Re: [Users] Multiple problems with latest beta ovirt

2012-12-04 Thread Juan Hernandez
On 12/04/2012 08:29 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 12/04/2012 09:23 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Itamar Heim > > wrote:
>>
>> On 12/04/2012 02:00 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Itamar Heim > 
>> >> wrote:
>>
>>  On 11/30/2012 12:46 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:
>>
>>
>>  Since the beta ovirt has a newer version than the
>> nightly, I was
>>  forced
>>  to upgrade.
>>
>>
>>  can you please elaborate on the sentence above? which
>> nightly/beta?
>>  (usually nightly is newer than beta, as it is built from
>> master)?
>>
>>  thanks,
>>  Itamar
>>
>>
>> beta is 3.1.0.4
>> nightly is still 3.1.0.3
>>
>>
>> 3.1.0.4 is latest 3.1 version, not beta?
>> next beta should be 3.2 versioned
>>
>>
>> Those are the versions from http:///ovirt/.org/releases/:
>> latest 3.1: ovirt-engine-3.1.0-4.fc17.noarch.rpm
>> beta: ovirt-engine-3.1.0-4.fc17.noarch.rpm
>> nightly: ovirt-engine-3.1.0-3.20121203.gitf60f575.fc17.noarch.rpm
>>
> 
> ofer/juan, seems that nightly wasn't moved to 3.1.0.4 (well, supposed to 
> be moved today to 3.2)
> 

Nightly is built based on the master branch of the repository, and the
version number change to 3.1.0-4 didn't go into that branch, only in the
engine_3.1 branch.

Now that the change in version number to 3.2.0 is merged into the master
branch next nightly should be 3.2.0-1.

-- 
Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta
3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain
Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 - Red Hat S.L.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Multiple problems with latest beta ovirt

2012-12-03 Thread Itamar Heim

On 12/04/2012 09:23 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:




On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Itamar Heim mailto:ih...@redhat.com>> wrote:

On 12/04/2012 02:00 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:




On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Itamar Heim mailto:ih...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:

 On 11/30/2012 12:46 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:


 Since the beta ovirt has a newer version than the
nightly, I was
 forced
 to upgrade.


 can you please elaborate on the sentence above? which
nightly/beta?
 (usually nightly is newer than beta, as it is built from
master)?

 thanks,
 Itamar


beta is 3.1.0.4
nightly is still 3.1.0.3


3.1.0.4 is latest 3.1 version, not beta?
next beta should be 3.2 versioned


Those are the versions from http:///ovirt/.org/releases/:
latest 3.1: ovirt-engine-3.1.0-4.fc17.noarch.rpm
beta: ovirt-engine-3.1.0-4.fc17.noarch.rpm
nightly: ovirt-engine-3.1.0-3.20121203.gitf60f575.fc17.noarch.rpm



ofer/juan, seems that nightly wasn't moved to 3.1.0.4 (well, supposed to 
be moved today to 3.2)


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Multiple problems with latest beta ovirt

2012-12-03 Thread Cristian Falcas
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Itamar Heim  wrote:

> On 12/04/2012 02:00 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Itamar Heim > > wrote:
>>
>> On 11/30/2012 12:46 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:
>>
>>
>> Since the beta ovirt has a newer version than the nightly, I was
>> forced
>> to upgrade.
>>
>>
>> can you please elaborate on the sentence above? which nightly/beta?
>> (usually nightly is newer than beta, as it is built from master)?
>>
>> thanks,
>> Itamar
>>
>>
>> beta is 3.1.0.4
>> nightly is still 3.1.0.3
>>
>
> 3.1.0.4 is latest 3.1 version, not beta?
> next beta should be 3.2 versioned
>
>
Those are the versions from http://*ovirt*.org/releases/:
latest 3.1: ovirt-engine-3.1.0-4.fc17.noarch.rpm
beta: ovirt-engine-3.1.0-4.fc17.noarch.rpm
nightly: ovirt-engine-3.1.0-3.20121203.gitf60f575.fc17.noarch.rpm
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Multiple problems with latest beta ovirt

2012-12-03 Thread Itamar Heim

On 12/04/2012 02:00 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:




On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Itamar Heim mailto:ih...@redhat.com>> wrote:

On 11/30/2012 12:46 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:


Since the beta ovirt has a newer version than the nightly, I was
forced
to upgrade.


can you please elaborate on the sentence above? which nightly/beta?
(usually nightly is newer than beta, as it is built from master)?

thanks,
Itamar


beta is 3.1.0.4
nightly is still 3.1.0.3


3.1.0.4 is latest 3.1 version, not beta?
next beta should be 3.2 versioned

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Multiple problems with latest beta ovirt

2012-12-03 Thread Cristian Falcas
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Itamar Heim  wrote:

> On 11/30/2012 12:46 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:
>
>>
>> Since the beta ovirt has a newer version than the nightly, I was forced
>> to upgrade.
>>
>
> can you please elaborate on the sentence above? which nightly/beta?
> (usually nightly is newer than beta, as it is built from master)?
>
> thanks,
>Itamar
>
>
beta is 3.1.0.4
nightly is still 3.1.0.3
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Multiple problems with latest beta ovirt

2012-12-03 Thread Itamar Heim

On 11/30/2012 12:46 AM, Cristian Falcas wrote:


Since the beta ovirt has a newer version than the nightly, I was forced
to upgrade.


can you please elaborate on the sentence above? which nightly/beta?
(usually nightly is newer than beta, as it is built from master)?

thanks,
   Itamar

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users