Re: Bayes failure on hi, it's Somebody spam
On 11/16/06, Jon Trulson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, that has not been my experience at all... Bayes (99) is still catching every one for me. In this instance, SpamAssassin is running after POP download from gmail, so I'm only seeing the samples that have already made it through google's filters. That may have something to do with it.
Bayes failure on hi, it's Somebody spam
It looks to me as if the recent spate of pump'n'dump spams are deliberately crafted to avoid being Bayes-learned by spamassassin. In spite of all having different subject lines and senders and other minor differences, once you've learned one of them sa-learn ignores all the rest -- and they all still get a BAYES_00 score for me. I thought I had a pretty good understanding of how SA's Bayes training worked, but this is pretty clearly confusing it somehow.
Re: Bayes failure on hi, it's Somebody spam
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Bart Schaefer wrote: It looks to me as if the recent spate of pump'n'dump spams are deliberately crafted to avoid being Bayes-learned by spamassassin. In spite of all having different subject lines and senders and other minor differences, once you've learned one of them sa-learn ignores all the rest -- and they all still get a BAYES_00 score for me. I thought I had a pretty good understanding of how SA's Bayes training worked, but this is pretty clearly confusing it somehow. Hmm, that has not been my experience at all... Bayes (99) is still catching every one for me. There may be something else going wrong with your setup - no idea what offhand though, sorry. -- Jon Trulson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] #include std/disclaimer.h No Kill I -Horta
