Re: Building Red Hat Rawhide SA 4.0.0 package for RHEL/CentOS 7
On 12/6/2023 5:19 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: can't procmail use X-Spam-Flag ? I think the reason I run it twice is that the mimedefang invocation doesn't have access to personal Bayes data. When it runs, it's not yet known what user(s) the mail is destined for.
Re: Building Red Hat Rawhide SA 4.0.0 package for RHEL/CentOS 7
Kenneth Porter skrev den 2023-12-06 08:25: On 12/5/2023 10:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: mimedefang does not use spamd, you only need either spamassassin only with spamd or mimedefang with spamassassin not running spamd It's a small server so I can afford to run SA twice, once at the MTA level through mimedefang (which can potentially reject egregious spam), and once during delivery via procmail, which invokes spamc. X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.junc.eu X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.758 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.758 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[CLEAR_TEXT_SASL_AUTH=1.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.1, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-0.2] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: mx.junc.eu (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcastmailservice.net header.b="qcfLyXGV"; dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: missing p= tag)" header.d=sewingwitch.com header.b="IYT0Idc+" X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mxout1-he-de.apache.org (mxout1-he-de.apache.org [95.216.194.37]) by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D48780DE5 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 08:25:45 +0100 (CET) can't procmail use X-Spam-Flag ?
Re: Building Red Hat Rawhide SA 4.0.0 package for RHEL/CentOS 7
On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 23:25 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote: > On 12/5/2023 10:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > mimedefang does not use spamd, you only need either spamassassin > > only > > with spamd or mimedefang with spamassassin not running spamd > > It's a small server so I can afford to run SA twice, once at the MTA > level through mimedefang (which can potentially reject egregious > spam), > and once during delivery via procmail, which invokes spamc. > > I'm run ing the XFCE spin of Redhat Linux and found vmlinuz-6.6.2-101.fc38.x86_64's display handling so flaky that I replaced it with vmlinuz-6.6.3-100.fc38.x86_64 six days later. vmlinuz-6.6.3-100.fc38.x86_64 is a huge improvement. I hopethis is useful feedback. MCG
Re: Building Red Hat Rawhide SA 4.0.0 package for RHEL/CentOS 7
On 12/6/23 08:25, Kenneth Porter wrote: On 12/5/2023 10:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: mimedefang does not use spamd, you only need either spamassassin only with spamd or mimedefang with spamassassin not running spamd It's a small server so I can afford to run SA twice, once at the MTA level through mimedefang (which can potentially reject egregious spam), and once during delivery via procmail, which invokes spamc. why ? If you run SA at the MTA level you shouldn't need to run spamc at all at delivery time. Spoiler: with next SA and MIMEDefang versions you will be able to use spamd natively. Giovanni OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
