...@integrado.com.au
>

Re: Data Provenance is not available

[Andrew Grande]

Yes.

It's a combination of a generic view data permission in the global menu and
specific access in the processing group.

Andrew

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016, 12:28 PM Pablo Lopez 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Any ideas as of why Data Provenance option is grayed out (not available)
> and none of the processors show the option in the context menu? Is this
> something to do with security?
>
> Thanks,
> Pablo.
>

GetDynamoDB multiple fields

[Pablo Lopez]

Hi,

I'm using the GetDynamoDB processor and it works fine. However, whenever I
get a record from DynamoDB it seems that in the processor we can only
retrieve one field at a time DynamoDB. The field to read is specified in
attribute "Json Document attribute". This can only point to only one field.

Is there a way to retrieve the value of all the fields in the record rather
than only one?
I can work around this by using multiple processors and each one read a
different field, but I was wondering if there is a better way to do this.

Thanks,
Pablo.

Code index question about PutElasticSearchHttp.java#L333

[Andreas Petter (External)]

Hello everybody,

I have a small question concerning the putElasticSearch.java code…
While reading through the code I found the following line… 
https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-elasticsearch-bundle/nifi-elasticsearch-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/elasticsearch/PutElasticsearchHttp.java#L333

Maybe it is a dumb question, but is the index in the remove (i.e. “i”) the 
index it was intended for (think about what happens if run on at least two 
items)?

Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Andreas




Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede 
contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la 
persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda 
notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin 
autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha 
recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente 
por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. 
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not 
read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this 
communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode 
conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa 
ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica 
notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização 
pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem 
por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e 
proceda a sua destruição