Re: [Users] Two fence devices per server.
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Livnat Peer wrote: Hi Nathan, Currently OE (oVirt engine) supports only one power management device per server. Most servers today take more then one power supply, in fact none of ours even come with 1 supply options. How are people dealing with this problem today? Is it possible to put both supplies on one strip and use oVirt to fence both outlets? If not, are people using some other device to feed multiple supplies from one outlet? We have looked at IPMI fence, but we have found it not to be very reliable. Livnat Nathan StrattonCTO, BlinkMind, Inc. nathan at robotics.net nathan at blinkmind.com http://www.robotics.nethttp://www.blinkmind.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] ovirt VM start fails - Perm Denied error
Hi, I have tried this multiple times and i hit the same error. I have 3 storage domains created (iso, data and export) all connected to the DC with DC status as Up and 1 host with status as Up and the same (only) host acting as SPM. I used the engine-iso-uploader utility to upload my .iso to the iso domain. Created a new VM and attached a vdisk of type sparse (thin-prov) and click on Run Once, where i select Attach CD and select my .iso, and change boot order to boot from CD, then disk. But i get this error... VM first-ovirt-vm is down. Exit message internal error process exited while connecting to monitor: qemu-kvm: -drive file=/rhev/data-center/4087fea7-b54a-4318-8d5c-828eff8846f4/35f880f8-bd0c-4063-b171-2ddaa59e1212/images/----/Fedora-16-x86_64-DVD.iso,if=none,media=cdrom,id=drive-ide0-1-0,readonly=on,format=raw: could not open disk image /rhev/data-center/4087fea7-b54a-4318-8d5c-828eff8846f4/35f880f8-bd0c-4063-b171-2ddaa59e1212/images/----/Fedora-16-x86_64-DVD.iso: Permission denied . I am unable to figure out why.. bcos the user.group perms for the .iso are fine. In fact i logged into the system serving the nfs share and added 0777 perms still i get the same error. Here is the snip of how the perms for .iso look like... ll /tmp/iso1-domain/35f880f8-bd0c-4063-b171-2ddaa59e1212/images/----/Fedora-16-x86_64-DVD.iso -rwxr-xr-x. 1 vdsm kvm 3757047808 Feb 13 04:24 /tmp/iso1-domain/35f880f8-bd0c-4063-b171-2ddaa59e1212/images/----/Fedora-16-x86_64-DVD.iso Here are some of the imp. logs from the engine.log... note that i tried multiple times, so there are multiple entries of ERRORs for each of those tries... 2012-02-13 05:10:04,563 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.UpdateVdsDynamicDataVDSCommand] (pool-5-thread-47) FINISH, UpdateVdsDynamicDataVDSCommand, log id: 549dfc2f 2012-02-13 05:10:04,612 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunVmOnceCommand] (pool-5-thread-47) Running command: RunVmOnceCommand internal: false. Entities affected : ID: c587bc8e-f800-4ce4-a35e-1dd43480cb58 Type: VM 2012-02-13 05:10:04,617 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunVmCommand] (pool-5-thread-47) Cant find VDS to run the VM c587bc8e-f800-4ce4-a35e-1dd43480cb58 on, so this VM will not be run. 2012-02-13 05:10:04,622 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunVmOnceCommand] (pool-5-thread-47) Transaction rolled-back for command: org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunVmOnceCommand. 2012-02-13 05:11:25,735 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.DbUserCacheManager] (QuartzScheduler_Worker-10) DbUserCacheManager::refreshAllUserData() - entered 2012-02-13 05:11:52,648 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.GetConfigurationValueQuery] (http--0.0.0.0-8080-1) calling GetConfigurationValueQuery with null version, using default general for version 2012-02-13 05:11:52,791 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.GetConfigurationValueQuery] (http--0.0.0.0-8080-2) calling GetConfigurationValueQuery with null version, using default general for version 2012-02-13 05:11:55,828 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.GetConfigurationValueQuery] (http--0.0.0.0-8080-8) calling GetConfigurationValueQuery with null version, using default general for version 2012-02-13 05:11:56,917 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.GetConfigurationValueQuery] (http--0.0.0.0-8080-2) calling GetConfigurationValueQuery with null version, using default general for version 2012-02-13 05:12:11,611 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.UpdateVmCommand] (http--0.0.0.0-8080-10) Running command: UpdateVmCommand internal: false. Entities affected : ID: c587bc8e-f800-4ce4-a35e-1dd43480cb58 Type: VM 2012-02-13 05:12:11,617 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsValidVDSCommand] (http--0.0.0.0-8080-10) START, IsValidVDSCommand(storagePoolId = 4087fea7-b54a-4318-8d5c-828eff8846f4, ignoreFailoverLimit = false, compatabilityVersion = null), log id: 247cacfc 2012-02-13 05:12:11,619 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsValidVDSCommand] (http--0.0.0.0-8080-10) FINISH, IsValidVDSCommand, return: true, log id: 247cacfc 2012-02-13 05:12:11,632 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.UpdateVMVDSCommand] (http--0.0.0.0-8080-10) START, UpdateVMVDSCommand(storagePoolId = 4087fea7-b54a-4318-8d5c-828eff8846f4, ignoreFailoverLimit = false, compatabilityVersion = null, storageDomainId = ----, infoDictionary.size = 1), log id: 1294a3c3 2012-02-13 05:12:11,904 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.UpdateVMVDSCommand] (http--0.0.0.0-8080-10) FINISH, UpdateVMVDSCommand, log id: 1294a3c3 2012-02-13 05:12:23,502 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsoPrefixVDSCommand] (http--0.0.0.0-8080-1) START, IsoPrefixVDSCommand(storagePoolId = 4087fea7-b54a-4318-8d5c-828eff8846f4, ignoreFailoverLimit = false, compatabilityVersion = null), log id: 201b9bfd 2012-02-13
[Users] Questions about Ovirt flexibility
Hello, I have in my server lab several machines: - with debian or ubuntu - without virtualization extensions. So I ask: - is the ovirt agent (not the manager) installable on debian/ubuntu/gentoo? - is the agent compatible with rhev? - can ovirt manager use rhev agent? - can ovirt use servers without virtualization extensions but with QEMU installed? Thanks in advance for any reply! Mario ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Questions about Ovirt flexibility
- Original Message - From: Mario Giammarco mgiamma...@gmail.com To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 4:54:24 PM Subject: [Users] Questions about Ovirt flexibility Hello, I have in my server lab several machines: - with debian or ubuntu - without virtualization extensions. So I ask: - is the ovirt agent (not the manager) installable on debian/ubuntu/gentoo? Not yet but community work in progress (patches welcome!) - is the agent compatible with rhev? RHEV isn't compatible with oVirt, in the same way that Fedora packages don't work on RHEL - can ovirt manager use rhev agent? Versions are different so you'll need to use oVirt agent instead. - can ovirt use servers without virtualization extensions but with QEMU installed? No we explicitly require KVM. Thanks in advance for any reply! Mario ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Ovirt Support life (timeframe) - upgrade path ?
- Original Message - From: Gary Scarborough virtually...@gmail.com To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 9:56:04 PM Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt Support life (timeframe) - upgrade path ? On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Perry Myers pmy...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/10/2012 08:03 AM, Mike Burns wrote: I answered with my limited knowledge on IRC, but I'll answer here too for those who didn't see the IRC questions. On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 03:48 -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote: On 02/10/2012 03:42 AM, Morgan Cox wrote: Hi. As Fedora the default system that Ovirt is packaged for does this mean that Ovirt will have the same (short) support life of 18 months ? I ask as that is a bit short to have in enterprise .. There is always RHEV if you want longer support... Right, I think the first question we should be asking here is... Morgan, what do you mean specifically by support? Since it's an upstream project, typically each new release would obviate the previous one, and new features would only go into the latest version. One valid question is whether or not bugfixes will only go into the latest version, or if the immediate prior version will get updates. (For example, bugfixes are backported to Fedora 15 even though Fedora 16 is out) Also, the term support from an upstream perspective is much different than from a product perspective. Perry ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users So on a follow up question: Is any consideration being given to RHEL as far as compatibility? Will Ovirt features be held back if adding them would be impossible to do with RHEL? Like a feature requiring a major update to a RHEL package? Or is it up to the RHEV developers to sort it all out for their needs? It won't be long before Fedora outpaces RHEL on version levels, depending on the time frame for RHEL 7. RHEL 5 had a very long life span and was quite dated by the time RHEL 6 shipped. What does held back mean? That's like asking if Fedora will be held back because of RHEL. Upstream is upstream - it's where new features are developed sometimes they can be backported, other times it's not possible and means waiting for a major release. -- Gary Scarborough IST Lab Manager Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester NY ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
