Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile

2009-10-02 Thread to...@starbridge.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> On tor 01 okt 2009 18:09:38 CEST, "to...@starbridge.org" wrote
>> thank for your answers. It's done:
>> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6214
>
> also
>
> spamassassin 2>&1 -D -t msg > output.log and another time with the
> plugin disabled shows it work (this time with >>output.log)
>
> add output.log to the ticket
>
it's done


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkrFs78ACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIN86QCglgcJCF0r26lWKxWFoosEOT6h
qAIAn0B6yUq01LaXSI3RpsbEJDqqZwWb
=NKGw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile

2009-10-01 Thread to...@starbridge.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Justin Mason a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 16:15, John Hardin  wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Zdenek Herman wrote:
>>
>>> I have same problem.
>>> Any solution ?
>>>
>>> to...@starbridge.org napsal(a):
>>>
>>>> i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with
>>>> compiled rules.
>>>>
>>>> sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when
>>>> restarted. But some body rules are now not detected.
>> A suggestion to both of you, based on sa-compile support requests seen
>> earlier on the list: run sa-compile with the debug option turned on,
publish
>> the debugging output and intermediate files on a webserver somewhere, and
>> post the URIs for that info here so they can be examined.
>
> even better: open a Bugzilla entry and do the same.  That's how we
> track (possible) bugs and prioritize them.
>
thank for your answers.
It's done:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6214
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkrE1EEACgkQ8FtMlUNHQINOJgCdG7Piu3Phd1Mb2iYl7dmX1pV7
b0UAn1yITwVbWgddDiUlJtdQgCWsb4QL
=mPa4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile

2009-09-30 Thread to...@starbridge.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,
i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with
compiled rules.

sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when restarted.
But some body rules are now not detected.

exemple of simple body rule (for testing):

body TONIO_SPAM_TEST/toniospam/i
describe TONIO_SPAM_TESTMentions Generic toniospamtest
score   TONIO_SPAM_TEST 5

if i commented out
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody
in v320.pre, body rules is working again.

I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active.
I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result.

Some info on my environnement:
debian testing
perl v5.10.0
xsubpp version 2.200401 (from debian perl package)
re2c version 0.13.5-1

Thanks for your help
Regards
Tonio

NB: sorry for this second post, but i've made a mistake with the
previous one (replying to  an other thread)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkrDzE4ACgkQ8FtMlUNHQINOIgCeIgXvgz5VafWgZmeb7RhS3vvo
7ZUAn0+ANE9/uzBbSTcCsn26PGVHlflt
=sq17
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile

2009-09-29 Thread to...@starbridge.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

McDonald, Dan a écrit :
> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 08:19 +0200, to...@starbridge.org wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> to...@starbridge.org a écrit :
>>> to...@starbridge.org a écrit :
>>>> Benny Pedersen a écrit :
>>>>> On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "to...@starbridge.org"
>>>>> wrote
>>>>>> I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with
>>>>>> Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules
>>>>>> and compile again: same result.
>>>>> forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ?
>>>> sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in
>>>> debug)
>>> has anyone encountered the same problem ?
>
> Someone posted a problem with perl 5.6. What version of perl are
> you running?
>
thx for your answer

perl v5.10.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkrCDtUACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIOPZgCfSY4GphHXEhWNolU7h0pYKcas
r8kAn1iP1rtNl9WHYPszFPBrpgpjECqv
=ccGX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile

2009-09-28 Thread to...@starbridge.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

to...@starbridge.org a écrit :
> to...@starbridge.org a écrit :
>> Benny Pedersen a écrit :
>>> On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "to...@starbridge.org" wrote
>>>> I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with
>>>> Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and
>>>> compile again: same result.
>>> forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ?
>> sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in debug)
> has anyone encountered the same problem ?
nobody ?
i really need help on this one

thx
Regards
Tonio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkrBpuIACgkQ8FtMlUNHQINEvwCg27ECYMTslFW1K80srvM5SdB3
YB0AoIytnseU1nW6iqlRasCNTCNFjrQW
=tjQR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile

2009-09-26 Thread to...@starbridge.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

to...@starbridge.org a écrit :
> Benny Pedersen a écrit :
>> On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "to...@starbridge.org" wrote
>
>>> I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with
>>> Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and
>>> compile again: same result.
>> forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ?
>
> sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in debug)
has anyone encountered the same problem ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkq9zccACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIMA4wCeK5STV5P49zdRhMgdy9saHmfq
a4oAoNdduS36HIID3G38afVydbgxBhgb
=D8Ng
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile

2009-09-25 Thread to...@starbridge.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "to...@starbridge.org" wrote
>
>> I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody
>> active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again:
>> same result.
>
> forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ?
>
sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in debug)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkq8syMACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIP2+wCdGgQpUR/MLpHT8hdW+4ooARAP
bYIAnRHf2xM7QeUE1HGWirN3OTTovnVW
=tO8Q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



3.3.0 and sa-compile

2009-09-25 Thread to...@starbridge.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,
i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with
compiled rules.

sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when restarted.
But some body rules are now not detected.

exemple of simple body rule (for testing):

body TONIO_SPAM_TEST/toniospam/i
describe TONIO_SPAM_TESTMentions Generic toniospamtest
score   TONIO_SPAM_TEST 5

if i commented out
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody
in v320.pre, rules is working again.

I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active.
I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result.

Some info on my environnement:
debian testing
xsubpp version 2.200401 (from debian perl package)
re2c version 0.13.5-1

Thanks for your help
Regard
Tonio



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkq8q6sACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIN9zwCg3s5HNL7DKUBRo8fTLbD6BsqV
aWMAoLnDI/+eABGST8KEG5todvABFUSF
=aDLE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-