Re: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git
+1 On 18 September 2014 18:10, Chuck Rolke cro...@redhat.com wrote: +1 Just promoting git in general. - Original Message - From: Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com To: users@qpid.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 12:35:09 PM Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git Hello all, I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread, and have decided just to call a vote on the subject. I would like to migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git rather than Subversion. This wont affect the rest of the Qpid codebase, though it could be viewed as a test for any such move in future. Only the bits in the following subtree are under consideration for migation at this time: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/jms/ I believe it would make things easier for those of us currently working on it, and ease future usage of things like the Github integration we can/should have Apache infra enable. For anyone still wanting to use a Subversion client to check things out, there will still be an option there as e.g. Github repos can also be checked out with svn clients, and Apache mirror things to Github. Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on Friday, i.e. 72hrs. Robbie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git
Adding my fairly obvious +1 explicitly, as I always forget to do it in the initial mail. Robbie On 16 September 2014 17:35, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread, and have decided just to call a vote on the subject. I would like to migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git rather than Subversion. This wont affect the rest of the Qpid codebase, though it could be viewed as a test for any such move in future. Only the bits in the following subtree are under consideration for migation at this time: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/jms/ I believe it would make things easier for those of us currently working on it, and ease future usage of things like the Github integration we can/should have Apache infra enable. For anyone still wanting to use a Subversion client to check things out, there will still be an option there as e.g. Github repos can also be checked out with svn clients, and Apache mirror things to Github. Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on Friday, i.e. 72hrs. Robbie
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git
On 17 September 2014 09:25, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/16/2014 05:35 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hello all, I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread, and have decided just to call a vote on the subject. I would like to migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git rather than Subversion. This wont affect the rest of the Qpid codebase, though it could be viewed as a test for any such move in future. Only the bits in the following subtree are under consideration for migation at this time: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/jms/ I believe it would make things easier for those of us currently working on it, and ease future usage of things like the Github integration we can/should have Apache infra enable. For anyone still wanting to use a Subversion client to check things out, there will still be an option there as e.g. Github repos can also be checked out with svn clients, and Apache mirror things to Github. Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on Friday, i.e. 72hrs. I'm in favour of those doing the work deciding what suits them best. Git is now well enough established that switching isn't in any real sense raising a barrier to new contributors. Just to be certain, is your reply to be taken as +1 vote Gordon? Robbie
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git
On 09/18/2014 10:07 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: On 17 September 2014 09:25, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/16/2014 05:35 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hello all, I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread, and have decided just to call a vote on the subject. I would like to migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git rather than Subversion. This wont affect the rest of the Qpid codebase, though it could be viewed as a test for any such move in future. Only the bits in the following subtree are under consideration for migation at this time: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/jms/ I believe it would make things easier for those of us currently working on it, and ease future usage of things like the Github integration we can/should have Apache infra enable. For anyone still wanting to use a Subversion client to check things out, there will still be an option there as e.g. Github repos can also be checked out with svn clients, and Apache mirror things to Github. Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on Friday, i.e. 72hrs. I'm in favour of those doing the work deciding what suits them best. Git is now well enough established that switching isn't in any real sense raising a barrier to new contributors. Just to be certain, is your reply to be taken as +1 vote Gordon? It's more in the category of 'contributing my thoughts' :-) I'm not going to be immediately involved, so I feel odd voting on it and since I don't think you are short of votes, I'm just saying explicitly that what you decide is alright with me. (as opposed to being silent which might be interpreted differently). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git
On 18 September 2014 10:38, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/18/2014 10:07 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: On 17 September 2014 09:25, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/16/2014 05:35 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hello all, I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread, and have decided just to call a vote on the subject. I would like to migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git rather than Subversion. This wont affect the rest of the Qpid codebase, though it could be viewed as a test for any such move in future. Only the bits in the following subtree are under consideration for migation at this time: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/jms/ I believe it would make things easier for those of us currently working on it, and ease future usage of things like the Github integration we can/should have Apache infra enable. For anyone still wanting to use a Subversion client to check things out, there will still be an option there as e.g. Github repos can also be checked out with svn clients, and Apache mirror things to Github. Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on Friday, i.e. 72hrs. I'm in favour of those doing the work deciding what suits them best. Git is now well enough established that switching isn't in any real sense raising a barrier to new contributors. Just to be certain, is your reply to be taken as +1 vote Gordon? It's more in the category of 'contributing my thoughts' :-) Thats actually what I thought, just wanted to confirm before the final tally. I'm not going to be immediately involved, so I feel odd voting on it and since I don't think you are short of votes, I'm just saying explicitly that what you decide is alright with me. (as opposed to being silent which might be interpreted differently) Ok. Additional votes are welcome though ;)
RE: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git
+1 -Original Message- From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:robbie.gemm...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 12:35 PM To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git Hello all, I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread, and have decided just to call a vote on the subject. I would like to migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git rather than Subversion. This wont affect the rest of the Qpid codebase, though it could be viewed as a test for any such move in future. Only the bits in the following subtree are under consideration for migation at this time: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/jms/ I believe it would make things easier for those of us currently working on it, and ease future usage of things like the Github integration we can/should have Apache infra enable. For anyone still wanting to use a Subversion client to check things out, there will still be an option there as e.g. Github repos can also be checked out with svn clients, and Apache mirror things to Github. Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on Friday, i.e. 72hrs. Robbie
RE: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git
+ 1 bizillion Jack and Jimmy cast your votes. -Original Message- From: Steve Huston [mailto:shus...@riverace.com] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 11:13 AM To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git +1 -Original Message- From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:robbie.gemm...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 12:35 PM To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git Hello all, I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread, and have decided just to call a vote on the subject. I would like to migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git rather than Subversion. This wont affect the rest of the Qpid codebase, though it could be viewed as a test for any such move in future. Only the bits in the following subtree are under consideration for migation at this time: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/jms/ I believe it would make things easier for those of us currently working on it, and ease future usage of things like the Github integration we can/should have Apache infra enable. For anyone still wanting to use a Subversion client to check things out, there will still be an option there as e.g. Github repos can also be checked out with svn clients, and Apache mirror things to Github. Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on Friday, i.e. 72hrs. Robbie B CB [ X ܚX KK[XZ[ \ \ ][ X ܚX P \Y \X K ܙ B ܈Y][ۘ[ [X[ K[XZ[ \ \ Z[ \Y \X K ܙ B B
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git
+1 On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote: Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on Friday, i.e. 72hrs. Robbie
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git
+1 Just promoting git in general. - Original Message - From: Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com To: users@qpid.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 12:35:09 PM Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git Hello all, I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread, and have decided just to call a vote on the subject. I would like to migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git rather than Subversion. This wont affect the rest of the Qpid codebase, though it could be viewed as a test for any such move in future. Only the bits in the following subtree are under consideration for migation at this time: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/jms/ I believe it would make things easier for those of us currently working on it, and ease future usage of things like the Github integration we can/should have Apache infra enable. For anyone still wanting to use a Subversion client to check things out, there will still be an option there as e.g. Github repos can also be checked out with svn clients, and Apache mirror things to Github. Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on Friday, i.e. 72hrs. Robbie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git
On 09/16/2014 05:35 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hello all, I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread, and have decided just to call a vote on the subject. I would like to migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git rather than Subversion. This wont affect the rest of the Qpid codebase, though it could be viewed as a test for any such move in future. Only the bits in the following subtree are under consideration for migation at this time: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/jms/ I believe it would make things easier for those of us currently working on it, and ease future usage of things like the Github integration we can/should have Apache infra enable. For anyone still wanting to use a Subversion client to check things out, there will still be an option there as e.g. Github repos can also be checked out with svn clients, and Apache mirror things to Github. Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on Friday, i.e. 72hrs. I'm in favour of those doing the work deciding what suits them best. Git is now well enough established that switching isn't in any real sense raising a barrier to new contributors. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git
On 09/16/2014 12:35 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hello all, I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread, and have decided just to call a vote on the subject. I would like to migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git rather than Subversion. This wont affect the rest of the Qpid codebase, though it could be viewed as a test for any such move in future. Only the bits in the following subtree are under consideration for migation at this time: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/jms/ I believe it would make things easier for those of us currently working on it, and ease future usage of things like the Github integration we can/should have Apache infra enable. For anyone still wanting to use a Subversion client to check things out, there will still be an option there as e.g. Github repos can also be checked out with svn clients, and Apache mirror things to Github. Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on Friday, i.e. 72hrs. Robbie +1 from me -- Tim Bish Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc. tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121 blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git
+1 On 09/16/2014 12:35 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hello all, I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread, and have decided just to call a vote on the subject. I would like to migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git rather than Subversion. This wont affect the rest of the Qpid codebase, though it could be viewed as a test for any such move in future. Only the bits in the following subtree are under consideration for migation at this time: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/jms/ I believe it would make things easier for those of us currently working on it, and ease future usage of things like the Github integration we can/should have Apache infra enable. For anyone still wanting to use a Subversion client to check things out, there will still be an option there as e.g. Github repos can also be checked out with svn clients, and Apache mirror things to Github. Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on Friday, i.e. 72hrs. Robbie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git
+1 On 17 September 2014 15:12, Ted Ross tr...@redhat.com wrote: +1 On 09/16/2014 12:35 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hello all, I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread, and have decided just to call a vote on the subject. I would like to migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git rather than Subversion. This wont affect the rest of the Qpid codebase, though it could be viewed as a test for any such move in future. Only the bits in the following subtree are under consideration for migation at this time: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/jms/ I believe it would make things easier for those of us currently working on it, and ease future usage of things like the Github integration we can/should have Apache infra enable. For anyone still wanting to use a Subversion client to check things out, there will still be an option there as e.g. Github repos can also be checked out with svn clients, and Apache mirror things to Github. Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on Friday, i.e. 72hrs. Robbie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
