[ovirt-users] usb and serial port redirection
Hi, Can I redirect the vm host's usb and serial ports to the guests? It is very important me, because we need to virtualize a physical host that use hardware tokens (usb hw key). I didn't find any option for this. Thanks in advance Best regards, Tibor ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] user portal permissions
Hi Jeff Roles determine two things: 1. What the user can see 2. What the user can do It is important to know on who is the user, what is the role (UserRole? as you also mentioned SuperUser?) and on what object(s) was the role granted on. Assuming it is UserRole, on a specific user, then: If on a VM, then the user can see/operate on this VM. If on a Cluster, then the user can see/operate on all the VMs in this cluster. If on a DC, then the user can see/operate on all the VMs in clusters that are part of this DC. If on System, then the user can see/operate on all the VMs in the system. So the hierarchy is System--DC--Cluster--VM. I hope this clarifies you question. Regards, Oved - Original Message - From: Jeff Clay jeffc...@gmail.com To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 10:31:53 PM Subject: [ovirt-users] user portal permissions For some reason, when logged in as a user with a modifed copy role of UserRole (only has login permssion and VM - Basic Operations - Remote Log In permission) the user can see all of the VM's and has the ability to open a console, start, shutdown or suspend any of the VM's. I have verified that all of the VM's only show the SuperUser role in their permissions. I went through all of the roles and verified that the user is only a member of the Copy_of_UserRole. The only thing I can think of is that the user is inheriting permissions from something, but I can't find what it is or where. Any suggestions? Thanks. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] user portal permissions
Thanks, that clarifies quite a bit. The permissions are being applied to System for the regular UserRole, but I don't see where to define what objects the roles are assigned to. On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Oved Ourfalli ov...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Jeff Roles determine two things: 1. What the user can see 2. What the user can do It is important to know on who is the user, what is the role (UserRole? as you also mentioned SuperUser?) and on what object(s) was the role granted on. Assuming it is UserRole, on a specific user, then: If on a VM, then the user can see/operate on this VM. If on a Cluster, then the user can see/operate on all the VMs in this cluster. If on a DC, then the user can see/operate on all the VMs in clusters that are part of this DC. If on System, then the user can see/operate on all the VMs in the system. So the hierarchy is System--DC--Cluster--VM. I hope this clarifies you question. Regards, Oved - Original Message - From: Jeff Clay jeffc...@gmail.com To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 10:31:53 PM Subject: [ovirt-users] user portal permissions For some reason, when logged in as a user with a modifed copy role of UserRole (only has login permssion and VM - Basic Operations - Remote Log In permission) the user can see all of the VM's and has the ability to open a console, start, shutdown or suspend any of the VM's. I have verified that all of the VM's only show the SuperUser role in their permissions. I went through all of the roles and verified that the user is only a member of the Copy_of_UserRole. The only thing I can think of is that the user is inheriting permissions from something, but I can't find what it is or where. Any suggestions? Thanks. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] user portal permissions
I figured it out. I was using Configure - System Permissions to add my users and assign them to roles. Removing the users from there and adding them under the Permissions tab on the actual object did what I wanted it to. On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Jeff Clay jeffc...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, that clarifies quite a bit. The permissions are being applied to System for the regular UserRole, but I don't see where to define what objects the roles are assigned to. On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Oved Ourfalli ov...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Jeff Roles determine two things: 1. What the user can see 2. What the user can do It is important to know on who is the user, what is the role (UserRole? as you also mentioned SuperUser?) and on what object(s) was the role granted on. Assuming it is UserRole, on a specific user, then: If on a VM, then the user can see/operate on this VM. If on a Cluster, then the user can see/operate on all the VMs in this cluster. If on a DC, then the user can see/operate on all the VMs in clusters that are part of this DC. If on System, then the user can see/operate on all the VMs in the system. So the hierarchy is System--DC--Cluster--VM. I hope this clarifies you question. Regards, Oved - Original Message - From: Jeff Clay jeffc...@gmail.com To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 10:31:53 PM Subject: [ovirt-users] user portal permissions For some reason, when logged in as a user with a modifed copy role of UserRole (only has login permssion and VM - Basic Operations - Remote Log In permission) the user can see all of the VM's and has the ability to open a console, start, shutdown or suspend any of the VM's. I have verified that all of the VM's only show the SuperUser role in their permissions. I went through all of the roles and verified that the user is only a member of the Copy_of_UserRole. The only thing I can think of is that the user is inheriting permissions from something, but I can't find what it is or where. Any suggestions? Thanks. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] user portal and pool views
Is there a way to get the user portal to show the pool tag or pool name and assign an unused vm from within the pool instead of showing all vm's in the pool for them to choose from? Thanks ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Question about power user and public template
Hi Tomas, Sorry for the late response :P 2014-04-17 21:02 GMT+08:00 Tomas Jelinek tjeli...@redhat.com: - Original Message - From: plysan ply...@gmail.com To: Tomas Jelinek tjeli...@redhat.com Cc: Users@ovirt.org List users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 8:15:43 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Question about power user and public template 2014-04-14 15:18 GMT+08:00 Tomas Jelinek tjeli...@redhat.com: - Original Message - From: plysan ply...@gmail.com To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 3:52:55 AM Subject: [ovirt-users] Question about power user and public template Hi, Currently I have run into a problem about permissions when creating vm from template. Say if non admin user A in power user portal want to create vm from template C created by non admin user B, I found out that A need to have both power user role and userbasedtemplatevm role to make it work. If i only assign userbasedtemplatevm to C, A can only view the template in power user portal but not able to create vm from it. I'd say the problem is that the template has some disks and as a UserTemplateBasedVm only you are not allowed to Access Image Storage Domains? Thanks for pointing that out, I really didn't think the disk has permissions too :) Because PowerUserRole has more permissions than UserTemplateBasedVm, so I think assigning PowerUserRole is enough to see the template in power user portal. Based on this thought, I did the following two experiment: 1. I assigned PowerUserRole to user A in Configure - System Permissions, but after that I still cannot see template C in power user portal. The above role assignment result in user A having PowerUserRole inherited from System Permission, and based on [1], user A should have PowerUserRole on template C, right ? yes, you should be able to verify this in the webadmin-template main tab-permissions subtab 2. Now based on 1 if I explicitly add PowerUserRole to user A on template C, I can see template C and create vms from it. but it should already be there. And also, since you have created the template as public everyone should have the UserTemplateBasedVm on it. You could verify this on the same subtab. I think my experiment above is not clear enough, so I made another one, and found the following behavior: 1. If user has only PowerUser role which is inherited from system on a template, he cannot see the template on userportal. And base on this if UserTemplateBasedVm role is added to the user, the user can see it in userportal now. 2. If user has only PowerUser role assigned independently (not inherited from system) on a template, he can see the template in userportal. IIUC, PowerUser role inherited from system should have the same behavior with PowerUser role assigned independently. Ideas ? --- Thanks plysan For my understanding, the above two role assignment should have the same result. Any ideas? so, if you have a template on which everyone has UserTemplateBasedVm and a user with PowerUserRole and you can not see it in the userportal, it should be a bug. But for me it seems working on current upstream code... [1]: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/engine-devel/2012-December/003229.html For details about specific roles and what can be done by which role you can have a look at: webadmin - Configure in top right corner - Roles side tab - pick a specific role - Edit button So is this the expected behavior? I don't quite understand what userbasedtemplatevm is used for. I noticed that making template C public have the effect of assign userbasedtemplatevm to everyone, but that seems not enough to let everyone use it. My engine version is 3.3.4. Any ideas? thanks for any help! ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2014-05-05
Minutes:http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-05-07-14.01.html Minutes (text): http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-05-07-14.01.txt Log: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-05-07-14.01.log.html = #ovirt: oVirt Weekly Sync = Meeting started by doron at 14:01:34 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-05-07-14.01.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Agenda and roll Call (doron, 14:01:36) * infra update (doron, 14:01:37) * 3.4.z updates (doron, 14:01:39) * 3.5 status (doron, 14:01:40) * conferences and workshops (doron, 14:01:42) * other topics (doron, 14:01:43) * infra update (doron, 14:02:04) * most of the rpm jobs have been migrated to run per-patch. Several slaves added to support the new load. (doron, 14:05:18) * jobs are now capapable of running per branch and GERRIT_REFSPEC . (doron, 14:06:21) * 3.4.z updates (doron, 14:08:45) * 3.4.1 GA expected tomorrow. (doron, 14:11:30) * 3.4.2 planning TBD. Draft is: RC in 3 weeks, GA in 1 month. (doron, 14:14:01) * 3.5 status (doron, 14:15:03) * ACTION: : sbonazzo to end an email to de...@ovirt.org with 3.4.2 timeline and tracker (doron, 14:16:27) * conferences and workshops (doron, 15:16:31) * Rene Koch will be presenting another workshop in Vienna this weekend. bkp gave a talk at the CentOS dojo on Monday night. Light attendance, but lots of VMware people who were eager to hear more. (doron, 15:17:20) * bkp is giving three talks this week at FISL 15 in Porto Alegre, Brazil. (doron, 15:18:03) * other topics (doron, 15:19:28) Meeting ended at 15:44:16 UTC. Action Items * : sbonazzo to end an email to de...@ovirt.org with 3.4.2 timeline and tracker Action Items, by person --- * sbonazzo * : sbonazzo to end an email to de...@ovirt.org with 3.4.2 timeline and tracker * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * doron (113) * itamar (80) * sbonazzo (31) * danken (31) * mskrivanek (24) * ybronhei (14) * fabiand (12) * lvernia (10) * apuimedo (10) * dcaro (5) * amureini (5) * awels (3) * fromani (3) * ovirtbot (2) * ecohen (1) * jb_netapp (1) * gshereme (1) * rbarry (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] problem in pulling zanata property files
Hi Einav, 2014-05-07 6:31 GMT+08:00 Einav Cohen eco...@redhat.com: Hi plysan, apologies for the late response (was OOO without internet connectivity last week). what we can do (maybe that's what you meant - not sure) is to make sure that when we auto-generate the 'on the fly' English .properties files (as part of the process of pushing the English strings), they are generated already in the proper naming and location, just so the matching zh-CN files will eventually be created with the similar (proper) naming and location once pulled from Zanata. Yes, this is what i meant. this will result in changed documents' names and paths in Zanata, i.e. Zanata will actually identify these newly-named-and-located documents as 'new' documents, rather than 'updated' docuemnts, so this process is a little bit risky (existing translations may be lost) so we must do it carefully, therefore it may take a while to complete (I need to consult the Zanata people in order to find out what is the best way to address this issue). It's really good to hear you can try to improve this. Really appreciated :) --- Thanks, plysan Thanks, Einav - Original Message - From: plysan ply...@gmail.com To: Einav Cohen eco...@redhat.com Cc: Users@ovirt.org List users@ovirt.org Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 12:35:48 AM Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] problem in pulling zanata property files Hi Einav, Thanks for your reply. This is very helpful. But I think we could fake these 'on the fly' English .properties files and just use them for zanata push operation. So we don't have to rename these files every time we pull them. What do you think ? --- Thanks, plysan 2014-04-25 2:59 GMT+08:00 Einav Cohen eco...@redhat.com : Hi plysan, the 9 documents with the strange name/location [1] are properties files that do not have matching English .properties files in the oVirt-engine code repo (as opposed to LocalizedEnums_zh_CN.properties and messages_zh_CN.properties that do have matching English .properties files in the ovirt-engine code repo [2]). The matching English strings for the documents in [1] reside in the ovirt-engine code repo within GWT Constants/Message interface Java files, rather than English .properties files. Zanata cannot receive GWT Constants/Message interface Java files as input. So the process of pushing the English strings to Zanata for translation includes a GWT-compilation-based auto-generation of 'on the fly' English .properties files with similar strange naming/location (those English .properties files are not pushed into the ovirt-engine code repo), which consequently leads to the strange naming/location of the zh-CN files as well. the names/locations of the files in [1] should actually be [3]. so if you want the translations that you are pulling from Zanata to be named correctly and reside in the correct location in your local ovirt-engine code directory, simply run [4] after doing the pull from Zanata. Thanks, Einav [1] frontend/webadmin/modules/webadmin/src/main/resources/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/org.ovirt.engine.ui.common.CommonApplicationConstants_zh_CN.properties frontend/webadmin/modules/webadmin/src/main/resources/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/org.ovirt.engine.ui.common.CommonApplicationMessages_zh_CN.properties frontend/webadmin/modules/webadmin/src/main/resources/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/org.ovirt.engine.ui.uicompat.SpiceRedKeys_zh_CN.properties frontend/webadmin/modules/webadmin/src/main/resources/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/org.ovirt.engine.ui.uicompat.UIConstants_zh_CN.properties frontend/webadmin/modules/webadmin/src/main/resources/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/org.ovirt.engine.ui.uicompat.UIMessages_zh_CN.properties frontend/webadmin/modules/webadmin/src/main/resources/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/org.ovirt.engine.ui.userportal.ApplicationConstants_zh_CN.properties frontend/webadmin/modules/webadmin/src/main/resources/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/org.ovirt.engine.ui.userportal.ApplicationMessages_zh_CN.properties frontend/webadmin/modules/webadmin/src/main/resources/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/org.ovirt.engine.ui.webadmin.ApplicationConstants_zh_CN.properties frontend/webadmin/modules/webadmin/src/main/resources/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/org.ovirt.engine.ui.webadmin.ApplicationMessages_zh_CN.properties [2] frontend/webadmin/modules/uicompat/src/main/resources/org/ovirt/engine/ui/uicompat/LocalizedEnums.properties packaging/branding/ovirt.brand/messages.properties [3] frontend/webadmin/modules/gwt-common/src/main/resources/org/ovirt/engine/ui/common/CommonApplicationConstants_zh_CN.properties frontend/webadmin/modules/gwt-common/src/main/resources/org/ovirt/engine/ui/common/CommonApplicationMessages_zh_CN.properties
Re: [ovirt-users] Ceph
On 01.05.2014 10:07, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: When I read [1] I got curious how much demand for supporting Ceph we can expect in the near future. So if use it or plan to use it please let us know. We are committed to deploy exactly Ceph (RBD) for several deployments in Bulgaria. [Because, in our humble opinion, Fedora/oVirt/Ceph is the optimal stack for the mass case corporate class datacenters today.] Our pilot project (for a datacenter in a state university) do not have strict deadlines, but we hope to be online before the end of 2014. We will try to contribute back as much as possible - as early adopters feedback or VDSM patches, where we are able to debug and workaround the issues. Kind Regards, Alek ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] How to install spice-xpi-2.8 on ubuntu12.04?
*when i complie spice-xpi-2.8 on ubuntu12.04 with firefox29,i receive this
error:*
root@user:~/src/spice-xpi-2.8# make
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/src/spice-xpi-2.8'
Making all in SpiceXPI
make[2]: Entering directory `/root/src/spice-xpi-2.8/SpiceXPI'
Making all in src
make[3]: Entering directory `/root/src/spice-xpi-2.8/SpiceXPI/src'
Making all in plugin
make[4]: Entering directory `/root/src/spice-xpi-2.8/SpiceXPI/src/plugin'
GENnsISpicec.xpt
make all-am
make[5]: Entering directory `/root/src/spice-xpi-2.8/SpiceXPI/src/plugin'
CXXlibnsISpicec_la-controller.lo
controller.cpp: In destructor 'SpiceController::~SpiceController()':
controller.cpp:73:5: warning: format not a string literal and no format
arguments [-Wformat-security]
CXXlibnsISpicec_la-np_entry.lo
CXXlibnsISpicec_la-npn_gate.lo
CXXlibnsISpicec_la-npp_gate.lo
CXXlibnsISpicec_la-nsScriptablePeer.lo
In file included from nsScriptablePeer.cpp:54:0:
/root/src/xulrunner-sdk/include/nsError.h:186:14: error: expected
constructor, destructor, or type conversion before '(' token
/root/src/xulrunner-sdk/include/nsError.h:188:14: error: expected
constructor, destructor, or type conversion before '(' token
make[5]: *** [libnsISpicec_la-nsScriptablePeer.lo] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/root/src/spice-xpi-2.8/SpiceXPI/src/plugin'
make[4]: *** [all] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/src/spice-xpi-2.8/SpiceXPI/src/plugin'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/src/spice-xpi-2.8/SpiceXPI/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/src/spice-xpi-2.8/SpiceXPI'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/src/spice-xpi-2.8'
make: *** [all] Error 2
#
*Any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you*
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
