Re: KAM info messages
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 05:22:07 -0700 @lbutlr wrote: > When I run my cron task to update SA. I am getting a LOT of lines in > the crpn output along the lines of > ... > > Is this something I need to worry about or just expected behavior? (I > generally only look at this log file when there is a problem, and > there hasn't beed a problem in a while.) See the recent thread "kam channel".
KAM info messages
When I run my cron task to update SA. I am getting a LOT of lines in the crpn output along the lines of info: rules: meta test KAM_REALLY_FAKE_DELIVER has dependency 'KAM_RPTR_PASSED' with a zero score And a lot of compile lines like: cc -c-DHAS_FPSETMASK -DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -DUSE_THREAD_SAFE_LOCALE -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -I/usr/local/include -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -DVERSION=\"1.0\" -DXS_VERSION=\"1.0\" -DPIC -fPIC "- Basically, I get about 200 lines each day. I am assuming something is wrong in my setup? Crontab: 19 1 * * * sa-update ; sa-update --gpgkey 24C063D8 --channel kam.sa-channels.mcgrail.com ; sa-compile && service sa-spamd restart I could redirect sa-compile to null, of course, but having spamd restart only when the compile succeeds seems like a good idea? Also, I don't remember SA being this noisy? OTOH, I don't keep these cron logs more than a day or two, so maybe they were always this noisy and I didn't notice. Is this something I need to worry about or just expected behavior? (I generally only look at this log file when there is a problem, and there hasn't beed a problem in a while.) -- We’re despairing in style, as befits two former High Kings of Fillory.
RE: Are these valid email headers?
>> with HTTPS (ZuckMail) WTF this guy is mental https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-25/dumb-f-ks-julian-assange-reminds-us-what-mark-zuckerberg-thinks-facebook-users -Original Message- From: @lbutlr [mailto:krem...@kreme.com] Sent: zondag 6 december 2020 7:42 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Are these valid email headers? On 05 Dec 2020, at 13:03, John Capo wrote: > On Sat, December 5, 2020 14:30, Loren Wilton wrote: >> I don't have a Faceboox account and don't know anyone on Facebook >> that would send me mail (and don't want to!), so I have absolutely no >> idea if these headers from recent spams are completely made up out of the air (and thus spam signs) or are valid headers. >> >> Can anyone tell me if this stuff is valid or obviously fake? >> >> >> X-Facebook: from 2401:db00:1050:208b:face:0:4f:0 ([MTI3LjAuMC4x]) by >> www.facebook.com with HTTPS (ZuckMail); X-Priority: 3 >> X-Mailer: ZuckMail [version 1.00] >> X-Facebook-Notify: skipped_password_change; >> mailid=5ac39662d1c08G5af32c89e396G5ac39afc31edaG569 Feedback-ID: >> 509:skipped_password_change:Facebook >> X-FACEBOOK-PRIORITY: 0 >> X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All >> Require-Recipient-Valid-Since: gouldi...@earthlink.net; Sunday, 29 >> Nov 2009 >> 00:17:08 + > > Except for mailid: I see those headers in mail from Facebook. Yeah, I use X-Facebook to auto-junk mail to me. For me it is 100% spam sign, but then again I refuse to use Facebook. -- You have severe reading comprehension problems that I can not be held responsible for.
