Re: [Users] oVirt quality team proposal
+1. That would be really usefull Vincent Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I would like to propose to the community to join creating a group for testing oVirt releases and oVirt bug fixes. I suggest to create a ovirt-qe mailing list and set that as default QE assignee for oVirt bugs. The list may be used for coordinating testing efforts, to be notified about new ovirt bugs, to plan test days, propose test cases, discussing about jenkins jobs implementation and so on. Forming just a small group of people testing milestones release will also help in having better release testing. What do you think about this? -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Datacenter is down
On 10/25/2013 03:01 PM, Mario Giammarco wrote: Hello, after some shutdowns and reboots of my ovirt cluster now the data center is down: - gluster volumes are all UP - all storage (Data/ISO) is inactive - Datacenter is down. I have tried to click on all activate buttons I have found but nothing happens. Only one time I got: - failed to activate storage domain - failed to reconstruct master domain for data center What can I do now?? Thanks, Mario ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users engine logs? vdsm logs from spm candidate host? Are your Gluster volumes mounted on the hypervisors? _Vincent ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Vincent Van der Kussen @vincentvdk ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Running Gluster on hypervisor nodes
On 10/09/2013 12:01 AM, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote: Hi, We are currently exeprimenting with running Gluster on the hypervisor nodes. To test this we have 2 machines running as hypervisor nodes with each a replicated Gluster Volume. We created a VM and stored the disks on the Gluster volume and this works quite well. However, there's one thing that doesn't seem to work or might not be supported. When we put one of the 2 nodes that holds the SPM role in maintenance, the VM is successfully migrated, but the SPM role is not migrated to the remaining active hypervisor. As a result, the Data Center goes into Down state. Other than that the VM keeps working. Our question is. Can this be done? you're using the webadmin to place the host in maint mode? SPM role should migrate. anything bad in the logs? Hi, I added 2 files with excerpts from the logfiles. our setup - cloud-001.test.btr.local - engine - cloud-002.test.btr.local - hypervisor1 (had SPM role) - cloud-003.test.btr.local - hypervisor2 Regards, Vincent Hi, Apparently it is working. We just didn't wait long enough. It takes around 1-2 min to transfer the role. Nice! -- Vincent Van der Kussen @vincentvdk ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Running Gluster on hypervisor nodes
Hi, We are currently exeprimenting with running Gluster on the hypervisor nodes. To test this we have 2 machines running as hypervisor nodes with each a replicated Gluster Volume. We created a VM and stored the disks on the Gluster volume and this works quite well. However, there's one thing that doesn't seem to work or might not be supported. When we put one of the 2 nodes that holds the SPM role in maintenance, the VM is successfully migrated, but the SPM role is not migrated to the remaining active hypervisor. As a result, the Data Center goes into Down state. Other than that the VM keeps working. Our question is. Can this be done? -- Vincent Van der Kussen @vincentvdk ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Update from 3.2 to 3.3 (CentOS 6.4)
Hi, I just updated our oVirt 3.2 test setup to 3.3 without problems. One thing seems to be changed. instead of running engine-upgrade you need to run ovirt-setup _Vincent On 09/16/2013 06:41 PM, H. Haven Liu wrote: Thanks for the discussion. But for those of us that are not using gluster, but just good ol' NFS, is updating simply yum update ovirt-*? No, yum update won't upgrade ovirt packages. If you're running on Fedora, you need to update Fedora first, then run engine-upgrade. If you're on EL6, a simple engine-upgrade should work. Ofer, any other gotchas? Can you have someone create a 3.2 to 3.3 upgrade page on the wiki? Thanks Mike On Sep 16, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Mike Burns mbu...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/16/2013 05:26 PM, Joop wrote: Mike Burns wrote: On 09/16/2013 04:30 PM, Joop wrote: H. Haven Liu wrote: Hello, Is there any recommended procedure for updating from 3.2 to 3.3 (namely on a CentOS 6.4 system), or anything one should be careful when doing such update? Be careful when you use glusterfs, not nfs over glusterfs, but read the release-notes. It should have something to say about glusterfs domain not (yet) working on el6. Saw a small discussion on irc just yet and my two cents are that you can't add el6 support to ovirt in release 3.2 and then withdraw it with 3.3 and say well just wait for Centos/Rhel-6.5. We haven't removed any functionality in 3.3. In 3.2, we added support for gluster domains through a POSIXFS interface. In 3.3, we're adding a feature where we support gluster natively. This works in Fedora, but is not available on EL6. The POSIXFS option still exists You're right but what about users who want to use the (much) improved speed of the gluster domain over the POSIXFS interface? They are left out or they should move to Fed19 which I would do but I need to convince a couple of other people as well and they aren't going to agree. I understand the complaint, honestly. And we're working on a solution so that it will work for people on EL6. From the perspective of whether we should release with this limitation or not, I'd point out that by not releasing, we'd be preventing everyone from using any of the new features until we get a solution for this. I'd rather release and make it available for everyone now and say that the Gluster domain for EL6 will come as soon as we can work out the dependency issues. The kernel can come from elrepo so that is not a burden for the ovirt team, qemu/libvirt should be build by the ovirt team and be available from the ovirt repo. At the moment I also see/saw Jboss-7.1.1 qemu/libvirt wouldn't be the first packages to be in the ovirt-repo which are also in the main distributions repos. We're trying to work out a way to do this in a consistent manner going forward. We should have a solution soon, but in the meantime, the other functionality and features should work on both Fedora and EL6. Thanks for the clarification and I'm waiting eagerly for what/when the solution comes out. There have been a few considerations for solving this including rebuilding pure upstream or fedora packages for EL6. That is a risky solution in my mind since there are rather large deltas between Fedora and EL6. We're looking at whether we can have a virt-preview type of repo for EL6 similar to what exists today for Fedora[1]. Thanks Mike [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Preview_Repository Joop ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Vincent Van der Kussen @vincentvdk ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Update from 3.2 to 3.3 (CentOS 6.4)
On 09/21/2013 06:16 PM, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote: Hi, I just updated our oVirt 3.2 test setup to 3.3 without problems. One thing seems to be changed. instead of running engine-upgrade you need to run ovirt-setup that's worth either having a symlink for, or updating release notes / various places in wiki mentioning this. This is mentioned when running engine-upgrade. _Vincent On 09/16/2013 06:41 PM, H. Haven Liu wrote: Thanks for the discussion. But for those of us that are not using gluster, but just good ol' NFS, is updating simply yum update ovirt-*? No, yum update won't upgrade ovirt packages. If you're running on Fedora, you need to update Fedora first, then run engine-upgrade. If you're on EL6, a simple engine-upgrade should work. Ofer, any other gotchas? Can you have someone create a 3.2 to 3.3 upgrade page on the wiki? Thanks Mike On Sep 16, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Mike Burns mbu...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/16/2013 05:26 PM, Joop wrote: Mike Burns wrote: On 09/16/2013 04:30 PM, Joop wrote: H. Haven Liu wrote: Hello, Is there any recommended procedure for updating from 3.2 to 3.3 (namely on a CentOS 6.4 system), or anything one should be careful when doing such update? Be careful when you use glusterfs, not nfs over glusterfs, but read the release-notes. It should have something to say about glusterfs domain not (yet) working on el6. Saw a small discussion on irc just yet and my two cents are that you can't add el6 support to ovirt in release 3.2 and then withdraw it with 3.3 and say well just wait for Centos/Rhel-6.5. We haven't removed any functionality in 3.3. In 3.2, we added support for gluster domains through a POSIXFS interface. In 3.3, we're adding a feature where we support gluster natively. This works in Fedora, but is not available on EL6. The POSIXFS option still exists You're right but what about users who want to use the (much) improved speed of the gluster domain over the POSIXFS interface? They are left out or they should move to Fed19 which I would do but I need to convince a couple of other people as well and they aren't going to agree. I understand the complaint, honestly. And we're working on a solution so that it will work for people on EL6. From the perspective of whether we should release with this limitation or not, I'd point out that by not releasing, we'd be preventing everyone from using any of the new features until we get a solution for this. I'd rather release and make it available for everyone now and say that the Gluster domain for EL6 will come as soon as we can work out the dependency issues. The kernel can come from elrepo so that is not a burden for the ovirt team, qemu/libvirt should be build by the ovirt team and be available from the ovirt repo. At the moment I also see/saw Jboss-7.1.1 qemu/libvirt wouldn't be the first packages to be in the ovirt-repo which are also in the main distributions repos. We're trying to work out a way to do this in a consistent manner going forward. We should have a solution soon, but in the meantime, the other functionality and features should work on both Fedora and EL6. Thanks for the clarification and I'm waiting eagerly for what/when the solution comes out. There have been a few considerations for solving this including rebuilding pure upstream or fedora packages for EL6. That is a risky solution in my mind since there are rather large deltas between Fedora and EL6. We're looking at whether we can have a virt-preview type of repo for EL6 similar to what exists today for Fedora[1]. Thanks Mike [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Preview_Repository Joop ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Vincent Van der Kussen @vincentvdk ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Nic names : always start by eth0
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:40:16 +0200 Vincent Van der Kussrn vinc...@vanderkussen.org wrote: I hadn't looked at the history below which already explains it. you can also add a .reconfigure file in your root that allows you to provide a new root pwd on boot. - Vincent You need to delete the udev created files under /etc/udev.d I believe persistent-net-70-* or something (can't check). And then create your template Vincent Connected by Motorola Sven M. Geschke ov...@nebulaone.com wrote: Hi AFAIK This is more a CentOS- than an oVirt-issue. CentOS behaves identically on vSphere. If I remember correctly, this is due to the fact that the MAC-address of the virtual NIC has to change, when you create a VM from a template. CentOS however keeps the MAC address of the template and just adds the new MAC, which then of course becomes eth1. --SMG - Original Message - From: gregoire leroy gregoire.le...@retenodus.net To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 7:59:35 AM Subject: [Users] Nic names : always start by eth0 Hello, I have an ovirt cluster which runs CentOS VM. I have a template to create VM. On this template, there are two interfaces, eth0 and eth1. When I create a VM using this template, the new interfaces are named eth2 and eth3. It can be pretty annoying and I would like to know if it would be possible to always start by eth0 ? If I remember the discussion on IRC, it would be necessary to clean old udev rules (in centos it seems to be /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules) Thanks, Regards, Grégoire ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Fwd: cannot assign network without IP address
Hi, Ok, I'll do the upgrade some day but this raises some questions. Thanks for the reply! Now that there are el6 packages available, oVirt could be used in small production environments by people who can't afford a RHEV subscription or don't need the support So I'm wondering if there will be some more extensive QA? At some point it would be nice to have version that is usable without you need to keep updating to fix things. I know some people in the CentOS community are interesting in this so it might be an idea to work together? just my 2c Vincent On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 03:25:52AM -0400, Alona Kaplan wrote: It seems like an old bug. Since oVirt3.1 a lot of bugs were fixed in the edit nic dialog. Maybe consider using ovirt3.2? Alona. - Original Message - From: Vincent Van der Kussen vinc...@vanderkussen.org To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 9:38:23 AM Subject: [Users] cannot assign network without IP address Hi, I'm using oVirt 3.1 on CentOS 6.3 and have the following issue If I add a logical network to the datacenter i cannot assign it to a host without giving it an IP address. I just want to use the logical network as a bridge without specifying an IP address (None option in the network settings). This is the error message : Error while executing action Setup Networks: Illegal or Incomplete IP Address In the log on the engine i see the following error : VDSGenericException: VDSNetworkException: Specified netmask or gateway but not ip To me this is complete bogus since none of my nics have any ip settings defined. Only the ovirtmgmt network has this which is copied from the initial network setup during the ovirt-engine install I also found this post which discusses the same problem : http://www.mail-archive.com/users@ovirt.org/msg06261.html When adding the logical network to the datacenter I can also not unset the VM Network option. In our RHEV setup we can do this perfectly. Regards, Vincent ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] cannot assign network without IP address
Hi, I'm using oVirt 3.1 on CentOS 6.3 and have the following issue If I add a logical network to the datacenter i cannot assign it to a host without giving it an IP address. I just want to use the logical network as a bridge without specifying an IP address (None option in the network settings). This is the error message : Error while executing action Setup Networks: Illegal or Incomplete IP Address In the log on the engine i see the following error : VDSGenericException: VDSNetworkException: Specified netmask or gateway but not ip To me this is complete bogus since none of my nics have any ip settings defined. Only the ovirtmgmt network has this which is copied from the initial network setup during the ovirt-engine install I also found this post which discusses the same problem : http://www.mail-archive.com/users@ovirt.org/msg06261.html When adding the logical network to the datacenter I can also not unset the VM Network option. In our RHEV setup we can do this perfectly. Regards, Vincent ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Using ovirt-shell as a regular user
Hi, I just found out that you cannot use the ovirt-shell as a regular (mortal) user. I can access the shell from the root account or if I give the user sudo rights to do so. I didn't find anything in the documentation about this so i would like to know if this is normal behaviour? also posted this here : https://access.redhat.com/discussion/use-rhevm-shell-mortal-user Regards, Vincent ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Using ovirt-shell as a regular user
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:08:36PM +0300, Michael Pasternak wrote: Hi Vincent, how did you installed ovirt-shell? On 04/02/2013 01:37 PM, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote: Hi, I just found out that you cannot use the ovirt-shell as a regular (mortal) user. I can access the shell from the root account or if I give the user sudo rights to do so. I didn't find anything in the documentation about this so i would like to know if this is normal behaviour? also posted this here : https://access.redhat.com/discussion/use-rhevm-shell-mortal-user Installed it from the yum repository on F18 -- Michael Pasternak RedHat, ENG-Virtualization RD ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Using ovirt-shell as a regular user
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:51:03PM +0300, Michael Pasternak wrote: what error did you see when trying to use shell (as non-privileged user)? On 04/02/2013 02:13 PM, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote: On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:08:36PM +0300, Michael Pasternak wrote: Hi Vincent, how did you installed ovirt-shell? No real error, just an empty page with END On 04/02/2013 01:37 PM, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote: Hi, I just found out that you cannot use the ovirt-shell as a regular (mortal) user. I can access the shell from the root account or if I give the user sudo rights to do so. I didn't find anything in the documentation about this so i would like to know if this is normal behaviour? also posted this here : https://access.redhat.com/discussion/use-rhevm-shell-mortal-user Installed it from the yum repository on F18 -- Michael Pasternak RedHat, ENG-Virtualization RD -- Michael Pasternak RedHat, ENG-Virtualization RD ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Using ovirt-shell as a regular user
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:33:49PM +0300, Michael Pasternak wrote: On 04/02/2013 02:48 PM, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote: On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:51:03PM +0300, Michael Pasternak wrote: what error did you see when trying to use shell (as non-privileged user)? On 04/02/2013 02:13 PM, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote: On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:08:36PM +0300, Michael Pasternak wrote: Hi Vincent, how did you installed ovirt-shell? No real error, just an empty page with END you mean that you could access the shell, but commands execution has failed, or an empty page when you trying to run the shell? I get an empty page. I also see no log of a user being logged in on the ovirt mgmt interface On 04/02/2013 01:37 PM, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote: Hi, I just found out that you cannot use the ovirt-shell as a regular (mortal) user. I can access the shell from the root account or if I give the user sudo rights to do so. I didn't find anything in the documentation about this so i would like to know if this is normal behaviour? also posted this here : https://access.redhat.com/discussion/use-rhevm-shell-mortal-user Installed it from the yum repository on F18 -- Michael Pasternak RedHat, ENG-Virtualization RD -- Michael Pasternak RedHat, ENG-Virtualization RD -- Michael Pasternak RedHat, ENG-Virtualization RD ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] oVirt 3.2.1 Beta EL6 Content is available
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:34:22PM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Mike Burns wrote: The oVirt Team is happy to announce that the EL6 rpms for the 3.2 release are now available in the beta repositories. To access this content, * download and install the release rpm [1] on your EL6 host. * Edit the ovirt.repo file in /etc/yum.repos.d to enable the ovirt-beta repository. * Follow the rest of the instructions on http://www.ovirt.org/Download. This content is in beta, so feedback on issues found is greatly appreciated. Issues can be filed in Bugzilla[2] in the Community/Ovirt project. You can also get help on IRC in #ovirt on OFTC.net or through the users@ovirt.org mailing list. Thanks The oVirt Team [1] http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/ovirt-release-el6-5-3.noarch.rpm [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users do they already contain the fix from http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/11254/ that was one of the biggest problems of 3.2? Gianluca Are there plans on releasing a SRPM for jboss-as-7.1.1-10.el6.x86_64.rpm ? Vincent ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] HA wirh oVirt
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:19:21PM +, Alexandre Santos wrote: 2013/2/13 Jorick Astrego jor...@netbulae.eu: On 02/13/2013 04:47 PM, Alexandre Santos wrote: Hi all, I've been asked for a HA solution and I've been testing oVirt with a NFS NAS and 2 hosts where I run 2 VMs that have a balancer at their front, each on a different host. Now I'm thinking on the possibility of a host malfunction and my question is: is there automatic migration of the VMs that are running on this host to the other host? Sorry if it is a silly question :-) Alex ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users Bit of a silly question as it is listed on the homepage (http://www.ovirt.org) ;- Packed with features choice of stand-alone Hypervisor or install-on-top of your existing Linux installation high availability live migration scheduled migration Web-based management interface iSCSI, FC, NFS, and local storage -- Kind regards, Jorick Astrego Netbulae B.V. Site: http://www.netbulae.eu Hi, Hi :-) I've been migrating VMs using the web administration but I need Power Management on each host so that the engine detects that a host is down, right? Yes, it needs to be fenced. Regarding the topic of this mail which grabbed my attention. when I think about HA and oVirt I think about the following : - oVirt Engine/RHEV-M can failover to an other host - The shared storage is also available on the other side. I've been testing migrating Engine in case it fails in a POC by putting Engine in a KVM VM under control of pacemaker and DRBD to drop the need of shared storage. The storage part is something I haven't found a solid solution for. Maybe with DRBD, but there must be a better way i think. Vincent Alex ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:08:48PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar Hi, Deploying multiple VMs from 1 template at the same time. Currently you have to wait until the template image is available again. Best regards, Vincent ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Python script retrieving MACs
Hi, Im currently making a script using the Python SDK to retrieve a list of VM names + their MAC address. I currently came up with this 17 vm = api.vms.list() 18 19 20 for item in vm: 21 hostname = item.get_name() 22 nic = api.vms.get(name=hostname).nics.list() 23 for net in nic: 24 nicname = net.mac.get_address() 25 print %s % hostname 26 print %s % nicname I've noticed that retrieving the nic list during the iteration does a logon each time which slows thing down dramatically. Is there a better way to get the NICs from a list of VMs? Regards, Vincent ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Mailinglist naming
Hi all, I was just wondering if it would be possible to rename the mailinglist from Users to ovirt-users or something. I think it would be just a bit more clear when looking at your inbox. This is just a suggestion. Don't take this as critic! -- Regards, Vincent ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Mailinglist naming
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:04:59PM +0100, Dave Neary wrote: Hi, On 10/30/2012 11:03 AM, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote: I was just wondering if it would be possible to rename the mailinglist from Users to ovirt-users or something. I think it would be just a bit more clear when looking at your inbox. This is just a suggestion. Don't take this as critic! I assume you're talking about the mailing list subject prefix, not the mailing list name - is that correct? I don't see why not, but would like to get opinions from others. Our mailing lists and other infrastructure have a dedicated team that manages them. Cheers, Dave. Hi Dave, I'm indeed talking about the subject prefix. Sorry for the confusion. -- Regards, Vincent -- Dave Neary Community Action and Impact Open Source and Standards, Red Hat Ph: +33 9 50 71 55 62 / Cell: +33 6 77 01 92 13 ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] engine-iso-uploader problem
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:20:54PM -0400, Keith Robertson wrote: Can you re-run with -v (verbose) and send me the output? On 10/30/2012 12:00 PM, Dennis Böck wrote: Thanks for the instructions how to build. I did it and installed the rpm. Now I get a new error message: [root@vdihost1 RPMS]# engine-iso-uploader upload -i local-iso-share /run/media/dennis/4F0B-18DE/ovirt/Fedora-17-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso Please provide the REST API username for oVirt Engine (CTRL+D to abort): admin Please provide the REST API password for the admin oVirt Engine user (CTRL+D to abort): ERROR: Unable to connect to REST API. Reason: Unauthorized ERROR: 'NoneType' object is not iterable INFO: Use the -h option to see usage. I am sure, that I used the same password as I used for the webinterface. Any ideas? Hi, Have you tried engine-iso-uploader -i local-iso-share upload /run/media/dennis/4F0B-18DE/ovirt/Fedora-17-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso -- Regards, Vincent __ Von: [1]users-boun...@ovirt.org [[2]users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von Keith Robertson [[3]krobe...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Oktober 2012 18:02 An: Dennis Böck Cc: [4]users@ovirt.org Betreff: Re: [Users] engine-iso-uploader problem On 10/24/2012 11:43 AM, Dennis Böck wrote: Since I am not experienced in building software, I took [5]http://www.ovirt.org/releases/3.1/rpm/Fedora/17/noarch/ovirt-iso-upl oader-3.1.0-0.git1841d9.fc17.noarch.rpm But your e-mail sounded like that you can just set a parameter to avoid the problem? Maybe I could avoid the problem, if there was another way for installing VMS/bringing ISOs to VMs? It doesn't appear to be build yet. Step 1: git clone [6]http://gerrit.ovirt.org/p/ovirt-iso-uploader.git Step 2: export APP_VERSION=3.0.0; export APP_RELEASE=1 Step 3: cd ovirt-iso-uploader Step 4: make Step 5: Notice the ovirt-iso-uploader*.rpm location in the STDOUT Step 6: yum install /path/to/ovirt-iso-uploader*.rpm Von: Keith Robertson [[7]mailto:krobe...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Oktober 2012 17:08 An: Dennis Böck Cc: [8]users@ovirt.org Betreff: Re: AW: [Users] engine-iso-uploader problem On 10/24/2012 10:56 AM, Dennis Böck wrote: Obviously my e-mail wasn't added to the intendet thread: [9]http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2012-September/003670.html Ah, that 'insecure flag'. That change should be merged. Are you still experiencing the issue with a recent build of the iso-uploader? [10]http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/7774/ (How can I reply to a such a thread??) Thanks in advance Dennis ___ Von: [11]users-boun...@ovirt.org [[12]users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von Keith Robertson [[13]krobe...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Oktober 2012 16:34 An: Dennis Böck Cc: [14]users@oVirt.org Betreff: Re: [Users] engine-iso-uploader problem Can you please elaborate on the 'insecure flag'? What exactly are you referring to? ___ From: Dennis Böck [15]den...@webdienstleistungen.com To: [16]users@oVirt.org [17]users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:26:32 AM Subject: [Users] engine-iso-uploader problem Hi Keith/Tobias, how can I set the insecure flag? The engine-iso-uploader tool doesn't have such a parameter. Best regards Dennis P.S.: I hope this e-mail goes to the [Users] engine-iso-uploader problem-thread - I have no idea how to do it else. ___ Users mailing list [18]Users@ovirt.org [19]http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users References 1. mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org 2. mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org 3. mailto:krobe...@redhat.com 4. mailto:users@ovirt.org 5. http://www.ovirt.org/releases/3.1/rpm/Fedora/17/noarch/ovirt-iso-uploader-3.1.0-0.git1841d9.fc17.noarch.rpm 6. http://gerrit.ovirt.org/p/ovirt-iso-uploader.git 7. mailto:krobe...@redhat.com 8. mailto:users@ovirt.org 9. http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2012-September/003670.html 10. http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/7774/ 11. mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org 12. mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org 13. mailto:krobe...@redhat.com 14. mailto:users@oVirt.org 15. mailto:den...@webdienstleistungen.com 16. mailto:users@oVirt.org 17. mailto:users@ovirt.org 18. mailto:Users@ovirt.org 19. http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org
Re: [Users] How to resize physical disk size with virt-p2v
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:44:14AM -0400, Allon Mureinik wrote: Hi Sven, Have you tried qemu-img? - Original Message - - Original Message - From: Sven Knohsalla s.knohsa...@netbiscuits.com To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 5:48:45 PM Subject: [Users] How to resize physical disk size with virt-p2v Hi, we’re currently using oVirt engine3.0 and have about 50 VMs successfully running ( thanks for your great work!!) At the moment we do migrate ESX/KVM VMs and baremetal servers to oVirt. For p2v migration we’re using virt-p2v 0.87 (iso created from rpm virt-p2v-image-builder) Migration is working fine, but the vdisk size is accordingly to original physical hdd size. For example: Server with 500 GB HDD size, partitions (swap,/,boot) shrinked to ~50 GB. (df –h will show only 50 GB for / ) First I thought, shrinking partitions of the server will help out, But unfortunately, the tool is using the whole hard disk space to convert (using dd ?) …and so we have a successfully migrated VM in oVirt with 500GB vHDD size. Is there any way or alternative software we can use for P2V migration? Thanks in advance, Sven. Sven Knohsalla | Systems Administration Netbiscuits - Enabling the mobile experience . Update: Netbiscuits is hiring mobile specialists in sales, marketing and development Recent awards accolades Mobile Entertainment Award Winner 2011 Deloitte Technology Fast 50 2011, ranked #28 Frost Sullivan Best Practices Award 2011 Beschreibung: Beschreibung: Beschreibung: http://www.netbiscuits.com/image/image_gallery?uuid=45e4676e-f783-42c7-8e34-de7b37986c27groupId=10211t=1322830528919Beschreibung: Beschreibung: Beschreibung: http://www.netbiscuits.com/image/image_gallery?uuid=5126cc7e-90cb-4173-bd2f-c5294548f996groupId=10211t=1322830528927 Register Court: Local Court Kaiserslautern | Commercial Register ID: HR B 3604 Management Board: Guido Moggert, Michael Neidhoefer, Christian Reitz, Martin Suess Hi, Maybe you can try using clonezilla to only export the partitions of your physical machine. Unless they take the full disk of course. Vincent ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
