Re: [Users] Network issues - Bonding

2014-01-13 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon


- Original Message -
> From: "Dan Ferris" 
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, January 6, 2014 3:52:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] Network issues - Bonding
> 
> It's FC 19 with all of the latest updates.
> 
> On 01/06/2014 05:56 AM, Sven Kieske wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > just out of curiosity (I'm also looking
> > at implementing bonding on our ComputeNodes):
> > 
> > Which OS version are you running ?

I think I once ran into it and a restart of the
computer solved it, tried to reproduce again and
couldn't (so no bug was filed).

> > 
> > 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Network issues - Bonding

2014-01-06 Thread Dan Ferris
It's FC 19 with all of the latest updates.

On 01/06/2014 05:56 AM, Sven Kieske wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> just out of curiosity (I'm also looking
> at implementing bonding on our ComputeNodes):
> 
> Which OS version are you running ?
> 
> 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Network issues - Bonding

2014-01-06 Thread Sven Kieske
Hi,

just out of curiosity (I'm also looking
at implementing bonding on our ComputeNodes):

Which OS version are you running ?


-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards

Sven Kieske

Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Network issues - Bonding

2014-01-06 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 03:39:45AM -0500, Assaf Muller wrote:
> If you ifdown bond4 then ifup it, does the bond mode properly update
> to bond mode 1? If not, it sounds like an initscripts or bonding module bug.
> 
> 
> Assaf Muller, Cloud Networking Engineer 
> Red Hat 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dan Ferris" 
> To: "users" 
> Sent: Saturday, January 4, 2014 5:31:21 AM
> Subject: [Users] Network issues - Bonding
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> A little bit ago I wrote an email about network issues I was having.
> 
> I found the problem...
> 
> On the VM host, I had a bond set up between two network interfaces.  The
> bond mode was set to mode 1 (active/passive).
> 
> However when I look at the bond on the box, I get this:
> 
> [root@node02 bonding]# cat bond4
> Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)
> 
> Bonding Mode: load balancing (round-robin)
> MII Status: up
> MII Polling Interval (ms): 0
> Up Delay (ms): 0
> Down Delay (ms): 0
> 
> Slave Interface: em2
> MII Status: up
> Speed: 1000 Mbps
> Duplex: full
> Link Failure Count: 0
> Permanent HW addr: d4:ae:52:6d:c8:cc
> Slave queue ID: 0
> 
> Slave Interface: em3
> MII Status: up
> Speed: 1000 Mbps
> Duplex: full
> Link Failure Count: 0
> Permanent HW addr: d4:ae:52:6d:c8:ce
> Slave queue ID: 0
> 
> Somehow, the OS is not setting the bonding mode right.  I verified that
> it was set to mode 1 in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfe-bond4
> 
> When I take the bond away, the host network works perfectly on both of
> the formerly bonded interfaces.
> 
> So again, if anyone has any ideas, I'm open to suggestions.

In particular, if you

  ifconfig bond0 down
  echo 1 > /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/mode
  ifconfig bond0 up

the content of /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/mode should change. If it
does not, it is most probably a kernel bug.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Network issues - Bonding

2014-01-05 Thread Assaf Muller
If you ifdown bond4 then ifup it, does the bond mode properly update
to bond mode 1? If not, it sounds like an initscripts or bonding module bug.


Assaf Muller, Cloud Networking Engineer 
Red Hat 

- Original Message -
From: "Dan Ferris" 
To: "users" 
Sent: Saturday, January 4, 2014 5:31:21 AM
Subject: [Users] Network issues - Bonding

Hello All,

A little bit ago I wrote an email about network issues I was having.

I found the problem...

On the VM host, I had a bond set up between two network interfaces.  The
bond mode was set to mode 1 (active/passive).

However when I look at the bond on the box, I get this:

[root@node02 bonding]# cat bond4
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)

Bonding Mode: load balancing (round-robin)
MII Status: up
MII Polling Interval (ms): 0
Up Delay (ms): 0
Down Delay (ms): 0

Slave Interface: em2
MII Status: up
Speed: 1000 Mbps
Duplex: full
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: d4:ae:52:6d:c8:cc
Slave queue ID: 0

Slave Interface: em3
MII Status: up
Speed: 1000 Mbps
Duplex: full
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: d4:ae:52:6d:c8:ce
Slave queue ID: 0

Somehow, the OS is not setting the bonding mode right.  I verified that
it was set to mode 1 in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfe-bond4

When I take the bond away, the host network works perfectly on both of
the formerly bonded interfaces.

So again, if anyone has any ideas, I'm open to suggestions.

Thanks,

Dan
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] Network issues - Bonding

2014-01-03 Thread Dan Ferris
Hello All,

A little bit ago I wrote an email about network issues I was having.

I found the problem...

On the VM host, I had a bond set up between two network interfaces.  The
bond mode was set to mode 1 (active/passive).

However when I look at the bond on the box, I get this:

[root@node02 bonding]# cat bond4
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)

Bonding Mode: load balancing (round-robin)
MII Status: up
MII Polling Interval (ms): 0
Up Delay (ms): 0
Down Delay (ms): 0

Slave Interface: em2
MII Status: up
Speed: 1000 Mbps
Duplex: full
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: d4:ae:52:6d:c8:cc
Slave queue ID: 0

Slave Interface: em3
MII Status: up
Speed: 1000 Mbps
Duplex: full
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: d4:ae:52:6d:c8:ce
Slave queue ID: 0

Somehow, the OS is not setting the bonding mode right.  I verified that
it was set to mode 1 in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfe-bond4

When I take the bond away, the host network works perfectly on both of
the formerly bonded interfaces.

So again, if anyone has any ideas, I'm open to suggestions.

Thanks,

Dan
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users