Re: [ovirt-users] epel and collectd

2017-09-13 Thread Fabrice Bacchella 

> Le 13 sept. 2017 à 10:39, Sandro Bonazzola  a écrit :
> 
>  In general, I still consider EPEL harmful so just dropped the part related 
> to collectd. 
> 

What kind of problems do you have with it ?
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] epel and collectd

2017-09-13 Thread Yedidyah Bar David 
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Sandro Bonazzola 
wrote:

>
>
> 2017-09-12 15:03 GMT+02:00 Fabrice Bacchella 
> :
>
>> In the releases notes, even for the 4.6 rc, I see:
>>
>> https://www.ovirt.org/release/4.1.6/
>> ...
>> OpsTools currently includes collectd 5.7.0, and the write_http plugin is
>> packaged separately.
>>
>> But if I check the current state:
>> yum list collectd-write_http collectd
>> ...
>> collectd.x86_64
>>5.7.2-1.el7
>> @centos-opstools-release
>> collectd-write_http.x86_64
>>   5.7.2-1.el7
>> @centos-opstools-release
>>
>> So I think the warning is not needed any more. One can uses both ovirt
>> and epel without any special check.
>>
>
>
> Pushed https://gerrit.ovirt.org/81667 taking care of this too. In
> general, I still consider EPEL harmful so just dropped the part related to
> collectd.
>

Please note that there are still certain differences between OpsTools SIG
repo and EPEL in collectd* packaging, so you can be hit in the future
exactly the same way if you happen to mix and EPEL releases a new version.


>
>
>
>>
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> SANDRO BONAZZOLA
>
> ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R
>
> Red Hat EMEA 
> 
> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. 
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>


-- 
Didi
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] epel and collectd

2017-09-13 Thread Sandro Bonazzola 
2017-09-12 15:03 GMT+02:00 Fabrice Bacchella :

> In the releases notes, even for the 4.6 rc, I see:
>
> https://www.ovirt.org/release/4.1.6/
> ...
> OpsTools currently includes collectd 5.7.0, and the write_http plugin is
> packaged separately.
>
> But if I check the current state:
> yum list collectd-write_http collectd
> ...
> collectd.x86_64
>  5.7.2-1.el7
>   @centos-opstools-release
> collectd-write_http.x86_64
>   5.7.2-1.el7
> @centos-opstools-release
>
> So I think the warning is not needed any more. One can uses both ovirt and
> epel without any special check.
>


Pushed https://gerrit.ovirt.org/81667 taking care of this too. In general,
I still consider EPEL harmful so just dropped the part related to collectd.



>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>



-- 

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R

Red Hat EMEA 

TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[ovirt-users] epel and collectd

2017-09-12 Thread Fabrice Bacchella 
In the releases notes, even for the 4.6 rc, I see:

https://www.ovirt.org/release/4.1.6/
...
OpsTools currently includes collectd 5.7.0, and the write_http plugin is 
packaged separately.

But if I check the current state:
yum list collectd-write_http collectd
...
collectd.x86_64 
5.7.2-1.el7 
 @centos-opstools-release
collectd-write_http.x86_64  
5.7.2-1.el7 
 @centos-opstools-release

So I think the warning is not needed any more. One can uses both ovirt and epel 
without any special check.

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users