[SOGo] [DEV] SOGo Sieve Code
Hello all! I am currently working on a perl Sieve parser / importer from SM / AvelSieve = SOGo. Currently have all the rules un base64'ed, de-serialized and in a flat file. Just need to see what format and how to get them into SOGo. Thanks!! -Ron-- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] [DEV] SOGo Sieve Code
On Dec 1, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Francis Lachapelle wrote:
Hi Ron
On 2011-12-01, at 9:09 AM, Ronald Yacketta wrote:
I am currently working on a perl Sieve parser / importer from SM / AvelSieve
= SOGo. Currently have all the rules un base64'ed, de-serialized and in a
flat file. Just need to see what format and how to get them into SOGo.
Look at the users profile table (defined in SOGoProfileURL) or use sogo-tool
to get/set Sieve-related parameters :
sogo-tool user-preferences get defaults username SOGoSieveFilters
sogo-tool user-preferences get defaults username Forward
sogo-tool user-preferences get defaults username Vacation
Setting the preferences is performed like this :
sogo-tool user-preferences set defaults username sieveadmin:password
SOGoSieveFilters '{SOGoSieveFilters: [{active: true, actions:
[{method: fileinto, argument: foo}], rules: [{operator:
contains, field: subject, value: bar}], match: any, name:
foobar}]}'
sogo-tool updates the SOGo database and puts the script on the Sieve server.
Francis
--
flachape...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3640 :: http://www.inverse.ca
Inverse :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(http://packetfence.org)
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Francis,
Thanks!
Looks like I am missing the piece that takes a sieve file that looks like
if header :contains From nag...@netcon.potsdam.edu
{
fileinto nagios;
}
elseif header :contains List-Id Apcupsd Discussion List
apcupsd-users.lists.sourceforge.net
{
fileinto apcupsd;
}
and converts into something SOGo likes {SOGoSieveFilters: [{active: true,
actions: [{method: fileinto, argument: foo}], rules: [{operator:
contains, field: subject, value: bar}], match: any, name:
foobar}]}''
-Ron
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Possible SOGo TZ issue
In the Sogo webui, my ics subscription shows all the events an hour later. I also have the same ics imported on my Google calendar and the times are all correct, so it appears to be limited to Sogo BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:2002T070509Z UID:2eebf38dz4892e83dz2a6d5fa7 LOCATION:Test Resource Location SUMMARY:Resource Testing TRANSP:OPAQUE CLASS:PUBLIC DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:2002T09 DURATION:PT60M Now here's the kicker, this is only the case for this week: 10/30-11/5 (week 45). And again it only affects my ics subscribed calendar. Wonder if this has anything to-do with the TZ change former President Bush made? -Ron-- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] proxy error
Just worked through the same issue here, ended up that I had SOGoSieveScriptsEnabled set to NO And SOGoForwardEnabled set to YES I set both to NO, reading the config pdf SOGoForwardEnabled defaults to NO so I could have just removed it -Ron From: Khapare Joshi khapar...@gmail.com Reply-To: users@sogo.nu Date: 19 Oct 2011 10:02:56 + To: users@sogo.nu Subject: [SOGo] proxy error So far my sogo is working perfectly, however I get proxy error now and then. Trying to know the root cause. some thread talked about increasing SxVMemlimit size, in that case i increased to 712. this happens when I am saving preference. I have also use PREFORK=4 and hint would be good. K -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] LDAP Odditiy
Fellow SOGo users Dev:
We are seeing a lot of LDAP queries from SOGo using a filter of
(|(uid=OPTIONS)(mail=OPTIONS)), obviously this will not return anything.
Also notice that user searches (when inviting to a meeting or address book
search) take an extremely long time, trying to track down this huge delay
(some times 15+ seconds).
This is the query that hammers our LDAP server; In a 2 minute span I can't
even begin count how many times it happens.. its insane with just 4 users
using SOGo, can't imagine what would happen when we open the flood gates to
4k+ end users.
SRCH base=ou=people,o=potsdam.edu scope=2
filter=(|(uid=OPTIONS)(mail=OPTIONS))
attrs=objectClass cn uid mail ou title company o displayName
modifyTimestamp
mozillaHomeState mozillaHomeUrl homeUrl st region mozillaCustom2 custom2
mozillaHomeCountryName description notes department departmentNumber ou
orgunit mobile
cellphone carphone mozillaCustom1 custom1 mozillaNickname mozillaNickname
mozillaWorkUrl workurl facsimileTelephoneNumber facsimileTelephoneNumber
telephoneNumber mozillaHomeStreet mozillaSecondEmail mozillaSecondEmail
mozillaCustom4
custom4 nsAIMid nsAIMid street street postOfficeBox homePhone cn cn
givenName
mozillaHomePostalCode mozillaHomeLocalityName mozillaWorkStreet2
mozillaUseHtmlMail
mozillaUseHtmlMail mozillaHomeStreet2 postalCode zip c c pager pagerphone
mail sn sn
mozillaCustom3 custom3 l l birthyear serialNumber calFBURL proxyaddresses
mailHost
We have also been trying to track down the initial LDAP login query as well
as the actual query used where searching LDAP for user invitees, any one
know?
Here is our LDAP config for SOGo
sogod SOGoUserSources '(
{
CNFieldName = cn;
IDFieldName = uid;
IMAPHostFieldName = mailHost;
ModulesConstraints = {
Mail = {
ou = People;
};
};
UIDFieldName = uid;
baseDN = ou=People,o=potsdam.edu;
bindAsCurrentUser = YES;
bindFields = (
uid
);
canAuthenticate = YES;
displayName = SPOT Users;
hostname = LDAP-SRVR;
id = public;
isAddressBook = YES;
port = 389;
},
{
CNFieldName = cn;
IDFieldName = uid;
KindFieldName = Kind;
MultipleBookingsFieldName = Multiplebookings;
UIDFieldName = uid;
baseDN = ou=Resources,o=potsdam.edu;
bindDN = cn=***;
bindPassword = ***;
canAuthenticate = YES;
displayName = SPOT Resources;
hostname = LDAP-SRVR;
id = resources;
isAddressBook = YES;
port = 389;
},
{
CNFieldName = ou;
IDFieldName = ou;
UIDFieldName = ou;
baseDN = ou=Departments,o=potsdam.edu;
bindDN = cn=***;
bindPassword = ***;
canAuthenticate = YES;
displayName = SPOT Departments;
hostname = LDAP-SRVR;
id = departments;
isAddressBook = YES;
port = 389;
}
)'
sogod LDAPDebugEnabled YES Seems useless, not getting anything out of SOGo
for LDAP
Regards,
Ron
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] LDAP Odditiy
Ludovic, After spending some time in wireshark and looking at logs our LDAP guy had to index the following attrs in order to fix the slow queries: cn, sn, mail, telephoneNumber, givenName and displayName Again, once those attrs were properly indexed then and only then did LDAP queries return in expected time frames. On a separate LDAP topic, what is the proper filter syntax? We need to limit results using (|(userClass=AE)(userClass=AS)) I have tried several combinations of that but each attempt leaves SOGo unusable (users can not login). (userClass=AE) AND (userClass=AS) (userClass='AE') AND (userClass='AS') ((userClass=AE) AND (userClass=AS)) ((userClass='AE') AND (userClass='AS') (userClass=AE AND userClass=AS) (userClass='AE' AND userClass='AS') ((userClass=AE AND userClass=AS)) ((userClass='AE' AND userClass='AS')) What would the proper syntax be? Regards, Ron On 10/14/11 10:39 AM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 14/10/11 10:20, Didier Belhomme wrote: I'm also experiencing slow LDAP query, but in my case it seems to be related to a specific configuration of 389-DS (aka Fedora Directory Server, aka RedHat Directory Server). In our case, the test ldap server is running well (although it's a small virtual machine) whereas ou production server (running on a much more healthier system with 16 GB RAM) is a dog, taking sometimes 10 times more times to answer the same query :-/ (and yes, the data are the same). Did anyone experienced problems with the very latest version of 389-DS (ie 389-ds-1.2.1-1.el5) on RedHat EL 5 (64bit) ? Any clue about this will be very appreciated... You have to make sure some attributes queried by SOGo are well indexed, like: givenName cn mail sn Your problem is only related to proper LDAP indexing. Regards, -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] LDAP Odditiy
Thanks, After adding it 'default reads' shows filter = (userClass=''AE'' OR userClass=''AS''); Is that correct??? -Ron On 10/14/11 11:16 AM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 14/10/11 11:12, Ronald Yacketta wrote: On a separate LDAP topic, what is the proper filter syntax? We need to limit results using (|(userClass=AE)(userClass=AS)) I have tried several combinations of that but each attempt leaves SOGo unusable (users can not login). filter = (userClass='AE' OR userClass='AS'); -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
