Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
On 14/09/12 12:55, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: # we've moved lots of projects to github (https://github.com/inverse-inc) - SOGo and SOPE are the only remaining projects to be moved This is now a thing of the past: https://github.com/inverse-inc/sogo https://github.com/inverse-inc/sope Enjoy! -- Ludovic Marcotte +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
Hello, Looks like we'll have to push back the release of SOGo v2.0 for a few days again. The main reasons behind this decision are: 1. we're still waiting for Microsoft for an issue regarding calendar sharing and one regarding recurring events - progress has been made nonetheless with the Microsoft team 2. we still need to finish our AD integration - so users can be provisioned in AD, and Samba 4 be joined to the existing AD domain. We've identified a bug in Samba 4 and we're working with the Samba team to fix it Nonetheless, lots of things have been accomplished in the past two weeks: 1. we've improved performance and stability of the overall solution 2. we've moved lots of projects to github (https://github.com/inverse-inc) - SOGo and SOPE are the only remaining projects to be moved 3. we released v1.3.18, v2.0rc5 and Funambol SOGo Connector v1.0.9 Thanks, On 24/08/12 16:07, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: Hello, We've been receiving quite a good amount of questions lately about this so let me clarify the upcoming releases/activities regarding SOGo. First, we'll release SOGo v1.3.18 early next week. This will be the last release for the 1.3 series. We also plan to release next week a new version of the Funambol SOGo Connector, with many awaited fixes. We initially planned to release v2.0 this week but we got slowed down by some issues (some of them are totally out of our control): 1. we're still waiting for Microsoft for an issue regarding calendar sharing and one regarding recurring events 2. we still need to finish our AD integration - so users can be provisioned in AD, and Samba 4 be joined to the existing AD domain 3. we still have some "minor" bugs to fix - see the roadmap to v2.0 at http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/ 4. we still need to improve performance for large mail folders, large calendars and large address books That being said, we'll also release 2.0rc5 next week - the last RC release before the first final one. In the past few days/weeks, we've reworked entirely the packages for v2.0 and the documentation. Things can now be easily installed, following the steps in our documentation. You can have a look at it from bit.ly/NPd4ks We now aim the week of September 10 for the final release of SOGo v2.0. In the meantime, folks are highly encouraged to give it a try using our nightly builds, follow our documentation (bit.ly/NPd4ks) and report their findings (http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/). Thanks and enjoy the weekend! -- Ludovic Marcotte +1.514.755.3630 ::www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) -- Ludovic Marcotte +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
Am 26.08.12 15:56, schrieb oo...@front.ru: I have been already tried Dovecot for some time. After some SOGo/Openchange changes it works togeter fine, at least with Dovecot 2.1.9. I asked Dovecot developer and he has added THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT IMAP4 extension. I think Dovecot has been fully ready to use with SOGo. Thank you for this information! Greetings, Martin -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
I have been already tried Dovecot for some time. After some SOGo/Openchange changes it works togeter fine, at least with Dovecot 2.1.9. I asked Dovecot developer and he has added THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT IMAP4 extension. I think Dovecot has been fully ready to use with SOGo. -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
Hi, Am 26.08.12 00:18, schrieb Jeroen Dekkers: At Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:43:50 +0200, Are there problems with dovecot support for UIDPLUS or QRESYNC? I can't find any documented issues. UIDPLUS: http://wiki.dovecot.org/FeatUIDPLUS Timo Sirainen yesterday answered on my Question: http://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg47163.html QRESYNC: It depends on UIDPLUS (imho). So, we (the dovecot users ;-) ) have to test both dovecot 1.2.x and 2.x against SOGo 2.0.0 for running, since there are a couple of SOGo friends are using dovecot. Greetings, Martin -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
At Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:43:50 +0200, Martin Rabl wrote: > Hm - does that mean, that an IMAP-Server which does not support QRESYNC > and UIDPLUS, never will run together with the "Outlook-Layer" of SOGo? > We have to use Cyrus, because dovecot seems not to suppor that in a > proper way (polite spoken ;-) )? Are there problems with dovecot support for UIDPLUS or QRESYNC? I can't find any documented issues. Kind regards, Jeroen Dekkers -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
On 25/08/12 14:43, Martin Rabl wrote: Hm - does that mean, that an IMAP-Server which does not support QRESYNC and UIDPLUS, never will run together with the "Outlook-Layer" of SOGo? Correct. -- Ludovic Marcotte +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
Hi, Am 25.08.12 13:20, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte: You most likely read that in the native Outlook compatibility guide. You only need Cyrus v2.4 if you plan to use it, because of the requirements on the QRESYNC extension which is not found in v2.3 and below. Hm - does that mean, that an IMAP-Server which does not support QRESYNC and UIDPLUS, never will run together with the "Outlook-Layer" of SOGo? We have to use Cyrus, because dovecot seems not to suppor that in a proper way (polite spoken ;-) )? Or did I misunderstand something in the "SOGo Native Microsoft Outlook Configuration" Guide? Thank you, Martin -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
Am 25.08.2012 13:20, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte: On 25/08/12 04:07, Martin (Lists) wrote: I read somewhere that with 2.0 I need a newer version of cyrus imap than I use today (default 2.3.7 revision of centos 5.x). Is this true and if so, will this be provided as well? You most likely read that in the native Outlook compatibility guide. You only need Cyrus v2.4 if you plan to use it, because of the requirements on the QRESYNC extension which is not found in v2.3 and below. One more thing I forgot to mention yesterday, we'll also move away from Monotone to GitHub for all our sources. ! fine ! André -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
Am 25.08.2012 13:20, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte: > On 25/08/12 04:07, Martin (Lists) wrote: >> I read somewhere that with 2.0 I need a newer version of cyrus imap than >> I use today (default 2.3.7 revision of centos 5.x). Is this true and if >> so, will this be provided as well? > You most likely read that in the native Outlook compatibility guide. You > only need Cyrus v2.4 if you plan to use it, because of the requirements > on the QRESYNC extension which is not found in v2.3 and below. Thanks for the info. Martin > > One more thing I forgot to mention yesterday, we'll also move away from > Monotone to GitHub for all our sources. > -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
On 25/08/12 04:07, Martin (Lists) wrote: I read somewhere that with 2.0 I need a newer version of cyrus imap than I use today (default 2.3.7 revision of centos 5.x). Is this true and if so, will this be provided as well? You most likely read that in the native Outlook compatibility guide. You only need Cyrus v2.4 if you plan to use it, because of the requirements on the QRESYNC extension which is not found in v2.3 and below. One more thing I forgot to mention yesterday, we'll also move away from Monotone to GitHub for all our sources. -- Ludovic Marcotte +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
Am 24.08.2012 23:26, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte: > On 24/08/12 17:20, Donny Brooks wrote: >> Awesome. the way I read it before was that was the only way to >> configure it. But then again I guess that was the appeal of it so that >> was why everyone was doing that. How would we go from the 1.3.18 to >> 2.0 once it is released? Would it be available to do a yum upgrade? > Of course! > I read somewhere that with 2.0 I need a newer version of cyrus imap than I use today (default 2.3.7 revision of centos 5.x). Is this true and if so, will this be provided as well? Martin -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
On 24/08/12 17:20, Donny Brooks wrote: Awesome. the way I read it before was that was the only way to configure it. But then again I guess that was the appeal of it so that was why everyone was doing that. How would we go from the 1.3.18 to 2.0 once it is released? Would it be available to do a yum upgrade? Of course! -- Ludovic Marcotte +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
On Friday, August 24, 2012 04:10 PM CDT, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: > On 24/08/12 17:09, Donny Brooks wrote: > > What does that mean to those of us that don't need the outlook connection > > or can't move to the samba4/AD setup? Basically meaning we have to stay > > with the 1.3.X branch? Will this mean no more features being added and/or > > bug fixes? > The native Outlook connectivity part is optional - it's just an addon to > SOGo. Right now, v1.3.18 is identical to v2.0.0 regarding "SOGo". > > -- > Ludovic Marcotte > +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca > Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence > (www.packetfence.org) > > -- > users@sogo.nu > https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists Awesome. the way I read it before was that was the only way to configure it. But then again I guess that was the appeal of it so that was why everyone was doing that. How would we go from the 1.3.18 to 2.0 once it is released? Would it be available to do a yum upgrade? -- Donny B. -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
On 24/08/12 17:09, Donny Brooks wrote: What does that mean to those of us that don't need the outlook connection or can't move to the samba4/AD setup? Basically meaning we have to stay with the 1.3.X branch? Will this mean no more features being added and/or bug fixes? The native Outlook connectivity part is optional - it's just an addon to SOGo. Right now, v1.3.18 is identical to v2.0.0 regarding "SOGo". -- Ludovic Marcotte +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
On Friday, August 24, 2012 03:07 PM CDT, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: > Hello, > > We've been receiving quite a good amount of questions lately about this > so let me clarify the upcoming releases/activities regarding SOGo. > > First, we'll release SOGo v1.3.18 early next week. This will be the last > release for the 1.3 series. We also plan to release next week a new > version of the Funambol SOGo Connector, with many awaited fixes. > > We initially planned to release v2.0 this week but we got slowed down by > some issues (some of them are totally out of our control): > > 1. we're still waiting for Microsoft for an issue regarding calendar > sharing and one regarding recurring events > 2. we still need to finish our AD integration - so users can be > provisioned in AD, and Samba 4 be joined to the existing AD domain > 3. we still have some "minor" bugs to fix - see the roadmap to v2.0 at > http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/ > 4. we still need to improve performance for large mail folders, large > calendars and large address books > > That being said, we'll also release 2.0rc5 next week - the last RC > release before the first final one. In the past few days/weeks, we've > reworked entirely the packages for v2.0 and the documentation. Things > can now be easily installed, following the steps in our documentation. > You can have a look at it from bit.ly/NPd4ks > > We now aim the week of September 10 for the final release of SOGo v2.0. > In the meantime, folks are highly encouraged to give it a try using our > nightly builds, follow our documentation (bit.ly/NPd4ks) and report > their findings (http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/). > > Thanks and enjoy the weekend! > > -- > Ludovic Marcotte > +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca > Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence > (www.packetfence.org) > > -- > users@sogo.nu > https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists What does that mean to those of us that don't need the outlook connection or can't move to the samba4/AD setup? Basically meaning we have to stay with the 1.3.X branch? Will this mean no more features being added and/or bug fixes? -- Donny B. -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Upcoming releases/activities
Hello, We've been receiving quite a good amount of questions lately about this so let me clarify the upcoming releases/activities regarding SOGo. First, we'll release SOGo v1.3.18 early next week. This will be the last release for the 1.3 series. We also plan to release next week a new version of the Funambol SOGo Connector, with many awaited fixes. We initially planned to release v2.0 this week but we got slowed down by some issues (some of them are totally out of our control): 1. we're still waiting for Microsoft for an issue regarding calendar sharing and one regarding recurring events 2. we still need to finish our AD integration - so users can be provisioned in AD, and Samba 4 be joined to the existing AD domain 3. we still have some "minor" bugs to fix - see the roadmap to v2.0 at http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/ 4. we still need to improve performance for large mail folders, large calendars and large address books That being said, we'll also release 2.0rc5 next week - the last RC release before the first final one. In the past few days/weeks, we've reworked entirely the packages for v2.0 and the documentation. Things can now be easily installed, following the steps in our documentation. You can have a look at it from bit.ly/NPd4ks We now aim the week of September 10 for the final release of SOGo v2.0. In the meantime, folks are highly encouraged to give it a try using our nightly builds, follow our documentation (bit.ly/NPd4ks) and report their findings (http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/). Thanks and enjoy the weekend! -- Ludovic Marcotte +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
