On 10/02/09 02:43, quoth Warren Togami:
> # 2005/07/29, http://www.apnic.net/db/ranges.html header RCVD_VIA_APNIC
> Received =~
> /[^0-9.](?:5[89]|6[01]|12[456]|20[23]|21[0189]|22[012])(?:\.[012]?[0-9]{1,2}){3}(?:\]|\)|
> )/ describe RCVD_VIA_APNIC Received through a relay in Asia/Pacific
> Network
>
> Adam Katz had this rule in one of his channels. While it is wholly unsafe
> to be used alone, it could be useful in masscheck statistics and possibly
> if used in meta booleans in combination with other rules.
>
> http://www.apnic.net/publications/research-and-insights/ip-address-trends/apnic-resource-range
>
>
> Unfortunately, in testing the above rule on my own corpus I see it is
> missing some obvious Asian addresses. This page reveals that the regex is
> out of date. Does there exist a good automated way to convert many CIDR
> ranges to a single regex?
>
> Warren Togami wtog...@redhat.com
http://www.brandonhutchinson.com/CIDR_netmasks_with_sendmail.html
--
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
