CTYPE_NULL false-positive for Content-Type: multipart/related ?
Hi, I'm seeing CTYPE_NULL triggering for certain messages from gmail. If I compare a message that doesn't trigger CTYPE_NULL: Content-Type: multipart/related; With one that does: Content-Type: multipart/related; I'm thinking it looks like a false positive rather than a legitimate hit? This is on SpamAssassin 3.3.1. Thanks, Edward The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer.
Re: CTYPE_NULL false-positive for Content-Type: multipart/related ?
On 08/09/11 16:23, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Edward Prendergast wrote: I'm seeing CTYPE_NULL triggering for certain messages from gmail. If I compare a message that doesn't trigger CTYPE_NULL: Content-Type: multipart/related; With one that does: Content-Type: multipart/related; CTYPE_NULL certainly shouldn't fire on either of those. Are they really identical, or is that a cut-and-paste error? Are those complete copies of ALL of the Content-Type headers in the message? Would it be possible to post the full FP message to a pastebin? Given what we're looking at, anonymization of email addresses, host names and body content shouldn't affect the analysis, just make sure you don't alter any of the MIME-related headers. Sorry, that WAS a typo, I meant to show a more standard content-type from a message not triggering CTYPE_NULL: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; It's quite heavily redacted, but haven't made any changes to the MIME header stuff. https://gist.github.com/1203746 Thanks The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer.
Re: Supporting 3.3 and 3.2?
On 04/03/11 16:10, Dennis German wrote: On 3/3/11 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 03:36 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 15:52 -1000, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: Could we please make an official project statement that 3.2.x is unsupported and people should really update to 3.3.x? That said, personally, with various Open Source projects, I have never given up support for old versions. As long as I *can* help people, I will. Besides, in this particular case, the *real* underlying issue of a badly trained Bayes won't get fixed by updating. Yes, the overall score would change drastically, as shown, but the training has been rather poor and won't change over night by updating. I would surely use a more recent version of SA if I could. My hosting service uses CPanel and Centos and I cannot convince them to upgrade. If you're using cPanel I think you should be able to upgrade to the latest version with /scripts /perlinstaller Mail::SpamAssassin - but proceed with caution, such a big upgrade could have a host of issues with dependencies. The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer.
[SOLVED] Re: (no report template found) - no 10_misc.cf but sa-update shows correct paths
On 28/09/2010 12:45, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:36 +0100, Edward Prendergast wrote: clear_report_template - I don't have this set in any of my configs It's part of 10_default_prefs.cf of the stock rule-set. To get the no template found error I'm running: spamassassin -C /etc/opt/mail/spamassassin/ -t /path/to/message ^^ Why are you using that option? The given path looks like your site config dir, not the default rule-set dir. The latter, which is what -C sets, also is the dir where sa-update puts the rules. See 'man spamassassin-run'. Also see 'man spamassassin' for the dirs used by default on your site, as set during configure. Not sure if it's OK to paste debug output here (20k) - if so (and it's wanted) please let me know and I'll include it/ It is OK -- or use a pastebin, if you prefer. Right you are - thanks! I should have been using the --siteconfigpath= switch for a more accurate test. Thanks The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer.
(no report template found) - no 10_misc.cf but sa-update shows correct paths
Hi, I'm seeing (no report template found) on: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2-r929478 running on Perl version 5.12.2 This is a build of perl installed in /opt/perl5. Took SpamAssassin from the SVN repo to get around the taint issue as this doesn't seem to have made it onto CPAN yet (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.3/ The docs I've seen from googling all seem to point to: clear_report_template - I don't have this set in any of my configs Failure to access 10_misc.cf - I don't have this on my system, but it also doesn't seem to exist on other systems which are working? To get the no template found error I'm running: spamassassin -C /etc/opt/mail/spamassassin/ -t /path/to/message Not sure if it's OK to paste debug output here (20k) - if so (and it's wanted) please let me know and I'll include it/ Any pointers in the right direction would be much appreciated! Thanks, Edward The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer.
Re: SpamAssassin cpan install @INC lib issue on CentOS 5.4
Kris Deugau wrote: (Please keep the discussion on-list.) Sorry about that - just hit 'reply' without checking where the message was actually going. Edward Prendergast wrote: Kris Deugau wrote: Edward Prendergast wrote: @@INSTALLSITELIB@@ /opt/perl5/lib/5.10.1/x86_64-linux ^^ This looks a little fishy... I agree, I'm not sure where it's coming from. FWIW, nothing like that showed up in my brief test - missing substitutions like that are usually a sign of a build gone wrong from early on. That's a good question, but my qualms are mainly down wanting to perhaps use local::lib and have up to date CPAN modules as it seems to take a long time for these to filter down via redhat. Mmm. I use the RPMForge repo for more up-to-date Perl modules, but I've yet to run into any problems using the nominally outdated ones filtering down from RedHat/CentOS. Net::DNS is the only module I can think of where there are/were known issues (at least with respect to SA's usage) in the stock version. My motivations aren't purely SpamAssassin related - there are other programs that want current Perl modules (MailScanner) and I wanted to get SpamAssassin along side these. This is based around what I've seen from local::lib: http://search.cpan.org/~apeiron/local-lib-1.004009/lib/local/lib.pm#SYNOPSIS Ah, hm. I think you should be fine just setting your path to call your custom Perl ahead of the system Perl; that looks to be targetted at cherrypicking module updates alongside the packaged system Perl. Right you are! When I change my .bashrc to this: #export MODULEBUILDRC=/opt/perl5/.modulebuildrc #export PERL_MM_OPT=INSTALL_BASE=/opt/perl5 #export PERL5LIB=/opt/perl5/lib/perl5:/opt/perl5/lib/perl5/x86_64-linux:/opt/perl5/lib/5.10.1:/opt/perl5/lib/site_perl/5.10.1 export PATH=/opt/perl5/bin:$PATH SpamAssassin now installs OK. Essentially when I use perl from the command line (and install other modules from CPAN) everything seems to be OK, issues only appear to be arising with Mail::SpamAssassin. Yeah, that's the weird bit. You might try installing SA from the tarball instead of CPAN - I had some odd errors come up when I tried via CPAN, but I have a feeling some of that had to do with doing the whole test as non-root. Still unsure where that @@INSTALLSITELIB@@ stuff was coming from but it certainly looks like the issue is now resolved. Many thanks for all your help. -Edward The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer.
SpamAssassin cpan install @INC lib issue on CentOS 5.4
Hi, I'm getting errors when I trying to install Mail::SpamAssassin via cpan. The crux of this seems to be: Can't locate Digest/SHA1.pm in @INC (@INC contains: ../blib/lib @@INSTALLSITELIB@@ /opt/perl5/lib/5.10.1/x86_64-linux /opt/perl5/lib/5.10.1 /opt/perl5/lib/site_perl/5.10.1/x86_64-linux /opt/perl5/lib/site_perl/5.10.1) at ../blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Bayes.pm line 61. Whole output is available here: http://pastebin.com/m404a0ffc This is already installed via CPAN and lives in /opt/perl/lib/perl5/x86_64-linux/Digest/SHA1.pm It is accessible via @INC in other scripts. For example if I run perl -MDigest::SHA1 -e 'exit' I don't get any errors. @INC for a normal perl script looks like this: ]# perl -e 'print join(, , @INC)' /opt/perl5/lib/perl5/x86_64-linux, /opt/perl5/lib/perl5, /opt/perl5/lib/perl5/x86_64-linux, /opt/perl5/lib/5.10.1/x86_64-linux, /opt/perl5/lib/5.10.1, /opt/perl5/lib/site_perl/5.10.1/x86_64-linux, /opt/perl5/lib/site_perl/5.10.1, /opt/perl5/lib/5.10.1/x86_64-linux, /opt/perl5/lib/5.10.1, /opt/perl5/lib/site_perl/5.10.1/x86_64-linux, /opt/perl5/lib/site_perl/5.10.1, . The reason perl lives in /opt is that this is a CentOS 5.4 and I'm looking to bypass the perl that comes with RPM without overwriting or deleting it so it's still around if something RPM-specific needs to use it. The way I ensure that I'm using the right version of perl while I'm trying to install Mail::SpamAssassin via the following environment variables in /root/.bashrc: export MODULEBUILDRC=/opt/perl5/.modulebuildrc export PERL_MM_OPT=INSTALL_BASE=/opt/perl5 export PERL5LIB=/opt/perl5/lib/perl5:/opt/perl5/lib/perl5/x86_64-linux:/opt/perl5/lib/5.10.1:/opt/perl5/lib/site_perl/5.10.1 export PATH=/opt/perl5/bin:$PATH ]# grep export ~/.bashrc export MODULEBUILDRC=/opt/perl5/.modulebuildrc export PERL_MM_OPT=INSTALL_BASE=/opt/perl5 export PERL5LIB=/opt/perl5/lib/perl5:/opt/perl5/lib/perl5/x86_64-linux:/opt/perl5/lib/5.10.1:/opt/perl5/lib/site_perl/5.10.1 export PATH=/opt/perl5/bin:$PATH ]# perl -v This is perl, v5.10.1 (*) built for x86_64-linux I'm running all of this as root. Any pointers in the right direction would be much appreciated. Thanks, Edward The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer.
