[ovirt-users] Re: Newbie Questions

2019-11-20 Thread Dominik Holler
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 1:34 PM Dirk Streubel 
wrote:

> So,
>
> after create the yum.repo at my host everything works fine for me.
>
> The integration of the new Host was in the second try no problem.
>
> At the first try something went wrong.
>

Glad it worked!
Please let us know if you notice that a step missing in the docs (or other
bugs).


> Thanks a lot for your help Dominik
>
> Regards
>
> Dirk
>
>
>
> Am 20.11.19 um 08:25 schrieb Dominik Holler:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:32 PM Dirk Streubel 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks a lot for the quick answers. So, my Server Management will run on
>> another machine, not a pi4 :)
>>
>> But i have still the problem with the integration with a host. Always the
>> same error of the host side.
>>
>> Maybe my hardware is to old for ovirt, but i'am not sure.  I send an
>> attachment with the log file of the host integration, maybe somebody can
>> read an and tell me what my fault is.
>>
>
> The relevant error is:
> 'Cannot locate ovirt-host package, '
>
> Should be there, if
> https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/yum-repo/ovirt-release43.rpm is installed.
> Is this step is missing in the doc you follow?
>
>
> Regards
>>
>> Dirk
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 18.11.19 um 11:23 schrieb Yedidyah Bar David:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:52 AM Pavol Brilla  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> just to clarify 1 question - RPI4 = Cortex A72 CPU, ovirt engine is x86,
>>> so no it is not possible
>>>
>>
>> Indeed it's not supported. But actually, engine itself is java, and most
>> of the other supplemental code involved is python. I guess most of the work
>> to support it would be in packaging all the dependencies.
>>
>> If you intend to work on this, you should probably start either by adding
>> Fedora support to rpi4 ([1] says it's not supported currently) or by
>> porting the engine to some other distribution supported on it. There was
>> interest some time ago on porting to Debian, but not sure about current
>> status. oVirt project itself only ships for Fedora and CentOS.
>>
>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 11:20 AM Dirk Streubel 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hello,

 i'am a new user and i have a few questions, maybe somebody can Help.

 It is possible to install the Server Management on a Raspberry PI 4 with
 4GB.  I find in the official Re Hat Document "Red Hat Virtualization
 Manager Hardware Requirements" that 4GB RAM is enough.
 And the PI has a 128 GB Flash Card. Would it work? Have somebody tested
 it?

 Another Question: Since yesterday i am trying to ad a host in my
 environment on ovirt Version 4.3.6. My Server Management runs under
 Fedora 31 under KVM/Virt-Manager without any problems.
 Adding a new Host doesn't work. I have tried to ad another VM with 8
 Cores and 32 GB RAM as a host. This is not working, maybe VMs in VMs
 under ovirt is not possible, i don't know.
 So i try  a physical Machine here as a Host. This and the other
 Installations fails with the Information: no route to Host. I found a
 bug and it says that the bug is closed.
 In the bug stand that maybe something wrong with the openvswitch. So i
 tried the following commands on the Server Management: ovn-nbctl show
 and ovn-sbctl show and the output was nothing.
 journalctl -xfe on the host that i want to migrate gave my the output:

 Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]: Accepted
 keyboard-interactive/pam for root from 10.2.0.99 port 43260 ssh2
 Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: New
 session 5 of user root.
 -- Subject: A new session 5 has been created for user root
 -- Defined-By: systemd
 -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
 -- Documentation:
 http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
 --
 -- A new session with the ID 5 has been created for the user root.
 --
 -- The leading process of the session is 12632.
 Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]:
 pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
 Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd[1]: Started Session
 5 of user root.
 -- Subject: Unit session-5.scope has finished start-up
 -- Defined-By: systemd
 -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
 --
 -- Unit session-5.scope has finished starting up.
 --
 -- The start-up result is done.
 Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]:
 pam_unix(sshd:session): session closed for user root
 Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: Removed
 session 5.
 -- Subject: Session 5 has been terminated
 -- Defined-By: systemd
 -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
 -- Documentation:
 http:

[ovirt-users] Re: Newbie Questions

2019-11-20 Thread Dirk Streubel
So,

after create the yum.repo at my host everything works fine for me.

The integration of the new Host was in the second try no problem.

At the first try something went wrong.

Thanks a lot for your help Dominik

Regards

Dirk



Am 20.11.19 um 08:25 schrieb Dominik Holler:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:32 PM Dirk Streubel  > wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks a lot for the quick answers. So, my Server Management will run on 
> another machine, not
> a pi4 :)
>
> But i have still the problem with the integration with a host. Always the 
> same error of the
> host side.
>
> Maybe my hardware is to old for ovirt, but i'am not sure.  I send an 
> attachment with the log
> file of the host integration, maybe somebody can read an and tell me what 
> my fault is.
>
>
> The relevant error is:
>     'Cannot locate ovirt-host package, '
>
> Should be there, if 
> https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/yum-repo/ovirt-release43.rpm is installed.
> Is this step is missing in the doc you follow?
>  
>
> Regards
>
> Dirk
>
>
>  
>
>
> Am 18.11.19 um 11:23 schrieb Yedidyah Bar David:
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:52 AM Pavol Brilla > > wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> just to clarify 1 question - RPI4 = Cortex A72 CPU, ovirt engine is 
>> x86, so no it is not
>> possible
>>
>>
>> Indeed it's not supported. But actually, engine itself is java, and most 
>> of the other
>> supplemental code involved is python. I guess most of the work to 
>> support it would be in
>> packaging all the dependencies.
>>
>> If you intend to work on this, you should probably start either by 
>> adding Fedora support to
>> rpi4 ([1] says it's not supported currently) or by porting the engine to 
>> some other
>> distribution supported on it. There was interest some time ago on 
>> porting to Debian, but not
>> sure about current status. oVirt project itself only ships for Fedora 
>> and CentOS.
>>
>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi
>>  
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 11:20 AM Dirk Streubel 
>> > > wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> i'am a new user and i have a few questions, maybe somebody can 
>> Help.
>>
>> It is possible to install the Server Management on a Raspberry 
>> PI 4 with
>> 4GB.  I find in the official Re Hat Document "Red Hat 
>> Virtualization
>> Manager Hardware Requirements" that 4GB RAM is enough.
>> And the PI has a 128 GB Flash Card. Would it work? Have somebody 
>> tested it?
>>
>> Another Question: Since yesterday i am trying to ad a host in my
>> environment on ovirt Version 4.3.6. My Server Management runs 
>> under
>> Fedora 31 under KVM/Virt-Manager without any problems.
>> Adding a new Host doesn't work. I have tried to ad another VM 
>> with 8
>> Cores and 32 GB RAM as a host. This is not working, maybe VMs in 
>> VMs
>> under ovirt is not possible, i don't know.
>> So i try  a physical Machine here as a Host. This and the other
>> Installations fails with the Information: no route to Host. I 
>> found a
>> bug and it says that the bug is closed.
>> In the bug stand that maybe something wrong with the 
>> openvswitch. So i
>> tried the following commands on the Server Management: ovn-nbctl 
>> show
>> and ovn-sbctl show and the output was nothing.
>> journalctl -xfe on the host that i want to migrate gave my the 
>> output:
>>
>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]: Accepted
>> keyboard-interactive/pam for root from 10.2.0.99 port 43260 ssh2
>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: 
>> New
>> session 5 of user root.
>> -- Subject: A new session 5 has been created for user root
>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>> -- Support: 
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>> -- Documentation: 
>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
>> --
>> -- A new session with the ID 5 has been created for the user 
>> root.
>> --
>> -- The leading process of the session is 12632.
>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]:
>> pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd[1]: Started 
>> Session
>> 5 of user root.
>> -- Subject: Unit session-5.scope has finished start-up
>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>> -- Support: 
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>> --
>>

[ovirt-users] Re: Newbie Questions

2019-11-20 Thread Dirk Streubel
Hello,

thanks a lot for the tip.;)

Yes, this step i have not seen in the document.

I will try to integrate the Host later this day and let you know what the 
Result is.

Regard from Castrop-Rauxel  (the world is so small)

Dirk



Am 20.11.19 um 08:25 schrieb Dominik Holler:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:32 PM Dirk Streubel  > wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks a lot for the quick answers. So, my Server Management will run on 
> another machine, not
> a pi4 :)
>
> But i have still the problem with the integration with a host. Always the 
> same error of the
> host side.
>
> Maybe my hardware is to old for ovirt, but i'am not sure.  I send an 
> attachment with the log
> file of the host integration, maybe somebody can read an and tell me what 
> my fault is.
>
>
> The relevant error is:
>     'Cannot locate ovirt-host package, '
>
> Should be there, if 
> https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/yum-repo/ovirt-release43.rpm is installed.
> Is this step is missing in the doc you follow?
>  
>
> Regards
>
> Dirk
>
>
>  
>
>
> Am 18.11.19 um 11:23 schrieb Yedidyah Bar David:
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:52 AM Pavol Brilla > > wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> just to clarify 1 question - RPI4 = Cortex A72 CPU, ovirt engine is 
>> x86, so no it is not
>> possible
>>
>>
>> Indeed it's not supported. But actually, engine itself is java, and most 
>> of the other
>> supplemental code involved is python. I guess most of the work to 
>> support it would be in
>> packaging all the dependencies.
>>
>> If you intend to work on this, you should probably start either by 
>> adding Fedora support to
>> rpi4 ([1] says it's not supported currently) or by porting the engine to 
>> some other
>> distribution supported on it. There was interest some time ago on 
>> porting to Debian, but not
>> sure about current status. oVirt project itself only ships for Fedora 
>> and CentOS.
>>
>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi
>>  
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 11:20 AM Dirk Streubel 
>> > > wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> i'am a new user and i have a few questions, maybe somebody can 
>> Help.
>>
>> It is possible to install the Server Management on a Raspberry 
>> PI 4 with
>> 4GB.  I find in the official Re Hat Document "Red Hat 
>> Virtualization
>> Manager Hardware Requirements" that 4GB RAM is enough.
>> And the PI has a 128 GB Flash Card. Would it work? Have somebody 
>> tested it?
>>
>> Another Question: Since yesterday i am trying to ad a host in my
>> environment on ovirt Version 4.3.6. My Server Management runs 
>> under
>> Fedora 31 under KVM/Virt-Manager without any problems.
>> Adding a new Host doesn't work. I have tried to ad another VM 
>> with 8
>> Cores and 32 GB RAM as a host. This is not working, maybe VMs in 
>> VMs
>> under ovirt is not possible, i don't know.
>> So i try  a physical Machine here as a Host. This and the other
>> Installations fails with the Information: no route to Host. I 
>> found a
>> bug and it says that the bug is closed.
>> In the bug stand that maybe something wrong with the 
>> openvswitch. So i
>> tried the following commands on the Server Management: ovn-nbctl 
>> show
>> and ovn-sbctl show and the output was nothing.
>> journalctl -xfe on the host that i want to migrate gave my the 
>> output:
>>
>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]: Accepted
>> keyboard-interactive/pam for root from 10.2.0.99 port 43260 ssh2
>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: 
>> New
>> session 5 of user root.
>> -- Subject: A new session 5 has been created for user root
>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>> -- Support: 
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>> -- Documentation: 
>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
>> --
>> -- A new session with the ID 5 has been created for the user 
>> root.
>> --
>> -- The leading process of the session is 12632.
>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]:
>> pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd[1]: Started 
>> Session
>> 5 of user root.
>> -- Subject: Unit session-5.scope has finished start-up
>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>> -- Support: 
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>> --
>>   

[ovirt-users] Re: Newbie Questions

2019-11-19 Thread Dominik Holler
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:32 PM Dirk Streubel 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> thanks a lot for the quick answers. So, my Server Management will run on
> another machine, not a pi4 :)
>
> But i have still the problem with the integration with a host. Always the
> same error of the host side.
>
> Maybe my hardware is to old for ovirt, but i'am not sure.  I send an
> attachment with the log file of the host integration, maybe somebody can
> read an and tell me what my fault is.
>

The relevant error is:
'Cannot locate ovirt-host package, '

Should be there, if
https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/yum-repo/ovirt-release43.rpm is installed.
Is this step is missing in the doc you follow?


Regards
>
> Dirk
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 18.11.19 um 11:23 schrieb Yedidyah Bar David:
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:52 AM Pavol Brilla  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> just to clarify 1 question - RPI4 = Cortex A72 CPU, ovirt engine is x86,
>> so no it is not possible
>>
>
> Indeed it's not supported. But actually, engine itself is java, and most
> of the other supplemental code involved is python. I guess most of the work
> to support it would be in packaging all the dependencies.
>
> If you intend to work on this, you should probably start either by adding
> Fedora support to rpi4 ([1] says it's not supported currently) or by
> porting the engine to some other distribution supported on it. There was
> interest some time ago on porting to Debian, but not sure about current
> status. oVirt project itself only ships for Fedora and CentOS.
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi
>
>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 11:20 AM Dirk Streubel 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> i'am a new user and i have a few questions, maybe somebody can Help.
>>>
>>> It is possible to install the Server Management on a Raspberry PI 4 with
>>> 4GB.  I find in the official Re Hat Document "Red Hat Virtualization
>>> Manager Hardware Requirements" that 4GB RAM is enough.
>>> And the PI has a 128 GB Flash Card. Would it work? Have somebody tested
>>> it?
>>>
>>> Another Question: Since yesterday i am trying to ad a host in my
>>> environment on ovirt Version 4.3.6. My Server Management runs under
>>> Fedora 31 under KVM/Virt-Manager without any problems.
>>> Adding a new Host doesn't work. I have tried to ad another VM with 8
>>> Cores and 32 GB RAM as a host. This is not working, maybe VMs in VMs
>>> under ovirt is not possible, i don't know.
>>> So i try  a physical Machine here as a Host. This and the other
>>> Installations fails with the Information: no route to Host. I found a
>>> bug and it says that the bug is closed.
>>> In the bug stand that maybe something wrong with the openvswitch. So i
>>> tried the following commands on the Server Management: ovn-nbctl show
>>> and ovn-sbctl show and the output was nothing.
>>> journalctl -xfe on the host that i want to migrate gave my the output:
>>>
>>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]: Accepted
>>> keyboard-interactive/pam for root from 10.2.0.99 port 43260 ssh2
>>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: New
>>> session 5 of user root.
>>> -- Subject: A new session 5 has been created for user root
>>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>>> -- Documentation:
>>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
>>> --
>>> -- A new session with the ID 5 has been created for the user root.
>>> --
>>> -- The leading process of the session is 12632.
>>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]:
>>> pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
>>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd[1]: Started Session
>>> 5 of user root.
>>> -- Subject: Unit session-5.scope has finished start-up
>>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>>> --
>>> -- Unit session-5.scope has finished starting up.
>>> --
>>> -- The start-up result is done.
>>> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]:
>>> pam_unix(sshd:session): session closed for user root
>>> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: Removed
>>> session 5.
>>> -- Subject: Session 5 has been terminated
>>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>>> -- Documentation:
>>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
>>> --
>>> -- A session with the ID 5 has been terminated.
>>> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12654]: Accepted
>>> keyboard-interactive/pam for root from 10.2.0.99 port 43264 ssh2
>>> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: New
>>> session 6 of user root.
>>> -- Subject: A new session 6 has been created for user root
>>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>>> -- Documentation:
>>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/sys

[ovirt-users] Re: Newbie Questions

2019-11-18 Thread Jayme
you might have better luck setting ovirt up on cheap VMs in AWS or
something like that

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 5:28 PM Dirk Streubel 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> thanks a lot for the quick answers. So, my Server Management will run on
> another machine, not a pi4 :)
>
> But i have still the problem with the integration with a host. Always the
> same error of the host side.
>
> Maybe my hardware is to old for ovirt, but i'am not sure.  I send an
> attachment with the log file of the host integration, maybe somebody can
> read an and tell me what my fault is.
>
> Regards
>
> Dirk
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 18.11.19 um 11:23 schrieb Yedidyah Bar David:
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:52 AM Pavol Brilla  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> just to clarify 1 question - RPI4 = Cortex A72 CPU, ovirt engine is x86,
>> so no it is not possible
>>
>
> Indeed it's not supported. But actually, engine itself is java, and most
> of the other supplemental code involved is python. I guess most of the work
> to support it would be in packaging all the dependencies.
>
> If you intend to work on this, you should probably start either by adding
> Fedora support to rpi4 ([1] says it's not supported currently) or by
> porting the engine to some other distribution supported on it. There was
> interest some time ago on porting to Debian, but not sure about current
> status. oVirt project itself only ships for Fedora and CentOS.
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi
>
>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 11:20 AM Dirk Streubel 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> i'am a new user and i have a few questions, maybe somebody can Help.
>>>
>>> It is possible to install the Server Management on a Raspberry PI 4 with
>>> 4GB.  I find in the official Re Hat Document "Red Hat Virtualization
>>> Manager Hardware Requirements" that 4GB RAM is enough.
>>> And the PI has a 128 GB Flash Card. Would it work? Have somebody tested
>>> it?
>>>
>>> Another Question: Since yesterday i am trying to ad a host in my
>>> environment on ovirt Version 4.3.6. My Server Management runs under
>>> Fedora 31 under KVM/Virt-Manager without any problems.
>>> Adding a new Host doesn't work. I have tried to ad another VM with 8
>>> Cores and 32 GB RAM as a host. This is not working, maybe VMs in VMs
>>> under ovirt is not possible, i don't know.
>>> So i try  a physical Machine here as a Host. This and the other
>>> Installations fails with the Information: no route to Host. I found a
>>> bug and it says that the bug is closed.
>>> In the bug stand that maybe something wrong with the openvswitch. So i
>>> tried the following commands on the Server Management: ovn-nbctl show
>>> and ovn-sbctl show and the output was nothing.
>>> journalctl -xfe on the host that i want to migrate gave my the output:
>>>
>>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]: Accepted
>>> keyboard-interactive/pam for root from 10.2.0.99 port 43260 ssh2
>>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: New
>>> session 5 of user root.
>>> -- Subject: A new session 5 has been created for user root
>>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>>> -- Documentation:
>>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
>>> --
>>> -- A new session with the ID 5 has been created for the user root.
>>> --
>>> -- The leading process of the session is 12632.
>>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]:
>>> pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
>>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd[1]: Started Session
>>> 5 of user root.
>>> -- Subject: Unit session-5.scope has finished start-up
>>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>>> --
>>> -- Unit session-5.scope has finished starting up.
>>> --
>>> -- The start-up result is done.
>>> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]:
>>> pam_unix(sshd:session): session closed for user root
>>> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: Removed
>>> session 5.
>>> -- Subject: Session 5 has been terminated
>>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>>> -- Documentation:
>>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
>>> --
>>> -- A session with the ID 5 has been terminated.
>>> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12654]: Accepted
>>> keyboard-interactive/pam for root from 10.2.0.99 port 43264 ssh2
>>> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: New
>>> session 6 of user root.
>>> -- Subject: A new session 6 has been created for user root
>>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>>> -- Documentation:
>>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
>>> --
>>> -- A new session with the ID 6 has been created for the user root.
>>> --
>>> -- The leading pr

[ovirt-users] Re: Newbie Questions

2019-11-18 Thread Yedidyah Bar David
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:52 AM Pavol Brilla  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> just to clarify 1 question - RPI4 = Cortex A72 CPU, ovirt engine is x86,
> so no it is not possible
>

Indeed it's not supported. But actually, engine itself is java, and most of
the other supplemental code involved is python. I guess most of the work to
support it would be in packaging all the dependencies.

If you intend to work on this, you should probably start either by adding
Fedora support to rpi4 ([1] says it's not supported currently) or by
porting the engine to some other distribution supported on it. There was
interest some time ago on porting to Debian, but not sure about current
status. oVirt project itself only ships for Fedora and CentOS.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi


>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 11:20 AM Dirk Streubel 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> i'am a new user and i have a few questions, maybe somebody can Help.
>>
>> It is possible to install the Server Management on a Raspberry PI 4 with
>> 4GB.  I find in the official Re Hat Document "Red Hat Virtualization
>> Manager Hardware Requirements" that 4GB RAM is enough.
>> And the PI has a 128 GB Flash Card. Would it work? Have somebody tested
>> it?
>>
>> Another Question: Since yesterday i am trying to ad a host in my
>> environment on ovirt Version 4.3.6. My Server Management runs under
>> Fedora 31 under KVM/Virt-Manager without any problems.
>> Adding a new Host doesn't work. I have tried to ad another VM with 8
>> Cores and 32 GB RAM as a host. This is not working, maybe VMs in VMs
>> under ovirt is not possible, i don't know.
>> So i try  a physical Machine here as a Host. This and the other
>> Installations fails with the Information: no route to Host. I found a
>> bug and it says that the bug is closed.
>> In the bug stand that maybe something wrong with the openvswitch. So i
>> tried the following commands on the Server Management: ovn-nbctl show
>> and ovn-sbctl show and the output was nothing.
>> journalctl -xfe on the host that i want to migrate gave my the output:
>>
>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]: Accepted
>> keyboard-interactive/pam for root from 10.2.0.99 port 43260 ssh2
>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: New
>> session 5 of user root.
>> -- Subject: A new session 5 has been created for user root
>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>> -- Documentation:
>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
>> --
>> -- A new session with the ID 5 has been created for the user root.
>> --
>> -- The leading process of the session is 12632.
>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]:
>> pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
>> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd[1]: Started Session
>> 5 of user root.
>> -- Subject: Unit session-5.scope has finished start-up
>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>> --
>> -- Unit session-5.scope has finished starting up.
>> --
>> -- The start-up result is done.
>> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]:
>> pam_unix(sshd:session): session closed for user root
>> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: Removed
>> session 5.
>> -- Subject: Session 5 has been terminated
>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>> -- Documentation:
>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
>> --
>> -- A session with the ID 5 has been terminated.
>> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12654]: Accepted
>> keyboard-interactive/pam for root from 10.2.0.99 port 43264 ssh2
>> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: New
>> session 6 of user root.
>> -- Subject: A new session 6 has been created for user root
>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>> -- Documentation:
>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
>> --
>> -- A new session with the ID 6 has been created for the user root.
>> --
>> -- The leading process of the session is 12654.
>> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd[1]: Started Session
>> 6 of user root.
>> -- Subject: Unit session-6.scope has finished start-up
>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>> --
>> -- Unit session-6.scope has finished starting up.
>> --
>> -- The start-up result is done.
>> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12654]:
>> pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
>> Nov 17 10:30:54 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12654]:
>> pam_unix(sshd:session): session closed for user root
>> Nov 17 10:30:54 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: Removed
>> session 6.
>> -- Subject: Session 6 has 

[ovirt-users] Re: Newbie Questions

2019-11-18 Thread Pavol Brilla
Hi,

just to clarify 1 question - RPI4 = Cortex A72 CPU, ovirt engine is x86, so
no it is not possible

On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 11:20 AM Dirk Streubel 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> i'am a new user and i have a few questions, maybe somebody can Help.
>
> It is possible to install the Server Management on a Raspberry PI 4 with
> 4GB.  I find in the official Re Hat Document "Red Hat Virtualization
> Manager Hardware Requirements" that 4GB RAM is enough.
> And the PI has a 128 GB Flash Card. Would it work? Have somebody tested it?
>
> Another Question: Since yesterday i am trying to ad a host in my
> environment on ovirt Version 4.3.6. My Server Management runs under
> Fedora 31 under KVM/Virt-Manager without any problems.
> Adding a new Host doesn't work. I have tried to ad another VM with 8
> Cores and 32 GB RAM as a host. This is not working, maybe VMs in VMs
> under ovirt is not possible, i don't know.
> So i try  a physical Machine here as a Host. This and the other
> Installations fails with the Information: no route to Host. I found a
> bug and it says that the bug is closed.
> In the bug stand that maybe something wrong with the openvswitch. So i
> tried the following commands on the Server Management: ovn-nbctl show
> and ovn-sbctl show and the output was nothing.
> journalctl -xfe on the host that i want to migrate gave my the output:
>
> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]: Accepted
> keyboard-interactive/pam for root from 10.2.0.99 port 43260 ssh2
> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: New
> session 5 of user root.
> -- Subject: A new session 5 has been created for user root
> -- Defined-By: systemd
> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
> -- Documentation:
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
> --
> -- A new session with the ID 5 has been created for the user root.
> --
> -- The leading process of the session is 12632.
> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]:
> pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
> Nov 17 10:30:38 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd[1]: Started Session
> 5 of user root.
> -- Subject: Unit session-5.scope has finished start-up
> -- Defined-By: systemd
> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
> --
> -- Unit session-5.scope has finished starting up.
> --
> -- The start-up result is done.
> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12632]:
> pam_unix(sshd:session): session closed for user root
> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: Removed
> session 5.
> -- Subject: Session 5 has been terminated
> -- Defined-By: systemd
> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
> -- Documentation:
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
> --
> -- A session with the ID 5 has been terminated.
> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12654]: Accepted
> keyboard-interactive/pam for root from 10.2.0.99 port 43264 ssh2
> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: New
> session 6 of user root.
> -- Subject: A new session 6 has been created for user root
> -- Defined-By: systemd
> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
> -- Documentation:
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
> --
> -- A new session with the ID 6 has been created for the user root.
> --
> -- The leading process of the session is 12654.
> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd[1]: Started Session
> 6 of user root.
> -- Subject: Unit session-6.scope has finished start-up
> -- Defined-By: systemd
> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
> --
> -- Unit session-6.scope has finished starting up.
> --
> -- The start-up result is done.
> Nov 17 10:30:39 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12654]:
> pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
> Nov 17 10:30:54 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box sshd[12654]:
> pam_unix(sshd:session): session closed for user root
> Nov 17 10:30:54 hypervisor1.linux.fritz.box systemd-logind[960]: Removed
> session 6.
> -- Subject: Session 6 has been terminated
> -- Defined-By: systemd
> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
> -- Documentation:
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat
> --
> -- A session with the ID 6 has been terminated.
>
> Maybe i mix some things, i don't know :(
>
> Regards
>
> Dirk
> ___
> Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/ODGZ77IMZ3J6CT6HMRKGYV4R47SXBMH2/
>


-- 

PAVOL BRILLA

RHV QUALITY ENGINEER, CLOUD

Red Hat 

[ovirt-users] Re: newbie questions about installation using synology NAS

2019-05-20 Thread Brian Millett
On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 06:26 +0800, Colin Coe wrote:
> Hi
> Add your nodes to oVirt then add your storage.  Don't try to manually
> control the storage, let oVirt do that.
> 
> 

Thanks.-- 
Brian Millett
"I am more 'one of us' at this moment, than I have ever been. More than you
 will ever know."
   -- [ Delenn (to Teronn), "A Distant Star"]
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/4XDQEYDUZO4VJ2DKWTUPTQRIKH4T4PNE/


[ovirt-users] Re: newbie questions about installation using synology NAS

2019-05-20 Thread Brian Millett
On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 06:49 +0300, Strahil wrote:
> Define the nodes and when you create your NFS storage domain - it
> will be automatically mounted on all hosts in the DC.
> Best Regards,Strahil NikolovOn May 20, 2019 00:03, bmill...@gmail.com
>  wrote:
> > I'm starting fairly fresh. Ovirt engine 4.3.3.7 on a host 2 nodes
> > installed with ovirt-release-host-node-4.3.3.1 synology DS418 with
> > 5 TB disks 
> > I've configured the master engine and am ready to add the nodes. My
> > questions have to do with the order or steps . Do I need to mount
> > /volume1/data/images/rhev from the DS418 on each of the nodes
> > before I add them or do I just add the nodes, then define a domain
> > using the NFS mounts from the DS418? 
> > Thanks.___

Awesome, thanks.
-- 
Brian Millett
"You feel like you're being symbolically cas...t in a bad light."
   -- [ Ivanova (to Londo re: Londo doll), "There All The Honor Lies"]
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/TWYPTPQJHVZUASYXL2N2HOWHX4HTSFBK/


[ovirt-users] Re: newbie questions about installation using synology NAS

2019-05-19 Thread Strahil
Define the nodes and when you create your NFS storage domain - it will be 
automatically mounted on all hosts in the DC.

Best Regards,
Strahil NikolovOn May 20, 2019 00:03, bmill...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I'm starting fairly fresh. 
> Ovirt engine 4.3.3.7 on a host 
> 2 nodes installed with ovirt-release-host-node-4.3.3.1 
> synology DS418 with 5 TB disks 
>
> I've configured the master engine and am ready to add the nodes. 
> My questions have to do with the order or steps . 
> Do I need to mount /volume1/data/images/rhev from the DS418 on each of the 
> nodes before I add them or 
> do I just add the nodes, then define a domain using the NFS mounts from the 
> DS418? 
>
> Thanks.
> ___
> Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct: 
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/IXCF3CZGQDDOFDFBAOUVRKPOWO3FUB3L/
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/QUOHYD5W2L7IPSPTNNHPWQ3F5I726SES/


[ovirt-users] Re: newbie questions about installation using synology NAS

2019-05-19 Thread Colin Coe
Hi

Add your nodes to oVirt then add your storage.  Don't try to manually
control the storage, let oVirt do that.

HTH

CC

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 5:04 AM  wrote:

> I'm starting fairly fresh.
> Ovirt engine 4.3.3.7 on a host
> 2 nodes installed with ovirt-release-host-node-4.3.3.1
> synology DS418 with 5 TB disks
>
> I've configured the master engine and am ready to add the nodes.
> My questions have to do with the order or steps .
> Do I need to mount /volume1/data/images/rhev from the DS418 on each of the
> nodes before I add them or
> do I just add the nodes, then define a domain using the NFS mounts from
> the DS418?
>
> Thanks.
> ___
> Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/IXCF3CZGQDDOFDFBAOUVRKPOWO3FUB3L/
>
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/L4ZVP43LE3GBTBMMLBC4VL4H2JQFKOIQ/


[ovirt-users] Re: newbie questions on networking

2018-05-13 Thread Rue, Randy

Getting weirder.

I reinstalled a third node from scratch with no bonding and my VM works 
fine.


To answer an earlier question, we're not configuring any bonding on the 
data center switches so I've stuck to bonding modes like round robin, 
active/stand-by, and XOR. I've mostly been using XOR.


Where it gets weird is if I switch the bonding mode from XOR to 
active/stand-by, a VM on that host can see the real world. And if I 
switch it from active/stand-by back to XOR, it still works.


I'm currently running three nodes, all with bonded interfaces in XOR 
mode, and all is well. I wish I knew why.


Randy
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org


[ovirt-users] Re: newbie questions on networking

2018-05-08 Thread Dominik Holler
On Mon, 7 May 2018 15:59:54 -0700
"Rue, Randy"  wrote:

> I installed the ovirt node to standalone interfaces, then created the 
> bond via the ovirt-node webui at port 9090, before adding the node to 
> the cluster.
> 

I recommend to use oVirt to configure the network interfaces of the
host, whenever possible. So the bond of the host should be configured by
oVirt, but maybe there is an additional configuration on the switch
required, too.

The troubleshooting can be done step by step, to find the action which
breaks the network connection.
1. After the ovirt-node is installed, the network connection of
   the host should be verified.
2. After the host is added to oVirt, the network connection of
   the host should be verified again.
3. The network connection of a VM running on the host should be
   verified.
4. The bond should be configured by oVirt, and the network connection
   of the host should be verified again. Maybe there is additional
   configuration on the switch required, too.
5. The network connection of a VM running on the host with bond should
   be verified, again.

In which step the network connection  breaks?

> The DHCP server happens to be in the same subnet but no, I can't ping
> it as I can't ping anything beyond the physical interfaces of the
> hosts.
> 

Interesting, so DHCP is working for the VM, but not a ping to the DHCP
server?

> I've added a third host and can also ping that from the VM on node 1.
> 
> For a hoot also spun up a new CentOS VM in case this was an OS
> problem. Same results. And when the two VMs are on different hosts,
> they can't ping each other. When I migrate one so they're both on the
> same host, they can each ping each other.
> 
> On 5/7/2018 1:58 PM, Dominik Holler wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 May 2018 11:43:51 -0700
> > "Rue, Randy"  wrote:
> >  
> >> I've sort of had some progress. On Friday I went to the dentist and
> >> when I returned, my VM could ping google.
> >>
> >> I don't believe I changed anything Friday morning but I confess
> >> I've been flailing on this for so long I'm not keeping detailed
> >> notes on what I change. And as I'm evaluating oVirt as a possible
> >> replacement for our production xencenter/xenserver systems, I need
> >> to know what was wrong and what fixed it.
> >>
> >> I reinstalled the ovirt-engine box and two hosts and started again.
> >> The only change I've made beyond the default is to remove the
> >> no-mac-spoofing filter from the ovirtmgmt vNIC profile so there are
> >> no filters applied. At this point I'm back to an ubuntu LTS server
> >> VM that again, is getting a DHCP IP address, nameserver entries in
> >> resolv.conf, and "route" shows correct local routing for addresses
> >> on the same subnet and the correct gateway for the rest of the
> >> world. The VM is even registering its hostname in our DNS
> >> correctly. And I can ping the static IP of the host the VM is on,
> >> but not the subnet gateway or anything in the real world.
> >>  
> > Can you ping the DHCP server?
> >  
> >> Two things I haven't mentioned that I haven't seen anything in the
> >> docs about. My ovirt-engine box is on a different subnet than my
> >> hosts, and my hosts are using a bonded pair of physical interfaces
> >> (XOR mode) for their single LAN connection.  
> > Was the bond created before adding the hosts to oVirt, or after
> > adding the hosts via oVirt web UI?
> > If the switch requires configuration for the bond, is this applied?
> > Can you check if the VM can ping the getaway, if you use a simple
> > Ethernet connection instead of the bond?
> >  
> >> Did I miss something in the docs where these are a problem?
> >>
> >> Dominik, to answer your thoughts earlier:
> >>
> >> * name resolution isn't happening at all, the VM can't reach a DNS
> >> server
> >>
> >> * I don't manage the data center network gear but am pretty sure
> >> there's no configuration that blocks traffic. This is supported by
> >> my temporary success on Friday. And we also have other
> >> virtualization hosts (VMWare hosts) in the same subnet, that
> >> forward traffic to/from their VMs just fine.
> >>  
> > OK, L3 seems to work now sometimes.
> >  
> >> * tcpdump on the host's ovirtmgmt interface is pretty noisy but if
> >> I grep for the ubuntu DDNS name I see a slew of ARP requests. I
> >> can see pings to the host's IP address, and attempts to SSH from
> >> the VM to its host. Any attempt to touch anything past the host
> >> shows nothing on any interface in tcpdump, not a ping to the
> >> subnet gateway, not an SSH attempt, not a DNS query or a ping to
> >> known IP address. 
> > The outgoing ARP requests looks like the traffic of the VM is
> > forwarded to ovirtmgmt.
> > Do you see ARP reply to the VM?
> > Maybe the VM fails to get the MAC address of the gateway.
> >  
> >> * hot damn, here's a clue! I can ping other oVirt hosts! (by IP
> >> only) I also tried pinging the ovirt-engine box, wasn't surprised
> >> when that failed as the VM would need to reach 

[ovirt-users] Re: newbie questions on networking

2018-05-07 Thread Dominik Holler
On Mon, 7 May 2018 22:44:08 +
Justin Zygmont  wrote:

> >Was the bond created before adding the hosts to oVirt, or after
> >adding the hosts via oVirt web UI? If the switch requires
> >configuration for the bond, is this applied? Can you check if the VM
> >can ping the getaway, if you use a simple Ethernet connection
> >instead of the >bond?  
> 
> Should any of this be done before adding the host to oVirt?

It is recommended to do as much as possible configuration via oVirt.
If the configuration via oVirt is not possible, the network
configuration has to be done before adding the host to oVirt.
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org