Re: T_DKIM_INVALID from yahoo.com

2016-12-24 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/24/2016 11:05 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> All mail I get from yahoo customers [1] scores on T_DKIM_INVALID, and
> always has.  Why?
> 

Is there any correlation between the DKIM result and the size of the
message?




Re: T_DKIM_INVALID from yahoo.com

2016-12-24 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2016-12-24 16:32, Groach wrote:

> I have just done a test and do not get the same results as you.  My 
> yahoo incoming emails pass ok:

And yours passed for me, too.  So it's only a subset of yahoo senders,
apparently :-(

> This might explain it: 
> http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/
> I-m-getting-T-DKIM-INVALID-from-gmail-td109464.html

Clearly not, since some pass (and _all_ legit mail passes from gmail,
earthlink, aol, and so on).

-- 
Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups
Personal signed mail: please _encrypt_ and sign
Don't clear-text sign: http://cr.yp.to/smtp/8bitmime.html


Re: T_DKIM_INVALID from yahoo.com

2016-12-24 Thread Groach
I have just done a test and do not get the same results as you.  My 
yahoo incoming emails pass ok:



Return-Path: stopspammin...@yahoo.net
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mailserver
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_MOSTLY,

RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,TVD_SPACE_RATIO
shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-Spam-Report:
*  0.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE RBL: HostKarma: relay in yellow list 
(varies)
*  [212.82.97.159 listed in hostkarma.junkemailfilter.net]
*  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail 
provider
*  (groachmail-stopspammingme[at]yahoo.net)
* -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2)
*  [212.82.97.159 listed in wl.mailspike.co]
* -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, 
no
*  trust
*  [212.82.97.159 listed in list.dnswl.org]
*  0.4 MIME_HTML_MOSTLY BODY: Multipart message mostly text/html MIME
*  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
*  0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
*  [score: 0.4608]
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from 
author's
*   domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
*  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
*  valid
*  0.0 TVD_SPACE_RATIO No description available.
*
Received: from nm38-vm9.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.net 
(nm38-vm9.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.net [212.82.97.159])
by mydomain.net with ESMTP
; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 16:25:16 +
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.net; s=s2048; 
t=1482596721; bh=ATY/rpmzVtt0ixEE+qh8r6sPMhEpXyjNG2QGr7N0zAY=; 
h=To:From:Subject:Date:From:Subject; 
b=Wt2qUdnnO1CE7zTLuVlVvOdNKn6mIhHd+P+mbrstu2RW0VTlAa2mUDoDDRn65t/a1V/zytTWzT9xmT+xe0TY3xx0blesGJtUuz5F/CwEJD4Jj2w9kcqGXs21ys77kLUmW1GmIEU0623eRUk/vvNF0FrnjQ9NLL/vc/ykDEMkJOy5ePscDRVlhmkYtvNIeX7dzWK4oBGbopKnDSZxrKKW/5qFud+OHQmGL3l0ebJ4JYZqzyM+7260GbpOnPsmr6/PovZksZx7ni7Qmfyqm95Eh6R7E1k2uMKg7zxgla0UDV/vhCsvICsd/bk0NBogn4Sedw8zsx2VWyiYZkuUDVOSRA==
Received: from [212.82.98.56] by nm38.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.net with NNFMP; 24 
Dec 2016 16:25:21 -

This might explain it: 
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/I-m-getting-T-DKIM-INVALID-from-gmail-td109464.html 
(And you are not the first: 
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=T_DKIM_INVALID)




On 24/12/2016 16:05, Ian Zimmerman wrote:

All mail I get from yahoo customers [1] scores on T_DKIM_INVALID, and
always has.  Why?

Maybe I can prepare a spample, but it will take some work to find a
privacy friendly specimen, since it obviously can't be altered.

[1] same for hotmail, while other big domains get DKIM_VALID.





T_DKIM_INVALID from yahoo.com

2016-12-24 Thread Ian Zimmerman
All mail I get from yahoo customers [1] scores on T_DKIM_INVALID, and
always has.  Why?

Maybe I can prepare a spample, but it will take some work to find a
privacy friendly specimen, since it obviously can't be altered.

[1] same for hotmail, while other big domains get DKIM_VALID.

-- 
Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups
Personal signed mail: please _encrypt_ and sign
Don't clear-text sign: http://cr.yp.to/smtp/8bitmime.html