Re: Multiple test failures
I haven't had a chance yet to read this thread carefully, but spamd when run as root in tests will, at least in some cases, set itself to run as user "nobody". If you do that in a subdirectory of your non-nobody user's HOME, the usual permission configuration will not provide read access to nobody and the test will fail. Basically, the only tests that should be run as root are the t/root*.t tests, and even those have comments in their source telling you about running under a directory with world read permissions, and those tests are not run by default, being used as part of our release testing on machines that do not run SpamAssassin in production. Sidney Bill Cole wrote on 4/04/24 3:46 am: On 2024-04-02 at 18:18:09 UTC-0400 (Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:18:09 -0400) Scott Ellentuch is rumored to have said: Hi, Trying to install SA 4.0.1 from scratch. Tried via CPAN, that didn't go well, so trying from tarball. (Enabled SSL when doing Makefile.PL) NEVER run 'make' as root except when you're ready to commit with 'make install' unless you're doing it on a sacrificial system.
Re: Multiple test failures
File attached. However, I don't see any smoking gun. Nothing in t/log [ec2-user@ip-172-31-131-251 Mail-SpamAssassin-4.0.1]$ ls -lR t/log t/log: total 0 Nothing big in iptables [ec2-user@ip-172-31-131-251 Mail-SpamAssassin-4.0.1]$ sudo iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- ip-10-8-0-0.ec2.internal/24 anywhere ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Tnx, Tuc On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 3:31 PM Bill Cole < sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote: > On 2024-04-03 at 14:01:44 UTC-0400 (Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:01:44 -0400) > Scott Ellentuch > is rumored to have said: > > > Hi, > > > > Ok, deleted the directory and started again. > > > > Test Summary Report > > --- > > t/spamd_client.t(Wstat: 26624 Tests: 4 Failed: 0) > > Non-zero exit status: 104 > > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 52 tests but ran 4. > > Files=217, Tests=3765, 890 wallclock secs ( 1.21 usr 0.19 sys + > > 271.62 > > cusr 25.51 csys = 298.53 CPU) > > Result: FAIL > > Failed 1/217 test programs. 0/3765 subtests failed. > > make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 > > > > Script file attached. > > This error appears to be a problem launching a spamd instance from the > test harness, verifying its PID, and getting responses from it. You can > get more details logged by clearing the test logs and re-running just > the one test file which displays the problem: > >rm -r t/log >make test TEST_FILES="t/spamd_client.t" TEST_VERBOSE=1 > > That should provide the precise command used to launch spamd and > hopefully a clue about why it failed. There may also be useful > information logged under t/log/ after a failed test. > > One possibility is a local packet filter (iptables, nftables, etc.) > blocking the port spamd uses for testing. That is rare because it > selects an unused high port on the loopback interface for the test run, > but if you have a very tight network security policy in place, that can > fail. SELinux and AppArmor can also interfere. > > > > > > Thanks Tuc > > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 10:46 AM Bill Cole < > > sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote: > > > >> On 2024-04-02 at 18:18:09 UTC-0400 (Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:18:09 -0400) > >> Scott Ellentuch > >> is rumored to have said: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Trying to install SA 4.0.1 from scratch. Tried via CPAN, that didn't > >>> go > >>> well, so trying from tarball. (Enabled SSL when doing Makefile.PL) > >> > >> NEVER run 'make' as root except when you're ready to commit with > >> 'make > >> install' unless you're doing it on a sacrificial system. > >> > >> Think about how unsafe it could be... > >> > >> These test failures look like you did that. I am flattered that you > >> trust the SpamAssassin team that much, but don't, please. We are only > >> human. In the past there have been bugs in the test suite that have > >> polluted the running config of the system if run as root. It is > >> possible > >> in principle for there to still be such bugs. > >> > >>> I'm on Amazon Linux 2 , 4.0.1 SA, and not sure what other info I can > >>> give. > >>> I installed every perl module it wanted. > >> > >> FWIW, non-root 'make test' has been clean for PMC members on a wide > >> range of systems, so a real test failure would be both a shock and a > >> serious problem. If this is happening with a normal user running > >> 'make > >> test' we definitely need to > >> address it. > >> > >>> > >>> The final summary is - > >>> Test Summary Report > >>> --- > >>> t/spamc_optL.t (Wstat: 2560 Tests: 18 Failed: 10) > >>> Failed tests: 2, 5-8, 10, 12, 15-16, 18 > >>> Non-zero exit status: 10 > >>> t/spamd_client.t(Wstat: 3584 Tests: 52 Failed: 14) > >>> Failed tests: 35, 37-42, 44, 46-51 > >>> Non-zero exit status: 14 > >>> Files=217, Tests=3807, 904 wallclock secs ( 1.21 usr 0.22 sys + > >>> 273.72 > >>> cusr 26.33 csys = 301.48 CPU) > >>> Result: FAIL > >>> Failed 2/217 test programs. 24/3807 subtests failed. > >>> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 > >>> > >>> During the run it seems to output : > >>> > >>> t/spamd_client.t .. 32/52 > >>> # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 152. > >>> ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run with -D for more > >>> information > >>> t/spamd_client.t .. 37/52 > >>> # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 157. > >>> Not found: spam in database = 1 0 non-token data: nspam at > >>> t/spamd_client.t line 158. > >>> > >>> # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. > >>> > >>> # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 161. > >>> ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run with -D for more > >>> information > >>> > >>> # Failed test
Re: Multiple test failures
On 2024-04-03 at 14:01:44 UTC-0400 (Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:01:44 -0400) Scott Ellentuch is rumored to have said: Hi, Ok, deleted the directory and started again. Test Summary Report --- t/spamd_client.t(Wstat: 26624 Tests: 4 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 104 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 52 tests but ran 4. Files=217, Tests=3765, 890 wallclock secs ( 1.21 usr 0.19 sys + 271.62 cusr 25.51 csys = 298.53 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 1/217 test programs. 0/3765 subtests failed. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 Script file attached. This error appears to be a problem launching a spamd instance from the test harness, verifying its PID, and getting responses from it. You can get more details logged by clearing the test logs and re-running just the one test file which displays the problem: rm -r t/log make test TEST_FILES="t/spamd_client.t" TEST_VERBOSE=1 That should provide the precise command used to launch spamd and hopefully a clue about why it failed. There may also be useful information logged under t/log/ after a failed test. One possibility is a local packet filter (iptables, nftables, etc.) blocking the port spamd uses for testing. That is rare because it selects an unused high port on the loopback interface for the test run, but if you have a very tight network security policy in place, that can fail. SELinux and AppArmor can also interfere. Thanks Tuc On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 10:46 AM Bill Cole < sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote: On 2024-04-02 at 18:18:09 UTC-0400 (Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:18:09 -0400) Scott Ellentuch is rumored to have said: Hi, Trying to install SA 4.0.1 from scratch. Tried via CPAN, that didn't go well, so trying from tarball. (Enabled SSL when doing Makefile.PL) NEVER run 'make' as root except when you're ready to commit with 'make install' unless you're doing it on a sacrificial system. Think about how unsafe it could be... These test failures look like you did that. I am flattered that you trust the SpamAssassin team that much, but don't, please. We are only human. In the past there have been bugs in the test suite that have polluted the running config of the system if run as root. It is possible in principle for there to still be such bugs. I'm on Amazon Linux 2 , 4.0.1 SA, and not sure what other info I can give. I installed every perl module it wanted. FWIW, non-root 'make test' has been clean for PMC members on a wide range of systems, so a real test failure would be both a shock and a serious problem. If this is happening with a normal user running 'make test' we definitely need to address it. The final summary is - Test Summary Report --- t/spamc_optL.t (Wstat: 2560 Tests: 18 Failed: 10) Failed tests: 2, 5-8, 10, 12, 15-16, 18 Non-zero exit status: 10 t/spamd_client.t(Wstat: 3584 Tests: 52 Failed: 14) Failed tests: 35, 37-42, 44, 46-51 Non-zero exit status: 14 Files=217, Tests=3807, 904 wallclock secs ( 1.21 usr 0.22 sys + 273.72 cusr 26.33 csys = 301.48 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 2/217 test programs. 24/3807 subtests failed. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 During the run it seems to output : t/spamd_client.t .. 32/52 # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 152. ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run with -D for more information t/spamd_client.t .. 37/52 # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 157. Not found: spam in database = 1 0 non-token data: nspam at t/spamd_client.t line 158. # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 161. ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run with -D for more information # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 165. Not found: ham in database = 0 0 non-token data: nham at t/spamd_client.t line 166. # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. Not found: spam in database = 0 0 non-token data: nspam at t/spamd_client.t line 166. # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. t/spamd_client.t .. 44/52 # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 172. ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run with -D for more information # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 177. Not found: ham in database = 1 0 non-token data: nham at t/spamd_client.t line 178. # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 181. ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run with -D for more information t/spamd_client.t .. 49/52 # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 185. Not found: ham in database = 0 0 non-token data: nham at t/spamd_client.t line 186. # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. Not found: spam in database = 0 0 non-token data: nspam at t/spamd_client.t line 186. # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. t/spamd_client.t .. 52/52 # Looks like you failed 14 tests of 52. t/spamd_client.t ..
Re: Multiple test failures
Hi, Ok, deleted the directory and started again. Test Summary Report --- t/spamd_client.t(Wstat: 26624 Tests: 4 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 104 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 52 tests but ran 4. Files=217, Tests=3765, 890 wallclock secs ( 1.21 usr 0.19 sys + 271.62 cusr 25.51 csys = 298.53 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 1/217 test programs. 0/3765 subtests failed. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 Script file attached. Thanks Tuc On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 10:46 AM Bill Cole < sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote: > On 2024-04-02 at 18:18:09 UTC-0400 (Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:18:09 -0400) > Scott Ellentuch > is rumored to have said: > > > Hi, > > > > Trying to install SA 4.0.1 from scratch. Tried via CPAN, that didn't > > go > > well, so trying from tarball. (Enabled SSL when doing Makefile.PL) > > NEVER run 'make' as root except when you're ready to commit with 'make > install' unless you're doing it on a sacrificial system. > > Think about how unsafe it could be... > > These test failures look like you did that. I am flattered that you > trust the SpamAssassin team that much, but don't, please. We are only > human. In the past there have been bugs in the test suite that have > polluted the running config of the system if run as root. It is possible > in principle for there to still be such bugs. > > > I'm on Amazon Linux 2 , 4.0.1 SA, and not sure what other info I can > > give. > > I installed every perl module it wanted. > > FWIW, non-root 'make test' has been clean for PMC members on a wide > range of systems, so a real test failure would be both a shock and a > serious problem. If this is happening with a normal user running 'make > test' we definitely need to > address it. > > > > > The final summary is - > > Test Summary Report > > --- > > t/spamc_optL.t (Wstat: 2560 Tests: 18 Failed: 10) > > Failed tests: 2, 5-8, 10, 12, 15-16, 18 > > Non-zero exit status: 10 > > t/spamd_client.t(Wstat: 3584 Tests: 52 Failed: 14) > > Failed tests: 35, 37-42, 44, 46-51 > > Non-zero exit status: 14 > > Files=217, Tests=3807, 904 wallclock secs ( 1.21 usr 0.22 sys + > > 273.72 > > cusr 26.33 csys = 301.48 CPU) > > Result: FAIL > > Failed 2/217 test programs. 24/3807 subtests failed. > > make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 > > > > During the run it seems to output : > > > > t/spamd_client.t .. 32/52 > > # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 152. > > ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run with -D for more > > information > > t/spamd_client.t .. 37/52 > > # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 157. > > Not found: spam in database = 1 0 non-token data: nspam at > > t/spamd_client.t line 158. > > > > # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. > > > > # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 161. > > ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run with -D for more > > information > > > > # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 165. > > Not found: ham in database = 0 0 non-token data: nham at > > t/spamd_client.t > > line 166. > > > > # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. > > Not found: spam in database = 0 0 non-token data: nspam at > > t/spamd_client.t line 166. > > > > # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. > > t/spamd_client.t .. 44/52 > > # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 172. > > ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run with -D for more > > information > > > > # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 177. > > Not found: ham in database = 1 0 non-token data: nham at > > t/spamd_client.t > > line 178. > > > > # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. > > > > # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 181. > > ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run with -D for more > > information > > t/spamd_client.t .. 49/52 > > # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 185. > > Not found: ham in database = 0 0 non-token data: nham at > > t/spamd_client.t > > line 186. > > > > # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. > > Not found: spam in database = 0 0 non-token data: nspam at > > t/spamd_client.t line 186. > > > > # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. > > t/spamd_client.t .. 52/52 # Looks like you failed 14 > > tests > > of 52. > > t/spamd_client.t .. Dubious, test returned 14 (wstat > > 3584, > > 0xe00) > > Failed 14/52 subtests > > > > Any indications as to the issue? > > > > Thanks, Tuc > > > -- > Bill Cole > b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org > (AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses) > Not Currently Available For Hire > Script started on Wed 03 Apr 2024 05:40:56 PM UTC ]0;ec2-user@ip-172-31-131-251:/usr/local/src/Mail-SpamAssassin-4.0.1[?1034h[ec2-user@ip-172-31-131-251 Mail-SpamAssassin-4.0.1]$ make test "/usr/bin/perl" build/mkrules --exit_on_no_src --src rulesrc --out rules --manifest MANIFEST --manifestskip MANIFEST.SKIP no source
Re: Syslog local3
On 2024-04-03 at 05:49:20 UTC-0400 (Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:49:20 +0200) Emmanuel Seyman is rumored to have said: Hello, all. It's taken me nearly a year to realize this but spamassassin sends to syslog with the local3 facility, not 'mail' as I had assumed. The spamd daemon logs as mail as configured in the source distribution, but a packager (e.g. Debian) may modify that. If you are using something else to call Spamassassin, e.g. Amavis, MIMEDefang, etc., that other software controls the logging. Is this something that can be configured? If you're running spamd, the facility is set with the "-s" option, as documented in the man page. -- Bill Cole b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org (AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses) Not Currently Available For Hire
Re: Multiple test failures
On 2024-04-02 at 18:18:09 UTC-0400 (Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:18:09 -0400) Scott Ellentuch is rumored to have said: Hi, Trying to install SA 4.0.1 from scratch. Tried via CPAN, that didn't go well, so trying from tarball. (Enabled SSL when doing Makefile.PL) NEVER run 'make' as root except when you're ready to commit with 'make install' unless you're doing it on a sacrificial system. Think about how unsafe it could be... These test failures look like you did that. I am flattered that you trust the SpamAssassin team that much, but don't, please. We are only human. In the past there have been bugs in the test suite that have polluted the running config of the system if run as root. It is possible in principle for there to still be such bugs. I'm on Amazon Linux 2 , 4.0.1 SA, and not sure what other info I can give. I installed every perl module it wanted. FWIW, non-root 'make test' has been clean for PMC members on a wide range of systems, so a real test failure would be both a shock and a serious problem. If this is happening with a normal user running 'make test' we definitely need to address it. The final summary is - Test Summary Report --- t/spamc_optL.t (Wstat: 2560 Tests: 18 Failed: 10) Failed tests: 2, 5-8, 10, 12, 15-16, 18 Non-zero exit status: 10 t/spamd_client.t(Wstat: 3584 Tests: 52 Failed: 14) Failed tests: 35, 37-42, 44, 46-51 Non-zero exit status: 14 Files=217, Tests=3807, 904 wallclock secs ( 1.21 usr 0.22 sys + 273.72 cusr 26.33 csys = 301.48 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 2/217 test programs. 24/3807 subtests failed. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 During the run it seems to output : t/spamd_client.t .. 32/52 # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 152. ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run with -D for more information t/spamd_client.t .. 37/52 # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 157. Not found: spam in database = 1 0 non-token data: nspam at t/spamd_client.t line 158. # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 161. ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run with -D for more information # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 165. Not found: ham in database = 0 0 non-token data: nham at t/spamd_client.t line 166. # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. Not found: spam in database = 0 0 non-token data: nspam at t/spamd_client.t line 166. # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. t/spamd_client.t .. 44/52 # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 172. ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run with -D for more information # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 177. Not found: ham in database = 1 0 non-token data: nham at t/spamd_client.t line 178. # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 181. ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run with -D for more information t/spamd_client.t .. 49/52 # Failed test at t/spamd_client.t line 185. Not found: ham in database = 0 0 non-token data: nham at t/spamd_client.t line 186. # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. Not found: spam in database = 0 0 non-token data: nspam at t/spamd_client.t line 186. # Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926. t/spamd_client.t .. 52/52 # Looks like you failed 14 tests of 52. t/spamd_client.t .. Dubious, test returned 14 (wstat 3584, 0xe00) Failed 14/52 subtests Any indications as to the issue? Thanks, Tuc -- Bill Cole b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org (AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses) Not Currently Available For Hire
Re: disable URIBL_ and spamhaus.net
W dniu 3.04.2024 o 15:25, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze: On 03.04.24 11:18, natan wrote: Where in pdns-recursor? I use pdns-recursor /etc/powerdns/recursor.conf W dniu 3.04.2024 o 13:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze: This is not about pdns-recursor itself. It's about using own recursing DNS server - you you don't use DNS server of your ISP, google(8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4), cloudflare(1.1.1.1) or quad-nine (9.9.9.9) look into your /etc/resolv.conf or SpamAssassin's configuration of "dns_server" (if there's none, /etc/resolv.conf is used). On 03.04.24 14:34, natan wrote: cat /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 127.0.0.1 so apparently you only use locally installed DNS server which I assume is powerdns-recursor. I guess your powerdns-recursor is not configured to forward lookups to other DNS servers but your ISP still may redirect DNS lookups to its servers. How many mail does your machine process daily? spamhaus limits to about 100k lookups daily. ~200K according to SA docs: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/DnsBlocklists since spamassassin 3.4 it should be enough to disable spamhaus lookups: dns_query_restriction deny spamhaus.org or probably split to these: For test I add i local.cf dns_query_restriction deny zen.spamhaus.org dns_query_restriction deny dbl.spamhaus.org dns_query_restriction deny zen.spamhaus.org dns_query_restriction deny dbl.spamhaus.org (if you lates find out one of those would work) --
Participate in the ASF 25th Anniversary Campaign
Hi everyone, As part of The ASF’s 25th anniversary campaign[1], we will be celebrating projects and communities in multiple ways. We invite all projects and contributors to participate in the following ways: * Individuals - submit your first contribution: https://news.apache.org/foundation/entry/the-asf-launches-firstasfcontribution-campaign * Projects - share your public good story: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1vuN-tUnBwpTgOE5xj3Z5AG1hsOoDNLBmGIqQHwQT6k8/viewform?edit_requested=true * Projects - submit a project spotlight for the blog: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=278466116 * Projects - contact the Voice of Apache podcast (formerly Feathercast) to be featured: https://feathercast.apache.org/help/ * Projects - use the 25th anniversary template and the #ASF25Years hashtag on social media: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1oDbMol3F_XQuCmttPYxBIOIjRuRBksUjDApjd8Ve3L8/edit#slide=id.g26b0919956e_0_13 If you have questions, email the Marketing & Publicity team at mark...@apache.org. Peace, BKP [1] https://apache.org/asf25years/ [NOTE: You are receiving this message because you are a contributor to an Apache Software Foundation project. The ASF will very occasionally send out messages relating to the Foundation to contributors and members, such as this one.] Brian Proffitt VP, Marketing & Publicity VP, Conferences
Re: disable URIBL_ and spamhaus.net
On 03.04.24 11:18, natan wrote: Where in pdns-recursor? I use pdns-recursor /etc/powerdns/recursor.conf W dniu 3.04.2024 o 13:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze: This is not about pdns-recursor itself. It's about using own recursing DNS server - you you don't use DNS server of your ISP, google(8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4), cloudflare(1.1.1.1) or quad-nine (9.9.9.9) look into your /etc/resolv.conf or SpamAssassin's configuration of "dns_server" (if there's none, /etc/resolv.conf is used). On 03.04.24 14:34, natan wrote: cat /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 127.0.0.1 so apparently you only use locally installed DNS server which I assume is powerdns-recursor. I guess your powerdns-recursor is not configured to forward lookups to other DNS servers but your ISP still may redirect DNS lookups to its servers. How many mail does your machine process daily? spamhaus limits to about 100k lookups daily. according to SA docs: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/DnsBlocklists since spamassassin 3.4 it should be enough to disable spamhaus lookups: dns_query_restriction deny spamhaus.org or probably split to these: dns_query_restriction deny zen.spamhaus.org dns_query_restriction deny dbl.spamhaus.org (if you lates find out one of those would work) -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.
Re: disable URIBL_ and spamhaus.net
W dniu 3.04.2024 o 13:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze: On 03.04.24 11:18, natan wrote: Where in pdns-recursor? I use pdns-recursor /etc/powerdns/recursor.conf This is not about pdns-recursor itself. It's about using own recursing DNS server - you you don't use DNS server of your ISP, google(8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4), cloudflare(1.1.1.1) or quad-nine (9.9.9.9) look into your /etc/resolv.conf or SpamAssassin's configuration of "dns_server" (if there's none, /etc/resolv.conf is used). cat /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 127.0.0.1 W dniu 3.04.2024 o 11:10, Reindl Harald (privat) pisze: use unbound as caching resolver and configure TTL properly cache-min-ttl: 60 cache-max-negative-ttl: 60 Am 03.04.24 um 11:06 schrieb natan: Hi I must chane or disable permanently spamhaus.net and all everything he uses. They calculated the rate so much that I couldn't afford to use their toys Does anyone have an interesting solution to this problem? Or maybe some other lists connected? --
Re: disable URIBL_ and spamhaus.net
Hi In this machine I use cat /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 127.0.0.1 W dniu 3.04.2024 o 14:18, Benny Pedersen pisze: natan skrev den 2024-04-03 11:06: I must chane or disable permanently spamhaus.net and all everything he uses. +1 They calculated the rate so much that I couldn't afford to use their toys +1 Does anyone have an interesting solution to this problem? Or maybe some other lists connected? more verbose info on how you use dns in your server setup is needed local resolver is payed no local resolver, no good results, your choice --
Re: disable URIBL_ and spamhaus.net
natan skrev den 2024-04-03 11:06: I must chane or disable permanently spamhaus.net and all everything he uses. +1 They calculated the rate so much that I couldn't afford to use their toys +1 Does anyone have an interesting solution to this problem? Or maybe some other lists connected? more verbose info on how you use dns in your server setup is needed local resolver is payed no local resolver, no good results, your choice
Re: disable URIBL_ and spamhaus.net
On 03.04.24 11:18, natan wrote: Where in pdns-recursor? I use pdns-recursor /etc/powerdns/recursor.conf This is not about pdns-recursor itself. It's about using own recursing DNS server - you you don't use DNS server of your ISP, google(8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4), cloudflare(1.1.1.1) or quad-nine (9.9.9.9) look into your /etc/resolv.conf or SpamAssassin's configuration of "dns_server" (if there's none, /etc/resolv.conf is used). W dniu 3.04.2024 o 11:10, Reindl Harald (privat) pisze: use unbound as caching resolver and configure TTL properly cache-min-ttl: 60 cache-max-negative-ttl: 60 Am 03.04.24 um 11:06 schrieb natan: Hi I must chane or disable permanently spamhaus.net and all everything he uses. They calculated the rate so much that I couldn't afford to use their toys Does anyone have an interesting solution to this problem? Or maybe some other lists connected? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Enter any 12-digit prime number to continue.
Re: disable URIBL_ and spamhaus.net
W dniu 3.04.2024 o 11:20, Marc pisze: I must chane or disable permanently spamhaus.net and all everything he uses. They calculated the rate so much that I couldn't afford to use their toys Does anyone have an interesting solution to this problem? Or maybe some other lists connected? Do you really need url checking? Maybe you can make a caching servlet so you do not send duplicate requests? I am thinking of doing this for geo / reverse geo lookups. I try naw disable: URIBL_SBL 0 URIBL_CSS 0 URIBL_SBL_A URIBL_CSS_A 0 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS 0 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED 0 URIBL_DBL_SPAM 0 URIBL_DBL_PHISH 0 URIBL_DBL_MALWARE 0 URIBL_DBL_BOTNETCC 0 URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_SPAM 0 URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_REDIR 0 URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_PHISH 0 URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_MALW 0 URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_BOTCC 0 URIBL_DBL_ERROR 0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED 0 Is that enough ? --
Re: disable URIBL_ and spamhaus.net
Hi IRTFM beacuse I use pdns-recursor where max-cache-ttl default is 86400 ecs-minimum-ttl-override=60 minimum-ttl-override=60 W dniu 3.04.2024 o 11:23, Reindl Harald (privat) pisze: Am 03.04.24 um 11:18 schrieb natan: Hi Where in pdns-recursor? I use pdns-recursor /etc/powerdns/recursor.conf RTFM or switch to unbound the point is if you ignore the short TTL you trigger only a small subset of outbound dns requests and shouldn't note any difference W dniu 3.04.2024 o 11:10, Reindl Harald (privat) pisze: use unbound as caching resolver and configure TTL properly cache-min-ttl: 60 cache-max-negative-ttl: 60 Am 03.04.24 um 11:06 schrieb natan: Hi I must chane or disable permanently spamhaus.net and all everything he uses. They calculated the rate so much that I couldn't afford to use their toys Does anyone have an interesting solution to this problem? Or maybe some other lists connected? --
Syslog local3
Hello, all. It's taken me nearly a year to realize this but spamassassin sends to syslog with the local3 facility, not 'mail' as I had assumed. Is this something that can be configured? Regards, Emmanuel
RE: disable URIBL_ and spamhaus.net
> I must chane or disable permanently spamhaus.net and all everything he > uses. > > They calculated the rate so much that I couldn't afford to use their toys > > Does anyone have an interesting solution to this problem? > Or maybe some other lists connected? > Do you really need url checking? Maybe you can make a caching servlet so you do not send duplicate requests? I am thinking of doing this for geo / reverse geo lookups.
Re: disable URIBL_ and spamhaus.net
Hi Where in pdns-recursor? I use pdns-recursor /etc/powerdns/recursor.conf W dniu 3.04.2024 o 11:10, Reindl Harald (privat) pisze: use unbound as caching resolver and configure TTL properly cache-min-ttl: 60 cache-max-negative-ttl: 60 Am 03.04.24 um 11:06 schrieb natan: Hi I must chane or disable permanently spamhaus.net and all everything he uses. They calculated the rate so much that I couldn't afford to use their toys Does anyone have an interesting solution to this problem? Or maybe some other lists connected? --
disable URIBL_ and spamhaus.net
Hi I must chane or disable permanently spamhaus.net and all everything he uses. They calculated the rate so much that I couldn't afford to use their toys Does anyone have an interesting solution to this problem? Or maybe some other lists connected? --
